FA500018R00020001_-_Amendment_1.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as p rovid ed herein, all terms and cond itions o f th e document referenced in Item 9A o r 10 A, as hereto fore chang ed , remains un ch an ged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND T IT LE OF SIGNER (T ype or print )

30-105-04EXCEP TION T O SF 30

AP PROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) P rescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The reason for this amendment is to:

Extend the proposal due date f rom 7 March 2018 at 4:00pm Alaska Standard Time (AST) to 9 March 2018 at 4:00pm (A ST).

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 4

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 22-Feb-2018

16B. UNITED STAT ES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signa ture of Cont ract ing Officer)(Signat ure of person aut horized t o sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONT RACT OR (No., St reet , County, Sta te and Zip Code) X FA 500018R0002

X 9B. DATED (SEE IT EM 11)

15-Feb-2018

10B. DATED (SEE IT EM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS IT EM ONLY AP PLIES TO AMENDMENT S OF SOLICITAT IONS

X Th e ab ove n umbered solicitation is amend ed as set forth in Item 1 4. Th e hou r and date sp ecified for receipt o f Offer X is extend ed , is not extended.

Offer mu st ackn owled ge receipt of this amen dment p rior to the h our an d d ate specified in the solicitation or as amen ded b y o ne of the following method s:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15 , and returnin g 1 co pies of the amen dment; (b ) By ackn owled ging receipt of this amen dment o n each copy of the o ffer sub mitted ;

o r (c) By separate letter o r teleg ram wh ich includ es a reference to th e so licitation and amend men t nu mbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtu e of this amen dment y ou desire to change an offer already su bmitted, su ch change may be made by teleg ram or letter, p rovid ed each telegram o r letter mak es reference to th e so licitation and this amen dment, an d is receiv ed prio r to the op en ing hou r and date sp ecified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND AP PROP RIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM AP PLIES ONLY T O MODIFICATIONS OF CONT RACT S/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES T HE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED P URSUANT T O: (Specify aut horit y) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN T HE

CONT RACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. T HE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office , appropria tion dat e, et c.) SET FORT H IN ITEM 14, P URSUANT TO T HE AUT HORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. T HIS SUPP LEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENT ERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUT HORITY OF:

D. OT HER (Specify type of modificat ion and aut horit y)

E. IMP ORTANT: Contrac tor is not, is required t o sign this document and re turn copies to t he issuing office.

14. DESCRIP TION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, inc luding solic ita tion/contrac t subject mat t er where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If app licable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

21-Feb-2018

CODE

FA5000 - 673D CONT RACTING SQUADRON

10480 SIJAN AVE

JBER AK 99506-2501

FA5000 7 . ADMINISTERED BY (If o ther than item 6)

4 . REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA500018R0002

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 07-Mar-2018 04:00 PM to 09-Mar-2018 04:00 PM.

The following have been modified:

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

1) Technical Acceptability

2) Price

3) Past Performance

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

Addenda to FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation - Commercial Items

A. The following is inserted as new paragraphs of the provision:

1. BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: Technical acceptability, price and past performance will be considered. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award without discussions, but reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest. Therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain their best terms from a price and technical standpoint.

Initially, the proposals will first be ranked by price. The lowest priced proposal will be evaluated for technical acceptability. If the proposal is found technically acceptable then it will be evaluated for acceptable past performance. If the proposal is found to have acceptable past performance, award will be made without further consideration of any other proposals received.

If it is found technically unacceptable, the Government will evaluate the next lowest priced proposal for technical acceptability until award can be made to the lowest priced technically acceptable Offeror(s) having acceptable past performance. If the Government finds any unacceptable past performance, of a technically acceptable proposal, the Government will evaluate the next lowest priced proposal for technical acceptability and past performance acceptability. Proposals that fail to furnish required representations or information, or reject the terms and conditions of the solicitation, may be excluded from consideration of contract award.

2. Award will be made to the lowest priced, technically acceptable proposal from an Offeror with acceptable past performance.

(a) Technical Evaluation: The Government will evaluate the technical proposal for acceptability based on the requirements in PWS Section 7.11. The evaluation will verify the certifications are consistent with the PWS Section 7.11. Any certifications not consistent with PWS Section 7.11 will be marked as unacceptable.

Table 1, Technical Ratings Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

(b) Price Evaluation Factor: The Government will rank all offers by Total Evaluated Priced

(TEP). The price evaluation will document the fairness and reasonableness of the TEP. In addition, each offeror’s separately priced line items or subline items shall be analyzed to determine if the prices are unbalanced in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(g). The Government reserves the right to perform price realism analysis.

1) Total Evaluated Price: A TEP will be computed for each offer. The price of a six-month extension authorized by 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, will be added to the proposed price for each potential contract performance period.

2) The TEP is a two-part computation. First, the offeror’s total proposed price will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in the Pricing Schedule (SF 1449, continuation of blocks 19 – 24) by the unit price, limited to two decimal places, for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) to confirm the extended total amount for each CLIN; the sum of all extended amounts will be the offeror’s total proposed price. Second, the total proposed price (total amount for CLINs X001, X002, X003, X004, X005, X006, X007, and X008 plus the sum of Option to Extend Services clause 52.217-8 formula (shown below) will constitute the TEP. Although Contractors are not to propose on CLIN X008, it will be considered a part of the TEP.

The formula for the Option to Extend Services amount is as follows:

Base Year = CLIN Unit Amount x 0.5 Option Year 1 = CLIN Unit Amount x 0.5 Option Year 2 = CLIN Unit Amount x 0.5 Option Year 3 = CLIN Unit Amount x 0.5 Option Year 4 = CLIN Unit Amount x 0.5

**Evaluating the Option CLINs does not obligate the Government to exercise the Options.**

3) Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in 52.212- 1, Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items, of this solicitation. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposals. Exchanges conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision. The Government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors. The Government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest.

4) Award will be made to the lowest priced offer, based on TEP, that meets the acceptability standards for non-price factors (Technical Capability and Past Performance).

(c) Past Performance Evaluation: The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s submitted Past Performance for acceptability based on an internal assessment to determine quality of work. If an Offeror’s past performance is determined to have quality performance then it will be determined acceptable. If an Offeror’s past performance is determined to not be of quality then it will be determined unacceptable.

Table 2, Past Performance Evaluation Ratings Rating Description Acceptable Based on the offeror’s submitted performance record, the

Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s submitted performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating cannot be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have an unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral shall be considered “acceptable.”

(End of Addendum)

(End of provision)

(End of Summary of Changes)