Attch 5 Example Past Performance Evaluation Worksheet.pdf
PDF 192 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Air Force/Space Force Branding Marketing Optimization Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA302223Q0334
About this file
This document contains an evaluation worksheet for past performance assessments related to solicitation FA302223Q0334 from the Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command for Air Force/Space Force branding and marketing optimization services. The worksheet provides details on how the government will evaluate offerors' past performance, including reviewing CPARS reports and other sources to assign a relevancy rating of very relevant, relevant, somewhat relevant, or not relevant based on the scope, magnitude, and complexity of prior efforts. Offerors will then receive a performance confidence assessment of substantial confidence, satisfactory confidence, neutral confidence, limited confidence, or no confidence. Only offerors assessed with satisfactory confidence or better will be considered for award. An integrated evaluation of past performance and price will determine best value.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attch - 4 Questions and Answers Updated 101023.pdf | ||
| Attch - 6 Past Performance Questionnaire FA302223Q0334 V2.pdf | ||
| AFPAA Combo V4 09222023.pdf | ||
| Attch - 6 Past Performance Questionnaire FA302223Q0334.pdf | ||
| AFPAA Combo V3 09152023.pdf | ||
| AFPAA Combo V2 09132023.pdf | ||
| Attch 3 Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Attch 2 Provisions and Clauses FA302223Q0334.pdf | ||
| Attch 4 Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| Attch 1 Statement of Work.pdf | ||
| Attch 5 Example Past Performance Evaluation Worksheet.pdf | ||
| Attch 4 Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| AFPAA Combo.pdf | ||
| Attch - 3 Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Attch - 1 Statement of Work.pdf | ||
| Attch - 2 Provisions and Clauses - FA302223Q0334.pdf |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Individual Evaluation Worksheet
AFPAA Program Optimization
OFFEROR:
The Government will accomplish Past Performance evaluation by reviewing past performance information provided in the Offeror' s Past Performance submittals and information obtained from other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPlRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Contract Tracking and Reporting System (CTARS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers or Contracting Officers or their appointed assistants referenced by the Offeror in any of the past performance information disclosed. Past Performance information is evaluated for the purpose of assigning a confidence assessment in order to make an award that is most advantageous to the Government.
1. The Past Performance evaluation results in an integrated assessment of the Offerors probability of meeting the RFP requirements and the assignment of an overall rating based on consideration of the Offeror's recent, relevant and quality past performance based on the Offeror's CPARS reports and other information.
2. Per the FAR 52.212-2 included in the RFP only offerors with an assessed confidence rating of Satisfactory Confidence or better will be considered for award
3. An integrated assessment of past performance and price factors will be accomplished to determine the best value to the Government.
The contractor will be assigned one of four assessments based on the Past Performance relevancy Table found in the Evaluation Criteria:
Table 1. Past Performance Relevancy Rating Method Rating Description
Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Assigned Relevancy: _______________________________
The contractor will be assigned one of five assessments based on the Past Performance relevancy Table found in the Evaluation Criteria:
Table 2. Performance Confidence Assessment
Adjectival Rating Description
Substantial Confidence
Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence
Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will
Neutral Confidence
No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror's performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.
Limited Confidence
Government has a low expectation that the offeror will
No Confidence
Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to
Assigned Assessment: _______________________________
Evaluator: ________________ Initials _________ Date: XX September 2023
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .