Attachment_3-_PPQ.pdf

PDF 427 KB Posted

Attached to
Kitchen Hoods and Hazmat Fire Suppression Systems Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4613-16-R-0002
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Global Strike Command

About this file

Attachment 3- PPQ

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Kitchen Hoods and Hazmat Fire Suppression Systems, newest first.
File Type Posted
Question_ _Answers.doc DOC document
Question_ _Answers.doc DOC document
FA4613-16-R-0002.pdf PDF
Attachment_1-_PWS_05_Oct_2015).pdf PDF
Attachment_2-_SCA_WD.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE AND COVER LETTER

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

TO:

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a the

Kitchen Hood and Hazmat Fire Suppression Systems Inspection and Maintenance Program.

contract at F.E. Warren AFB, Wyoming.

Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, I can be contacted at via phone or email: 307-773.4650 or melissa.battiste.2@us.af.mil.

10/7/2015

X Melissa Battiste

Melissa Battiste

Contracting Offiicer

Signed by: BATTISTE.MELISSA.E.1407453669

1 Atch

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire file:///D:/far/Far02.doc%23T2101 file:///D:/far/FAR03.DOC%23b3104 mailto:melissa.battiste.2@us.af.mil

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________

Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________

__________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________*

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________

Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ___________________

_____________________________ Fax Number: _____________________

_____________________________ Email Address: _____________________

C. Mail, Fax or Email COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:

Upon completion of the questionnaires, they shall be returned directly from the references to the attention of 90 CONS/LGCA, A1C Allyson Martin, Email to allyson.martin.@us.af.mil, Fax 307-773-3973 or Mail

7505 Barnes Loop, Bldg 208. F.E. Warren AFB, WY. 82005. Completed questionnaires must be submitted no later than 22 Mar 2015 05:00pm MST.

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE

PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E G S M U N

Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral

Performance meets/met contractual requirements with many exceeded to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets/met contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

does not meet/did not meet some contractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

mailto:allyson.martin.@us.af.mil

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor: E G S M U N

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

5. Followed approved quality control plan.

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

9. Identified problems as they occurred.

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

12. Developed realistic progress schedules.

13. Met established project schedules.

14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.

15. Was responsive to contract changes.

The contractor: E G S M U N

16. Provided adequate project supervision.

17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.

18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

19. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

22. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

23. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

Remarks:______________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .