FA8224-16-R-0021-0003.pdf

PDF 161 KB Posted

Attached to
Facilitate Other Maintenance Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8224-16-R-0021
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Hill Air Force Base

About this file

Amendment 03

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Facilitate Other Maintenance, newest first.
File Type Posted
PWS_AMXG_FOM_27_Apr_16.docx DOCX document
FA8224-16-R-0021-02.doc DOC document
FOM_Answers_(3).docx DOCX document
AMXGOI 21-12.pdf PDF
afi23-101.pdf PDF
afi21-101_afmcsup_oo-alcsup.pdf PDF
afman33-152.pdf PDF
afi21-102_afmcsup.pdf PDF
AFI31-101.pdf PDF
afh23-123v1.pdf PDF
afscman21-102.pdf PDF
afi32-7086_hillafbsup_i.pdf PDF
afpd24-3.pdf PDF
afi33-200.pdf PDF
AMXGOI 21-7.pdf PDF
PWS_AMXG_FOM_17_Mar_16.docx DOCX document
FOM_Answers.docx DOCX document
afman33-282.pdf PDF
afi33-115.pdf PDF
afi32-7086.pdf PDF
afi21-102.pdf PDF
FA8224-16-R-0021-01.doc DOC document
FOM_Answers_(2).docx DOCX document
afi31-501_afmcsup_i.pdf PDF
afman23-122.pdf PDF
AMXGOI 24-5.pdf PDF
afi10-701.pdf PDF
FA8224-16-R-0021.doc DOC document
CDRL_A002_Quality_System_Plan.pdf PDF
CDRL_A005_Management_Plan.pdf PDF
CDRL_A003_Safety_Program_Plan(SSPP).pdf PDF
CDRL_A004_Accident_Report.pdf PDF
PWS_AMXG_FOM_17_Feb_16.docx DOCX document
CDRL_A001_Status_Report.pdf PDF
Show all 34

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

F2DCAF5317A002

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this Amendment is to update the Performance Work Statement. Section 19 is added to page 19. Technical evaluation factors are updated in accordance w ith this PWS change. See 52.212-2 Technical Subfactor 4.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 4

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 06-May-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA8224-16-R-0021

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

29-Feb-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06-May-2016

CODE

OL:H/PZIM

PZIM JESSE BALL 6038 ASPEN AVE BLDG 1289

HILL AFB UT 84056-5805

FA8224 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA8224-16-R-0021

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 Performance Work

Statement

30 17-MAR-2016

Attachment 2 CDRL A001 2 18-NOV-2015

Attachment 3 CDRL A002 2 18-NOV-2015

Attachment 4 CDRL A003 2 18-NOV-2015

Attachment 5 CDRL A004 2 18-NOV-2015

Attachment 6 CDRL A005 2 18-NOV-2015 to:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 7 Performance Work

Statement

30 27-APR-2016

The following have been modified:

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The government will award one (1) contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

(1) PRICE

(2) TECHNICAL FACTORS

(3) PAST PERFORMANCE

Technical and Past Performance, when combined, are significantly more important than price.

(b) The government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the requirement.

(c) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(d) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the Offeror’s specified expiration time, the government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2 – TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD:

This acquisition will utilize Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection procedures in accordance with FAR 15.101-2 as supplemented. Technical tradeoffs will not be made and no additional credit will be given for exceeding acceptability. Award will be made to the acceptable offeror with the lowest evaluated cost or price, which is deemed responsible in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation and whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements. The solicitation requirements include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors of this solicitation. The

Government reserves the right to award without discussions. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the

Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined necessary by the Contracting Officer. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

(A) Evaluation Factors:

i. Initially, offers shall be ranked according to price. An Offerors proposed price will be determined by adding the price for each CLIN including option CLINs. The total evaluated price will be the sum of all CLIN prices.

ii. Technical Acceptability (not a tradeoff factor). Next, the government technical evaluation team will review the technical proposal submitted by the lowest priced offeror on an acceptable/unacceptable basis to ensure the solicitation requirements including all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by this solicitation are met. For price comparison purposes, technical evaluations cease when the technical evaluation teams finds two proposals technically acceptable.

iii. Each Technical Capability subfactor will receive a rating of acceptable, or unacceptable. If any subfactor is rated ―unacceptable, the entire proposal may be rendered technically unacceptable. Only proposals deemed technically acceptable (either initially or as the result of discussions) will be considered for award.

(A) Acceptable: The proposal meets specified minimum requirements necessary for acceptable contract performance. Only those proposals determined acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award.

(B) Unacceptable: The proposal fails to meet specified minimum requirements necessary for contract performance. Proposals with an unacceptable rating are not awardable.

(B) Award Decision: The award decision will be made as follows:

i. Step One - Evaluate Price. The Offerors Price proposals will be evaluated, for ranking purposes, based upon the total price proposed.

ii. Step Two - Determine Technical Acceptability. The technical evaluation provides an assessment of the

Offeror’s capability to satisfy the Government’s requirements. The Government will evaluate the lowest priced proposal first for technical capability and determine technically acceptability or unacceptability. If unacceptable, the next lowest priced proposal will be technically evaluated. For price comparison purposes, technical evaluations cease when the technical evaluation teams finds two proposals technically acceptable.

Technical Subfactors are as follows:

Subfactor 1. Describe how the contractor will manage and maintain the 309 AMXG’s FOM program for aircraft parts and material. Reference Performance Based Work Statement Paragraphs 2.1 and 2.2.

Subfactor 2. Describe how personnel shall be managed to meet the estimated workload. The Contractor shall demonstrate how qualified personnel with appropriate combinations of education, experience, knowledge, training, abilities and skills, shall be employed and utilized to meet PWS Paragraphs 2.1 and

2.2.

Subfactor 3. Describe past performance accomplished in the past three years of similar scope specified in

PWS Paragraphs 2.1 and 2.2

Subfactor 4. Describe how the contractor will meet minimum team complement requirement in accordance with PWS Paragraph 19.

(C) Discussions: It is the Government’s intent to award without discussions; therefore, it is imperative that Offerors submit their best terms initially. However, if during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs), and the Final Proposal

Revisions (FPRs) will be considered in making the selection decision.

(D) Tradeoffs will not be made between technical and price among those Offerors who have been determined technically acceptable.

(End of provision)

(End of Summary of Changes)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .