RFI Existing Fence Removal.pdf

PDF 762 KB Posted

Attached to
FA557026R0001 - Security Fencing, RAF Barford St John
Solicitation number
FA557026R0001
Issued by

About this file

This is a Request for Information (RFI) from the 422 Civil Engineer Squadron regarding existing fence removal as an optional component of the "Install Security Fence BstJ" project (Project Reference: AWJB 25-1006). The RFI was raised on April 17, 2026, with a need-by date of April 23, 2026, and was responded to on the same date by Darran Griffiths of 422 CES.

The contractor requested specific information about the existing fence to be removed, including the fence type, total length/quantity, disposal requirements, site constraints, and procedures for dismantling. The government response indicates that the existing fence consists of chain-link fencing with concrete posts totaling approximately 1,765 linear feet. Disposal has no restrictions, but waste transfer notes must be provided for any materials leaving the site for USVF/DIO environmental reporting. Site access will be unrestricted for the duration of proposed works. The removal work requires taking down the chain-link and concrete posts to just below ground level and backfilling with soil to promote grass growth. The RFI includes photographic documentation of the existing fencing conditions, depicting the chain-link fence with plastic-coated wire insulation, concrete posts, metal tension wire, and varying states of degradation.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Request For Information (RFI)

422 Civil Engineer Squadron Page 1 of 3

Project Title: Install Security Fence BstJ Project Ref: AWJB 25-1006

RFI Title: Existing Fence Removal (Option)

RFI Ref: 004

Date Raised: 17-April-2026

SECTION 1 - REQUEST

Request By: Contractor

Addressed To: 422 CES

Description:

• Type of existing fence (e.g., chain-link, mesh, etc.)

• Approximate total length/quantity of fencing to be removed

• Any specific disposal requirements or restrictions

• Any site constraints or access considerations related to this work

• Take down of existing chain-link and concrete posts

Need By Date: 23-April-2026

Attachments:

SECTION 2 - RESPONSE

Response By: Darran Griffiths, 422 CES

Date of Response: 23-April-2026

Description:

Type of existing fence – See attached Photos

Approximate total length - ≈ 1,765 linear feet

Specific disposal requirements or restrictions - No restrictions, waste transfer notes must be provided for any waste materials leaving the site, for USVF/DIO environmental reporting.

Site constraints - No restrictions, access to site will be provided for duration of proposed works.

Take down of existing chain-link and concrete posts – Take down to just below ground level and back-fill with soil to promote grass growth later

Attachments: Photos/Description of Existing Fencing

422 Civil Engineer Squadron Page 2 of 3

422 Civil Engineer Squadron Page 3 of 3

AWJB 25-1006
Project Ref:
Install Security Fence BstJ
Project Title:
004
RFI Ref:
Existing Fence Removal (Option)
RFI Title:
17-April-2026
Date Raised:
SECTION 1 - REQUEST
Contractor
Request By:
422 CES
Addressed To:
Description:
23-April-2026
Need By Date:
Attachments:
SECTION 2 - RESPONSE
Darran Griffiths, 422 CES
Response By:
Date of Response:
23-April-2026
Description:
Type of existing fence – See attached Photos
Approximate total length - ≈ 1,765 linear feet
Specific disposal requirements or restrictions - No restrictions, waste transfer notes must be provided for any waste materials leaving the site, for USVF/DIO environmental reporting.
Site constraints - No restrictions, access to site will be provided for duration of proposed works.
Take down of existing chain-link and concrete posts – Take down to just below ground level and back-fill with soil to promote grass growth later
Photos/Description of Existing Fencing
Attachments:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .