Base Camp_FAR 12_Construction RFP Letter - Amendment 2_signed.pdf

11 March 2026

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) #FA445226R0007

Project Number: P4-00007-25

Project Title: 352 Special Warfare Training Squadron (SWTS) Base Camp Upgrade

Issuing Office: 763d Enterprise Sourcing Squadron, OL-Pope AAF

510 POW/MIA Drive, Bldg. P40, Suite E1004 Scott AFB, IL 62225-5022

Contracting Officer: Ms. Tonya Hughes Telephone: 618-256-9979 Email Address: tonya.hughes.2@us.af.mil

Contract Specialist: Ms. Amber Climaco Telephone: 618-256-9964 Email Address: amber.climaco@us.af.mil

SECTION A. GENERAL INFORMATION

The purpose of Amendment 2 is to extend the solicitation to 25 Mar 26, amend offer expiration date, add Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) acronym, and attach the Statement of Work (SOW). Any changes to the Statement of work are in red font.

This is a sole source direct 8(a) construction effort for Unami, LLC.

This RFP is not authorization to begin performance and in no way obligates the Government for any costs incurred by the contractor associated with developing a proposal. The Government reserves the right not to award a contract in response to this RFP. Prior to commencement of any activities associated with performance of this requirement, the Government will issue a written directive or contractual document signed by the CO with appropriate consideration established.

The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, with no obligation to the contractor by the Government.

1. Offer Acceptance Period: All offers shall contain a period of validity. Any offer that expires prior to 30 May 2026 shall be rejected and not considered for award.

2. Site Visit: A site visit is not scheduled as Unami, LLC has already conducted a site visit and provided the Government with a quote for this requirement. If another site visit is needed, contact the Contracting Officer, Tonya Hughes, at tonya.hughes.2@us.af.mil.

3. Questions: Questions or clarification of RFP documents shall be submitted in writing to the point of contact listed above. The request shall address the rationale and justification for obtaining such information in terms of how the clarification or explanation into how the mailto:tonya.hughes.2@us.af.mil mailto:hunter.ottensmeier@us.af.mil mailto:tonya.hughes.2@us.af.mil

RFP #FA445226R0007, 352 SWTS Base Camp Upgrade discrepancy affects development of the proposal in terms of price, schedule, or performance.

Additionally, the request should provide the applicable citations (sections, page numbers, and paragraphs) in the RFP documents where there exists a discrepancy or which requires clarification. Such requests may not receive a response if received after 11 March 2026 @ 10:00 am Central Time. Finally, if the request does not meet the requirements specified herein, the Government reserves the right to disregard the request. All questions and comments will be consolidated, and responses will be posted to SAM.gov.

4. Quote Due Date: The proposal for this solicitation is due 25 March 2026 @ 12:00 pm Central Time.

5. Quote Submission:

a. The quote and all required attachments shall be submitted via Email to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist (listed above) in accordance with the instructions stated in Section E below and must be received prior to the proposal due date and time stated above. Late proposals shall be handled in accordance with Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) FAR 15.107(b).

SECTION B. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT:

Contractor: ________________________________________________________ (Type Full Name)

Contractor POC Name / Title: ____________________________________________________ (Type Full Name and Title / Position)

Signature / Date: _______________________________________________________________

Telephone Number: ____________________________________________________________

Email Address: ________________________________________________________________

Total Number of Calendar Days from Notice To Proceed (NTP) Contractor can begin performance: __________________________________________

Total Number of Calendar Days to Complete Performance:______________________________

SECTION C. TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. Construction Wage Rate Requirements: The Davis Bacon Act (DBA) wage determination applicable to this RFP is the NC20250122, Building, published 01/02/2026.

2. Liquidated Damages (LD): Not Required.

3. Offer Guarantee (Bid Bond): If applicable, an offer guarantee shall be submitted in accordance with RFO FAR clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee. Bid Guarantees shall be submitted electronically with proposals as a part of Volume I, if applicable. Offerors shall ensure the seal and all signatures are plainly visible in electronically submitted bonds. Bid Guarantee shall be provided if proposal amount is over $150,000.00.

4. Alternative Payment Protections: An alternative payment protection shall be required in accordance with RFO FAR clause 52.228-13, Alternative Payment Protections. The contractor shall submit either a Payment Bond or an Irrevocable Letter of Credit within 10 days of award. A Notice to Proceed will not be issued until the payment protection is received. Alternate Payment Protection shall be provided if proposal amount is between $35,000.00 and $150,000.00.

5. Performance and Payment Bonds: Bonds shall be required in accordance with RFO FAR clause 52.228-15, Performance and Payment Bonds – Construction, within 10 calendar days after award. Bonds are to be submitted electronically, and offerors shall ensure the seal and all signatures are plainly visible. Offerors are required to include in their proposal, within Volume III, Price Proposal, the cost to provide the appropriate payment protection or bonds whenever their proposed cost exceeds $35,000.00.

SECTION D. EXHIBIT OF ATTACHMENTS

Attachment Title Date Pages 1 Statement of Work (SOW) 10 Mar 2026 11 2 Wage Determination 4 Mar 2026 6 3 Provisions and Clauses 4 Mar 2026 9 4 Price Proposal 4 Mar 2026 1

SECTION E. PROPOSAL PREPARATION / INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1. Failure to comply with RFP requirements may result in rejection of the proposal or an unfavorable proposal evaluation or being deemed ineligible for award. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in this RFP and all attachments.

2. Proposal Organization: Offeror’s submitting a proposal in response to this RFP shall submit their quote as follows:

Table 1

Volume Volume Title Page Limit

Unsanitized Copy

I Administrative Requirements N/A 1 II Technical Proposal 10 1 III Price Proposal N/A 1

3. Unsanitized Proposals: Text shall be black in Times New Roman 12-point font with no bold, italicized, or underlined text. Paragraphs shall be single-spaced. The only information permitted in headers is the RFP number and the footers shall only contain page numbers.

Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. If exceeded, the excess pages will not be read or considered in the Government’s evaluation of the proposal. If Interchange Notices (INs) are required, page limitations may be placed on responses to INs. The specified page limits to IN responses will be identified in the INs to the offeror. Each page shall be counted except the following: Cover pages, title pages, provisions and clauses (anything in relation to volume I).

4. Volume Contents:

a. Volume I – Administrative Requirements: Shall include the following:

i. RFP Letter: Section B shall be completed and signed.

ii. RFP Amendments, if applicable: Acknowledgement of Receipt of any RFP amendments shall be completed by the due dates stated in the RFP amendments, if applicable.

iii. Bid Guarantee: If required, bid guarantees shall be submitted within this volume in accordance with Section C of this RFP.

iv. Provisions and Clauses: The contractor shall complete the fill-in provisions and clauses applicable in Attachment 2.

b. Volume II – Technical Proposal: Shall include all documentation and information detailed in Section F. The technical proposal shall be clear, concise, and include all required information required by this provision in sufficient detail for an effective evaluation. The technical proposal shall detail the methodology to be used to take the requirement documents to construction completion and describe the approach for meeting the requirements. The narrative should include how the work will transition from one area or element to the next and your approach for ensuring the work required in the SOW meets the applicable codes and regulations.

Schedule. As part of Section B provided in Volume I, the offeror will propose the total number of calendar days from Notice To Proceed (NTP) the Contractor can begin performance as well as the total number of calendar days to complete performance. The proposed schedule to be submitted with Volume II, Technical, shall clearly show each critical element of construction with corresponding completion in calendar days as well as the total proposed project completion in calendar days. The schedule must be accompanied by a narrative that identifies significant risks that may hinder progress and a realistic mitigation plan for each risk.

Conditions, Limitations, and Assumptions. All technical proposal conditions, assumptions, and limitations the offeror seeks to have reflected in the final contract that deviates from the SOW provided by Government shall be separately and conspicuously listed under a separate heading titled “Conditions, Assumptions and Limitations” in the Volume II, Technical.

Failure by the offeror to ensure any such condition, assumption, or limitation as discussed above are incorporated into the SOW that is awarded to the contractor are deemed to be irrevocably waived by the contractor, even if the contractor’s proposal is incorporated into the final agreement, whether in part, in whole, or by reference.

c. Volume III – Price Proposal: The price proposal shall include the Price Proposal (Attachment 4) (see Section D for list of attachments) and a Cost Estimate Breakdown for the job. No cost or pricing information shall be included in any other section of this proposal. If performance and payment bonds are required in accordance with RFO FAR Clause 52.228- 15, Performance and Payment Bonds – Construction, the offeror shall include the cost to provide the appropriate payment protection or bonds within this Volume within their Cost Estimate Breakdown.

By submission of a proposal, the contractor accedes to all RFP requirements including terms, conditions, and representations.

SECTION F. EVALUATION / BASIS OF AWARD

1. This is a sole source negotiation conducted in accordance with RFO FAR Part 12 and 36.

Award will be made in accordance with the procedures specified in the RFP. A purchase order may be awarded to an offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the RFP requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by the RFP) and is judged to represent the technically acceptable proposal.

Following receipt of the proposals to this RFP, the Government will assign Factor 1, Technical, an adjectival rating, as defined below. Next, the Government will perform a comparative analysis (comparing offeror proposals to one another) in order to select the Offeror that is best suited to fulfill the requirements of the RFP. The comparative analysis will be based on the offeror’s responses to the Factors outlined in the RFP.

2. Interchanges: Interchanges are fluid interactions(s) between the CO and the Offerors that may address any aspect of the proposal and may or may not be documented in real time. The Government intends to make award based on initial proposal submissions without conducting interchanges. Therefore, each proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a technical and price standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to hold interchanges using INs, if during any portion of the evaluation it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government. Interchanges may be conducted with none, one, all, or a limited number of Offerors to address any issues, including Technical Approach and/or Price, if necessary. The Government is not required to conduct interchanges with any or all Offerors responding to this RFP.

3. Proposal Evaluation: Responses to this RFP will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria below:

a. Factor 1 – Technical: Under this factor, the Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposed Technical Approach based on the following:

Technical. A detailed methodology to take the requirement documents to construction completion and an approach for meeting the requirements. Approach includes how the work will transition from one area or element to the next and ensuring the work required in the SOW meets applicable codes and regulations.

Schedule. A total number of calendar days from Notice To Proceed (NTP) the Contractor can begin performance as well as the total number of calendar days to complete performance was proposed. A schedule clearly stated each critical element of construction with corresponding completion in calendar days as well as the total proposed project completion in calendar days. The schedule was accompanied by a narrative identifying significant risks and realistic mitigation plan for each risk.

During the evaluation of each proposal, the Government will assign the Factor a rating as shown below. The following ratings will be utilized:

Technical Approach Ratings Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets all requirements of the RFP and attachments, and the contractor can complete the required work within the specified period of performance.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet all requirements of the RFP and attachment, and/or the contractor cannot complete the required work within the specified period of performance.

b. Factor 2 – Price: The Government will evaluate the offeror’s price to ensure it is complete and determine whether the proposed prices are fair and reasonable. An Initial Total Evaluated Price (I-TEP) will result from an evaluation of the proposed prices. Should there be any interchanges, any price adjustments will be evaluated resulting in a Final Total Evaluated Price (F-TEP). If there are no price adjustments, the offeror’s I-TEP will become the F-TEP. Pricing is evaluated but not assigned a rating.

Completeness. The proposal will be reviewed to determine the extent to which all the price elements of the proposal have been addressed. The offeror’s price proposal will be evaluated to ensure continuity and traceability of prices to the technical proposal and between the initial proposal and any revisions thereto. The review will determine the adequacy of the offeror’s proposal in addressing and fulfilling the RFP requirements.

Reasonableness. For a price to be reasonable, it must represent a price to the Government that a prudent person would pay in the conduct of competitive business.

The Government will determine prices fair and reasonable through the use of one or more of the price analysis techniques at RFO FAR 15.404-1(b).

TONYA L. HUGHES

Contracting Officer