Combo-Solicitation - FA706026R0016 - Final.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

11TH CONTRACTING SQUADRON (AFDW)

JOINT BASE ANACOSTIA-BOLLING DC

QUAERO CUM INTEGRITAS

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation

VIP Furniture Management

FA7060-26-R-0016

16 September 2026

1.0 General Information

1.1. This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO), Part 12.

This announcement constitutes the solicitation only; quotations are being requested, and a written solicitation will not be issued.

1.2. The combined synopsis is issued as a Request for Proposal (RFP) under solicitation number:

FA7060-26-R-0016.

1.3. The purpose of this combined synopsis/solicitation is to establish a Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) contract.

1.4. This solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2026-01, effective 03/13/2026.

1.5. Small Business Set-Aside: 100%; Applicable Size Standard is Forty-Seven Million Dollars.

1.6. NAICS Code: 561210 - Facilities Support Services

1.7. Posting Date: 09 September 2026

1.8. Questions to solicitation due date: 14 September 2026 at 4:00 PM (EST)

1.9. Answers to submitted questions posting date: 17 September 2026 at 6:00 PM (EST)

1.10. Response Due: 22 September 2026 at 4:00 PM (EST)

1.11. Contracting Office: 11 CONS/PKA

1.12. Government Points of Contact:

Contracting Officer: Mr. James Carnes, james.carnes.2@us.af.mil Contract Specialist: Mr. J. Brandon La’Pierre, jerome.lapierre.1@us.af.mil mailto:james.carnes.2@us.af.mil mailto:jerome.lapierre.1@us.af.mil

1.13. Offerors must be System for Award Management (SAM) registered and the online representation and certification in SAM must be completed. Information concerning SAM requirements may be viewed via the internet at https://www.sam.gov or by calling 866-606- 8220, or 334-206-7828 for international calls. Offerors that reject the terms and conditions of the solicitation may be excluded from consideration.

2.0 Description of services to be acquired:

2.1. The purpose of this RFP is to acquire VIP Furniture Management in accordance with the attached PWS.

2.2. Period of Performance: 30 September 2026 through 29 September 2031

2.3. Contract Line-Item Numbers (CLINs quotation): Package shall include the following Firm Fixed Price CLIN (see Attch. 2 for complete CLIN structure).

CLIN Description QTY Unit of Measure

0001 Furnishing Management Services 12 Months

0002 Moving Services 12 Months

0003 Dry Cleaning Services 12 Months

3.0 Addendum to 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors–Commercial Products and Services

Offer Submission Instructions: To be determined responsive to this combined synopsis/solicitation, offerors shall have an active registration in SAM.gov. To ensure timely evaluation of the quote, the offeror must follow the format contained herein. Offeror is required to meet all solicitation requirements, including format, terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in the offer being ineligible for award. Acceptance shall be evaluated against the following information:

a) Minimum Requirements of Offers. At minimum; this requirement is met when the offeror has provided and thoroughly addressed all requirements identified in RFO FAR Clause 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Products and Commercial Services, Paragraphs a and b.

b) Describe detailed approach to PWS

c) The Technical Capability volume shall not exceed 20 pages, not including Title Page and Table of Contents. If exceeded, the excess pages will not be considered in the evaluation of the proposal.

https://www.sam.gov/

The quote shall include: (1) Technical Capability, (2) Past Performance, (3) Pricing Schedule Worksheet. The content of each part is discussed below.

1) Technical Capability The Technical Capability section of the quote shall present relevant information articulating the offeror’s proposed approach to meeting the Performance Works Statement of this requirement. This section shall clearly demonstrate the offeror’s understanding by providing all documentation required as listed below. This section shall not include any pricing data. The offeror’s quote will be evaluated to assess the offeror’s qualifications as presented in the submitted documentation.

2) Past Performance: Offerors shall provide past performance information for a maximum of (3) references in which they operated as prime contractors. An offeror without a record of relevant past performance will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably. Evidence of prior experience shall include the following information:

• Company/Division/Agency/Customer name

• Description of service provided

• Contract Number

• Contract Value

• Period of Experience

• Verified, up-to-date name, address, email of company representative

• Contracting office contact information.

3) Pricing Schedule Worksheet Offeror Shall complete the government provided pricing schedule worksheet by inserting the proposed price(s) in Attachment 2 - Pricing Schedule Worksheet for Contract Line-Item Numbers (CLIN) 0001 – (CLIN) 0003 (as well as Option Years) and the Total Proposed Price. The total proposed amount must equal the sum of CLIN 0001 – (CLIN) 0003 and all Option Years. Offeror shall also fill in the Offeror (Company) Name, POC Name and Email, and Cage code in the pricing worksheet.

4.0 Addendum to 52.212-2, Evaluation – Commercial Products and Services

*** This Section Is For Solicitation Purposes Only. This Section Will Be Physically Removed From The Resultant Award. ***

4.1 Basis for Award

The government intends to award a single Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) Contract as a result of this solicitation. The government will assess the offeror’s quote on three (3) factors: (1) Technical Capability, (2) Past Performance, and (3) Total Price.

The government intends to select one contractor/offeror for this acquisition. However, the government reserves the right not to award a contract at all. This determination is based upon the quality of the proposals, prices submitted, and the availability of funds.

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and is the most advantageous to the government, which includes price and other factors. Additionally, the government intends to make a trade-off determination with past performance as the most important factor. Although price is not expected to be the most significant factor in the selection of an offeror, the degree of importance of price as a factor could become greater depending upon the equality of the proposals. The government will make a subjective evaluation to determine if the offeror’s technical proposal, past performance and proposed price represents the greatest value to the Government. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

1. Technical Capability

2. Past Performance

3. Price

1) EVALUATION OF TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

In accordance with RFO FAR 12.203, evaluation of this factor will assess the offeror's proposed approach and understanding of the requirements and risk of unsuccessful performance of the proposed approach to technical capability in accordance with the Performance Works Statement.

2) PAST PERFORMANCE

Evaluation of this factor will assess past performance information for a maximum of three (3) references in which offeror operated as prime contractors.

3) EVALUATION OF PRICING SCHEDULE

Evaluation of price will be performed using RFO FAR 12.204. The government will determine whether prices are reasonable, complete, and are not unbalanced.

Reasonableness. The government will determine price-reasonableness, primarily through competitive quotes/offers, to ensure prices are fair and reasonable.

Completeness. The government reserves the right to conduct exchanges with offerors, but exchanges are not anticipated or intended. Since exchanges are not anticipated or intended, the government requires complete quotes with respect to price. A complete quote will include all information required by this solicitation.

Unbalanced Pricing. Offerors should note that pricing will be carefully reviewed to detect whether quotes are unbalanced between line items, as well as unbalanced between periods. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more line-items is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. Unbalanced offers may be determined unacceptable.

James Carnes, NH-03, USAF Contracting Officer

3 Attachments

1. Performance Works Statement

2. Pricing Schedule Worksheet

3. Applicable Provisions and Clauses