3_RFP_Atc_J-5a_1stQA.XLSX
XLSX spreadsheet 18 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA5209-19-R-A006
About this file
This document contains questions and answers related to solicitation number FA5209-19-R-A006 for an Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity Multiple Award Construction Contract to provide general construction services at U.S. Army and Air Force installations in Japan. The contract has a one-year base period and nine one-year options, with a minimum value of $2,000 and maximum total value of $990 million. Services will include multiple disciplines such as design-build and construction. A pre-proposal conference will be held on June 13, 2019 to discuss the mock project and solicit questions, which are due by June 20. Past performance questionnaires must be submitted by June 28. Proposals in response to the solicitation are due by July 10, 2019. The Air Force Pacific intends to award up to ten IDIQ contracts to provide general construction services at locations including Yokota Air Base and its geographically separated units through June 2030.
New RFP Attachment J-5a - Questions & Answers #1
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 66 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet 1
FA5209-19-R-A006
Attachment J-5 Questions & Answers #1
| Question | |||||
| No. | Reference | QUESTION | GOVERNMENT RESPONSE | ||
| 1 | Mock Project | Fire suppression system and fire alarm equipment were equipped in As-built drawings. | |||
| Please clarify equipment to be kept or to be newly designed. | 既存図には次の消火設備と火報設備が設置されているようです。これらの消火設備の残す部分と新規に設計する部分を明確にご指示下さい。 きぞん ず つぎ しょうか せつび かほう せつび せっち しょうか せつび のこ ぶぶん しんき せっけい ぶぶん めいかく しじ くだ | Remove all existing equipment and install all new equipment based on SOW. | |||
| 2 | Mock Project | Please indicate wet sprinklers shall be used or not. | 湿式ｽﾌﾟﾘﾝｸﾗｰ設備になりますか、ご指示下さい。 しつ しき せつび しじ くだ | Wet sprinklers in accordance with NFPA. | |
| 3 | Mock Project | Please indicate vertical axis electric motor driven fire pump and underground tank shall be used or not. | 縦軸型電気ﾓｰﾀｰ消火ﾎﾟﾝﾌﾟと地下水槽になりますか、ご指示下さい。 たてじく かた でんき しょうか ちか すいそう しじ くだ | New vertical axis electric motor driven fire pump and underground tank shall be required. | |
| 4 | Mock Project | Please specify criteria for newly designed fire equipment to be adapted. (Example: NFPA13-2019 Sprinkler System, or NFPA11 Foam System, ETL, UFC) | 新規に設計する消火設備の採用基準をご指示下さい。 | ||
| (一例としてNFPA13-2019 Sprinkler System、 or NFPA11 Foam System, ETL, UFC) | The Contractor shall consult this matter with the US certified |
Protection Engineer to determine which chapter is applicable after verifying the site condition. Refer SOW IV. A. 5.
| 5 | Mock Project | In the case of designing foam fire suppression system, please indicate which shall be used for ones discharging from ceiling, high foaming type or low foaming type. | 泡消火設備を新規に設計する場合、天井部分から放出する設備は、高発泡消火設備か低発泡消火設備かご指示下さい。 あわ しょうか せつび しんき せっけい ばあい てんじょう ぶぶん ほうしゅつ せつび たか はつ あわ しょうか せつび ひく はっぽう しょうか せつび しじ くだ | Foaming type shall not be required based on the existing usage situation. |
| 6 | Mock Project | Please indicate classification of hazard level by building use. | 建物の用途別危険度の分類のご指示をお願い致します。 | Ordinary group 2 hazard shall be adapted in accordance with NFPA. |
| 7 | Mock Project | Please indicate if the capacity for existing main sprinkler piping is enough. | 既存ﾒｲﾝｽﾌﾟﾘﾝｸﾗｰ配管の容量が問題ないか、ご指示下さい。 きぞん はいかん ようりょう もんだい しじ くだ | The Contractor shall consult this matter with the US certified Fire |
Protection Engineer to determine if the capacity is sufficient. Refer the SOW paragraph II.D.8 and Attachment 5, Water Flow Test report.
| 8 | RFP, Section L | May we submit CCASS evaluation sheet in lieu of asking customers evaluation regarding with past performance evaluation? Should we submit both Attachment J-4 and hard copy of CCASS evaluation sheets with our proposal, if CCASS evaluation sheet is acceptable? | 工事評価に関して、顧客に対して評価を依頼する代わりにCCASS評価がある場合はそれで代替えができますか？ もしそれがで可能な時は J-4の書類に記入し、CCASS評価書のハードコピーともに入札書に同封すればよろしいですか？ | The Government requests the submissions of Past Performance Questionnaires(PPQs). See Section L, L-100, Para B.3. | |
| 9 | RFP, Section L | In accordance with L-100 of RFP, page 32,3. Part III (a) Quality and Satisfaction Ration of Contract, Provide any information currently available (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) that demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and/or quality of completed and/or ongoing contracts and other items. However those information are written in Past performance information PART III (C) and evaluation will be in the answer of evaluator Part III (b). Therefore, may we write as a answer to Part III(a) “Please refer items (b) and (c) of Part III” ? | RFP23ページL-100パート32,3.パートIII(a)にて要求されている工事実績および/または完成した顧客満足度に関する記述ですが、それはパートIIIの（ｂ）顧客評価（c）工事経歴に記入されています。よって 「パートIII（b）及び（ｃ）を参照してくださ」 という書き方でよろしいでしょうか？ | Please carefully read L-100, Part III, sections (a) through (e) to understand the different past performance information requested. It is up to the contractor to determine how to prepare its past performance appraisal.” |
VOGELEY, CHARLES S GS-13 USAF PACAF 5 AF/JA: VOGELEY, CHARLES S GS-13 USAF PACAF 5 AF/JA:
It may be helpful to explain that the parts in section III (a) (b) and (c) ask for different sorts of information, though they look like similar requests. Making the statement to prepare in accordance with Part III does not really address the question asked. The are assuming part (a) is duplicative of (b) and (c). I don't think it is too much to tell the contractors that the requested information is a little different.
| 10 | RFP, Section L | Should we submit our proposal documents including SF1442 in two rings binding holder? | SF1442を含む入札書類は2リングのファイルに綴って提出すべきですか？ | As stated in L-100, paragraph 4.(j), elaborate formats, bindings, and color presentations are not desired or required. |
| 11 | RFP, Section J | We received J-3.c.2, EXEMPTION FROM JAPANESE CUSTOMS DUTIES AND TAXES PURSUANT TO STATUS OF FORCES AGREEMENT. Should Type and Percentage or Tax and Amount of Duty or Tax Excluded in Yen be for Mock Project? | J-3.c.2に軍協定による免税措置の記入 |
ですが、Mock Project を対象とした金額
| を記入するのですか？ | Yes (Refer to Attachment J1, Para K003) | |||
| 12 | RFP, Section M | In accordance with the solicitation Section M, B(2) page 35, the value ranging of past performance project is from PY25,000,000 to JPY100,000,000. We have very relevant past performed project, but value is about JPY 670,000,000. Would such over value ranging project be out of your evaluation or lower rating? | プロジェクト評価に関して、Section M, B(2) page 35に￥25,000,000から | |
| ￥100,000,000とありますが、今回のプロジェクトと関連性がある工事があるのですが、金額が約¥670,000,000です。評価の対象とはなりませんか。或いは評価が低くなりますでしょうか。 | PPI relevancy will be evaluated based on scope, complexity and magnitude. Very Relevant contract performance efforts involved essentially the same scope, magnitude of effort, and complexities to that required by this solicitation. In addition, the performance must have been concurrent (overlapping performance periods) with at least one other project of equal or greater magnitude and performed at a separate geographic location. |
Any project greater than the range will not be negatively evaluated for the magnitude of effort portion to determine relevancy.
| 13 | RFP, Section M | 1. RFP-a, page35, section M (2), past performance project value ranging from JPY25,000,000 to JPY100,000,000, We have work experiences in Design Build project value over JPY100,000,000. Is it possible for us to submit the DB projects each values over JPY100,000,000 as past performance proposal? | RFPの３５ページ、 Section M(2)に、”ast performance project value ranging from JPY25,000,000 to JPY100,000,000”とありますが、弊社はJPY100,000,000超えの設計施工のProjectがあります。JPY100,000,000超えの設計施工の工事実績を提出してよろしいでしょうか？ | Same answer as above |
| 14 | Mock Project | There was no description regaring Bid Guarantee for the Mock Project in the RFP. |
Do we need one for the Mock project? If so, please provide us information.
Mock Projectに関して、Bid Guaranteeの記述がございませんが、提出は必要でしょうか？必要でしたら、詳しい情報をお願いします。 Bid Guarantee is not required for the Mock Project.
For the actual task order, only Performance Bonds will be required.
Refer to Attachment J-1, H003 & K002.
| 15 | Section J-1, K002 | We would like to propose as a prime offeror, can we use the Past Performance Information performed with JV in the past five years? | 弊社は、元受けとして入札する予定です。ジョイントベンチャーとしての過去５年以内の工事実績を提出してよろしいでしょうか？ | Your firm shall submit past performance solely for your firm. The Government will accept your firm's past performance as a prime contractor. If your firm is proposing as a JV, please refer to L-100, para B.3.(e). |
| 16 | Peformance Bond | RFP-Attach J1, page 9, K002 under Performance Bonds. |
Is this Y800,000,000 amount obtained from a surety company or a total amount obtained from a few surety companies?
| RFP添付J-1９ページ目の履行保証に関して。 | |
| ８億円分の保証の念書は、１社からになりますでしょうか、それとも数社からの合計金額となりますでしょうか？ | You may submit the letter of intent either from a single surety or multiple sureties. |
| &11QAs for FA5209-19-R-A006 | &12 |
| Sheet &P of &N |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .