Bldg 586 Seed Project FOPR (LPTA) Amendment 1.docx

Fair Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements

SABER

Fair Opportunity Proposal Request (FOPR) Amendment #1

I. FOPR INFORMATION

A. FOPR No: 16002928

B. Issue Date: 15 Sep 2026

C. Issued By:

AFSC OL:H/PZIOC

6038 Aspen Ave / Bldg. 1289 NE Hill Air Force Base, Utah 84056

D. For information regarding this FOPR please contact:

E. FOPR issued to:

F. Project Title: Building 586 “Repair Restroom and Drains” G. Project No: Capital Project No. 1145899

H. Project Location: Building 586

I. Site Visit Specifics:

25 Aug 2026 15 September 2026

** Additional Site Visit Information** Site Contact POC to schedule Sub-Contractor site visits:

Andres Valenzuela Facility Engineer 309th CMXG 801-586-9835 andres.valenzuela@us.af.mil

Government personnel will be monitoring all picture taking IF allowed on the site visit. This ensures picture of assets are not inadvertently taken without proper authorization.

J. Questions: Questions resulting from this FOPR and/or site visit shall be submitted to the points of contact (POC) listed above in Paragraph d, no later than 25 Sept 2026, by 12:00 pm Mountain Time (MT)

K. Proposal Due: See SABER V Source Selection for proposal due date and time. Late proposals will not be accepted.

L. FOPR list of attachments:

II. GENERAL TASK ORDER INFORMATION

A. Disclosure of the Magnitude of Project in accordance with (IAW) FAR 36.101-3:

Less than $25,000

Between $25,000 and $100,000

Between 100,000 and $250,000

Between 500,000 and $1,000,000

Between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000

Between $5,000,000 and $10,000,000

The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs incurred.

B. Type Of Task Order: Firm-Fixed Price

C. Task Order Evaluation Criteria: IAW the Basic contract Statement of Work (SOW) Section 16.1 , dated 19 May 2026, A Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) will be utilized for issuance of this task order to determine best value.

D. Project Completion: 150 Calendar Days after Contractor receipt of Notice-To-Proceed. In the event conflicts arise between the Offeror’s proposals and the Task Order SOW, the task order SOW takes precedence.

E. Proposal Acceptance Period: Proposals which provide less than 90 calendar days for Government acceptance from the proposal due date may not be considered and may be rejected.

F. Construction Warranty: Work completed under contract resulting from this FOPR will be warranted IAW the clause at FAR 52.246-21 (Dev Mar 1994), Warranty of Construction, as included in the basic contract.

G. Construction Wage Rate Requirements: All work completed under contract resulting from this FOPR comply with the wage rate requirements of the clause at FAR 52.222-6 (Dev Aug 2018), Construction Wage Rate requirements. The primary site of the work and the applicable Wage Determination or General Wage Decision is designated below. In the event the General Wage Decision is revised prior to task order award, the most current decision will be utilized in the resulting task order.

H. Liquidated Damages: Issuance of a task order arising from this FOPR will be performed IAW the clause at FAR 52.211-12 (Dev Sept 2000), Liquidated Damages – Construction. If the Contractor fails to complete the work within the time specified in the task order, the Contractor shall pay liquidated damages to the Government in the amount $439.20 for each calendar day of delay until the work is completed or accepted.

I. Safety: Issuance of a task order arising from this FOPR will be performed IAW the clause at FAR 52.236-13 (Dev Nov 1991), Accident Prevention. Contractors shall comply with all applicable provisions of the latest versions of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Safety and Health Requirements Engineer Manual (EM) 385-1-1.

J. Superintendence by the Contractor: Issuance of a task order arising from this FOPR will be performed IAW the clause at FAR 52.236-6 (Dev Apr 1984), Superintendence by the Contractor. The Contractor shall directly supervise or appoint a superintendent who has the authority to act for the Contractor.

K. Bid Guarantee: In accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1 (Dev Sept 1996), Bid Guarantee, the offeror shall provide a bid guarantee in the amount of 20 percent of the bid price. Bid Guarantees are required anytime Payment and Performance Bonds are required.

L. Payment and Performance Bonds: In accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-15 (Dev Jun 2020), Performance and Payment Bonds—Construction, award of a task order resulting from this FOPR shall require Payment and Performance bonds. IAW this basic contract, Offerors are required to maintain a minimum blanket bond capacity of $5 million for SABER Task Orders. Evidence of additional payment and performance bonding will be required if award of this task order exceeds $5 million in active SABER project for the awardee.

M. Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment: In accordance with FAR Clause 52.204-24 (Dev Nov 2021), Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment, IAW this basic contract, Offerors are required to review the list of excluded parties in the System for Award Management (SAM) (https://www.sam.gov) for entities excluded from receiving federal awards for “covered telecommunications equipment or services.” Following this review, the Offeror is required to complete the representation, and if applicable, the additional disclosures as set forth in the provision.

N. Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls: In accordance with DFARS 252.204-7008, Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls, Offerors are required to adhere to the security requirements required by contract clause 252.204-7012 , shall be implemented for all covered defense information on all covered contractor information systems that support the performance of this contract.

O. Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DOD ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS (DEVIATION 2026-O0025)(FEB 2026): In accordance with DFARS 252.240-7997, NIST SP 800-171 DOD ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS (DEVIATION 2026-O0025)(FEB 2026), The Contractor shall provide access to its facilities, systems, and personnel necessary for the Government to conduct a Medium or High NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment, using the methodology described at 32 CFR 170.24, if necessary. The results of Medium or High NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessments, when conducted by DCMA, will take precedence over any other assessment, in accordance with 32 CFR 170.16(a)(1)(iv), 32 CFR 170.17(a)(1)(iv), and 32 CFR 170.18(a)(1)(iv).

P. Notice on the Use of the Supplier Performance Risk System. In accordance with DFARS 252.207-7024, Notice on the Use of the Supplier Performance Risk System, the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS), available at https://piee.eb.mil/, will be used in the evaluation of the Quoter or Offeror’s performance. SPRS retrieves item, price, quality, delivery, and contractor information on contracts from Government reporting systems in order to develop risk assessments.

III. PROPOSAL PREPARATION

A. Proposal Preparation: To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Proposals must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirement of this FOPR and the basic SABER contract. The proposal must incorporate the information from any and all requests for information, site visits, questions and answers throughout the FOPR time period, and address all pricing options in the SOW. All attachments found in the basic IDIQ contract (I.E. UFC’s, Regulations, SOW, and Standards) and referenced in the Task Order SOW dated 15 Sep 2026 must be adhered to and taken into consideration when proposing.

If Heavy Hitters are not identified in the FOPR and SOW , any incomplete narratives not addressing all sections of the Task Order SOW may be considered technically unacceptable. If Heavy Hitters are identified in the FOPR and SOW, any incomplete narratives not addressing all Heavy Hitter sections of the Task Order SOW may be considered technically unacceptable. Examples include; not proposing night shift when night shifts are identified, not addressing proposal options, and not addressing any item in the Task Order SOW asked for. If any inconsistencies are identified in the Government Task Order SOW, when compared to a standard or regulation, the inconsistencies must be addressed prior to the proposal submittal date. The Task Order SOW will be revised and a FOPR extension will be issued on an as needed basis.

B. Format: Offerors are to submit proposals which include a completed FOPR and a Technical Proposal. Technical Proposals are to be legible, clear, concise, and professional. Technical Proposals must be submitted in electronic format. Electronic format is to be Adobe PDF, Microsoft Word, or Microsoft Power point. Electronic formats shall be compatible with a Microsoft operating system.

C. Proposal Submissions: Offerors shall submit one (1) copy of the following (electronic copies must be submitted in individual volumes). If the electronic file size is too large, and multiple e-mails will be required, the Offeror is allowed to submit a copy of the Proposal on a CD:

I. Signed FOPR/Proposal

II. Acknowledgement of Amendments, if applicable

III. Pricing Schedule

i. Software and unit price requirement IAW paragraph 01 04 00 of the Basic SOW (page 21 of Basic SOW)

· The offeror shall either use the pricing matrix or latest version of e4Clicks Basic based program to generate the pricing proposal.

IV. Gantt chart on 8-1/2” x 11” paper (without any company identifiers)

V. Bid Guarantee (Bid Bond) (if needed, see FOPR Section II, paragraph K and L.

VI. Technical Proposal, to include: Narrative shall be on blank (no company letterhead paper and should not contain any company identifiers. Copying or pasting of the Government SOW, unless authorized by the Program Manager in the Task Order SOW dated 15 Sep 2026, will result in an unacceptable rating. Incorporate the most current version of all attachments in the basic IDIQ, as applicable.

i. The Technical Proposal must address how the contractor will accomplish the following areas of the Task Order SOW:

· The Prime Contractor shall develop a Management Plan IAW Section 5 of the Basic Contract SOW which shall be submitted at the time of task order proposal for all contractor personnel that will be assigned to this project before award. The Management Plan shall include a position description for all key personnel identified in Section 4 of the Basic Contract SOW. The plan shall include resumes, licenses, and certifications to demonstrate compliance with requirements in Basic Contract SOW, Sections 4.1 thru 4.5. Specify which positions are being accomplished by subcontractors. Subcontractors filling key personnel positions shall have the same authority, qualifications and certifications required for the positions they are filling.

· Submittals required with proposal:

1. Conceptual Drawing.

· Submittals required prior to install:

1. Plumbing Fixtures

2. Electrical Fixtures

3. Lighting Layout

· Heavy Hitters –: Sections 5, 7 and 8.

· PART Time Superintendent

I. Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment, see FOPR Section II, paragraph M.

· The Offeror shall submit the required representations in the provision at FAR 52.204-24(d)(1) and (d)(2) (Dev Nov 2021) Incomplete proposals may be considered technically unacceptable.

IV. EVALUATION FACTOR : TECHNICAL & PRICE

A Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) evaluation will be utilized for issuance of this task order to determine best value.

Offerors price proposals will be ranked by price (lowest to highest), then evaluated for price reasonableness. If the lowest priced offeror is found to be technically acceptable and evaluated to be reasonable then that proposal will be considered to be the “best value” to the Government and the award shall be made to that offeror, provided there are at least two technically acceptable proposals to establish adequate price competition. If the lowest priced proposal is not technically acceptable, the Government may enter into interchanges. The purpose of interchanges may be to correct errors, address technical deficiencies or gain an understanding of aspects of a proposal. After interchanges, if the lowest priced proposal (complete and reasonable) is determined technically acceptable, award shall be made to that offeror.

If the Government deems the lowest priced proposal not easily correctable, the next lowest priced proposal will be evaluated for technical acceptability. Interchanges may continue taking place with offerors as necessary or deemed appropriate by the Government until reaching a technically acceptable proposal with a complete and reasonable price or until all proposals are evaluated. The Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without further contact.

Technical acceptability will be determined based on the following:

· Offeror’s technical approach and capability to satisfy the following aspects of the SOW dated 15 Sep 2026:

ii. The Technical Proposal must address how the contractor will accomplish the following areas of the Task Order SOW:

· The Prime Contractor shall develop a Management Plan IAW Section 5 of the Basic Contract SOW which shall be submitted at the time of task order proposal for all contractor personnel that will be assigned to this project before award. The Management Plan shall include a position description for all key personnel identified in Section 4 of the Basic Contract SOW. The plan shall include resumes, licenses, and certifications to demonstrate compliance with requirements in Basic Contract SOW, Sections 4.1 thru 4.5. Specify which positions are being accomplished by subcontractors. Subcontractors filling key personnel positions shall have the same authority, qualifications and certifications required for the positions they are filling.

· Submittals required with proposal:

1. Conceptual Drawing.

· Submittals required prior to install:

1. Plumbing Fixtures

2. Electrical Fixtures

3. Lighting Layout

· Heavy Hitters –: Sections 5, 7 and 8.

· Part Time Superintendent Although offerors will be required to meet all the requirements of the SOW the offerors will be evaluated on how well they describe an approach and capability to meet the identified criteria as outlined above. The technical evaluation team will evaluate proposals against the above criteria.

Proposal(s) will be rated as either acceptable, or unacceptable as outlined in the table below.

Table A-1. Technically Acceptable / Unacceptable Ratings

NOTE: Per FAR 9.104-1(b) to be determined responsible, a prospective Offeror must be able to comply with the required or proposed delivery or performance schedule, taking into consideration all existing commercial and Governmental business commitments. If you are behind or late on other task orders, the Government may deem you non-responsible and ineligible for future awards until you are back on schedule or completed with other projects.

V. FAIR OPPORTUNITY REQUEST SUBMISSION

A. Name and Address of Offeror:

Telephone No:

B. Offer (Must be fully completed by offeror):

IAW Basic Contract CLIN 0001, the Offeror must not exceed their professional labor hourly rates. The Offeror shall verify they are not exceeding their NTE rates for this effort by completing the following:

For Task Order

TOTAL

The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this Request for Proposal and the basic contract, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within 90 calendars days after the date the offers are due.

Scope of Work: The scope of work for this requirement is detailed in the Task Order SOW.

FOPR Bid Proposal Breakdown Costs

Total Overall Amount $ _________

C. Offeror Acknowledgement of Amendment: The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the Request for Proposal -- give number and date of each amendment:

Amendment No.

Date:

D. Name and Title of Person Authorized to Sign Offer:

Comments / Concerns/ Notes / Alternatives Methods / Assumptions / Etc. (Offeror may make notes on any issues or concerns, or make the Government aware of any items of interest in this area.