RFP_Attach_4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 47 KB Posted

Attached to
A-10 Thunderbolt Advanced-Wing Continuation Kit (ATTACK) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8202-18-R-1001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Hill Air Force Base

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor responding to RFP FA8202-18-R-1001 from the Department of the Air Force Materiel Command for the A-10 Thunderbolt Advanced-Wing Continuation Kit. The questionnaire requests information on the contractor's performance on prior contracts including schedule and cost performance, technical performance ratings, customer satisfaction, management of subcontractors, and whether the customer would award to the contractor again. Respondents are asked to provide contract numbers, periods of performance, dollar values, reasons for any changes, and documentation to support any performance ratings other than satisfactory. Completion of the questionnaire is required by close of business on June 27, 2016 to assist the source selection team in evaluating offerors for the solicitation.

RFP Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to A-10 Thunderbolt Advanced-Wing Continuation Kit (ATTACK), newest first.
File Type Posted
Non_Proprietary_Questions_211_-_212.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Non_Proprietary_Questions_162_-_210.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Section_L.docx DOCX document
TEP_Pricing_Matrix_8-3-2018.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Section_M.docx DOCX document
RFP_Attach_1_Instruct_to_Offerors.pdf PDF
9579776_Digital_Data_Delivery_Requirements.pdf PDF
Form_260.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_F_-_Government_Furnished_Information_List_Rev_A.pdf PDF
RFP_Attach_3_-_SubKtr_and_Joint_Venture_Partner_Consent.docx DOCX document
TM-86-01_RevA.pdf PDF
ppi_tool.accdb MDB file
Non_Proprietary_Questions_141-161.pdf PDF
A019_CDRL.pdf PDF
A026_CDRL.pdf PDF
A034_CDRL.pdf PDF
DD_form_2345.pdf PDF
A036_CDRL.pdf PDF
A002_CDRL.pdf PDF
A028_CDRL.pdf PDF
A020_CDRL.pdf PDF
RFP_Attach_6_-_TEP_Pricing_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A016_CDRL.pdf PDF
A035_CDRL.pdf PDF
A010_CDRL.pdf PDF
A011_CDRL.pdf PDF
A023_CDRL_-.pdf PDF
A003_CDRL.pdf PDF
A009_CDRL.pdf PDF
A008_CDRL.pdf PDF
RFP_Attach_7_SUPPLEMENT_Data_Entry_Form.pdf PDF
Section_L.docx DOCX document
Section_M.docx DOCX document
A030_CDRL.pdf PDF
SOW_ATTACHMENT_C_Contract_Data_Requirements_List_CDRL_and_Distribution.pdf PDF
A029_CDRL.pdf PDF
ATTACK_SOW.pdf PDF
A014_CDRL.pdf PDF
A042_CDRL.pdf PDF
RFP_Attach_7_Government_Furnished_Property_List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A040_CDRL.pdf PDF
Non_Proprietary_Questions_(27Apr_thru_RFP).pdf PDF
A006_CDRL.pdf PDF
RFP_Attach_2_Past_Perf_Info_Sheet.docx DOCX document
A021_CDRL.pdf PDF
A029_TMCR.pdf PDF
A001_CDRL.pdf PDF
A013_CDRL.pdf PDF
A022_CDRL.pdf PDF
A024_CDRL.pdf PDF
Show all 50

A-10 Thunderbolt Advanced-Wing Continuation Kit (ATTACK) has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

RFP FA8202-18-R-1001

Name Company Office Phone

Return your completed questionnaire electronically BY COB MONDAY 27 JUNE 16 to wade.appel.1@us.af.mil.

If you have questions regarding this Questionnaire, please contact the Past Performance Team Lead:

Captain Wade Appel wade.appel.1@us.af.mil 801-586-5769

NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND SHALL NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.

Instructions to Evaluator: Please assist our source selection team as we evaluate sources for our solicitation. Expand the document as needed to fit answers. Lines are a placeholder (delete as necessary).

PART I. SPECIFIC PROGRAM INFORMATION.

Contractor/Business: Company CAGE Code: ####

Program Title and Brief Description: RFP Contract Title Narrative from RFP Contract Intro

Role in the Program/Work Performed As: Prime Subcontractor Vendor/Supplier

Contract Number: XXX

Contract Type(s): XXX

PART II. GENERAL PROGRAM INFORMATION.

Period of Performance:

Number of Years?: Basic: Option:

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Date through

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Date through

3. Reason for difference (if applicable)

Contract Dollar Value:

1. Original MAX Contract $ Value (assuming all options are exercised:

2. Current MAX $ Value (assuming all options exercised):
3. Primary Causes of Changes:

NOTE: In Part III, should your response be other than “satisfactory,” please provide supporting documentation in “Additional Remarks” on page 3.

PART III.PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS.

Please check the appropriate rating for each of the following questions (see definitions on page 4):

E = Exceptional VG = Very Good S = Satisfactory M = Marginal US = Unsatisfactory NA = Not Available

E
VG
S
M
US

1. Extent to which Company’s products and/or services met the specification /performance requirements

2. Configuration Management (first product delivered same as last)

3. Quality of Completed Product

4. Overall management of subcontracting efforts

5. Quality of Technical Manuals or Commercial Manuals

6. Customer’s Satisfaction with warranty response times and corrective actions

7. Adequate Number of Dedicated Resources For Your Program

8. Timely recognition and notification of administrative, engineering, production, problems affecting the program

9. Company performed independently without significant customer direction/oversight

10. Monitoring of Program Schedules and Critical Milestones

11. Company demonstrated positive responsiveness to unscheduled requirements or contract changes

12. Has action been initiated to cancel or terminate the contract for default? If yes, explain.

13. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? If yes, explain.

14. Describe the contractor’s or company’s strong and/or weak points identified as a result of technical performance and any technical performance risk identified during the life of the contract.

15. If given a choice, would you award to this contractor again? If not, please explain.

16. Do you feel you “got what you paid for?” Please explain.

17. Additional Remarks: In Part III, should your response be other than “satisfactory,” please provide supporting documentation

QUESTIONNAIRE RATING SYSTEM

CONTRACT PERFORMANCE

Rating
Description
Exceptional
During the contract period, contractor performance outstanding, meeting all contract requirements and consistently exceeded many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.
Very Good
During the contract period, contractor performance very good, meeting all contract requirements and consistently exceeded some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action.
Satisfactory
During the contract period, contractor performance acceptable, meeting all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.
Marginal
During the contract period, contractor performance less than acceptable, not meeting some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Government involvement was required.
Unsatisfactory
During the contract period, contractor performance unacceptable, failing to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered. Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive government oversight and involvement was required.

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION

SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 1

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .