_01_Q A.pdf

QUESTION

Page

Paragraph Reference QUESTION / COMMENT

1 16 H-001, a. & c. The Proposal Bond - What Volume would you like the Bid Bond placed?

2 59 L.C.1.(b) This paragraph references twice "Pricing Schedule Attachment 1" - it should be "Attachment 7"

3 60 L.C.3.(b) This paragraph references "Section J, Attachment 3" - it should be "Attachment 9"

4 54 K.52.204-8(2) NAICS code 236220 shows $33.5M - should be $36.5M

5 59 L.C.3

Allows for Teaming:

1. Do you want us to include our Teaming Agreement?

2. If yes, what Volume would you like it placed?

3. Are Joint Ventures allowed as well?

6 64 M.C & D.

With reference to L.C.3 above that states Teaming is allowed, Section M.C. & D. only reference the performance of the "Offeror" being evaluated.

1. Will the past performance of the Critical Sub of a Team or JV partner be considered relevant?

2. And will it be evaluated?

3. And with this being a SABER can the PP of our A&E be submitted as part of the 10 projects?

7 60 L.C.3.(b)

Can recent, previously completed PPQ's be submited in lieu of Attachment 9? These are NAVFAC/USACE PPQ's (Form PPQ-0) that were recently filled out for another proposal.

If yes, can we place these in the back section of this Volume?

Also, if a CCASS has already been completed, can that be submitted in lieu of Attachment 9 as well?

There is no reference in the RFP as to where this goes - can you tell us where you'd like it placed and how many projects this is to include. It just states to start with the most recent completed project and proceed backwards chronologically. For our Team, we have over 1,000 completed task orders/stand alone jobs.

This paragraph will be udpated in a forthcoming amendment

This paragraph will be udpated in a forthcoming amendment

Place in Volume I

Reference Pages 64 and 65 paragraph D, "Past Performance regarding predecessor companies or subcontractors that will perform major aspects of the requirement will NOT be rated as highly as the past performance information for the principal offeror." Reference Page

60 paragraph (b), "The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition."

Attachment 8

Reference page 59 paragraph C3, A maximum three page partnership arrangement description should be placed in Part III. There is no verbiage disallowing joint ventures. However, the restrictions of 13 CFR 126.616 would apply.

Reference page 60 paragraph (b); The offeror is to, "Provide a list of no more than ten (10), of the most relevant contracts completed for Federal agencies and commercial customers within the last five (5) years from the date of issuance of this RFP."

No, The PPQ's included in this solicitation need to be accomplished. No, CCASS cannot be submitted in lieu of Attachment #9

The clause will be updated to reflect the change in size standard which will match the first page of the solicitation in a forthcoming amendment.

FA5000-14-R-0022

#01 Q&A, 20 Aug 2014