Industry_Questions_22_Nov_16_Posting.pdf

PDF 84 KB Posted

Attached to
Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4890-16-R-0032
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

Responses to Industry Questions received prior to Draft RFP posting.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA), newest first.
File Type Posted
Questions_and_Responses_posted_3_Feb_17.pdf PDF
RPA_Solicitation_Draft_OCI_Clause.pdf PDF
Draft_RFP_Questions_and_Responses.pdf PDF
Draft_Pricing_Tables_22Nov16.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Appendix_D_-_Publications_Forms_and_Websites_(8_Nov_16)_RECOMPETE.pdf PDF
Appendix_C_-_AFI_CAFI_ANG_Comp_Matrix_(8_Nov_16)_RECOMPETE.pdf PDF
TO_000E_(Holloman)_Unique_Requirements.pdf PDF
TO_000H_(Des_Moines)_Unique_Requirements.pdf PDF
Atch_4I_WD_05-2037_R16_Sebastian_AR-Ft_Smith.pdf PDF
Atch_4L_WD_15-4647_R2_Davidson_TN-Nashville.pdf PDF
Appendix_H_-_RPA_Service_Summary_(8_Nov_16)_RECOMPETE.pdf PDF
Appendix_I_-_Special_Requirements_Deployment_(8_Nov_16)_RECOMPETE.pdf PDF
Appendix_G_-_QMS_(8_Nov_16)_RECOMPETE_2016.pdf PDF
Atch_4P_WD_05-2147_R19_Guam_Statewide-Andersen.pdf PDF
Atch_4E_WD_CBA-16-8493_R3_Otero_NM-Holloman_Prime_Sub.pdf PDF
Atch_4F_WD_CBA-14-7325_R2_Clark_NV-Creech_Prime.pdf PDF
Appendix_N_-_Operational_Requirements_(8_Nov_16)_RECOMPETE.pdf PDF
TO_000D_(Ellsworth)_Unique_Requirements.pdf PDF
Atch_4O_WD_15-2277_R1_Calhoun_MI-Battle_Creek.pdf PDF
Atch_4J_WD_15-2205_R1_Polk_IA-Des_Moines.pdf PDF
TO_000J_(Niagara_Falls)_Unique_Requirements.pdf PDF
Draft_DD254_RECOMPETE.pdf PDF
PERFORMANCE_WORK_STATEMENT_Recompete_-_1_Nov_16.pdf PDF
TO_000K_(Springfield)_Unique_Requirements.pdf PDF
Atch_4D_WD_15-5367_R1_Meade_SD-Ellsworth.pdf PDF
TO_000M_(Nashville)_Unique_Requirements.pdf PDF
TO_000P_(DP-14_MX)_Unique_Requirements.pdf PDF
Atch_4H_WD_05-2025_R19_Cochise_AZ-Ft_Huachuca.pdf PDF
Atch_4G_WD_CBA-16-8368_R2_Clark_NV-Creech_Sub.pdf PDF
Atch_4C_WD_05-2407_R17_ND_Statewide-Grand_Forks.pdf PDF
Appendix_M_-_Certifications _Training_and_Qualifications_(8_Nov_16)_RECOMPETE.pdf PDF
Appendix_B_-_Reports_(8_Nov_16)_RECOMPETE.pdf PDF
Atch_4N_WD_15-4147_R1_Niagara_NY-Niagara_Falls.pdf PDF
TO_000S_(DP-14_LRE)_Unique_Requirements.pdf PDF
Appendix_A_-_Definitions _Abbreviations_and_Acronyms_(8_Nov_16)_RECOMPETE.pdf PDF
Atch_4B_WD_15-5593_R1_Clark_NV-Nellis.pdf PDF
TO_000Q_(DP-31_MX)_Unique_Requirements.pdf PDF
Atch_4M_WD_15-2419_R2_Clark_OH-Springfield.pdf PDF
TO_000C_(Whiteman)_Unique_Requirements.pdf PDF
TO_000B_(Nellis)_Unique_Requirements.pdf PDF
RPA_FA4890-16-R-0032_Section_M_ROUGH_DRAFT_23_Aug_16.pdf PDF
Q A_from_Industry_Day_posting.pdf PDF
Industry_Day_Attendees_Sign-in.pdf PDF
Appendix_C_-_AFI_CAFI_ANG_Comp_Matrix_16_Jun_16_Sources_Sought.pdf PDF
Appendix_D_-_Publications_Forms_and_Websites_16_Jun_16_Sources_Sought.pdf PDF
Appendix_A_-_Definitions _Abbreviations _and_Acronyms_16_Jun_16_Sources_Sought.pdf PDF
Appendix_B_-_Reports_16_Jun_16_Sources_Sought.pdf PDF
Atch_1_-_RPA_FA4890-16-R-0032_Sources_Sought_Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Appendix_H_-_RPA_Service_Summary_16_Jun_16_Sources_Sought.pdf PDF
Appendix_G_-_QMS_16_Jun_16_Sources_Sought.pdf PDF
Show all 50

Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Industry Questions (Q) and Responses (R) 22 Nov 16

1. Q. Since there are numerous types of unmanned pilots and sensor operators in the DoD and since the MQ‐1/9 LRE crews require unique skills, it would be logical that ACC/AMIC would reduce risk by requiring resumes for a certain portion of the requirement. Correct?

R. We won’t be requiring resumes or flight histories for the re‐compete proposals. Flight history requirements will be spelled out in the PWS and submitted by the winning offeror after award.

2. Q. Due to the expanded scope of the program across medium and high altitude maintenance and medium altitude LRE crews, it would be logical that ACC/AMIC would reduce risk by requiring resumes for at least the program manager and chief pilot. Correct?

R. AMIC will not require resumes, however, key personnel requirements are addressed in the PWS.

3. Q. Are all downrange LRE locations covered under bilateral agreements, SOFA, and/or business tax agreements?

R. There are various SOFA and other agreements that vary by country. For example, the winning offeror will have to register with the Afghan Government to obtain a business license.

4. Q. Considering the speed at which modifications to aircraft, weapons, sensors, and GCSs have occurred over the past 7 years, it is clear there will continue to be considerable changes that have to be integrated into the fleet for the maintainers and aircrews. Can ACC/AMIC incorporate some type of CLIN whereby the contract can include modifications? This would improve speed and ease of integration of future changes making it easier for the end user to enhance their capabilities. Logically, ACC/AMIC would reduce risk by requiring past examples of modification installs and might ask for sample TOs on how to integrate these mods into the fleet. Correct?

R. TCTOs & mods are considered a part of normal Organizational‐level maintenance support and performed by assigned site personnel as required. AMIC will not incorporate a separate CLIN for TCTOs/mods.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .