RFP_FA8051-16-R-0001 _Revised_Attach_4-6.docx

Attachment 4 (Revision-1, 25 Jan 2016) – Contractor Team Organization

1. Provide the information on the Offeror as the Prime Contractor below. If the Offeror is a Joint Venture, provide the details for the companies in the Joint Venture below.

Company Name (Prime Contractor)

List AFB(s) where you will self- perform work

* Use the requirement categories identification in paragraph 3 below. Only list the requirement categories that the Offeror will self-perform, above.

2. Provide the information on all Teaming Partners/Subcontractors proposed as part of the Contractor Team Organization on this acquisition. (Add additional rows if more space is needed and number pages as 1, 2, etc.)

Company Name Teaming Partner/ Subcontractor

Address

POC & Telephone

* Use the requirement categories identification in paragraph 3 below. Only list the requirement categories that the Offeror will self-perform, above.

3. The requirement categories on this acquisition are listed below.

A

B

with the Statement of Work for Marking - Non-Reflective Paint

– Red/White/Yellow/Black.

C

Solicitation # FA8051-16-R-0001

FA8051-16-R-0001

ATTACHMENT 5 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When filled in, this document is source selection sensitive information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104

Offeror: Complete SECTION 1, and send a questionnaire to the primary customer point of contact (POC) listed on the Past Performance Information Sheet who is identified as the most familiar with the performance of the effort on the contract.

Primary Customer POC: Complete SECTIONS 2-5. Handwritten responses are sufficient. If you need more space, please attach additional pages. If you have any questions, please call the Contracting Officer, Anthony Rogiano III at (850) 283-6841. *Please email the completed questionnaire to anthony.rogiano.1@us.af.mil and michaela.holston@us.af.mil.

SECTION 1: CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION

.Contractor

Other (specify)

.If Performed as a Subcontractor/Teaming Partner, list Prime Contractor:

.Contract Number

Task Order Number (if applicable)

.Contract Type

Period of Performance

Initial Contract/Task Order Cost ($)

.Current/Final Contract/Task Order Cost ($)

Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs (enter below):

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

.Customer or Agency Name

.Customer or Agency Description (if applicable)

.Location of R3 Efforts:

Description of R3 Efforts:

Agency for this contract of task order (choose as many as apply)

Department of Defense, Air Force

Department of Defense, Army

Department of Defense, Navy

Other

Commercial Airfield

Military Airfield

R3 Categories provided under this contract or task order (choose as many as apply):

Airfield Rubber Removal

Airfield Paint Removal

Airfield Markings/Restriping

Other (please explain below)

SECTION 3: EVALUATORS IDENTIFICATION

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please confirm that ypur evaluation is consistent with the R3 efforts provided in Section 2, Description of R3 Efforts. Indicate your level of satisfaction with each component of the Contractor‘s performance by circling. Please note that Contractors will be given an opportunity to respond to any ratings less than Green/Satisfactory and any negative comments. Indicate your satisfaction with the overall evaluation using the scale provided below and to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CHECK

BOX

PRIME CONTRACTOR:

QUALITY OF SOLUTION: The Contractor comprehended the goals, thoroughly researched the issues, and presented a comprehensive, complete, feasible, and effective solution. (Requirements met and performed successfully).

1. EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT USE OF RESOURCES: The Contractor deployed, in a timely manner, the proper amount and type of personnel, facilities and other resources to support the project. Use of Subcontractors was appropriate in supporting the project

2. COMMUNICATION: The Contractor worked and communicated well with client management, staff, and contracting officials as well as with his or her own staff and subcontractors.

3. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE: The Contractor planned and proposed realistic schedules, successfully monitored performance and completed work on time.

4. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION: The Contractor exhibited a commitment to customer satisfaction and achieved customer satisfaction.

5. RESPONSIVENESS AND ATTENTIVENESS: The Contractor exhibited reasonable and cooperative behavior in response to client changes, criticism/ rejection of contract deliverables and in detecting and correcting errors, poor performance, and other problems.

For #6 and #7, please answer either YES or NO

6. Given the choice would you do business with this Contractor again?

7. Did either you or the Contractor have to resort to litigation to resolve problems?

8. Overall rating, A (Acceptable), U (Unacceptable) or O Other. Use space below if necessary to explain “Other” or if “Unacceptable,” describe specifically how the Contractor did not meet requirements.

Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract partially or completely terminated for default, convenience, or are there any pending terminations? YES or NO

If Yes, please identify termination type and explain below. (Default / Convenience / Pending Termination)

FA8051-16-R-0001

SECTION 5: EVALUATION SUMMARY

What were the Contractor‘s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

What were the Contractor‘s most negative aspects in the performance of the contract?

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this Contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this Contractor‘s performance, as desired.

Evaluator‘s Signature_______________________________________ Date:___________________

*Please email the completed questionnaire to anthony.rogiano.1@us.af.mil and michaela.holston@us.af.mil

Solicitation FA8051-16-R-0001 Attachment 5, Past Performance Questionnaire

Attachment – 6: Subcontractor/Teaming Partner Consent Letter

Note: Past performance information concerning Subcontractors and Teaming Partners cannot be disclosed to a private party without the Subcontractor‘s or Teaming Partner‘s consent. Because a Prime Contractor is a private party, the Government will need that consent before disclosing Subcontractor/Teaming Partner past and present performance information to the prime Contractor during exchanges. In an effort to assist the Government‘s Performance Confidence Assessment Group (PCAG) in assessing your past performance relevancy and confidence, we request that a consent letter (similar to the sample below) be completed by the major Subcontractors/Teaming Partners identified in Attachment 3, Contractor Team Organization in your proposal. The completed consent letters should be submitted as part of your Past Performance Volume.

SAMPLE

Dear Contracting Officer:

We are participating as a (Subcontractor/Teaming Partner) with (Prime Contractor or name of entity providing proposal) in responding to the Department of the Air Force, 772 Enterprise Sourcing Squadron, Tyndall AFB, Florida. Request for Proposal FA8051-16-R-0001 for the Airfield Rubber/Paint Removal and Airfield Re-striping (R3) contract.

We understand that the Government is placing increased emphasis on past performance in order to obtain best value in source selections. In order to facilitate the performance confidence assessment process we are signing this consent letter to allow you to discuss our past and present performance information with the Prime Contractor during the Source Selection Process.

(Signature and title of individual who has the authority to sign for and legally bind the company) Company Name:

Address: