PASTPERFORMANCEQUESTIONNAIRE(2).doc
DOC document 46 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Airfield Paving Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4887-07-R-0012
About this file
Attachment 8 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q As.doc | DOC document | |
| ConformedSolicitation07R0012Amendment 4.doc | DOC document | |
| Amendment 4.doc | DOC document | |
| Conformed07R0012 7Aug07.doc | DOC document | |
| Amendment 3.doc | DOC document | |
| Amendment 2.doc | DOC document | |
| Amendment 1.doc | DOC document | |
| ConformedSolicitation07R0012.doc | DOC document | |
| 07-R-0012AirfieldPavementIDIQ.doc | DOC document | |
| DavisBacon20Jul07.doc | DOC document | |
| AFLDBSEFORM66.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| AirfieldPavementSpecifications...doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 4Drawings.zip | ZIP file | |
| PastPerformanceInformation.doc | DOC document | |
| afi32-1042.pdf | ||
| BIDSCHEDULEAirfieldPavementsIDIQFY07.xls | XLS spreadsheet |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTIN SENSITIVE
IAW FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
RFP: FA4887-07-R-0012
CONTRACTOR: __________________________
I. Background
The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain past performane information relative to contracts that have previously been completed within the past five years or are currently being performed by the contractor identified above. This company is a potential source for performing a Firm Fixed Priced contract.
II. Instructions
Please complete the questionnaire based on the following guidance:
A. Handwritten responses are sufficient.
B. Indicate, based on the description below, the contractor’s performance on the identified program in the assessment area. Assessments should reflect only contractor liable performance. The following is a definition of the scoring levels:
CODE
PERFORMANCE LEVEL
High Confidence Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is a high conficence that offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Significant Confidence there is significant confidence the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Confidence there is confidence the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Normal contractor emphasis should preclude any problems.
Unknown Confidence No performance record is identifiable.
Little Confidence substantial doubt exists that the offeror
No Confidence extreme doubt exists that the offeror
Circle the word corresponding to your rating
C. Please provide comments for all questions in which a “No Confidence”, “Little Confidence”, or “Satisfactory Confidence” rating is given and as appropriate for all other answers. Space for your comments is provided in each area. If more space is needed, attach additional sheets to the end of the questionnaire and reference the respective question.
D. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the offeror’s performance with the judgement of others in your organization. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the program, we solicit your comments on other similar programs for which your office has contracts with this offeror.
E. PLEASE FAX YOUR COMPLETE QUESTIONNAIRE WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER RECEIPT, BUT NO LATER THAN 10:00am, 20 August 2007, TO:
56 CONS/LGCB
ATTN: TSgt Alvina Andrews, Contract Specialist
Commercial FAX: 623-856-3438
DSN: 896-3438
Commercial Voice: 623-856-7179 x252 DSN: 896-7179 x252
YOUR ASSISTANCE IN EVALUATING THE CONTRACTOR’S PAST PERFORMANCE IS APPRECIATED. OUR GOAL IS TO SELECT THE BEST VALUE TO THE GOVERNMENT. YOUR PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION IS A CONSIDERATION IN DETERMINING THE BEST VALUE.
III. Program Identification:
Evaluator please complete.
A. Contractor: _______________________________________________
B. Contract Number: __________________________________________
C. Estimated contract dollar amount: _____________________________
D. Period of Performance: _____________________________________
E. Describe product acquired: ___________________________________
F. Contract Type: ____________________________________________
IV. Past Performance Evaluation:
1. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance on the project?
High Confidence Significant Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Little Confidence No Confidence Unknown Confidence Comments: ___________________________________________________________________
2. How would you rate the contractor’s responsiveness and flexibility in working around the end user’s flying schedule?
High Confidence Significant Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Little Confidence
No Confidence Unknown Confidence
Comments:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. How would you rate the contractor’s experience with working on a military installation (i.e, contractor was cognizant of, and had no difficulty in complying, with stringent military standards/regulations)?
High Confidence Significant Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Little Confidence
No Confidence Unknown Confidence
Comments:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
THE CONTRACTOR:
4. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements?
High Confidence Significant Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Little Confidence No Confidence Unknown Confidence
Comments: ___________________________________________________________________
5. Effectively managed subcontractors (if used)?
High Confidence Significant Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Little Confidence
No Confidence Unknown Confidence
Comments: ___________________________________________________________________
6. Corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures?
High Confidence Significant Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Little Confidence
No Confidence Unknown Confidence
Comments:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. Displayed initiative to solve problems?
High Confidence Significant Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Little Confidence
No Confidence Unknown Confidence
Comments:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. Developed realistic progress schedules?
High Confidence Significant Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Little Confidence
No Confidence Unknown Confidence
Comments:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. Met established project schedules?
High Confidence Significant Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Little Confidence
No Confidence Unknown Confidence
Comments:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. Cooperated with Government personnel after award?
High Confidence Significant Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Little Confidence
No Confidence Unknown Confidence
Comments:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. Was responsive to contract changes?
High Confidence Significant Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Little Confidence
No Confidence Unknown Confidence
Comments:______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Put an X next to the most applicable answer:
Knowing what I know about this contractor.
____I would not enter into another contract with this contractor
____I might enter into another contract with this contractor
____I would enter into another contract with this contractor
V. Respondent Information:
The following information will assist in the analysis of the data and will be kept confidential.
A. Name of Evaluator:______________________________________
B. Office Symbol/Location:__________________________________
C. Phone (Commercial/DSN):________________________________
D. Position of Title/Grade:___________________________________
E. Length of Time on Program/Contract:________________________
F. Date Questionnaire Completed:_____________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .