Solicitation- FA813726R00140001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

J

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

05 May 2026

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE

REQUISITION NUMBER

5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE FA8137

FA8137 AFSC PZIOC

CP 405 739 4040, 7858 5TH ST STE 1

TINKER AFB, OK 73145-9125

UNITED STATES

DOROTHY INOA, Email: dorothy.inoa@us.af.mil Telephone: 0000000 Sharla Brandon, Email: sharla.flowers_brandon.1@us.af.mil Telephone: 405-739-3516

7. ADMINISTERED BY (if other than Item 6)

CODE

SCD: PAS:

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE: FACILITY CODE:

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

FA813726R0014

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

29 Apr 2026

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER

NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; 1 or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (if required) See Section G - Contract Administration Data

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK

ONE

A.THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.)

SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Date Extension for proposals due from May 13, 2026 to June 16, 2026. Initial date was a rough day, due to changing order type, we extended the days for coordination.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

Sharla Flowers

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

05 May 2026

Computer generated. Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA-FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The following modifications were made:

Information From To Response Due Time 04:00 PM 01:00 PM Response Due Date 18 May 2026 16 Jun 2026

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS:

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, Offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of three (3) separate volumes, Volume I - Technical Proposal, Volume II - Price Proposal.

B. The Contracting Officer (CO) has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the CO will review this determination and if, in the CO's opinion, adequate price competition exists, no additional price information will be requested and certification under FAR will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the CO determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required 15.406-2 to submit information to the extent necessary for the CO to determine the reasonableness of the price.

C. Exchanges of source selection information between Government and offerors will be controlled by the Contracting Officer. Email may be used to transmit such information, only if the email can be sentence crypted, and must include "Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104"in the subject line of the email.

Otherwise, source selection information will be transmitted via direct mailing or facsimile. In order to facilitate the sending and receiving often crypted emails, offerors must use MS Outlook email configured to support encryption or a different email product that is S/MIME compatible and configured to support encryption. If you intend to submit your source selection information via encrypted email, you will need to contact the Buyer/Contracting Officer indicated on the face page of the solicitation prior to that first submittal to exchange certificates used for encryption. To ensure the process is working correctly, send a test encrypted message first (without including any source selection information). Otherwise, source selection information will be transmitted via direct mailing or AMRDEC SAFE athttps://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/guide.aspx.

When submitting source selection information via email, file suppression utilities, to include but not limited to zip files, will not be accepted.

D. Specific Instructions:

VOLUME I - TECHNICAL PROPOSAL:

a. The page limitation for Volume I, Written Technical Proposal, is 10 pages. The page limitation includes any cover page, charts, graphs, drawings, diagrams, supporting illustrations, spreadsheets, etc., but excludes any table of contents or list of acronyms (if utilized). Offerors are cautioned that any pages that exceed the page limitations shall not be read but shall be removed and either retained in the contract file without being considered in the evaluation or sent back to the offeror.

b. The written technical proposal shall be clear, concise, and include all the information required by this provision in sufficient detail for effective evaluation. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume the Government has no prior knowledge of their capabilities, work processes, facilities, and experience and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror's technical proposal. The written technical proposal shall address the following subfactor to describe the offeror's proposed approach to performing the requirements set forth in the Statement of Work. The Government will assess the offeror's proposed technical capabilities and associated

FA813726R00140001

technical risks. For each subfactor, the offer or identifies risks, if any, associated with the proposed approach and actions the offeror will take to mitigate the identified risks.

If no risks/mitigations are identified in the offeror's proposal, it indicates the offeror does not consider there to be any risk associated with their proposed approach.

Subfactor 1 - Work Plan Description: This subfactor evaluates the offeror's work plan. Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when the offeror's proposal provides a Gantt Chart (or similar) highlighting a breakdown of the items/tasks (milestones) identified in the specifications/drawings and how the offeror plans on accomplishing each individual task within the performance period specified for the project. Additionally, the offeror shall clearly and thoroughly depict the critical path to complete the project within the performance period.

VOLUME II - PRICE PROPOSAL

a. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in RFP Sections A Complete blocks 14 through 20C of the RFP Section A, SF1442.

through K. These sections constitute the model contract. The offeror shall submit only those pages that require a fill-in.

b. No price information should be included in the technical proposal volume.

c. Other than certified cost or pricing data may be requested by the Government.

d. Prices must be entered for all items of the schedule. Total amounts submitted without prices being entered on individual items will be rejected. Additions will be subject to verification by the Government. In case of variation between the lump-sum prices and the total amount, the lump-sum prices will be considered the price submitted.

e. Quantities for unit priced items are estimated only and the respective unit price will prevail in the event of an overrun or underrun subject to Section FAR 52.211-18"Variation in Estimated Quantities".

f. Access Delays. Measure and pay for each half hour that the entire workforce is delayed or prevented from accessing the project site. The Contractor's superintendent shall notify the Contracting Officer's on-site representative within twenty-four hours (24) of any delay restricting access to the jobsite. This item will be paid based on a half-hour of work basis. All partial half hours for a notified delay will be rounded up to the next half-hour increment.

E. General Information:

1. Format for proposal parts I and II shall be as follows:

a. The proposals will be 8 1/2" x 11" paper or standard A4 paper, except for foldouts used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11" x 17". All tables, charts, graphs, figures, etc. must be legible.

b. A page is defined as one face of a page containing information.

c. Typing shall not be less than 10 point.

d. .Elaborate formats, bindings or color presentations are not desired or required

e. Electronic Submission - In accordance with - Instructions to Offerors, emailed proposals will be accepted. Emailed proposals must be sent to FAR52.215-1 dorothy.inoa and sharla.flowers_brandon.1@us.af.mil . Note email size must not exceed 10 MB. If the proposal is more than 10 MB, please submit as @us.af.mil email 1 of2, etc. Format must be a Word Document, PDF, or Excel sheet. The offeror must request and obtain an acknowledgement of receipt for electronic submission.

f. A Completed RFP shall consist of the completed and signed RFP, to include any amendments issued. Acknowledgement of all amendments to the solicitation in accordance with the instructions on the SF 30 (amendment form).

g. Page limitations may be placed on responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs), if issued. The specified page limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters forwarding the ENs to offerors or on the EN form itself. Each page containing proprietary information should be so marked.

h. Each page of the offeror's proposal and any EN responses should contain the following legend at the bottom of each sheet: SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION--SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104 CUI

2. Any noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the RFP may cause the offeror's proposal to be determined unacceptable and therefore not considered eligible for award.

3. Offerors shall ensure that all clauses and provisions requiring "fill in" information are appropriately completed, including the proposed prices associated with the contract line items in the schedule of the RFP.

4. A pre-proposal site visit will be conducted as specified in clause .52.236-27 Alternate1

b. An organized site visit was held on - March 25, 2026 AND March 31, 2026 at 10 AM CST.

c. Participants site visit was at building 820, Tinker AFB, OK.

5. Offerors should allow sufficient time for the proposal email to arrive timely to the Contracting Contracting Office prior to the time deadline. Late proposals will not be accepted.

6. All contractors' questions in response to this solicitation must be emailed to and sharla.flowers_brandon.1@us.af.mil no later than dorothy.inoa@us.af.mil April 07, 2026 . The US Government will not be held responsible for answering any questions after this time. All questions/answers resulting from this solicitation will be posted to by COB

SAM.gov.

7. This section provides general guidance for preparing proposals. Offerors' proposals must include all data and information requested by this solicitation and must be submitted and conducted in strict accordance with these instructions. Non-conformance with the specific organization, content, and page limitations may result in misevaluation of proposals or, depending on the magnitude of the nonconformance the proposals may be eliminated from further consideration.

8. The proposal must be completed and returned NLT the offeror due date and time specified in block 13 of the solicitation SF1442. To: dorothy.inoa@us.af.mil AND NLTsharla.flowers_brandon.1@us.af.mil June 16, 2026 1PM CST.

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

EVALUATION FACTORS:

A. SOURCE SELECTION

1. Basis for Contract Award: This acquisition will utilize Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15 - Contracting by Negotiations, as supplemented by the FAR Overhaul, Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and DoD Source Selection Procedures, dated 20 August 2022 and Department of Air Force Mandatory Procedures 5315.3 to make an integrated assessment for award decision. These regulations are available electronically athttps://www.acquisition.gov/. The Government intends to award one contract as a result of this solicitation to the Woman Owned Small Business offeror with the LPTA proposal who is deemed responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9.1, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation's requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Section L of this solicitation), meets all requirements set forth in the RFP, based on the results of the evaluation as described in this solicitation Section M.

2. Number of Contracts to be Awarded: The Government intends to award one contract for this requirement.

3. Discussions: The Government reserves the right to award a contract without discussions or the opportunity for proposal revisions. If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices(ENs) and the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the source selection decision. Offerors may be required to respond with their FPR within 24 hours. If the offeror's proposal has been evaluated as acceptable at the time discussions are closed, any changes or exceptions in the FPR are subject to re-evaluation and may introduce risk that the offeror's proposal will be determined unacceptable and ineligible for award. If the Government elects to open discussions, the competitive range may or may not include proposals removed for unfavorable ratings or pricing at the sole discretion of the Government. A competitive range, if required, may be further reduced for purposes of efficiency pursuant to FAR 15.306(c)(2).

4. Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions: Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors or subfactors. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award.

5. Proposal Evaluation Approach:

a. Step 1: Evaluate all timely proposals for completeness.

b. Step 2: Evaluate all complete proposals for technical acceptability.

c. Step 3: Evaluate all proposals to determine whether the price is fair and reasonable (IAW FAR 15.404) then ranked by Total Evaluated Price (TEP).

d. Step 4: The Government may request clarifications, communications, or discussions for proposals through Evaluation Notice(s).

e. Step 5: The Contracting Officer will compile the contractors to make up the competitive range, those with the most highly qualified and technically acceptable proposals. The Contracting officer will then determine the lowest price of those technically acceptable

6. Responsibility: In addition to the evaluation factors noted above, the offeror must be determined responsible according to the standards in FAR Subpart 9.1 Responsible Prospective Contractors.

B. EVALUATION FACTORS

1. Evaluation Factors and Subfactors: The following evaluation factors and subfactors will be used to evaluate each proposal. The Government will evaluate proposals for acceptability but will not rank the proposals by the non-price factors or subfactors.

Factor 1: Technical

Subfactor 1: Work Plan

Subfactor 2:Technical Risk

Factor 2: Price.

2. Relative Importance: The Government will conduct a competitive source selection in which technical (including technical risk)rating, will be evaluated on a basis equally important to price considerations.

1. Volume I - Technical Factor The Government's technical evaluation team shall evaluate the combined workplan/technical risk/past performance of proposals by assigning one of the ratings described below, to determine if the offeror provides a sound, compliant approach that meets the requirements and demonstrates a thorough knowledge and understanding of the specs and SOW and their associated risks. For each subfactor, the offeror identifies risks, if any, associated with the proposed approach and actions the offeror will take to mitigate the identified risks. If no risks/mitigations are identified in the offeror's proposal, it indicates the offeror does not consider there to be any risk associated with their proposed approach. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable or higher, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. However, the offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

Combined Technical/Risk Rating Table Adjectival Rating: Description

Acceptable: Proposal demonstrates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths and/or at least one significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low. Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength or significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate. : Proposal meets or exceeds the requirements and indicates an adequate to Good exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Unacceptable: Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is Marginal to high. :

Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is un awardable, and/or risk of Unacceptable performance is unacceptably high. Combined Technical/Technical Risk Rating: The technical rating evaluates the quality of the offeror's technical solution for meeting the Government's requirement. Technical risk, which is manifested by the identification of weaknesses, assesses the degree to which an offeror's proposed approach for the requirements of the solicitation may cause disruption of schedule, increased costs, degraded performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance. The evaluation shall address the Source Selection Team's identification of any weakness as well as the offeror's identified risks and proposed mitigation (if applicable)and document why that is or is not manageable. Each Technical subfactor identified below will receive one of the adjectival ratings described in the DoD Source Selection Procedures table above, which focuses on the strengths ,weaknesses, significant weaknesses, uncertainties, and deficiencies of the offeror's proposal. The adjectival rating depicts how well the offeror's proposal meets the Technical subfactor requirements. Subfactor ratings shall not be rolled up into an overall rating for the Technical factors. The proposals shall be evaluated against the following technical subfactors:

Subfactor 1: Work Plan Description: This subfactor evaluates the offeror's work plan. Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when the offeror's proposal provides a Gantt Chart (or similar) highlighting a breakdown of the items/tasks (milestones)identified in the specifications/drawings and how the offeror plans on accomplishing each individual task within the performance period specified for the project. Additionally, the offeror shall clearly and thoroughly depict the critical path to complete the project within the performance period