Attach 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 58 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Travis AFB Handy Man Multiple Award Construction Contract Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA442720R0002
About this file
This past performance questionnaire requests performance evaluations for a construction contractor being considered for the Travis AFB Handy Man Multiple Award Construction Contract solicitation. The solicitation will result in a minimum of three contracts awarded for labor, materials, equipment, transportation and supervision to perform handyman service projects at Travis AFB, CA in accordance with the contract statement of work and technical specifications. Respondents are asked to evaluate the contractor's performance on past projects based on criteria such as management and supervision quality, scheduling, cost proposals, and resolution of issues. The completed surveys should be emailed to the contracting officer by the specified date.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFI 004 - Flaking Paint-signed.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA442720R00020002 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Attach 7 - Travis bldg 931 report ltd lead Survey 9 January 2020.pdf | ||
| Attach 3 - Bldg 931 Insulation Foam Statement of Need dated 15 Jan 20.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment - FA442720R00020002.pdf | ||
| Attach 8 - Bldg 931 Asbuilts.pdf | ||
| Attach 9 - RFI QA Combined - B931.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation Amendment FA442720R00020001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Attach 3 - Bldg. 931 Insulation Foam Statement of Need.pdf | ||
| Attach 5 - Contract Security Clause 29 Apr 19.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attach 4 - Davis Bacon Wage Determination CA20190019 dated 6 December 2019.pdf | ||
| Attach 1 - SOW Handyman dated 23 September 2019.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation - FA442720R0002.pdf | ||
| Attach 6 - SCA Wage Determination 2015-5656 Rev. 14 dated 6 December 2019.pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a construction contract at Travis AFB, CA.
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact Lt Daniel Henry at (707) 424-7754 or daniel.henry.14@us.af.mil
BRYAN ARMSTRONG
Contracting Officer
1 Atch Past and Present Performance Questionnaire mailto:daniel.henry.14@us.af.mil
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: _________________________________________________________
Address: _________________________________________________________________
Phone Number: ____________________________________________________________
Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________
Dollar Amount: ____________________
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________
Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________ Fax Number: ___________________ _____________________________ Email Address: ___________________
C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:
60th Contracting Squadron Attn: 2nd Lt Daniel Henry daniel.henry.14@us.af.mil mailto:daniel.henry.14@us.af.mil
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate number on the scale (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 4 or 5.
1 2 3 4 5 Substantial Confidence
Satisfactory Confidence
Limited Confidence
No Confidence Unknown Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort
No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
The contractor: 1 2 3 4 5
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
5. Identified problems as they occurred.
6. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
7. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
8. Developed realistic progress schedules.
9. Met established project schedules.
10. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
11. Provided adequate project supervision.
12. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
13. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
14. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
15. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?
If yes, explain.
EXPLANATION:
☐ Yes
☐ No
The contractor: 1 2 3 4 5
16. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.
EXPLANATION:
☐ Yes
☐ No
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .