Section L Attachment 3 Present Past Performance Questionnaire .docx

Section L, Attachment 3: Present/Past Performance Questionnaire Commandwide O & M Project Execution Contract (COMPEC)

POSITION

Part I - To Be Confirmed/Corrected by Reference

1. Contract Title: ____________________________________________________________

2. Contract Number: _________________________________________________________

3. Teaming Partners: List separately all COMPEC Teaming Partners that worked on this effort (An effort is defined as a contract or a task order under an IDIQ contract). Lump the rest into “all other…” Identify for each contractor listed if they were a Prime or a subcontractor on this effort.

All other contractors not part of the proposed team

4. Contracting Agency or Customer: __________________________________________

5. Reference contact information: Identify those persons/customers most knowledgeable about the submitted contract. For Government contracts provide current information for the Government Program Manager, Project/Task Manager, Contracting Officer and Administrative Contracting Office. For commercial contracts, provide points of contact fulfilling these same roles. Any additional customers that have in-depth knowledge of the contract may be added.

6.

Contract type: Select all that apply.

· Cost Plus Fixed-Fee

· Firm-Fixed Price

· Task order under IDIQ

· Independent Contract

· Other ___________________

If the values are different, explain why: ___________________________________________

If the schedule has changed, explain why: _________________________________________

9. Place of performance:

· Continental US Specify State: _______________________________________________

· Other: __________________________________________________________________

10. Were tasks accomplished simultaneously on this project with other contracts at multiple locations?

· No

· Yes

11. Please check all types of services that apply to this effort: (Mark selections in first column)

Turn-Key

Work Plan (CWP/IWP) Construction

12 Please provide a brief description of service provided under this contract. Include details that will indicate specific efforts of key personnel identified in Question 13 below. Clearly demonstrate management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions, in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified. This may include a discussion of efforts accomplished by the Offeror, or applicable Teaming Partner, to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts as well as past efforts to identify and manage program risk. For example, submit quality performance indicators or other management indicators that clearly support that an Offeror, or applicable Teaming Partner, has overcome past problems.

13. Key Personnel: Specify by name, any key individual(s) who participated in the submitted effort and are also proposed to support the COMPEC acquisition. Indicate the roles on the submitted contract and the proposed role on the COMPEC acquisition. Also provide the number of projects currently being worked by the individual(s).

14. Rationale for effort relevance: Describe your rationale supporting your assertion of relevance of the submitted contract to the COMPEC acquisition. Clearly link the past performance information to the COMPEC Basic Contract Statement of Work (SOW), especially those requirements identified paragraph 11 above.

Part II - To Be Completed by Reference

Please provide your opinion on the contractor’s performance for the following statements by putting a check mark in the appropriate box using the following definitions:

EXCEPTIONAL - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contract's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to the effort assessed.

1. How well did the contractor demonstrate the ability to effectively perform multiple task orders concurrently?

2. How well did the contractor manage, design, and construct multiple types of projects with varying complexity?

3. How would you rate the quality and timeliness of submittals?

4. How effectively did the contractor execute mobilization?

5. How well did the contractor meet start-up timelines?

6. How well did the contractor respond to project request for proposals in terms of timeliness and substantiated subcontracting costs?

7. How well did the contractor maintain effective management and oversight of their subcontractor(s) to ensure task for multiple skills were provided?

8. How well did the contractor meet cost requirements?

9. How well did the contractor meet schedule requirements?

10. How well did the contractor meet quality requirements?

11. How effective was the management team?

12. How well did the contractor respond to issues raised by government oversight?

13. How effective was the contractor’s Quality Assurance/Quality Control management?

14. How well did the contractor identify and mitigate issues timely and accurately to make informed, proactive and corrective decisions?

15. Did the contractor have clear and concise lines of communication with all parties?

16. How well did the contractor coordinate worksite activities with applicable personnel to ensure the safety and protection of human health, and the environment; the prevention of damage to property, utilities, materials, supplies, and equipment; and the avoidance of work interruptions?

17. How effectively did the contractor manage Government Furnished Equipment (GFE)?

18. How well did the contractor protect existing site utilities, structures, surface features, service operations, monitoring wells and other types of wells, and the general site environment, including flora, fauna, water and air quality, both in preparation for and during construction?

19. Did the contractor have problems obtaining necessary bonding?

20. Contractor’s cost control. How well did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to or estimated price/cost? Describe the reasons for changes to contract/Task Order value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/under run, Government-imposed changes, etc.)?

21. How well did the contractor manage obtaining federal, state, local, and other applicable permits, access, agreements, licenses, and certificates required to perform and complete the contracted effort?

22. How well did the contractor comply with all applicable permit conditions?

23. How well did the contractor correct warranty and latent defects?

24. How well did the contractor demonstrate cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction?

25. Was the contractor issued a cure notice or a show cause notice?

26. Has the contractor ever not met contract standards/objectives/thresholds or been issued a notice for poor performance?

27. Did the contractor achieve small business subcontracting goals during contract performance?

28. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default?

29. What is your overall rating of the contractor’s performance?

30. Would you recommend this contractor?

Please explain.

31. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? If “Yes”, please identify contract/program and point of contact by name, organization, telephone number, and email address.

Name:

Organization:

Telephone:

Email:

32. Additional comments.