Post-FOPR Release Questions_Govt Responses FA8509-20-R-0023.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 18 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MC-130J Loadmaster Conformal Signal Lights
- Solicitation number
- FA8509-20-R-0023
View the file
Other files
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| No. | Question | Gov't Responses |
| 1 | The FOPR Section 8 says “Progress payments may be authorized for the base period only.” Will the government consider making progress payments for the Option periods as well? | Progress payments will only be for base period since each of the production units in the option periods can be billed for as each delivery is made. |
| 2 | Attachment 4 and Attachment 5 are named Not Separately Priced and Separately Priced respectively. Attachment 4 should be Separately priced to match the FOPR and Attachment 5 NSP. Please confirm that Attachment 4 contains the Separately Priced CDRL. | According to the FOPR Attch #4 should be NSP & Attch #5 should be SP. The FOPR Amendment 01 corrects this. |
| 3 | Paragraph H.4 of the FOPR states that all information shall be in Word or PDF format except the pricing information. Pricing information shall be in MS Excel format. Does this mean the government does not expect to receive a Word or PDF Cost Narrative with the Excel volume? | Correct. The Basis of Estimate should be included in the technical narrative. |
| 4 | Request clarification on the following statement in SOW/OD 3.9.9.2, “The Contractor will provide a Systems Safety Hazard Analysis Report (SSHAR) that shows compliance with MILSTD-810.” MIL-STD-810 is an Environmental Test Method Standard, not related to Safety or |
an SSHAR. Perhaps the correct standard to be referenced here is MIL-STD-882, StandardPractice for System Safety. However, in relation to System and Component Testing (3.9.9.2), MIL-STD-810 does apply and compliance would be delivered in a Test/Inspection Report,
| CDRL A01Z | OD para 3.9.9.2 has been corrected to, "The Contractor will provide a SSHAR that shows compliance with MIL-STD-882." | ||
| 5 | The FOPR states that progress payments are only allowable for the base period. As a small business, it is important that progress payments are allowable in the option period as well. Will the overnment reconsider allowing progress payments for the option periods? | Progress payments will only be for base period since each of the production units in the option periods can be billed for as each delivery is made. | |
| 6 | The SOF MACM IDIQ states that the Service Contract Labor Standard clauses are determined at the task order level. Are these standards applicable to this task order? | FA8509-20-R-0023 requirement is considered a supply with incidental services where the Service Contract Labor Standards will not apply. | |
| 7 | |||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | |||
| 10 | |||
| 11 | |||
| 12 | |||
| 13 | |||
| 14 | |||
| 15 | |||
| 16 | |||
| 17 | |||
| 18 | |||
| 19 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .