Attachment_3_-_Past_and_Present_Performance_Questionnaire_(4_Mar_16).pdf

FA5641-16-R-0001 - ATTACHMENT 3

QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONDENT LETTER

FROM: 764 SCONS/PKA

Unit 3024

APO AE 09021-0385

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Information

TO:

1. The 764th Specialized Contracting Squadron is in the process of conducting a source selection for USAFE mail handling and distribution, Germany Aerial Mail Terminal (GAMT II) requirement. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offeror's past performance on contracts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform. The Government depends on information received from those who have first-hand information, in order to evaluate the offeror's past performance.

2. Areas of interest in the offerors past performance are summarized in the electronic past performance questionnaire e-mailed to you by the offeror.

3. Although this questionnaire was distributed to you by the offeror/contractor, it is important you electronically complete the questionnaire and forward it directly to the Government Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) at the following e-mail address:

randall.johnson.14@us.af.mil and emely.reamsnyder@us.af.mil.

4. Please DO NOT return or e-mail the questionnaires back to the offeror or contractor. Once the questionnaire is filled out, it becomes source selection sensitive and needs to be handled accordingly. If you have any concerns please contact Mr. Randall Johnson at +49 (0)631-536- 7159 or Ms. Emely Reamsnyder at +49 (0)631-536-6374.

5. Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this source selection.

Sincerely, RANDALL JOHNSON

Procuring Contracting Officer

Attachment:

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire mailto:randall.johnson.14@us.af.mil mailto:emely.reamsnyder@us.af.mil

When Filled ln This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ___________________

Address: _____________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work*: ____________________________________________

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: _____________

Kilograms of Mail Processed Annually*: ____________

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror*: _______________________

Contractor Performed as*: � Prime Contractor � Sub-Contractor � Key Personnel

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _______________________ Title: _________________________

Address: ____________________ Telephone Number: _______________________

__________________________ Fax Number: _____________________________ __________________________ Email Address: ___________________________

C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: randall.johnson.14@us.af.mil and emely.reamsnyder@us.af.mil.

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (S, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor's performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A

NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY “U” RATINGS.

S U N Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Neutral

Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the clement or sub· element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual I performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

mailto:randall.johnson.14@us.af.mil mailto:emely.reamsnyder@us.af.mil

CONTRACTOR'S NAME: _________________ CONTRACT NUMBER: __________________

Place an "X" in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above. Provide comments in the remark section for any rating other than satisfactory (S).

The contractor: S U N

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

Remarks:

2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary. qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

5. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

6. Followed approved quality control plan.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

9. Identified problems as they occurred.

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

12. Developed realistic progress schedules.

13. Met established project schedules.

14. Was responsive to contract changes.

15. Provided adequate project supervision.

16. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

17. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

18. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

19. Demonstrated ability to process and move military mail in support of the U.S.

Government.

20. Was knowledgeable and responsive to the complexities of performing work at any international airport.

21. Displayed knowledge of and compliance with European Union regulations on aviation security (Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 of the European Parliament).

22. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

23. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks”.

YES/NO

24. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks”.

YES/NO

Remarks: ____________________________________________________________________