Attachment 26 - Section M v2 1-29-25.pdf

PDF 146 KB Posted

Attached to
MJU-76B Pre-solicitation Synopsis Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8213-25-R-B009
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Hill Air Force Base

About this file

This document is Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award for a Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for the MJU-76/B Program. The government intends to award contracts to "all qualified" offerors for manufacturing infrared countermeasure flares, with an anticipated award date of July 2025. The contract will have a 5-year Basic Ordering Period and a 1-year optional Ordering Period, with an estimated procurement of approximately 500,000 replenishment spares.

The technical evaluation will focus on the offeror's manufacturing plan, including processes, equipment, facilities, production rates, and quality control. Proposals will be evaluated on an "acceptable" or "unacceptable" basis across several technical factors such as in-house vs. subcontractor manufacturing, automated equipment benefits, machine types, defect prevention, and inventory management. The government may conduct a pre-award survey, including a safety assessment for ammunition and explosives, to determine each offeror's capability to meet solicitation requirements. Price/cost will not be a primary evaluation factor for the initial contract award, though it will be considered for subsequent delivery orders.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to MJU-76B Pre-solicitation Synopsis, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment 27 - MJU-76 DD Form 254 Signed.pdf PDF
Attachment 22 - GFP Worksheet Placeholder.docx DOCX document
Attachment 21 - MJU 76 Contract Data Requirements List.pdf PDF
Attachment 20 - RFOP Worksheet - MJU-76.pdf PDF
Attachment 18 - AF Form 260 MJU-76.pdf PDF
Attachment 17 - Interim Hazard Classification Log No 23-208.pdf PDF
Attachment 14 - Performance Specification for MJU 76 Infrared Countermeasure Flare Rev B.pdf PDF
Attachment 13 - Data List for Drawing 201825310.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - Contractor First Article Testing.pdf PDF
Attachment 25 - Section L v2 1-29-25.pdf PDF
Attachment 19 - MJU-76 Ordering Procedures.pdf PDF
Attachment 15 - Detail Specification for MJU-76B Infrared Countermeasure Flare.pdf PDF
Attachment 11 - REPSHIP.pdf PDF
Attachment 9 - ES6925 MSE.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - ES6200 Ammunition Data Cards.pdf PDF
Draft Solicitation - FA821325RB009.pdf PDF
Attachment 24 - Justification for Qualification Requirements MJU-76.pdf PDF
Attachment 23 - Example Request for Order Proposal 5-6-25.pdf PDF
Attachment 16 - Data List for Drawing -MJU 76B 201825310_98747_DL_B.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - ES7035 Energetic Material Description Sheets.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - AIR SPEC IM FD2020-24-52553.pdf PDF
Attachment 12 - SPI 1370015904428.pdf PDF
Attachment 10 - Report of Shipment.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 - Government First Article Testing.pdf PDF
Attachment 6 - ES7650_Oct2000 - MIL-STD-1916.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - ES7034 Rework and Repair of Non-Conforming Material.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - USAF Statement of Work - Ammunition Data Cards WARP 4-19-2018.pdf PDF
Interested Vendor Question and Answer.pdf PDF
JQR MJU-76.pdf PDF
JQR MJU-76.pdf PDF
Show all 30

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

1.0 Basis for Contract Award

This source selection will be conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15, Contracting by Negotiation, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), the Department of the Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DAFFARS), DoD Source Selection Procedures, dated 20 Aug. 2022. These regulations are available electronically at the Air Force (AF) acquisition.gov.

The government intends to award Basic IDIQ contract(s) to “all qualified” offerors. An offeror is a “qualifying offeror” if:

a) it is determined responsible in accordance with FAR 9.1, as supplemented,

b) its proposal conforms to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Section L of this solicitation),

c) it is determined to be qualified prior to contract award IAW FAR clause 52.209-1

1.1 Number of Contracts to be Awarded

The government intends to award to “all qualified” offerors (multiple award) for the Basic IDIQ of the MJU-76/B Program. However, the government reserves the right to award to only one source or to no source at all.

1.2 Discussions

If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the government to hold discussions, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs) and the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the source selection decision. If the offeror’s proposal has been evaluated as acceptable at the time discussions are closed, any changes or exceptions in the FPR are subject to evaluation and may introduce risk that the offeror’s proposal be determined unacceptable and ineligible for award. The government reserves the right to not hold discussions.

1.3 Solicitation Requirements, Terms, and Conditions

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award.

Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale (see Section L). The government reserves the right to determine any such exceptions unacceptable.

1.4 Pricing related Data

Approval to deviate from FAR 15.304(c)(1) and waive price/cost as a source selection evaluation factor for the Basic IDIQ contract(s) has been authorized IAW DPAP Class Deviation 2018-O0006 dated December 13, 2017 and FAR Case 2017-010. The qualifying offeror(s) is not required to disclose http://farsite.hill.af.mil/ price/cost in response to this solicitation. The contracting officer shall consider price or cost as one of the factors in the selection decision for each delivery order under the multiple-award contracts IAW FAR 16.505(b)(1)(ii)(E). Note that the price for the Kick-Off Meeting CLIN 0001 is and will be fixed at $3,000 and will be used to meet the minimum guarantee for the first delivery order.

2.0 Evaluation Factors

The following evaluation factors will be used to verify eligibility for award:

Factor 1: Technical

2.1 Factor 1: Technical

Technical proposals will be evaluated for acceptability in accordance with the criteria set forth in this section. The technical proposal must convey to the Government that the offeror possesses adequate technical expertise and experience, sufficient resources, and is able to plan, organize, and use those resources in a coordinated and timely fashion to meet the needs of the Government. The Government may make a final determination as to the offeror's capability to perform based on the proposal as submitted without requesting further information from the offeror.

The government will determine applicability of sources based upon prior qualification. The government maintains a list of qualified vendors for the MJU-76/B. During the solicitation period, any potential offeror can contact the contracting officer to verify if it is on/not on the qualified vendors list. A copy of this confirmation email may be submitted with the offerors proposal but is not necessary. In the event that all qualification steps are not completed and approved prior to solicitation closure, the award of the contract will not be delayed.

2.2 The Government technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” basis, assigning one of the ratings described below for each factor and/or subfactor.

Rating Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal Does Not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

2.3 Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable either initially, or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. The technical factor, as a whole, will be rated "Unacceptable" if any single element or sub-factor is rated "Unacceptable”. The offeror is reminded that the Government intends to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions. However, the Government may hold discussions if necessary.

2.4 Technical Factors

2.4.1 Factor 1 – Plan and Technical Approach to Manufacture MJU-76

Provide a plan which details the proposed processes, equipment, and facilities that will be used to manufacture the item at the required production rates.

2.4.2 Information on whether the process/part is manufactured in house or procured from a subcontractor/vendor.

2.4.3. Description of any automated equipment and its benefit in maintain a high production rate.

2.4.4. Descriptions of types and quantities of machines to be used.

2.4.5. Description of how the proposed processes will prevent the formation of defects.

2.4.6 Description of inventory management control of critical components to assure meeting the production rate.

2.4.7 A flow diagram of the proposed assembly line or lines. Contract Documentation

This volume will be reviewed for completeness. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements.

Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to determine any such exceptions unacceptable. The offeror’s proposal shall include a signed copy of the Model Contract/Solicitation, completed sections A through K, applicable RFP attachments (Small Business Subcontracting Plan), and signed amendments to the solicitation (if any).

3.0 Pre-Award Survey

The government may conduct a pre-award survey (PAS) as a part of this source selection. Additionally, the requirements of DFARS PGI 223.307-4(iv) require that a safety pre-award survey be conducted before awarding any contracts involving ammunition and explosives, as defined in DFARS 252.223-7002

– Safety Precautions for Ammunition and Explosives. This requirement extends to any subcontractors a prospective contractor intends to use. Therefore, to facilitate any potential PAS, the offeror shall provide a list of all locations where the work is to be performed (to include all locations/contractors outside of the United States) and indicate whether such a facility is a division, affiliate, associate contractor, or subcontractor. Results of the PAS (if conducted) will be evaluated to determine each offeror’s capability to meet the requirements of the solicitation and shall be a condition of award.

1.0 Basis for Contract Award
1.1 Number of Contracts to be Awarded
1.2 Discussions
1.3 Solicitation Requirements, Terms, and Conditions
2.0 Evaluation Factors
2.1 Factor 1: Technical
2.4.7 A flow diagram of the proposed assembly line or lines. Contract Documentation
3.0 Pre-Award Survey

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .