RFIs - CEMACCC III IDIQ Robins AFB - FA850122R0023 ongoing.pdf
PDF 177 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Civil Engineering Multiple Award Construction Contract III, IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8501-22-R0023
About this file
This document contains a request for information and responses regarding a solicitation for the Civil Engineering Multiple Award Construction Contract III, IDIQ opportunity with the Air Force Sustainment Center. The solicitation will result in multiple awards of indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contracts for construction and facility support services at Robins Air Force Base in Georgia. The contracts have a maximum total value of $300 million over a five year period, and individual task orders will range from $150,000 to $2 million. Eligible firms must be service-disabled veteran owned small businesses. The North American Industry Classification code is 236220 with a small business size standard of $36.5 million. Awards will be made to the lowest priced technically acceptable offerors.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
9/30/2022
Request for Information CEMACCC III IDIQ Robins AFB - FA850122R0023
1. Missing Attachments per Section J
a. 13 - Procedural Guide for Designers Including AE Firms 29 May 15. Can this be provided?
ANSWER: Yes, this document will be added to the attachments on https://www.sam.gov.
b. 19 - Building Wage Determination. Can this be provided?
ANSWER: Yes, this document will be added to the attachments on https://www.sam.gov.
2. Section J’s list of attachments skipped #5 and #16. Please confirm we aren’t missing other attachments.
ANSWER: Confirmed – there was not a #5 and #16- listed. This was a system error on the document.
3. Section J Shows 1 Submittal Register - 2 Submittal Registers were included in the attached documents. Please confirm there are no differences between the 2 or confirm which Submittal Register is to be used.
ANSWER: There are no differences in the submittal registers, these are just templates.
4. Received an attachment not listed in Section J - Is this applicable to the solicitation?
a. MRR Compiled Searches ANSWER: This document was inadvertently attached to the posting.
Disregard.
5. Section B - Note 4 states that to be considered for award contractor must have a current Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) assessment. Does proof of this assessment need to be included in the Proposal Packet?
ANSWER: No, you don’t need to submit the SPRS assessment with your proposal. We will independently verify registrations.
6. Section B - Note 5 states we need to submit a report to the DOL (VETS
4212). Does proof of this form being submitted need to be included in the Proposal Packet?
ANSWER: No, you don’t need to submit the VETS information with your proposal. We will independently verify registrations.
7. Section B - Note 3 (page 5) states “Ensure your Proposal contains:
Demonstration Project 170100, Rpr/Rpl AHU's Production Bay, WHSE SUP EQUIP DEP, B350, Proposal Pricing Worksheet, Bid Bond, signed SF 1442, Special Standard of Responsibility (SSR) and acknowledge any amendments if applicable.” Is a second bid bond required or does the overarching CEMACC III bid bond noted under Bonds Requirements A. in the amount of $3 Million cover the Demonstration Project as well?
ANSWER: We only need the bid bond for $3 Million.
8. Per the drawings, the scope of the Demonstration Project is an existing building that includes cutting into existing concrete decks, installation of new Steel Curb Work, new Structural steel members, insulation around the curb and maybe painting the curbs.
As the bid bond amount was supposed to be $2,000,000. ANSWER: Bid bond amount is $3 Million
Will the steel curbs have an exterior paint finish and if so what type?
ANSWER: The drawings are as-builts of a previous project in the corresponding area and for information purposes only. The scope of this Design-Build project is described in the Statement of Work for
UHHZ170100.
Can the Superintendent act a Quality Control Manager and a Safety Officer also?
ANSWER: The drawings are as-builts of a previous project in the corresponding area and for information purposes only. The scope of this Design-Build project is described in the Statement of Work for
UHHZ170100.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .