Attch - 6 Past Performance Questionnaire FA302223Q0334 V2.pdf

PDF 464 KB Posted

Attached to
Air Force/Space Force Branding Marketing Optimization Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA302223Q0334
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command

About this file

This document is a past performance questionnaire for a federal solicitation. The Air Force Air Education and Training Command is seeking an industry consultant to review and assess the Air Force/Space Force trademark licensing program, analyze the consumer market for branded merchandise, and develop a formalized merchandise licensing plan. Offerors must provide references, and contracting officers will send this questionnaire to evaluate past performance on similar efforts. Respondents have three calendar days to complete and return the questionnaire electronically or by fax by 12 October 2023 to allow for analysis before negotiations. The questionnaire includes sections for contract and respondent identification, performance ratings in technical areas, program management, and cost, as well as general comments.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Source Selection Information When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Section L Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire

Source Selection Information Page 1 of 8

The 14th Contracting Squadron of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command is in the process of competitively selecting a source for AFPAA Program Optimization. The customer is searching for an industry consultant will review and assess the trademark licensing program for effectiveness and efficiency, analyze the consumer market to see where we are undersaturated or oversaturated with Air Force/Space Force-branded merchandise, and develop a formalized merchandise licensing plan based on their findings and industry best practices.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 3 calendar days after your receipt of this letter 12 October 2023. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to Jacob.wunder.1@us.af.mil or by hand and faxed to 662 434 7753. Please call 1st Lieutenant Jacob Wunder at (662) 434-7762 prior to fax transmission or if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

IVAN T. LUCKETT, CIV, USAF

Contracting Officer

Attachements :

1. Past Performance Questionnaire http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836

Section L Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire – Sample 1

Source Selection Information Page 2 of 8

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

Section L Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire – Sample 1

Source Selection Information Page 3 of 8

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone number / fax number / e-mail address:

D. Respondent’s position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, etc.):

E. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

F. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

Section L Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire – Sample 1

Source Selection Information Page 4 of 8

Note: The following are SAMPLE questions. Past Performance evaluation teams MUST construct a simple and concise Past Performance Questionnaire, tailored to seek out key information tied to the significant aspects of the planned acquisition. Avoid questions that can be answered with a “yes” or “no” but instead include probing and direct questions to draw out the required information desired.

Technical Performance E V S M U N/A

T1. How well did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the specification?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

T2. How was the quality of technical system operations & maintenance testing and certification efforts?

T3. How was the quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts?

T4. How adequate/effective was the System Engineering Process?

T5. How well did the contractor implement current quality processes, standard practices for computer hardware design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control?

T6. How well did the contractor implement current standard practices for computer software design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control?

T7. How adequate/effective were the contractor’s environmental safety procedures?

Source Selection Information Page 5 of 8

Program Management E V S M U N/A

P1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

P2. How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)?

P3. How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance?

P4. How well did the contractor understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements?

P5. How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency and/or surge situations?

P6. How well did the contractor manage quality/effectiveness of subcontracted efforts?

P7. How effective was the contractor’s material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)?

Source Selection Information Page 6 of 8

Program Management E V S M U N/A

P8. How effective was the contractor’s acquisition management?

P9. Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors?

P10. To what degree did the contractor implement responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support?

Transition / Phase-in E V S M U N/A

TP1. How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel?

TP2. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts?

Employee Retention / Attraction E V S M U N/A

E1. How effectively was the contractor able to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort?

E2. How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort?

Section L Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire – Sample 1

Source Selection Information Page 7 of 8

Employee Retention / Attraction E V S M U N/A

E3. How effective was employee compensation towards quality of work?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation E V S M U N/A

S1. If the contract included FAR 52.219-9, to what degree was the contractor able to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

(Please state if FAR 52.219-9 was not included in the contract)

S2. If the contract included FAR 52.219-8, how effectively did the contractor manage small business participation to meet technical performance?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

(Please state if FAR 52.219-8 was not included in the contract)

Cost Performance E V S M U N/A

C1. How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

C2. How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

C3. How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

C4. How sufficient and timely was the contractor’s cost reporting?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

Section L Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire – Sample 1

Source Selection Information Page 8 of 8

Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

☐ Yes ☐ Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Terminations ☐ No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: GENERAL COMMENT

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I [ click and select an item ] award to him today given that I had a choice.

