FA521524R0006 - Appendix B Self Scoring Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 302 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA521524R0006
- Issued by
-
Department of the Air Force
About this file
This document is a self-scoring matrix for a federal contract opportunity related to the Alaska Radar System (ARS) Operation and Maintenance. The ARS requirement consists of operations and maintenance of 15 geographically separated long-range radar sites, three remote radio sites, and the Maintenance Control and Communications Center (MC3) activities of the Regional Air Operations Center (RAOC) at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. The work supports the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and the United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) mission for air sovereignty within Alaska, and provides civil aircraft information to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The self-scoring matrix outlines technical experience, geographic expertise, workforce expertise, and past performance evaluation criteria, with each criteria having a maximum number of self-scored points. The offeror is to complete the matrix and provide supporting documentation to demonstrate their qualifications.
View the file
Other files
Show all 45
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Self Score Sheet
| PWS | Eval Criteria Section | Section Name | Category | Max No. of Work Samples (PWSs, SOWs) from the last 5 years | Max No. Self-Score points | Actual Self Scored Points | Instructions: No inputs on the sheet. Column G will reflect the score from each of the following sheets. The total score is reflected in cell G17. Add inputs only in green cells |
| Category I - Technical Experience | |||||||
| 1 | 1 | Radar O&M | Experience operating and maintaining land based, long range, L-band, solid state, 3-dimensional air surveillance phased array and monopulse secondary surveillance radar (MSSR), similar, but not limited to: FPS-117, TPS-77 and/or FPS-59 within the last 5 years | 5 | 350 | 350 | |
| 1.12. | 2 | Systems O&M | Experience operating and maintaining communication/electronic systems (inclusive of, at least: satellite, terrestrial, ground to air to ground, tactical data link systems) within the last 5 years | 5 | 80 | 60 | |
| 1.7. | 3 | Airfield O&M | Experience conducting Airfield Operations (inclusive of, at least, fire control, BASH, foreign object debris, weather, snow removal, runway service condition management, navigational aids, POL operations, aircraft ground handling, servicing, and NOTAM) (Minimum of 1 gravel runway work sample) within the last 5 years | 5 | 200 | 117 | |
| Appendix 11 | 4 | Facility O&M | Experience providing operations and maintenance support to aging facilities (inclusive of, at least, corrosion control, minor maintenance and repairs, and identification and handling of hazardous materials (e.g. lead, asbestos) within the last 5 years | 3 | 75 | 64 | |
| Category II - Geographic Expertise | |||||||
| Appendix 11 | 5 | Site Conditions | Experience operating at remote sites (inclusive of air access only, unimproved roads, and barge delivery), severe weather (-40 F to 90 F, 60+ MPH winds, significant snowfall accumulation, rime ice), and geographically-separated sites (within the last 5 years, with at least 1 year of overlapping performance across multiple work sample submissions). | 5 | 150 | 90 | |
| Category III - Workforce Expertise | |||||||
| 4.1.2. | 6 | Workforce Retention | Key personnel experience and staffing retention rates for the last 5 years, identifying personnel turnover rates at the corporate level, and on-site staffing support for similar services performed in remote areas. | 3 | 60 | 40 | |
| 1.6.11. | 7 | Training Management | Experience in curriculum development, management of lesson plans, associated training materials in the related fields inclusive of radar, communications, cybersecurity, weather observation, airfield operations, facility maintenance, vehicle maintenance, heavy equipment operations, safety, OSHA regulations, environmental requirements, engineering, security, services, and first aid within the last 5 years | 6 | 100 | 55 | |
| 4.1.2. | 8 | Workforce Qualifications | Highly-skilled workforce with certifications and demonstrated working knowledge | 8 | 80 | 80 | |
| Category V - Past Performance | |||||||
| N/A | 9 | Adapability | Experience in contract support requiring varying levels of effort, surge, and evolving mission needs. Requirements resulting from weather, logistics, military exercises, equipment upgrades, and VIP visits. Provide past situations within the last 5 years | 6 | 100 | 86 | |
| N/A | 10 | CPARs | Past validated CPAR ratings | N/A | 25 | 8 | |
| Total: | 950 |
| Radar O&M | Experience operating and maintaining land based, long range, L-band, solid state, 3-dimensional air surveillance phased array and monopulse secondary surveillance radar (MSSR), similar, but not limited to: FPS-117, TPS-77 and/or FPS-59 within the last 5 years | 5 | 350 | 350 | ||
| Systems O&M | Experience operating and maintaining communication/electronic systems (inclusive of, at least: satellite, terrestrial, ground to air to ground, tactical data link systems) within the last 5 years | 5 | 80 | 60 | 1 | Category I - Technical Experience |
| Airfield O&M | Experience conducting Airfield Operations (inclusive of, at least, fire control, BASH, foreign object debris, weather, snow removal, runway service condition management, navigational aids, POL operations, aircraft ground handling, servicing, and NOTAM) (Minimum of 1 gravel runway work sample) within the last 5 years | 5 | 200 | 117 | 0.75 | Category II - Geographic Expertise |
| Facility O&M | Experience providing operations and maintenance support to aging facilities (inclusive of, at least, corrosion control, minor maintenance and repairs, and identification and handling of hazardous materials (e.g. lead, asbestos) within the last 5 years | 3 | 75 | 64 | 0.585 | Category III - Workforce Expertise |
| Site Conditions | Experience operating at remote sites (inclusive of air access only, unimproved roads, and barge delivery), severe weather (-40 F to 90 F, 60+ MPH winds, significant snowfall accumulation, rime ice), and geographically-separated sites (within the last 5 years, with at least 1 year of overlapping performance across multiple work sample submissions). | 5 | 150 | 90 | 0.8533333333 | Category V - Past Performance |
| Workforce Retention | Key personnel experience and staffing retention rates for the last 5 years, identifying personnel turnover rates at the corporate level, and on-site staffing support for similar services performed in remote areas. | 3 | 60 | 40 | 0.6 | |
| Training Management | Experience in curriculum development, management of lesson plans, associated training materials in the related fields inclusive of radar, communications, cybersecurity, weather observation, airfield operations, facility maintenance, vehicle maintenance, heavy equipment operations, safety, OSHA regulations, environmental requirements, engineering, security, services, and first aid within the last 5 years | 6 | 100 | 55 | 0.6666666667 | |
| Workforce Qualifications | Highly-skilled workforce with certifications and demonstrated working knowledge | 8 | 80 | 80 | 0.55 | |
| Adapability | Experience in contract support requiring varying levels of effort, surge, and evolving mission needs. Requirements resulting from weather, logistics, military exercises, equipment upgrades, and VIP visits. Provide past situations within the last 5 years | 6 | 100 | 86 | 1 | |
| CPARs | Past validated CPAR ratings | N/A | 25 | 8 | 0.86 | |
| 0.32 |
Percent of Score Earned Per Category
Percent of Score Radar O & M Systems O & M Airfield O & M Facility O & M Site Conditions Workforce Retention Training Management Workforce Qualifications Adapability CPARs 1 0.75 0.58499999999999996 0.85333333333333339 0.6 0.66666666666666663 0.55000000000000004 1 0.86 0.32
| Radar O&M | |||||
| Experience operating and maintaining land based, long range, L-band, solid state, 3-dimensional air surveillance phased array and monopulse secondary surveillance radar (MSSR), similar, but not limited to: FPS-117, TPS-77 and/or FPS-59 within the last 5 years | Instructions: Enter the appropriate value inside the green box on column C. An entry of "1" reflects documented experience as specified in the criteria. An entry of "0" reflects no appropriate experience. | ||||
| Criteria: | Points: (enter "1" or "0") | PWS Reference | |||
| 1.1 | Land based, long range (up to 250nm), L-band, solid state, 3-dimensional (range, bearing, height) air surveillance phased array and monopulse secondary surveillance radar (MSSR). | 1 | Awaiting new PWS | ||
| 1.2 | Land or ship based, short range (up to 70nm), 2-dimensional (range and bearing) or 3-dimensional (range, bearing, height) air surveillance radar | ||||
| 1.3 | Fixed Direction Radar | 1 | |||
| 1.4 | Airborne Radar | 1 | |||
| Score Ratio: | 1 |
| Systems O&M | ||||
| Experience operating and maintaining communication/electronic systems (inclusive of, at least: satellite, terrestrial, ground to air to ground, tactical data link systems) within the last 5 years | Instructions: Enter the appropriate value inside the green box on column C. An entry of "1" reflects documented experience as specified in the criteria. An entry of "0" reflects no appropriate experience. | |||
| Criteria: | Points: (enter "1" or "0") | PWS Reference | ||
| 2.1 | Satellite | 1 | Awaiting new PWS | |
| 2.2 | Terrestrial | 1 | ||
| 2.3 | Ground to Air to Ground | 1 | ||
| 2.4 | Tactical Data Link Systems | |||
| Score Ratio: | 0.75 |
| Airfield O&M | |||||||
| Experience conducting Airfield Operations (inclusive of, at least, fire control, BASH, foreign object debris, weather, snow removal, runway service condition management, navigational aids, POL operations, aircraft ground handling, servicing, and NOTAM) (Minimum of 1 gravel runway work sample) within the last 5 years | Instructions: Enter the appropriate value inside the green box on column C. An entry of "1" reflects documented experience as specified in the criteria. An entry of "0" reflects no appropriate experience. | ||||||
| Category: | Points: (enter "1" or "0") | Scale Factor: | PWS Reference | ||||
| 3.1 | Fire Support | 1 | Awaiting new PWS | 10 | 1 | ||
| 3.2 | BASH | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0.9 | ||
| 3.3 | Foreign Object Debris | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0.8 | ||
| 3.4 | Weather Operations | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0.7 | ||
| 3.5 | Heavy Equipment Snow Removal | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0.6 | ||
| 3.6 | Runway Service Condition Management | 2 | 5 | 0.5 | |||
| 3.7 | Navigational Aids | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0.4 | ||
| 3.8 | NOTAM | 1 | 1 | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||
| 3.9 | Gravel Runway Maintenance | 2 | |||||
| Score Ratio: | 0.5833333333 |
| Facility O&M | |||||
| Experience providing operations and maintenance support to aging facilities (inclusive of, at least, corrosion control, minor maintenance and repairs, and identification and handling of hazardous materials (e.g. lead, asbestos) within the last 5 years | Instructions: Enter the appropriate value inside the green box on column C. An entry of "1" reflects documented experience as specified in the criteria. An entry of "0" reflects no appropriate experience. | ||||
| Criteria: | Points: (enter "1" or "0") | Scale Factor | PWS Reference | ||
| 4.1 | O&M with Facilities Older Than 1970 | 1 | 3 | Awaiting new PWS | |
| 4.2 | Corrosion Control | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4.3 | Minor Repairs (<$15k) | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4.4 | Lead Identification and Handling | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4.5 | Asbestos Identification and Handling | 1 | |||
| Score Ratio: | 0.8571428571 |
| Site Conditions | |||
| Experience operating at remote sites (inclusive of air access only, unimproved roads, and barge delivery), severe weather (-40 F to 90 F, 60+ MPH winds, significant snowfall accumulation, rime ice), and geographically-separated sites (within the last 5 years, with at least 1 year of overlapping performance across multiple work sample submissions). | Instructions: Enter the appropriate value inside the green box on column C. An entry of "1" reflects documented experience as specified in the criteria. An entry of "0" reflects no appropriate experience. | ||
| Criteria: | Points: (enter "1" or "0") | ||
| 5.1 | Air Access Only Sites | ||
| 5.2 | Unimproved/Mountainous Roads | 1 | |
| 5.3 | High Winds | 1 | |
| 5.4 | Snowfall | 1 | |
| 5.5 | Rime Ice | ||
| Score Ratio: | 0.6 |
| Workforce Retention | |||
| Key personnel experience and staffing retention rates for the last 5 years, identifying personnel turnover rates at the corporate level, and on-site staffing support for similar services performed in remote areas. | Instructions: Enter the value out of 100 inside the green box on column C. . | ||
| Criteria: | Enter Rate as a Percentage from 1-100: | ||
| 6.1 | Key Personnel Retention Rate | 100 | |
| 6.2 | Corporate Retention Rate | 100 | |
| 6.3 | On-Site Retention Rate | ||
| Score Ratio: | 0.6666666667 |
| Training Management | |||||
| Experience in curriculum development, management of lesson plans, associated training materials in the related fields inclusive of radar, communications, cybersecurity, weather observation, airfield operations, facility maintenance, vehicle maintenance, heavy equipment operations, safety, OSHA regulations, environmental requirements, engineering, security, services, and first aid within the last 5 years | Instructions: Enter the appropriate value inside the green box on column C. An entry of "1" reflects documented experience as specified in the criteria. An entry of "0" reflects no appropriate experience. | ||||
| Criteria for Training Materials: | Points: (enter "1" or "0") | Scale Factor | PWS Reference | ||
| 7.1 | Radar | 1 | 3 | 4.1.2.12 | |
| 7.2 | Communications | 2 | 1.3.1.2 | ||
| 7.3 | Cybersecurity | 1 | 2 | Awaiting new PWS | |
| 7.4 | Weather Observing | 1 | 1 | ||
| 7.5 | Airfield Operations | 1 | 1 | ||
| 7.6 | Facility Maintenance | 1 | 1 | ||
| 7.7 | Vehicle Maintenance | 1 | 1 | ||
| 7.8 | Heavy Equipment Operations | 2 | |||
| 7.9 | Site-specific Safety | 1 | 1 | ||
| 7.10 | Applicable OSHA Regs | 1 | |||
| 7.11 | Enviromental Requirements | 1 | |||
| 7.12 | Related Engineering | 1 | |||
| 7.13 | Physical Security | 1 | |||
| 7.14 | Hospitality Services | 1 | 1 | ||
| 7.15 | First Aid | 1 | |||
| Score Ratio: | 0.55 |
| Workforce Qualifications | ||||
| Highly-skilled workforce with certifications and demonstrated working knowledge | Instructions: Enter the appropriate value inside the green box on column C. An entry of "1" reflects documented experience as specified in the criteria. An entry of "0" reflects no appropriate experience. | |||
| Criteria: | Points: (enter "1" or "0") | PWS Reference | ||
| 8.1 | Contractor Project Manager | 1 | 4.1.2.1 | |
| 8.2 | Operations Manager | 1 | 4.1.2.2 | |
| 8.3 | Logistics Manager | 1 | 4.1.2.3 | |
| 8.4 | Quality Control Manager | 1 | 4.1.2.4 | |
| 8.5 | Lead Engineer | 1 | 4.1.2.5 | |
| 8.6 | Contractor Site Leads | 1 | 4.1.2.6 | |
| 8.7 | Weather Observers | 1 | 4.1.2.8 | |
| 8.8 | Network Administrator | 1 | 4.1.2.9 | |
| 8.9 | Airfield Manager | 1 | 4.1.2.10 | |
| 8.10 | Meteorological and Navigational Equipment Maintenance Technician | 1 | 4.1.2.11 | |
| 8.11 | Cybersecurity | 1 | Awaiting new PWS | |
| 8.12 | Emergency Response | 1 | 4.1.2.13 | |
| 8.13 | Hazardous Waste/Material Specialist | 1 | 4.1.2.14 | |
| Score Ratio: | 1 |
| Adapability | ||||
| Experience in contract support requiring varying levels of effort, surge, and evolving mission needs. Requirements resulting from weather, logistics, military exercises, equipment upgrades, and VIP visits. Provide past situations within the last 5 years | Instructions: Enter the appropriate value inside the green box on column C. An entry of "1" reflects documented experience as specified in the criteria. An entry of "0" reflects no appropriate experience. | |||
| 9.1 | Criteria: | Points: (enter "1" or "0") | PWS Reference | |
| 9.2 | Surge Support* | 1 | ||
| 9.3 | Significant Weather Situations | 1 | 1.9.14.2.7 | |
| 9.4 | Logistics | 1 | 1.13 | |
| 9.5 | Facility Projects | 1.9.2.2.2.2 | ||
| 9.6 | Time Compliance Technical Orders | 1 | 1.12.3 | |
| 9.7 | DV/VIP Visitors | 1 | Awaiting new PWS | |
| 9.8 | Emergency Response | 1 | ||
| Score Ratio: | 0.8571428571 | |||
| *Surge Support | Sudden brief increase of personnel needing various levels of support |
Bright123$
| Past validated CPAR ratings | Points: (enter "-1", "0" or "1" in rows 3-6) | |||
| Contract Number & Year Earned: | ||||
| 10.1 | Quality | -1 | ||
| 10.2 | Schedule | |||
| 10.3 | Management | 1 | ||
| 10.4 | Regulatory Compliance | 1 | ||
| Score Ratio | 0.3333333333 | |||
| Instructions: In row 2, enter the contract number and the information year. Enter a numerical value corresponding to the relevant CPAR as shown in the provided table. Only submit CPARs for artifacts related to the previously stated requirements in Eval Criteria Section 1-4 within the last 5 years, add more columns as necessary. | Unsatisfactory | -1 | ||
| Marginal | -1 | |||
| Very Good | 1 | |||
| Exceptional | 1 |
Summation Instructions
| Instructions for Atch 09 Self Scoring Matrix FOPR 48 | |
| Tab Scoring Sheet: | The purpose of this workbook is to assist the Offeror in calculating the number of positions being utilized by work sample against some of the evaluation criteria. This will also provide additional reference points to the Government Technical team in helping better locate and validate the Offeror's substantiation of their Self-Score |
| Summation Tab | This worksheet will automatically populate the Offeror's Self Score based on the data entered on the Work Sample Sheet tabs. |
| Work Sample Sheets: | Match up the Work Samples being used based on the identifier selected in Attachment 10, Work Sample Cover Sheet, to the tabs in this workbook. Below is a sample worksheet filled out: |
| Contract/TO #: | FA9876-17-F-1234 | Enter in the Work Sample Contract/TO # |
| WS Category | Cat-1 | Select the Work Sample Category applicable to the Work Sample based on the categories listed in Attachment 05 Eval Criteria section 3.0 |
| # Geo Locations | 2 | Starting with WS 1, enter in the number of geographically separated locations (GSL) on the Contract/TO. On WS 2, enter in the number of GSLs that were not included with WS 1. Continue with WS 3, 4, and 5. |
| Each GSL can only be counted once. For example, WS 1 has GSLs of Robins AFB and Hill AFB, so a 2 would be entered. WS 2 has GSLs of Robins AFB and WPAFB, a 1 would be entered as Robins AFB was already accounted for. WS 3 has GSLs of Hill AFB, WPAFB, Tinker AFB, and Hanscom AFB, so a 2 would be entered to account for the new GSLs. |
| Criteria 3.1.1 (Point in Time): | 9/15/16 | Criteria 3.2.3 (Point in Time): | N/A | Enter in the Single Point in Time that will be used for each specific Criteria. If the work sample does not address one of the Criteria, enter N/A for the Date in Time. The sample shows for Criteria 3.1.5 the Single Point in Time used to determine the number of Positions is 15 September 2016. The sample uses a different Point in Time for Criteria 3.2.5, 15 June 2017. Criteria 3.2.4 is not covered by this sample so N/A was entered. The Point/Period in Time entered here will be checked against tte Start and End Dates entered in Columns O and P. |
| Criteria 3.1.3 (Period in Time): | 9/15/2016-11/13/2016 | Criteria 3.2.4 (Point in Time): | N/A | |
| Criteria 3.1.4 (Period in Time): | 9/15/2016-10/14/2016 | Criteria 3.2.5 (Point in Time): | 6/15/17 | |
| Criteria 3.1.5 (Point in Time): | 9/15/16 | Criteria 3.3.1 (Point in Time): | 6/15/17 | |
| Criteria 3.2.1 (Point in Time): | 9/15/16 | Criteria 3.3.2 (Point in Time): | 6/15/17 | |
| Criteria 3.2.2 (Point in Time): | 9/15/16 |
| Position Identification | Evaluation Criteria | |||||||||||||||
| UID | Name | Labor Category | 3.1.1 | 3.1.3 | 3.1.4 | 3.1.5 | 3.2.1 | 3.2.2 | 3.2.3 | 3.2.4 | 3.2.5 | 3.3.1 | 3.3.2 | Start Date | End Date or Present | Reference(s) |
| 1234.ABC.01 | Johnson, John | Program Manager | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6/1/16 | 5/30/18 | WS-1, Pgs 4, 18 | |||||||
| 1234.ABC.02 | Adams, Abigail | Systems Engineer | 1 | 1 | 6/1/16 | 4/15/17 | WS-1, Pgs 4, 26 | |||||||||
| 1234.ABC.02 | Richards, Robert | Systems Engineer | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5/1/17 | Present | WS-1, Pgs 5, 52 | |||||||
| 1234.ABC.03 | Griffin, Gail | Acquisition Logistician | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6/1/16 | Present | WS-1, Pgs 4, 28 |
| Unique Identification Number (UID): Enter in the UID used during the performance of the contract or if no UIDs were used create a UID for each unique position | |
| Name: | Enter the full name of the individual associated with the UID under Column A |
| Labor Category: | Enter in the labor category as used in the performance of the contract |
| Evaluation Category: | Put a "1" under those columns in which a position meets the requirements for each criteria. In the Sample UID 1234.ABC.01, John Johnson, applies to Categories 3.1.1, 3.1.4, 3.1.4, and 3.2.2, thus "1"s were included under those Criteria |
| Start Date: | Enter the date upon which the contractor personnel under Column B began working, not the date the UID under Column A was put on contract |
| End Date or Present: | Enter either the date upon which the contractor personnel under Column B stopped working or enter "Present" if they are still currently working under the contract |
| Reference(s): | Include the reference(s) that substantiate this position/contractor personnel within Volume II |
Summation
| FOPR # 48 - AFLCMC/WWU (F-22 Division) |
| SOLICITATION # FA8622-19-R-8138 |
| ATTACHMENT 09 |
| SELF-SCORING MATRIX |
| OFFEROR NAME: [FILL IN OFFEROR NAME HERE] |
| Note: See Attachment 05, Evaluation Criteria, for Additional Information |
| Note: Offerors only fill in the orange shaded blocks throughout |
| Eval Criteria Section | Category | Offeror's Position/Location Total | Points Per Position/ Location (1,000 Points/Max. Count) | Weight Factor | Max. Possible Points | Offeror's Self-Score | Offeror's Weighted Self-Score | Offeror's WS Rollup | WS-1 | WS-2 | WS-3 | WS-4 | WS-5 | ||||||
| 3.1 | General | ||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 3.1.1 | Number of total positions (Max. count = 93) | 10.75 | 5 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 3.1.2 | Number of geographically separated work locations supported (Max. count = 3) | 333.33 | 1 | 1,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| 2 | 3.1.3 | Number of non-incumbent positions hired in a 30 day span (Max. count = 16) | 62.50 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 3 | 3.1.4 | Number of incumbent positions transitioned in a 60 day span (Max. count = 77) | 12.99 | 4 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 4 | 3.1.5 | Number of total positions supporting programs which require an adjudicated Single Scope Background Investigation (SSBI)/Tier 5 Investigation | |||||||||||||||||
| (Max. count = 93) | 10.75 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 3.2 | Technical | ||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | 3.2.1 | Number of positions whose primary purpose is providing A&AS support for fifth-generation fighter aircraft (Max. count = 86) | 11.63 | 5 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 6 | 3.2.2 | Number of positions whose primary purpose is providing A&AS support for low-observable non-fighter aircraft (Max. count = 86) | 11.63 | 4 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 7 | 3.2.3 | Number of positions whose primary purpose is providing A&AS support for modern fourth-generation fighter aircraft | |||||||||||||||||
| (Max. count = 86) | 11.63 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| 8 | 3.2.4 | Number of positions whose primary purpose is providing acquisition program management A&AS support for fifth-generation fighter aircraft (Max. count = 34) | 29.41 | 4 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 9 | 3.2.5 | Number of positions whose primary purpose is providing acquisition program management A&AS support for low-observable non-fighter aircraft (Max. count = 34) | 29.41 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 10 | 3.2.6 | Number of positions whose primary purpose is providing acquisition program management A&AS support for modern fourth-generation fighter aircraft (Max. count = 34) | 29.41 | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 11 | 3.2.7 | Number of positions who provide Agile acquisition A&AS support for fifth-generation fighter aircraft (Max. count = 30) | 33.33 | 5 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 12 | 3.2.8 | Number of positions who provide Agile acquisition A&AS support for low-observable non-fighter aircraft (Max. count = 30) | 33.33 | 4 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 13 | 3.2.9 | Number of positions who provide Agile acquisition A&AS support for modern fourth-generation fighter aircraft (Max. count = 30) | 33.33 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 14 | 3.2.10 | Number of positions whose primary purpose is providing security management A&AS support (Max. count = 8) | 125.00 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| 15 | 3.2.11 | Number of positions whose primary purpose is providing system security engineering (SSE) A&AS support (Max. count = 4) | 250.00 | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval Criteria Section | Category | 1000 Points | 800 Points | 600 Points | 400 Points | 200 Points | Weight Factor | Max. Possible Points | Offeror's Self-Score | Offeror's Weighted Self-Score | Offeror's WS Rollup | WS-1 | WS-2 | WS-3 | WS-4 | WS-5 | |||
| 16 | 3.2.12 | Providing relevant avionics engineering A&AS support | DoD Fifth-Generation Fighter Aircraft | DoD Low-Observable Non-Fighter Aircraft | DoD Modern Fourth-Generation Fighter Aircraft | DoD Major Weapon System Aircraft | Other DoD Aircraft | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 17 | 3.2.13 | Providing relevant radar engineering A&AS support | DoD Fifth-Generation Fighter Aircraft | DoD Low-Observable Non-Fighter Aircraft | DoD Modern Fourth-Generation Fighter Aircraft | DoD Major Weapon System Aircraft | Other DoD Aircraft | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 18 | 3.2.14 | Providing relevant communication, navigation, and identification engineering A&AS support | DoD Fifth-Generation Fighter Aircraft | DoD Low-Observable Non-Fighter Aircraft | DoD Modern Fourth-Generation Fighter Aircraft | DoD Major Weapon System Aircraft | Other DoD Aircraft | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 19 | 3.2.15 | Providing relevant electronic warfare engineering A&AS support | DoD Fifth-Generation Fighter Aircraft | DoD Low-Observable Non-Fighter Aircraft | DoD Modern Fourth-Generation Fighter Aircraft | DoD Major Weapon System Aircraft | Other DoD Aircraft | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eval Criteria Section | Category | 1000 Points | 750 Points | 500 Points | 0 Points | -500 Points | -1000 Points | Weight Factor | Max. Possible Points | Offeror's Self-Score |
| 3.3 | DSS Vunerability Rating | |||||||||
| 3.3.1 | Most recent DSS vulnerability assessment | Superior | Commendable | Satisfactory | No Current Rating Available | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | 1 | 1,000 |
| Eval Criteria Section | Category | Percentage of CPAR Ratings (Cannot Exceed 100.00% in Total) | Points for Each Rating | Weight Factor | Max Possible Points | Offeror's Self-Score | Offeror's Weighted Self-Score |
| 3.4 | Work Sample CPAR Ratings | ||||||
| 3.4.1 | CPAR categories rated "exceptional" over last 5 years | 1,000 | 10 | 10,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.4.2 | CPAR categories rated "very good" over last 5 years | 750 | 10 | 7,500 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.4.3 | CPAR categories rated "satisfactory" over last 5 years | 500 | 10 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.4.4 | CPAR categories rated "not applicable" over last 5 years | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.4.5 | CPAR categories rated "marginal" over last 5 years | (500) | 10 | (5,000) | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.4.6 | CPAR categories rated "unsatisfactory" over last 5 years | (1,000) | 10 | (10,000) | 0 | 0 |
Totals 0.00% 10,000 0 0
| Maximum Total Score | 54,000 |
| Offeror's Total Self-Score | 0 |
WS-1
| Work Sample 1 |
| Contract/TO #: |
| WS Category |
| # Geo Locations |
| Criteria 3.1.1 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.3 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.9 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.1.3 (Period in Time): | Criteria 3.2.4 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.10 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.1.4 (Period in Time): | Criteria 3.2.5 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.11 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.1.5 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.6 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.12 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.2.1 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.7 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.13 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.2.2 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.8 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.3.1 (Point in Time): |
| Position Identification | Evaluation Criteria | Period of Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| UID | Name | Labor Category | 3.1.1 | 3.1.3 | 3.1.4 | 3.1.5 | 3.2.1 | 3.2.2 | 3.2.3 | 3.2.4 | 3.2.5 | 3.2.6 | 3.2.7 | 3.2.8 | 3.2.9 | 3.2.10 | 3.2.11 | 3.2.12 | 3.2.13 | 3.2.14 | 3.2.15 | Start Date | End Date or Present | Reference(s) |
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WS-2
| Work Sample 2 |
| Contract/TO #: |
| WS Category |
| # Geo Locations |
| Criteria 3.1.1 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.3 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.9 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.1.3 (Period in Time): | Criteria 3.2.4 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.10 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.1.4 (Period in Time): | Criteria 3.2.5 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.11 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.1.5 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.6 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.12 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.2.1 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.7 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.13 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.2.2 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.8 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.3.1 (Point in Time): |
| Position Identification | Evaluation Criteria | Period of Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| UID | Name | Labor Category | 3.1.1 | 3.1.3 | 3.1.4 | 3.1.5 | 3.2.1 | 3.2.2 | 3.2.3 | 3.2.4 | 3.2.5 | 3.2.6 | 3.2.7 | 3.2.8 | 3.2.9 | 3.2.10 | 3.2.11 | 3.2.12 | 3.2.13 | 3.2.14 | 3.2.15 | Start Date | End Date or Present | Reference(s) |
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WS-3
| Work Sample 3 |
| Contract/TO #: |
| WS Category |
| # Geo Locations |
| Criteria 3.1.1 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.3 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.9 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.1.3 (Period in Time): | Criteria 3.2.4 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.10 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.1.4 (Period in Time): | Criteria 3.2.5 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.11 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.1.5 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.6 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.12 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.2.1 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.7 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.13 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.2.2 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.8 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.3.1 (Point in Time): |
| Position Identification | Evaluation Criteria | Period of Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| UID | Name | Labor Category | 3.1.1 | 3.1.3 | 3.1.4 | 3.1.5 | 3.2.1 | 3.2.2 | 3.2.3 | 3.2.4 | 3.2.5 | 3.2.6 | 3.2.7 | 3.2.8 | 3.2.9 | 3.2.10 | 3.2.11 | 3.2.12 | 3.2.13 | 3.2.14 | 3.2.15 | Start Date | End Date or Present | Reference(s) |
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WS-4
| Work Sample 4 |
| Contract/TO #: |
| WS Category |
| # Geo Locations |
| Criteria 3.1.1 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.3 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.9 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.1.3 (Period in Time): | Criteria 3.2.4 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.10 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.1.4 (Period in Time): | Criteria 3.2.5 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.11 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.1.5 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.6 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.12 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.2.1 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.7 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.13 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.2.2 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.8 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.3.1 (Point in Time): |
| Position Identification | Evaluation Criteria | Period of Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| UID | Name | Labor Category | 3.1.1 | 3.1.3 | 3.1.4 | 3.1.5 | 3.2.1 | 3.2.2 | 3.2.3 | 3.2.4 | 3.2.5 | 3.2.6 | 3.2.7 | 3.2.8 | 3.2.9 | 3.2.10 | 3.2.11 | 3.2.12 | 3.2.13 | 3.2.14 | 3.2.15 | Start Date | End Date or Present | Reference(s) |
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WS-5
| Work Sample 5 |
| Contract/TO #: |
| WS Category |
| # Geo Locations |
| Criteria 3.1.1 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.3 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.9 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.1.3 (Period in Time): | Criteria 3.2.4 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.10 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.1.4 (Period in Time): | Criteria 3.2.5 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.11 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.1.5 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.6 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.12 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.2.1 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.7 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.13 (Point in Time): |
| Criteria 3.2.2 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.2.8 (Point in Time): | Criteria 3.3.1 (Point in Time): |
| Position Identification | Evaluation Criteria | Period of Performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| UID | Name | Labor Category | 3.1.1 | 3.1.3 | 3.1.4 | 3.1.5 | 3.2.1 | 3.2.2 | 3.2.3 | 3.2.4 | 3.2.5 | 3.2.6 | 3.2.7 | 3.2.8 | 3.2.9 | 3.2.10 | 3.2.11 | 3.2.12 | 3.2.13 | 3.2.14 | 3.2.15 | Start Date | End Date or Present | Reference(s) |
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .