RFP Attachment 6.docx

RFP: FA8532-21-R-0004 ATTACHMENT 6

PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Strategic Replenishment Contract (SRC) for Common Support Equipment (CSE)

Return your completed questionnaire via email to Reid Sawyer AFLCMC/WNKAA reid.sawyer@us.af.mil and Erica Carter AFLCMC/WNKAA erica.carter.3@us.af.mil. NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND SHALL NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.

Part I. EVALUATOR INFORMATION. Please provide the following information about yourself.

Name and Role Relative to Contract (e.g. Buyer, Program Manager):

Agency or Business:

Address:

Telephone No. Email Length of time (years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract

Part II. CONTRACT AND PROGRAM INFORMATION. Please provide the following information about the subject contract.

Contractor/Business: Contractor CAGE Code:

Contract Number:

Total Number of Years:

Basic:

Option(s):

Was this a competitive contract? Yes No

Role in the Program/Work Performed As: Prime

Subcontractor

Vendor/Supplier

Deliveries included: DoD CONUS location(s) DoD OCONUS location(s) Other:

Program Title and Brief Description of work performed:

Contract Type(s): List all applicable (i.e. Firm-Fixed-Price, Time & Materials, Cost, etc.)

Period of Performance:

3. Reason for difference (if applicable)

NOTE: In Part III., should your response be other than “satisfactory,” please provide supporting documentation in “Additional Remarks” on page 3 or on an additional sheet to this document (which is in Word format). If supporting documentation is not provided for ratings that are other than “satisfactory,” the ratings will be considered to be unsubstantiated and will be interpreted as satisfactory.

PART III. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS. Please check the appropriate rating for each of the following questions: N/A=Not Applicable U=Unsatisfactory M=Marginal S=Satisfactory V=Very Good E=Exceptional

1. How well did the company’s products and/or services met the technical or performance requirements?

2. Please rate the overall quality of the delivered product(s) and/or services.

3. Please rate the company’s adherence to delivery schedules.

4. How well did the contractor manage the quality and effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts? (i.e., if applicable, did the contractor establish an effective risk management plan to mitigate issues encountered?)

5. Please rate the quality of delivered technical manuals, commercial manuals, or updates to technical/commercial manuals.

6. Please rate the customer’s satisfaction with warranty response times and corrective actions.

7. Please rate the personnel the contractor dedicated to your program (i.e, did the contractor assign sufficient quantity and quality personnel to your program).

8. Please rate the company’s timely recognition of problems affecting the program (including but not limited to administrative, technical, cost, schedule, etc.).

9. Please rate the company’s overall communication, including timeliness and thoroughness.

10. Please rate the accuracy of the company’s reports (i.e., were there an acceptable number of errors with the status reports and were any errors resolved in a reasonable timeframe?).

11. Please rate the company’s independent performance (without significant customer direction/oversight).

12. Please rate the company’s facilitation of Government Inspection and Acceptance activities.

13. Has action been initiated to cancel or terminate the contract for default (partially or completely)? If yes, explain.

14. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? If yes, explain.

15. Describe the contractor’s strong and/or weak points with regards to subcontractor management.

16. If given a choice, would you award to this contractor again? If not, please explain.

17. Additional Remarks.

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance.

RFP FA8532-21-R-0004 PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM

E EXCEPTIONAL: During the contract period, performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD: During the contract period, performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY: During the contract period, performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL: During the contract period, performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY: During the contract period, performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE: Did not apply to this acquisition; or, questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area