Attachment 2 Evaluation Criteria.pdf
PDF 38 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Architect and Engineering Services
- Solicitation number
- FA665626R0007
About this file
This document is a Selection Board Evaluation Criteria form for a 2026 Open End Architect & Engineer (A&E) Contract with the Department of War (DOW)/Department of Defense (DOD).
The evaluation criteria consist of seven factors weighted to assess A&E design companies. Criterion 1, weighted at 30 points, evaluates specialized experience and technical competence in multidiscipline capabilities including architectural, interior design, electrical, civil, structural, environmental, and mechanical disciplines, as well as technical competence in energy conservation, pollution prevention, waste reduction, use of recovered materials, and sustainability of design. Criterion 2, weighted at 25 points, assesses professional qualifications necessary for satisfactory performance and availability of key personnel. Criterion 3, weighted at 15 points, evaluates capability to accomplish work within required timeframes. Criterion 4, weighted at 15 points, examines past performance on government and private sector contracts regarding cost control, quality of work, and schedule compliance, requiring documentation of previous contracts with contact information. Criterion 5, weighted at 20 points, assesses location in the geographical area of the 910th Airlift Wing, Youngstown Air Reserve Station, and knowledge of local and environmental laws and regulations. Criterion 6, weighted at 5 points, considers the volume of previous DOW A&E contract awards to promote equitable distribution among qualified firms, including those without prior DOW contracts. Criterion 7 is a mandatory pass/fail requirement that firms maintain current, active status in the System for Award Management (SAM.gov); firms failing this requirement are ineligible and will not be rated on criteria 1-6. The form includes columns for evaluators to record weight, points awarded, and resulting ratings for multiple design companies.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions-Answers 1 Oct.docx | DOCX document | |
| Questions-Answers 30 Sep.docx | DOCX document | |
| Question-Answers 29 Sep.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 2 Evaluation Criteria.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA665626R0007.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 SOW Kitchen and Dining Facility.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 OH Wage Determination.txt | TXT text file | |
| Attachment 1 SF330.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
WEIGHT POINTS RATING POINTS RATING POINTS RATING
Specialized experience and technical competence in the multidiscipline capabilities in the ares of architectural, interior design, electrical, civil, structural, environmental, mechanical disciplines; technical competence in energy conservation, poluttion prevention, waste reduction, use of recovered materials and sustaniablity of design;
Professional Qualifiactions necessary for satisfactory performance of required services and availability of key personnel to work on projects; 25
3 Capability to accomplish the work in the required time; 15
Past performance on contracts with Government Agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and other compliance with performance schedules. List previous contracts and include the name, address, telephone number, email address and the point of contact for each contract;
Location in general geographical area of the 910th AirLift Wing, Youngstown Air Reserve Station and knowledge of the locality , local and environmental laws and regulations;
Volume of work previously awarded by the Department of War (DOW, DOD: Defence) with the object of effecting an equitable distribution of DOW architect-Engineer (A &E) contracts among qualified A & E Firms including firms that have not had prior DOW Contracts
Firm must have current, active status in the www.SAM.gov Note: IF NO, FIRM IS INELEIGABLE AND WILL NOT BE RATED ON 1-6
YES / NO
WEIGHT x PONTS = RATING
Signature: Approving Engineer:
SELECTION BOARD EVALUATION CRITERIA - 2026 OPEN END A & E CONTRACT
CRITERIA BASIS
A & E DESIGN COMPANY
Summary (2)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .