Att_9_PPQ.docx

DOCX document 40 KB Posted

Attached to
JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON SABER IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA500014R0022
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Pacific Air Forces

About this file

Attachment 9 FA5000-14-R-0022 Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON SABER IDIQ, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA5000-14-R-0022 _Amend_0001.pdf PDF
Att_11_CTC__Labor_Rates.pdf PDF
_02_Q A.pdf PDF
SABER_Site_Visit_Powerpoint.pdf PDF
SABER_Site_Visit_Record_of_Attendance.pdf PDF
SABER_Site_Visit_Minutes.pdf PDF
_01_Q A.pdf PDF
Att_6_CTC_March2014.pdf PDF
Att_7_Price_Evaluation_Worksheet_31July2014.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SOW_Att_2_Elmendorf_Architectural_Standards.pdf PDF
Att_1_AK140001_Building Heavy.pdf PDF
SOW_Att_3_Richardson_Installation_Design_Guide.pdf PDF
SOW_Att_1_JBER_OPLAN_19-3.pdf PDF
Att_5_Technical_Specifications_March2014.pdf PDF
Att_8_-_Past_Performance_Project_Listing.docx DOCX document
Att_4_SABER__SOW_(21Jul2014).pdf PDF
Att_3_AK140007_Highway.pdf PDF
SOW_Att_4_JBER_Telecommunications_Installation_Standards.pdf PDF
Att_10_SABER_Historical_Data.pdf PDF
Att_2_AK140004_Residential.pdf PDF
FA5000-14-R-0022_Solicitation.pdf PDF
SABER_Draft_SOW_(30_Jan_2014).pdf PDF
Draft_RFP_Verbiage.pdf PDF
SABER_Draft_Coefficient_Structure(17January2014).pdf PDF
FA5000-14-R-0022_Draft_RFP_(30Jan2014).pdf PDF
SABER_Draft_Inst_to_Offerors(17Jan2014).pdf PDF
Questions_Comments_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA5000-14-R-0022 Attachment #9 3/14/2014

“Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104”

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

FA5000-14-R-0022

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

TO:

We are currently participating as an offeror in response to the Government’s Request for Proposal Number FA5000-14-R-0022 for the Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) contract at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska.

The Government will be selecting contractors for this requirement based on selection factors. One of the selection factors to be rated is contractor past performance. It shall be a key factor in the Government’s final decision. To assist the Government in its assessment of contractor past performance, we are required to identify previous projects and clients who are familiar with our past work. As one of our prior/current customers for past contracting work on (insert project name) we are requesting that you complete the attached Past Performance Questionnaire. This letter also authorizes you to discuss our past performance with the Government and to release information regarding our past performance.

Your prompt attention in completing the attached Past Performance Questionnaire is greatly appreciated. Please return the completed form to the Government representative identified below, to arrive no later than the proposal due date of ________.

Please use the point of contact listed below:

Mr. Chris Vance 673d Contracting Squadron/LGCA 10480 Sijan Ave Ste 234 Christopher.vance.4@us.af.mil Phone (907) 552-3539 Fax (907) 552-7497

Signature Block
////////////////////////

1 Atch Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________ Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

__________________________
__________________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________* Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________* Contract Type:_____________________________________________________________ Number of Task Orders Performed: (If applicable):__ ______________________________ Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________* Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 5 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________

Address: _____________________Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________Fax Number:_____________________
_____________________________Email Address: _____________________

C. FAX OR EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:

Mr. Chris Vance 673d Contracting Squadron/LGCA 10480 Sijan Ave Ste 234 Christopher.vance.4@us.af.mil Phone (907) 552-3539 Fax (907) 552-7497

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets/met contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets/met contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet/did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Performed work encompassing the broad range of maintenance, repair and minor construction work that incorporates a majority of the Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) Divisions 02000 through 19000.
2.
Developed multiple project proposals within a two (2) week period.
3.
Performed multiple concurrent projects.
4.
Met cost, quality standards and schedule.
5.
Completed work in cold weather. (Above the 60th parallel North and Below the 60th Parallel South)
6.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
7.
Staff adequately sized and fully qualified in all areas necessary to complete the contract.
8.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
9.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
10.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
11.
Followed approved quality control plan.
12.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
13.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
14.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
15.
Identified problems as they occurred.
16.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
17.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
18.
Developed realistic progress schedules.
19.
Met established project schedules.
20.
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
21.
Was responsive to contract changes.
22.
Provided adequate project supervision.
23.
Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
24.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
25.
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
26.
Cooperated with Owner personnel after award.
27.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?
28.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

30.
Was it easy to communicate with the contractor?

YES/NO

31.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

Remarks:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

“Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104”

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .