Solicitation Amendment FA461025R00060002 SF 30.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

Created On:

28 Feb 2025, 08:31 AM Pacific Standard Time

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of this solicitation FA461025R0006 amendment 02 is to update verbiage in Sections L and M Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

of the solicitation, as well as, update Attachments 05 and 06. Further details regarding the updates are discussed below:

(1) Section L, paragraph L-2, subparagraph 1.6.5 has been amended to include the verbiage "The appendix SOWs will not count against the 80 page count maximum."

(2) Section L, paragraph L-2, subparagraph 1.6.8, fully responsive has been updated to "found acceptable."

(3) Section L, paragraph L-2, subparagraph 2.1.5, non responsive has been updated to "unacceptable."

(4) Section L, paragraph L-2, subpargraph 2.2.1.6 has been updated to include the following verbiage, "Offeror's may include project SOWs as Appendix 1, Project Specific Statements of Work to Section J, Attachment 06, Volume II_Relevant Project Template. The appendix SOWs will not count against the 80 page count maximum."

(5) Section L, paragraph L-2, subparagraph 2.1.6 verbiage has been updated.

(6) Section M, paragraph M-1, subparagraph 5.2, unresponsive has been updated to "unacceptable."

(7) Section J, Attachment 05, Section V. "Contractor has an Aggregate Bonding Capacity of" ranges have been updated.

(8) Section L, paragraph L-2, subparagraph 2.2.1.11, aggregate bonding capacity ranges have been updated.

(9) Section J, Attachment 06, Relevant Experience Project Template, additional instructions have been added to the instructions page, as well as, Appendix 1 on

Section J - List of Attachments

The following attachments were added:

ATT 05_Volume II_HTRO Self-Scoring Worksheet_20250227 ATT 06_Volume II_Relevant Experience Project Template_20250227

The following attachments were deleted:

ATT 05_Volume II_HTRO Self-Scoring Worksheet_20241029 ATT 06_Volume II_Relevant Experience Project Template_20241024

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors

PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS

L-1 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1.0 General Instructions

1.0.1. This solicitation is being issued for the acquisition of the Western-Range Operational Ordering Contract for Infrastructure Enhancement Multiple Award Construction Contract (WOOKIE MACC) which will be utilized to execute a broad range of maintenance, repair and minor construction projects on real property at Vandenberg Space Force Base (VSFB), California, and VSFB remote locations. The remote locations for VSFB include, but are not limited to Oak Mountain, Vandenberg Village Antenna Farm, Pillar Point Air Force Station, Anderson Peak, Laguna Peak, Santa Ynez Peak, Naval Base Ventura County Point Hueneme, Naval Base Ventura County Point Mugu, and Orcutt Hill. The projects will include tasks in a variety of trades such as demolition, site work, excavation, cast-in-place concrete, masonry, structural steel, electrical, mechanical (including HVAC), painting, millwork, and other specialty and general contracting work. This competitive acquisition will utilize the source selection procedures in accordance with (IAW) Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.3 as supplemented by the DoD Source Selection Procedures referenced in Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 215.300 and the Department of the Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DAFFARS) Mandatory Procedures 5315.3 to make an integrated assessment for a Highest Technically Rated Offeror with a Fair and Reasonable Price (HTRO) award decision.

1.0.2. The Government intends to award up to five (5) indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts firm-fixed-price (FFP) task orders to the highest technically rated offerors with fair and reasonable pricing IAW FAR 15.304(c). Proposals may only be submitted by 8(a) firms or joint ventures, registered in the North American Industrial Classification System Code (NAICS) of 236220, Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. The Period of Performance for the WOOKIE MACC includes a five (5) year base period and one (1) two (2) year option period. Awardees are required to recertify their 8(a) small business status prior to the completion of the fifth year of the contract IAW FAR 52.219-28.

1.0.3. This section provides general guidance for preparing proposals, as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the proposal. Throughout this section, the term "offeror" includes joint venture partners the contractor proposes to maintain throughout the entirety of the contract.

1.0.4. The offeror's proposal must include all data and information requested and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. Any offeror who submits an incomplete package may be considered unacceptable. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the Request for Proposal (RFP). A proposal that is sufficiently documented to support cost/price and technical requirements in a complete, orderly, and specific detailed manner will enable the Government to perform a thorough and fair evaluation. Non-compliance with the instructions and RFP may result in the Government being unable to substantiate ratings.

FA461025R00060002

2.0 Type of Acquisition

This acquisition is a competitive 8(a) small business set-aside. For this acquisition, selection of the best value offeror(s) will be made using Highest Technically Rated Offeror with a Fair and Reasonable Price (HTRO) methodology. This solicitation will result in the award of up to five (5) IDIQ contracts. Proposals may only be submitted by Small Business Certified 8(a) Small Business firms or joint ventures listed under the 236220 NAICS.

3.0 Discrepancies and Ambiguities

If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, ambiguity, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer (CO) in writing with supporting rationale No Later Than (NLT) ten (10) calendar days after the RFP release. The offeror is reminded that the Government intends to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions.

4.0 Mistakes

Mistakes in an offeror's proposal shall be handled in accordance with FAR 14.407-4 as referenced in FAR 15.508.

5.0 Postponement of Proposal Closing Date

If a determination is made to postpone a proposal closing date, an announcement of the determination shall be posted to the Government Point of Entry (GPE), https://sam.gov/content/home and, if practicable, before issuance of a formal RFP amendment otherwise communicated to prospective offerors.

6.0 Discussions

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award contracts without discussions with offerors except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a).

Therefore, the offeror's initial proposal should contain the offeror's best terms. When discussions or requests for revised offers are not conducted or requested by the Government, the prices identified in Section J, Attachment 03, Volume I_Price Proposal Template shall be valid through the date in Block 13D of the SF 1442.

7.0 Contract Document

Sections K, L, and M apply to the solicitation phase only; therefore, they will not be a physical part of the resulting contract but remain in full force and effect and should be applicable.

8.0 Points of Contact (POC)

The POCs for this acquisition are the CO, Alyson R. Kolding and Contract Specialists (CS), Jennifer A. Paccioretti and Meghann Applebay. Written requests for clarification may be sent to the CO/CS at the group email address listed below. Address any questions or concerns to them using the following contact information:

WOOKIEMACC2025@groups.af.mil

30 CONS/PKA

1515 Iceland Ave Bldg. 8500 Vandenberg SFB, CA 93437

L-2 PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

1.0 The proposal package must be completed, and an electronic or hard copy submission delivered to the POCs in Section L paragraph L-1 subparagraph 8.0, prior to the set due date of proposals, see Block 13A of the SF1442. Hard copy submissions shall comply with Section L paragraph L-2 subparagraph 1.6.2 and

1.6.5. Electronic copy submissions shall comply with Section L paragraph L-2 subparagraph 1.6.6.

1.1 Offerors are instructed to read the entire solicitation document, including all the attachments in Section J, and any subsequent solicitation amendments prior to submitting questions, preparing your offer, and submitting a proposal.

1.2 The Government will not reimburse offerors for any cost incurred for the preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation.

1.3 The proposal package must be completed and returned to the address in Block 7 of the SF 1442, prior to the time set for closing of proposals, see Block 13A of the SF 1442.

1.4 To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Proposals must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation; alternate proposals will not be accepted. Offeror's proposals shall be formatted into two (2) separate volumes:

Volume I - Executed Contract Documentation and Price Proposal Volume II - Technical

1.5 The CO has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the CO will review this determination and if, in the CO's determination, adequate price competition exists no additional cost information is expected to be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists or if additional information is required to substantiate pricing; offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the CO to determine the reasonableness of the price.

1.6 Formatting shall be as follows:

1.6.1 To facilitate review and evaluation for this source : USE OF COMMERCIAL SYSTEMS TO TRANSMIT SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION selection the Government proposes to transmit data via commercial systems. Distributed material will be identified as source selection sensitive and distribution will be strictly limited to appropriate personnel and shall be encrypted per DAFFARS MP 5315.3 paragraph 1.4.2.2.3. Should any contractor object to their proprietary information being shared between source selection evaluators and advisors via commercial email as described above, please advise either the Contracting Specialists or the Contracting Officer using the contact information above.

1.6.2 Offerors are cautioned that VSFB has stringent visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the :HAND-CARRIED PROPOSALS NOTICE installation to obtain a visitor pass and be cleared by the Government point of contact to be visited prior to entrance. A request must be received no later than four for an offeror to gain entrance onto VSFB. If within four (4) business days prior to the proposal due date and time, the offeror may (4) business days prior to entry try and schedule a day and time with the points of contact to pick up the proposal at the Visitor Center. It is possible that the points of contact may not be available to clear offerors for entrance, which may prohibit submission of hand-carried proposals; consequently, offerors electing to hand-carry their proposals for submittal just prior to closing time do so at their own risk.

1.6.3 Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with an explanation for each. The glossaries will not count against the page limitations.

1.6.4 Type face shall not be less than 11 point font, with 1" margins on all sides. Smaller, legible font size, no smaller than 6 point, may be used for charts and tables.

1.6.5 Hard copy volumes shall be submitted in three-ring, loose leaf binders permitting the volume to lie flat when open. Staples shall not be used to bind pages. If the binder used has protective sleeves on the covers or spine (including the exterior), the offeror should not insert anything in these protective sleeves. A cover sheet shall be included in each binder clearly identifying the company name, solicitation number, and volume number. The header of each page shall include the company name, solicitation number, and page number. See the table below for specific number of copies to be submitted and maximum number of pages permitted.

TITLE

# OF

COPI

ES

MAXIMUM # OF PAGES

Volume I - Executed Contract Documentation & Price Proposal

(1) copy

No page limitation

Volume II - Technical (1) copy

80 pages excluding the score sheet (No more than two (2) pages per Relevant Experience Project for a maximum of 30 projects.)

*The appendix SOWs will count against the 80 page count maximum.not

1.6.6 Offerors may submit their proposals electronically through email or the Department of Defense (DoD) Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE) site. Offerors electing to submit their proposals through email are cautioned that the Government's email server may block emails it considers as potential security risks with no notice being provided to either the sender or the recipient. In addition, the server may block emails with large file attachments and it is therefore recommended that emails over 5MB in size be submitted through DoD SAFE. As such, offerors should only use approved file formats, .pdf, .docx, or .xlsx., and are strongly encouraged to follow up with the POCs to ensure their proposal package is received prior to exact time specified for the receipt of proposals. Offerors electing to use the DoD SAFE site shall request a drop-off link be sent to them at least one (1) business day but not more than seven (7) calendar days in advance of the proposal due date to ensure the Government has sufficient time to submit the request through the DoD SAFE site. Offerors are cautioned that files may take a significant amount of time to upload onto the DoD SAFE server and should not wait until the last minute to upload their proposal package.

1.6.7 The offeror should be sure to apply all appropriate markings on its proposal, including those prescribed in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(e), Restriction on disclosure and use of data, and FAR 3.104-4, Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Contractor Bid or Proposal Information and Source Selection Information.

1.6.8 Documents submitted in response to this solicitation must be found acceptable and consistent with the following:

1.6.8.1 Requirements of the solicitation, and Government standards and regulations pertaining to the specification.

1.6.8.2 Evaluation Factors for Award in Section M of this solicitation.

1.6.8.3 Any limitation on the number of proposal pages. Pages exceeding the page limitations set forth in this section will be removed from the proposal and not read or evaluated.

1.6.9 The magnitude of construction in accordance with FAR 36.204, as supplemented, for the total WOOKIE MACC program for the five (5) year base period and one (1) two (2) year option is over $500,000,000.00. The total program shall not exceed $525,000,000.00. The estimated magnitude of the task orders will vary between task orders and will be identified on each task order request. Task orders will range in value from $2,000.00 to $25,000,000.00.

2.0 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

The minimum acceptable requirements and scored evaluation criteria under Volume I - Executed Contract Documentation & Price Proposal and Volume II - Technical are defined herein.

2.1 VOLUME I - EXECUTED CONTRACT DOCUMENTATION & PRICE PROPOSAL

To be eligible for award, the Offeror must adhere to the directions and submit the following information under Volume I - Executed Contract Documentation and Price Proposal.

2.1.1 Executive Summary Sheet

Offerors shall submit a summary about the company, including the company's CAGE code, SAM Unique Entity ID (UEI), small business categories, and identification of the name(s), email(s), and phone number(s) of the principal person(s) authorized to negotiate on behalf of and obligate the company.

2.1.2 Chapter 1 - SF 1442

Offerors shall submit a completed Standard Form (SF) 1442 - Solicitation, Offer, and Award. Offerors shall complete applicable blanks. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP Sections A through J. These sections constitute the model contract.

2.1.2.1 The offeror's official legal name and address in Block 14 of the SF 1442 shall match the offeror's official legal name and address in System for Award Management (SAM) at https://www.sam.gov.

2.1.2.2 The offeror's official legal name and address in Block 14 of the SF 1442 will be the official mailing address used by the Government for letter correspondence, the official name and address under an awarded contract, and the official name and address under corresponding task order awards.

2.1.2.3 Acknowledge all amendments issued to the solicitation in Block 19 of the SF 1442.

2.1.2.4 The Name, Title, Signature and Date identified in Block 20a, 20b, and 20c of the SF 1442 shall be an authorized representative with authority to commit the offeror to all contractual obligations.

2.1.3 Chapter 2 - Section K

Offerors shall submit a completed Section K. Complete the representations, certifications, and acknowledgments. Section K shall be returned in its entirety.

2.1.4 Chapter 3 - Joint Venture Agreements

Joint ventures are allowable on competitive 8(a) small business set-asides; however, the joint venture agreement must be received by Small Business Administration (SBA) prior to proposal due date and approved before award of any resulting contract. If the offeror is contemplating a joint venture on this project, the offeror should advise, in writing, its assigned SBA Business Opportunity Specialist (BOS) as soon as possible. It also recommended that the agreement be submitted to the assigned SBA BOS as soon as practicable to ensure compliance with established regulations. Any corrections and/or changes needed can be made only when the BOS has had adequate time for a thorough review before the proposal due date. NO CORRECTIONS AND/OR CHANGES ARE ALLOWED

AFTER TIME OF SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS.

2.1.5 Chapter 4 - SBA Validation

Offerors shall provide a letter from the SBA showing proof of Section 8(a) status. Offerors who do not comply with this requirement shall be considered unacceptable and not eligible for award.

2.1.6 Chapter 5 - Contractor's License

Offeror must possess an active California General Contractor's License, "Class A" or "Class B", or equivalent license from a state with a reciprocity agreement with State of California, registered in the prime contractor's name; or must demonstrate a four (4) year history of experience in successfully completing multiple trade construction efforts. Multiple trade construction efforts are defined as projects which involve at least two (2) separate and distinct construction trades including but not limited to carpentry, plumbing, electrical, mechanical, painting, pipe fitting, sheet metal, welding, roofing, site work, site utilities, excavation, concrete, masonry, pavement repair, asbestos abatement, lead paint removal, security hardware installation, or demolition.

2.1.7 Chapter 6 - Bonding Capacity

Offerors shall provide a letter from their surety company, stating the offeror's bonding capacity. Bonding may be obtained from a surety listed in the Department of the Treasury Circular 570 list of approved surety companies (http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570/) or other security permitted by FAR Subpart 28.2, unless prohibited by law or regulation.

2.1.8 Chapter 7 - Price Proposal

In lieu of completing Section B of the SF 1442, offerors shall submit a completed Section J, Attachment 03, Volume I_Price Proposal Template.

2.1.8.1 Offerors shall enter their official legal name in the orange shaded cell in Row 2.

2.1.8.2 Offerors submitted Section J, Attachment 03, Volume I_Price Proposal Template shall identify fully burdened hourly labor rates for the offeror's Site Superintendent, Quality Control Manager, and Project Manager for fiscal year (FY) 2025 through FY 2032. These FYs will cover the five (5) year base and one (1) two (2) year option.

2.1.8.3 In the shaded gray cells in columns B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I of the Section J, Attachment 03, Volume I_Price Proposal Template, Offerors shall enter fully burdened hourly labor rates for the offeror's Site Superintendent, Quality Control Manager, and Project Manager. All fully burdened hourly labor rates shall be rounded to two decimal places.

2.1.8.4 Fully burdened hourly labor rates are the total hourly labor rate for an employee including both the direct wages paid to an employee, but also the various indirect costs associated with employing a person in the business. These indirect costs include but are not limited to:

Training/Employee Development Federal and state unemployment costs Federal and state payroll taxes Vacation and/or holiday and sick pay Employee Benefits (e.g. health or retirement plans) General Liability Insurance Worker's Compensation Insurance

The fully burdened hourly labor rate does not include profit or general business overhead costs such as administrative staff or home office operating costs.

2.2 VOLUME II - TECHNICAL

To be eligible for award, the offeror must adhere to the directions and submit the following information under Volume II - Technical.

2.2.1 Self-Scoring Worksheet

2.2.1.1 Offerors shall submit Section J, Attachment 05, Volume II_HTRO Self-Scoring Worksheet. No other format will be considered.

2.2.1.2 The Self-Scoring Worksheet reflects the scored evaluation criteria for six (6) categories:

I. Relevant Experience Projects II. Number of Design-Build Projects as a Prime Contractor III. Experience in Complex Projects IV. Staffing V. Contractor Aggregate Bonding Capacity VI. Contractor California General Contractor's License

2.2.1.3 Offerors shall complete the orange shaded cells in row 2 and Columns C and E. For each scored evaluation criteria, read each description carefully in column C and fill in Column E by selecting the appropriate choice from the drop-down box or inputting an appropriate response. Do not leave any answer under column E blank. Offerors shall not alter any other rows, columns, or formulas within the Self-Scoring Worksheet. Column F will automatically calculate the offeror's score for each row and the overall total points scored. The offeror shall accurately rate itself using the scoring instructions for each element as described throughout this section, 2.2.1 Self-Scoring Worksheet of Section L.

2.2.1.4 The burden of proof to substantiate the offeror's self-rated score rests with the offeror. The proposal shall include evidence to support each proposed self-rated score. .

2.2.1.5 Offerors shall enter their official legal name in the orange cell in Row 2 of the Self-Scoring Worksheet.

2.2.1.6 For each individual Relevant Experience Project (REP), thirty (30) maximum, offerors shall enter the contract number, including the task order number if applicable, and its page number in Volume II in the orange cells in column C of the Self-Scoring Worksheet. If the offeror chooses not to submit a project for the REP section, the offeror shall enter N/A in column C and select "NO" from the drop down in column E. Offerors shall refer to Section J, Attachment 04, Volume II_Project Category Definitions for detailed descriptions of each of the ten (10) categories listed under Section I: Relevant Experience Projects on the Self-Scoring Worksheet.

For each REP on the Self-Scoring Worksheet, the offeror shall complete Section J, Attachment 06, Volume II_Relevant Experience Project Template. A total of thirty (30) maximum shall be submitted. Offeror's may include project SOWs as Appendix 1, Project Specific Statements of Work to Section J, Attachment 06, Volume II_Relevant Project Template. The appendix SOWs will not count against the 80 page count maximum.

All REPs identified on the Self-Scoring Worksheet shall directly correspond to the projects identified in Section J, Attachment 06, Volume II_Relevant Experience Project Template.

All REPs must have been completed with the offeror acting as the prime contractor and have had construction completed projects within the past five (5) years from the date of solicitation or must be more than 50% constructed by the proposal due date. Any REPs exceeding this time frame will not be considered for evaluation.

In the case of joint ventures, the prime contractor on the REP may be either joint venture partner or the joint venture.

2.2.1.7 The same projects listed in Section I: Relevant Experience Projects section of the Self-Scoring Worksheet shall be utilized for the offeror's response to Section II: Number of Design-Build Projects as Prime Contractor and Section III: Experience in Complex Projects sections of the Self-Scoring Worksheet.

2.2.1.8 In Section II: Number of Design-Build Projects as the Prime Contractor of the Self-Scoring Worksheet, offerors shall select the number of design-build projects from Section I performed in each of the following locations: in California, in Santa Barbara County, with Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District, and CONUS/HI/AK US Military Bases. Projects not listed in Section I shall not be included in these numbers. Offerors shall only utilize the projects listed in Section I: Relevant Experience Projects to select the appropriate responses for Section II: Number of Design-Build Projects as a Prime Contractor. Projects that are performed at locations which fall under multiple options can be counted under each option. For example, a project performed at Edwards Air Force Base could count towards being performed in California and at a CONUS/HI/AK US Military Base.

2.2.1.8.1 Design-build projects are defined as projects where the prime contractor performed as the prime contractor for both the design phase and construction phase of a project. The design phase shall include completing a 100% design as defined in the WOOKIE MACC SOW and could have been done either internally by the prime contractor or through a subcontract with a firm that utilized registered architects or engineers in the preparation of the design.

2.2.1.8.2 Projects with the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District are defined as projects which require compliance with permits issued by the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District for Asbestos Remediation, or Emission Source installation, modification, or removal.

2.2.1.9 In Section III: Experience in Complex Projects as the Prime Contractor of the Self-Scoring Worksheet, offerors shall select the number of projects from Section I with five (5) or more tasks, four (4) or more tasks, and three (3) or more tasks. Offerors shall utilize the projects listed in Section I: Relevant Experience Projects to select the appropriate responses for Section III: Experience in Complex Projects. Projects shall only be included in the appropriate option. For example, a project with 6 tasks shall only be counted in the five (5) or more tasks and shall not count towards the "With 4 tasks" or "With 3 tasks" options. A task is defined as one of the engineered tasks listed in 2.2.1.9.1 through 2.2.1.9.4 below. Each task must involve the use of a registered engineer in the development of the construction effort.

2.2.1.9.1 Mechanical

HVAC

Interior Plumbing Fire Suppression

2.2.1.9.2 Electrical

High or Medium Voltage Electrical Distribution/Transmission Power Generation (either large scale or backup power systems) Interior or Facility Electrical Fire Alarm/Mass Notification Systems Electronic Security System for Secured Facilities in accordance with ICD 705 Specifications Communication Systems Lightning Protection Systems Military Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Systems

2.2.1.9.3 Civil

Water Distribution or Sanitary Sewer Systems Stormwater Systems or Culverts Erosion Repair or Soil Stabilization Road or Pavement Engineered Construction Geotechnical Environmental Remediation Traffic and/or Transportation Engineering

2.2.1.9.4 Structural/Architectural

Seismic Renovations or Upgrades New Facility Designed Construction Engineered Facility Renovation Physical Security Systems for Secured Facilities in accordance with ICD 705 Specifications Entry Control Facilities

2.2.1.10 In Section IV: Staffing of the Self-Scoring Worksheet, offerors shall enter the number of qualified Project Managers, Superintendents, and Quality Control Managers currently on staff. Offerors shall provide substantiating documentation to support their claimed staffing meets the qualification requirements in the WOOKIE MACC Statement of Work paragraph 17.1. In the case of joint ventures, staffing may be part This category will be capped at 3,750 points maximum.

of either joint venture partner.

2.2.1.11 In Section V: Contractor has an Aggregate Bonding Capacity of, offerors shall select the bonding capacity currently possessed from a drop-down of three

(3) choices: Equal to $60M but less than $75M, Equal to or Greater Than $75M but less than $90M, or Equal to or Greater Than $90M. Offerors shall provide substantiating documentation to support their selection. In the case of joint ventures, the bonding capacity shall be for the joint venture entity and not for the individual partners.

2.2.1.12 In Section VI: Contractor has a California General Contractor's License, offerors shall select yes or no from the drop-down for a Type A License and Type B License. Offerors shall provide substantiating documentation to support their selection. In the case of joint ventures, licenses may be held by either joint venture partner or by the joint venture.

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

SSP Attachment 4 Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

M-1 SOURCE SELECTION

1.0 Basis for Contract Award

1.1. This is a competitive Highest Technically Rated Offeror with a Fair and Reasonable Price (HTRO) source selection performed in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15.3, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and the Department of the Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DAFFARS). These regulations are available electronically at http://acquisition.gov/. The Government will determine best value based on an objective assessment and validation of the HTRO with a fair and reasonable price.

1.2. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award contracts without discussions with offerors except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a).

Therefore, the offeror's initial proposal should contain the offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint.

1.3. Contract(s) may be awarded to the offerors who are deemed responsible in accordance (IAW) with FAR Subpart 9.1, as supplemented, and the requirements in Section M, paragraph M-2 subparagraph 2.0, Step 5, whose proposal conform to the solicitation's requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Section L of this solicitation) and is judged, based on the evaluation factors to represent the best value to the Government. The Government seeks to award to the offerors who give the Air Force the greatest confidence that it will best meet the requirements and successfully perform the requirement. The Source Selection Authority (SSA) will base the source selection decision on an integrated assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in the solicitation (described below). While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective; and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

1.4. The Government intends to strictly enforce all of the proposal submission requirements outlined in Section L. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in an offeror's proposal being determined non-conforming to the solicitation and rejected.

1.5. In the event the evaluation team discovers an exaggerated Self-Scoring Worksheet with numerous point deductions required based on ambiguous, deceptive, faulty, misleading, or inadequate supporting documentation, the offeror shall immediately be eliminated from further consideration for award. Falsification of any proposal submission, documents, or statements may subject the offeror to civil or criminal prosecution under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

2.0 Number of Contracts to be Awarded

Multiple awards shall be made as a result of this solicitation. The Government intends to award to up to five (5) 8(a) businesses who are validated as the highest technically rated, have a fair and reasonable evaluated price, and are determined responsible IAW FAR Subpart 9.1 and the requirements in Section M, paragraph M-2 subparagraph 2.0, Step 5.

3.0 Minimum Guarantee

All contractors who are awarded a contract under the Western Operational Ordering Contract for Infrastructure Enhancement Multiple Award Construction Contract (WOOKIE MACC) solicitation will be awarded a task order to meet the minimum guaranteed amount of $2,000.00. Contractors will be required to attend a Pre- Construction Conference to discuss VSFB specifics and general WOOKIE MACC requirements. After the conference all the contractors awarded a contract under the WOOKIE MACC may invoice for the minimum guarantee. There is no guarantee of any task order beyond the minimum guarantee.

4.0 IDIQ Ceiling

The overall program will not exceed $525,000,000.00 for the five (5) year base period and one (1) two (2) year option period. The total value of all task orders awarded under the indefinite-delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) will not exceed this amount. Task orders will range in value from $2,000.00 to $25,000,000.00.

Funding will be determined at the individual task order level.

5.0 Proposal Compliance and Offeror Responsibility

5.1 Proposal Substantiation

Unsubstantiated or misleading claims for any technical evaluation element could result in the Government determining that the offeror's proposed self-rated score is artificially inflated. If this were to occur, the Government will unilaterally downward adjust the offeror's score, potentially down to zero points. Self-rated scores shall be determined grossly misrepresented if an offeror misrepresented their scoring on six (6) or more Relevant Experience Projects. If the Government determines an offeror's self-rated score to be grossly misrepresented the Government may immediately cease evaluation and eliminate the offeror from further consideration for award.

5.2 Proposal Compliance

Offerors shall meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, submission requirements, representations and certifications, and other instructions identified within the solicitation. Offerors shall comply with content required within each of the proposal sections. Failure to comply with any requirement of the solicitation may result in the Government determining the offeror to be unacceptable and ineligible for award. The Government will review each offeror's proposal to ensure all required documentation was provided in response to the solicitation. The Government will rely on the documentation provided by the offeror to facilitate the Contracting Officer's determination of proposal compliance.

5.3 Offeror Responsibility

No award shall be made to an offeror unless the Contracting Officer determines them to be responsible. To be determined responsible, an offeror shall meet the general standards described in FAR 9.104-1 and the requirements in Section M, paragraph M-2 subparagraph 2.0, Step 5. The Contracting Officer may consider information provided within any section of the proposal, and other information, not limited to proposal information, when making the determination of responsibility.

M-2 EVALUATION FACTORS AND METHODOLOGY

1.0 Evaluation of Proposals

The Government will select the proposal(s) that give the best value to the Government. To arrive at a decision, the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) will evaluate each offeror's Volume 1 - Executed Contract Documentation and Price Proposal and Volume II - Technical.

2.0 Evaluation Process

The evaluation process to be used is as follows:

Step 1 - Perform compliance review on all proposals to assess compliance with terms and conditions of the solicitation. Non-compliance with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation and may be grounds to eliminate the proposal from consideration for contract award.

Step 2 - The Government will sort the offerors not eliminated from consideration in Step 1 from highest to lowest by the offerors' self-scores identified on the Self- Scoring Worksheets.

Step 3 - The Government will validate the offerors' self-rated technical proposals beginning with the top five (5) highest scored offerors' Self-Scoring Worksheets. If the Government is unable to validate an offeror's self-rated score based on the substantiating documentation, the Government will unilaterally downward adjust the offeror's self-rated score, potentially down to zero points. The Government will only adjust the offeror's self-rated score downward, no upward adjustments will be made. The Government may cease evaluation of an offeror and eliminate it from further consideration for award if its Self-Scoring Worksheet is found to be grossly misrepresented as defined in paragraph M-1, subparagraph 5.1 above.

If an offeror's validated score causes the offeror to fall below the top five (5) scores, the next highest self-score will be evaluated. Validation of self-scores will continue until the Government identifies the top five (5) validated scores. The Government at its sole discretion may continue validation of scores below the top five

(5) highest validated scores to determine up to three (3) TBD IDIQ awardees eligible for potential on-ramping in accordance with the On-Ramping Procedures detailed in Section H, or if one or more of the prices for the top five (5) validated scores is determined not to be fair and reasonable in Step 4, or as otherwise determined to be in the best interest of the Government.

In the event two or more offerors achieve the same Government-validated technical proposal scores, the following will be used, in order, to rank proposals: (1) offeror with the higher number of unique design-build projects, (2) offeror with the higher number of highly complex projects, and (3) drawing of lots. Unique design-build projects are defined as projects included in Section I: Relevant Experience Projects of the Self-Scoring Worksheet which are not reused in multiple categories.

Highly complex projects are defined as projects with 5 or more tasks as defined in Section L paragraph L-2 subparagraph 2.2.1.9.

Step 4 - The Government will evaluate the price for the top five (5) validated scores as identified in step 3 and not eliminated from consideration in step 1. If the price for one or more of the top five (5) validated scores is determined not to be fair and reasonable, the Government will resume score validation as detailed in Step 3 until the Government identifies the five (5) highest Government-validated technical proposal scores with fair and reasonable pricing. The Government, at its sole discretion, may continue price evaluations to determine up to three (3) TBD IDIQ awardees eligible for potential on-ramping in accordance with the On- Ramping Procedures detailed in Section H or as otherwise determined to be in the best interest of the Government.

Step 5 - Perform a responsibility determination on the five (5) highest Government-validated technical proposal scores with fair and reasonable pricing. In order to be determined responsible an offeror must meet the following conditions:

--Offeror must meet the standards identified in FAR 9.104-1;

--Offeror must have an active 8(a) status at the time of initial bid due date. Joint ventures must have an SBA approved Joint Venture Agreement or have submitted its Joint Venture Agreement to the SBA prior to the initial bid due date.

--Offeror must possess an active California General Contractor's License, "Class A" or "Class B", or equivalent license from a state with a reciprocity agreement with State of California, registered in the prime contractor's name; or must demonstrate a four (4) year history of experience in successfully completing multiple trade construction efforts. Multiple trade construction efforts are defined as projects which involve at least two (2) separate and distinct construction trades including but not limited to carpentry, plumbing, electrical, mechanical, painting, pipe fitting, sheet metal, welding, roofing, site work, site utilities, excavation, concrete, masonry, pavement repair, asbestos abatement, lead paint removal, security hardware installation, or demolition.

--Offeror must provide evidence that it is able to obtain a minimum single project bonding capacity of $25M from an approved surety listed in the Department of the Treasury Circular 570 (http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570/) or other security permitted by FAR Subpart 28.2, unless prohibited by law or regulation.

If one or more of the five (5) offerors with highest Government-validated technical proposal scores and fair and reasonable pricing are determined non-responsible, the Government will forward the determination of non-responsibility to the Small Business Administration for review in accordance with FAR Subpart 19.6, except as exempted in FAR 19.602-1(a)(2), and may resume score validation and price evaluation as detailed in Steps 3 and 4. Evaluations will continue until the Government identifies the five (5) highest Government-validated technical proposal scores with fair and reasonable pricing who are determined responsible.

3.0 Evaluation Factors and Standards

3.1 Volume I - Executed Contract Documentation and Price Proposal

3.1.1 Compliance with Section L, Paragraph L-2, Subparagraph 2.1

3.1.1.1 The Government will review each offeror's Volume I - Executed Contract Documentation and Price Proposal to ensure all required documentation was provided in response to the solicitation. The Government will rely on the documentation provided by the offeror to facilitate the Contracting Officer's determination of proposal compliance.

3.1.1.2 Offeror's Executive Summary Sheet, Chapter 1 - SF 1442, Chapter 2 - Section K, Chapter 3 - Joint Venture Agreements (if applicable), Chapter 4 - SBA Validation, Chapter 5 - Contractor's License, Chapter 6 - Bonding Capacity, and Chapter 7 - Price Proposal will be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis regarding whether the requested proposal submission information meets all the conditions for the information requested in Section L paragraph L-2 subparagraph 2.1.

3.1.2 Price Proposal

3.1.2.1 The Government will evaluate the price for the top (5) highest scored offerors as identified in Section M paragraph M-2 step 3 Evaluation Process. The next three (3) offerors may be evaluated for price at the Government's discretion for TBD IDIQ award. The Government will evaluate highest scored offerors' Section J, Attachment 03, Volume I_Price Proposal Template for fair and reasonableness as a pass/fail criteria. An offer may be determined non-conforming to the solicitation and rejected if there is any missing or incomplete data on the Section J, Attachment 03, Volume I_Price Proposal Template.

3.1.2.2 Price proposals will be evaluated by reviewing the Program Manager, Superintendent, and Quality Control Manager hourly rates across fiscal years (FY) 2025 through FY 2032. These FYs will cover the five (5) year base and one (1) two (2) year option. Price proposals will be evaluated, using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR 15.404(b), in order to determine if it is fair and reasonable. For a price to be determined reasonable, it must represent a price to the Government that a prudent person would pay in the conduct of competitive business.

3.1.2.3 Normally, competition establishes price reasonableness. Therefore, comparison of the proposed prices will usually satisfy the requirement to perform a price analysis and other techniques need not be utilized. In limited circumstances, other price analysis techniques may be appropriate to establish price reasonableness.

3.2 Volume II - Technical

3.2.1 Self-Scoring Worksheet

3.2.1.1 Compliance with Section L, Paragraph L-2, Subparagraph 2.2 The Government will review each offeror's Volume II - Technical to ensure all required documentation was provided in response to the solicitation. The Government will rely on the documentation provided by the offeror to facilitate the Contracting Officer's determination of proposal compliance. Proposal submission information shall meet all conditions for the information requested in Section L paragraph L-2 subparagraph 2.2.

3.2.1.2 Scoring Validation

3.2.1.2.1 The HTRO methodology requires the offeror to submit a self-rated score based on the objective criteria and definitions described in Section L. The maximum number of points a contractor can receive is 75,000. Assessing technical excellence is inherent to the HTRO methodology with price. The Government will evaluate the offeror's self-rated technical proposal by validating the proposed Self-Scoring Worksheet. The Government will validate the offeror's self-rated scores using the substantiating documentation provided in accordance with Sections L paragraph L-2 subparagraphs 2.2.1.5 through 2.2.1.12. If the Government is unable to find the substantiating information within the referenced pages, paragraphs, tables, etc., the Government will not search further for the substantiating information. If the Government is unable to validate that offeror's self-rated score based on the substantiating documentation, the Government will unilaterally downward adjust the offeror's self-rated score, potentially down to zero points. The Government will only adjust the offeror's self-rated score downward, no upward adjustments will be made. Such adjustments are within the sole discretion of the Government and are based upon the substantiation of the self-rated score provided by the offeror.

1515 ICELAND AVE RM 150, VANDENBERG SFB CA 93437-5212

VANDENBERG SFB, CA 93437-5212

UNITED STATES

Jennifer Paccioretti, Email: jennifer.paccioretti@spaceforce.mil Telephone:…