REMARKS:

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address:

[Insert here]

FAX to:

E-Mail to:

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836

through:
Current Schedule assuming all options exercised:
through_2:
Reason for difference if applicable:
K Was this a competitively awarded contract: Off
Prime Contractor: Off
Subcontractor: Off
Key Personnel: Off
ET1 How well did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the specification SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VT1 How well did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the specification SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ST1 How well did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the specification SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MT1 How well did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the specification SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UT1 How well did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the specification SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAT1 How well did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the specification SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ET2 How was the quality of technical system operations maintenance testing and certification efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VT2 How was the quality of technical system operations maintenance testing and certification efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ST2 How was the quality of technical system operations maintenance testing and certification efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MT2 How was the quality of technical system operations maintenance testing and certification efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UT2 How was the quality of technical system operations maintenance testing and certification efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAT2 How was the quality of technical system operations maintenance testing and certification efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ET3 How was the qualityintegrity of technical datareport preparation efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VT3 How was the qualityintegrity of technical datareport preparation efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ST3 How was the qualityintegrity of technical datareport preparation efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MT3 How was the qualityintegrity of technical datareport preparation efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UT3 How was the qualityintegrity of technical datareport preparation efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAT3 How was the qualityintegrity of technical datareport preparation efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ET4 How adequateeffective was the System Engineering Process SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VT4 How adequateeffective was the System Engineering Process SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ST4 How adequateeffective was the System Engineering Process SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MT4 How adequateeffective was the System Engineering Process SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UT4 How adequateeffective was the System Engineering Process SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAT4 How adequateeffective was the System Engineering Process SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ET5 How well did the contractor implement current quality processes standard practices for computer hardware design operation maintenance upgrades and configuration control SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VT5 How well did the contractor implement current quality processes standard practices for computer hardware design operation maintenance upgrades and configuration control SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ST5 How well did the contractor implement current quality processes standard practices for computer hardware design operation maintenance upgrades and configuration control SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MT5 How well did the contractor implement current quality processes standard practices for computer hardware design operation maintenance upgrades and configuration control SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UT5 How well did the contractor implement current quality processes standard practices for computer hardware design operation maintenance upgrades and configuration control SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAT5 How well did the contractor implement current quality processes standard practices for computer hardware design operation maintenance upgrades and configuration control SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ET6 How well did the contractor implement current standard practices for computer software design operation maintenance upgrades and configuration control SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VT6 How well did the contractor implement current standard practices for computer software design operation maintenance upgrades and configuration control SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ST6 How well did the contractor implement current standard practices for computer software design operation maintenance upgrades and configuration control SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MT6 How well did the contractor implement current standard practices for computer software design operation maintenance upgrades and configuration control SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UT6 How well did the contractor implement current standard practices for computer software design operation maintenance upgrades and configuration control SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAT6 How well did the contractor implement current standard practices for computer software design operation maintenance upgrades and configuration control SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ET7 How adequateeffective were the contractors environmental safety procedures SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VT7 How adequateeffective were the contractors environmental safety procedures SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ST7 How adequateeffective were the contractors environmental safety procedures SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MT7 How adequateeffective were the contractors environmental safety procedures SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UT7 How adequateeffective were the contractors environmental safety procedures SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAT7 How adequateeffective were the contractors environmental safety procedures SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
undefined:
EP1 How effective was overall contract management including ability to effectively lead manage control and deliver ontime SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VP1 How effective was overall contract management including ability to effectively lead manage control and deliver ontime SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
SP1 How effective was overall contract management including ability to effectively lead manage control and deliver ontime SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MP1 How effective was overall contract management including ability to effectively lead manage control and deliver ontime SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UP1 How effective was overall contract management including ability to effectively lead manage control and deliver ontime SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAP1 How effective was overall contract management including ability to effectively lead manage control and deliver ontime SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
EP2 How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff including the ability to successfully resolve disagreementsdisputes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VP2 How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff including the ability to successfully resolve disagreementsdisputes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
SP2 How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff including the ability to successfully resolve disagreementsdisputes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MP2 How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff including the ability to successfully resolve disagreementsdisputes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UP2 How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff including the ability to successfully resolve disagreementsdisputes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAP2 How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff including the ability to successfully resolve disagreementsdisputes SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
EP3 How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VP3 How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
SP3 How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MP3 How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UP3 How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAP3 How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
EP4 How well did the contractor understandcomply with customer objectives and technical requirements SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VP4 How well did the contractor understandcomply with customer objectives and technical requirements SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
SP4 How well did the contractor understandcomply with customer objectives and technical requirements SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MP4 How well did the contractor understandcomply with customer objectives and technical requirements SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UP4 How well did the contractor understandcomply with customer objectives and technical requirements SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAP4 How well did the contractor understandcomply with customer objectives and technical requirements SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
EP5 How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency andor surge situations SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VP5 How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency andor surge situations SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
SP5 How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency andor surge situations SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MP5 How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency andor surge situations SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UP5 How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency andor surge situations SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAP5 How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency andor surge situations SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
EP6 How well did the contractor manage qualityeffectiveness of subcontracted efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VP6 How well did the contractor manage qualityeffectiveness of subcontracted efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
SP6 How well did the contractor manage qualityeffectiveness of subcontracted efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MP6 How well did the contractor manage qualityeffectiveness of subcontracted efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UP6 How well did the contractor manage qualityeffectiveness of subcontracted efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAP6 How well did the contractor manage qualityeffectiveness of subcontracted efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
EP7 How effective was the contractors material management including Government Furnished Property or Material SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VP7 How effective was the contractors material management including Government Furnished Property or Material SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
SP7 How effective was the contractors material management including Government Furnished Property or Material SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MP7 How effective was the contractors material management including Government Furnished Property or Material SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UP7 How effective was the contractors material management including Government Furnished Property or Material SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAP7 How effective was the contractors material management including Government Furnished Property or Material SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
EP8 How effective was the contractors acquisition management SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VP8 How effective was the contractors acquisition management SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
SP8 How effective was the contractors acquisition management SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MP8 How effective was the contractors acquisition management SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UP8 How effective was the contractors acquisition management SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAP8 How effective was the contractors acquisition management SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
EP9 Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methodsprocesses that reduced cost improved maintainability or other factors SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VP9 Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methodsprocesses that reduced cost improved maintainability or other factors SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
SP9 Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methodsprocesses that reduced cost improved maintainability or other factors SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MP9 Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methodsprocesses that reduced cost improved maintainability or other factors SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UP9 Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methodsprocesses that reduced cost improved maintainability or other factors SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAP9 Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methodsprocesses that reduced cost improved maintainability or other factors SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
EP10 To what degree did the contractor implement responsiveflexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VP10 To what degree did the contractor implement responsiveflexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
SP10 To what degree did the contractor implement responsiveflexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MP10 To what degree did the contractor implement responsiveflexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UP10 To what degree did the contractor implement responsiveflexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAP10 To what degree did the contractor implement responsiveflexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ETP1 How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VTP1 How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
STP1 How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MTP1 How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UTP1 How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NATP1 How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ETP2 How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioningphasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VTP2 How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioningphasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
STP2 How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioningphasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MTP2 How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioningphasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UTP2 How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioningphasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NATP2 How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioningphasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
EE1 How effectively was the contractor able to hireapply a qualified workforce to this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VE1 How effectively was the contractor able to hireapply a qualified workforce to this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
SE1 How effectively was the contractor able to hireapply a qualified workforce to this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ME1 How effectively was the contractor able to hireapply a qualified workforce to this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UE1 How effectively was the contractor able to hireapply a qualified workforce to this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAE1 How effectively was the contractor able to hireapply a qualified workforce to this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
EE2 How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VE2 How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
SE2 How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ME2 How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UE2 How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAE2 How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
EE3 How effective was employee compensation towards quality of work SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VE3 How effective was employee compensation towards quality of work SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
SE3 How effective was employee compensation towards quality of work SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ME3 How effective was employee compensation towards quality of work SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UE3 How effective was employee compensation towards quality of work SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAE3 How effective was employee compensation towards quality of work SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
ES1 If the contract included FAR 522199 to what degree was the contractor able to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan SUPPORTING INFORMATION Please state if FAR 522199 was not included in the contract:
VS1 If the contract included FAR 522199 to what degree was the contractor able to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan SUPPORTING INFORMATION Please state if FAR 522199 was not included in the contract:
SS1 If the contract included FAR 522199 to what degree was the contractor able to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan SUPPORTING INFORMATION Please state if FAR 522199 was not included in the contract:
MS1 If the contract included FAR 522199 to what degree was the contractor able to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan SUPPORTING INFORMATION Please state if FAR 522199 was not included in the contract:
US1 If the contract included FAR 522199 to what degree was the contractor able to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan SUPPORTING INFORMATION Please state if FAR 522199 was not included in the contract:
NAS1 If the contract included FAR 522199 to what degree was the contractor able to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan SUPPORTING INFORMATION Please state if FAR 522199 was not included in the contract:
ES2 If the contract included FAR 522198 how effectively did the contractor manage small business participation to meet technical performance SUPPORTING INFORMATION Please state if FAR 522198 was not included in the contract:
VS2 If the contract included FAR 522198 how effectively did the contractor manage small business participation to meet technical performance SUPPORTING INFORMATION Please state if FAR 522198 was not included in the contract:
SS2 If the contract included FAR 522198 how effectively did the contractor manage small business participation to meet technical performance SUPPORTING INFORMATION Please state if FAR 522198 was not included in the contract:
MS2 If the contract included FAR 522198 how effectively did the contractor manage small business participation to meet technical performance SUPPORTING INFORMATION Please state if FAR 522198 was not included in the contract:
US2 If the contract included FAR 522198 how effectively did the contractor manage small business participation to meet technical performance SUPPORTING INFORMATION Please state if FAR 522198 was not included in the contract:
NAS2 If the contract included FAR 522198 how effectively did the contractor manage small business participation to meet technical performance SUPPORTING INFORMATION Please state if FAR 522198 was not included in the contract:
EC1 How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VC1 How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
SC1 How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MC1 How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UC1 How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAC1 How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
EC2 How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VC2 How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
SC2 How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MC2 How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UC2 How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAC2 How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
EC3 How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VC3 How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
SC3 How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MC3 How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UC3 How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAC3 How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
EC4 How sufficient and timely was the contractors cost reporting SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
VC4 How sufficient and timely was the contractors cost reporting SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
SC4 How sufficient and timely was the contractors cost reporting SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
MC4 How sufficient and timely was the contractors cost reporting SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
UC4 How sufficient and timely was the contractors cost reporting SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
NAC4 How sufficient and timely was the contractors cost reporting SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
Yes_2: Off
Default: Off
Convenience: Off
Pending Terminations: Off
No_2: Off
Date2_af_date:
Dropdown4: [Choose an Item]
Text5:
Text6:
Text7:
Text8:
Text9:
Text10:
Text11:
Text12:
Text13:
Text14:
Text15:
Text16:
Text17:
Text18:
Text19:
Text20:
Text21:
Text22:
Text23:
Text24:
Text25:
Text26:
Text27:
Text28:
Text29:
Text30:
Text31:
2023-09-22T15:09:31-0500
LUCKETT.IVAN.TERRELL.1233582740

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .