Solicitation Amendment FA301625R00350001 SF 30.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors--Commercial Products and Commercial Services

Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors--Commercial Products and Commercial Services

Addendum to 52.212-1(b), Submission of Offers. The paragraph is tailored as follows:

1.0 General Instructions

This section provides general guidance for preparing proposals, as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the proposal. Throughout this solicitation, the term "Offeror" includes subcontractors, teammates and/or joint venture partners. The Offeror's proposal must include all data and information requested and must be submitted in accordance with (IAW) these instructions. The Offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the solicitation. A proposal that is sufficiently documented to support technical capability and price in a complete, orderly, and specific detailed manner will enable the Government to perform a thorough and fair evaluation. Compliance with the instructions and solicitation is mandatory. Failure to comply may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation and render the proposal ineligible for award.

2.0 Site Visit

A site visit will be scheduled for at 9:00 AM CDT at JBSA Lackland, Texas. Tuesday, 29 July 2025 The meeting place will be the JBSA Lackland AFB Luke Gate Visitor Center located at 2602 Luke Blvd, Lackland Air Force Base, TX 78236. Please arrive at least 1-hour PRIOR to sign in and retrieve your pass at the

The Government WILL NOT provide transportation to travel between the sites. Interested parties are required to haveVisitor Center due to potential wait times.

a valid Driver's License, vehicle registration and insurance readily available while on JBSA Lackland.

Interested parties shall send a request to Emily Rodriguez at emily.rodriguez.8@us.af.mil and Miranda Garza at NOT LATER THANmiranda.garza.2@us.af.mil Monday, 21 July 2025, at 11:00 a.m. CDT. It is the interested party's responsibility to ensure their request has been received. This information will be used to obtain base access passes and safeguarded IAW procedures outlined in the Privacy Act of 1974 and DoD 5400.11R. The request should include the following information:

(a) Name(s) of the individual who will be in attendance (Last Name, First Name, MI)

(b) Date of Birth (DD/MMM/YY)

(c) Country of Birth

(d) 4ID Type (State or Federal issued Identification (ID) Number, to include Country of Issue and State of Issue (Driver's License, State Identification, or U.S.

Passport ID Number))

(e) Company Representing

(f) Phone Number

Note: . Please inform the above POC's if company representative(s) have access to Air Force installations and do not require coordinated base access

2.1 Questions and/or concerns regarding this Solicitation shall be presented in writing and directed via email to the Contracting Officer, Emily Rodriguez at and the Contract Specialist, Miranda Garza at , emily.rodriguez.8@us.af.mil miranda.garza.2@us.af.mil

All questions and/or concerns SHALL be submitted no later than . Late questions/concerns will not be accepted nor considered.Thursday, 31 July 2025 Responses to questions will be posted to SAM.gov (the Contract Opportunities website).

2.2 Notice to Offeror(s)/Supplier(s): Funds are not presently available for this effort. No award will be made under this solicitation until funds are available. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs.

3.0 Information Regarding Submission Requirements

Documents submitted in response to this solicitation must comply with requirements of the solicitation and Performance Work Statement (PWS). To be considered, the complete proposal must be received not later than the date and time established in Block 8 of the SF 1449. electronically, via email to all "recipients" detailed below:

(a) Recipient: Emily Rodriguez at emily.rodriguez.8@us.af.mil

(b) Recipient: Miranda Garza at miranda.garza.2@us.af.mil

Offerors should be aware of the potential that the Government experiences delays in email service to JBSA Lackland and must take all necessary precautions. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(f) "Late submission, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers"

All proposals must be in English. Any proposal, modification, or revision that is received after the exact time specified for receipt of proposals is "late" and will not be considered unless it is received before award is made, the Contracting Officer determines that accepting the late proposal would not unduly delay the acquisition and it was the only proposal received.

4.0 Proposal Preparation and Format Instructions

This section provides general guidance for preparing proposals regarding the format and content of the proposal. To ensureEach volume shall be complete.

timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein; all the requirements specified in this solicitation are mandatory.

FA301625R00350001

mailto:emily.rodriguez.8@us.af.mil mailto:emily.rodriguez.8@us.af.mil mailto:miranda.garza.2@us.af.mil

By submitting your proposal, Offerors are representing that your firm will fulfil all the requirements specified in the solicitation. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, and representations and certifications, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors and subfactors.

Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale.

4.1 Page Limitations

Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. Total page count will be based on the electronic proposal submission. If page limitations are exceeded, excess pages will not be read nor considered in the evaluation of the proposal. A page is defined as an 8.5 x 11-inch document containing information. All information except for document numbers, page numbers, etc., shall be provided in an image area with no less than one inch (1") in margin. The maximum number of pages foreach volume is listed below. Price information shall be limited to Volume I. Excess pages will not be evaluated but will be retained in the file. See table below for specific number of copies required and pages for each of the Volumes.

TITLE NUMBER OF COPIES

MAXIMUM NUMBER OF

PAGES

Volume I.

Contracting & Pricing

One (1) Original No page limitation

Volume II.

Technical Proposal

One (1) Original plus, 1 Redacted copy

Redacted copy should not include any reference to the company name or names of personnel and/or any identifying logos

Limit to no more than ten (10) pages

4.2 Pages Counted

Each page shall be counted except for the following:

(a) Cover pages

(b) Table of Contents

(c) List of Figures

(d) Glossaries

(e) Tabs

(f) Section or Dividing Pages

(g) Blank Pages

4.3 Text

Text type should be Times New Roman or Arial, no smaller than 12-point font with normal proportional spacing. Illustrations and tables shall be no smaller than Times New Roman or Arial 10-point font. Text lines will be, at a minimum, single-spaced.

4.4 Tables, Charts, Graphs, and Figures

Legible tables, charts, graphs, and figures shall be used wherever practical to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plants, etc.

These displays shall be uncomplicated, legible, and shall not exceed 11 x 17-inches in document size. These documents will count as a single page and may only be used for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams, and schematics, but not for pages of text. For graphics, exhibits and figures, text shall be no smaller than Times New Roman or Arial 10-point font. Text within tables shall be no smaller than Times New Roman or Arial 10-point font.

4.5 Labeling

Each volume (Volume I - Contracting & Pricing, Volume II - Technical Proposal) of the proposal shall be implemented and written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated on a stand-alone basis. Cross-referencing between volumes is not permitted. Information required for proposal evaluation which is not found in its designated volume will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted. The title of each document (Volume I and Volume II) shall be labeled with the identity the Offeror's name and volume title (Volume I - Contracting & Pricing, Volume II - Technical).

Within each electronic document, the Offeror will identify the Offeror's point of contact (to include name, phone number and email address), Volume number/title, RFP No. FA301625R0035 and RFP title "16th Air Force Custodial Services".

4.6 Proposal Clarity

The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation of the Offeror's capabilities and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The Offeror's proposal shall not simply rephrase, reiterate, or restate the Government's own language, but rather shall provide convincing rationale describing how it intends to fulfill the requirement. Legibility, clarity, and coherence are very important. Provide as specifically as possible the actual methodology you would use for accomplishing and satisfying the requirements. The Offeror shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of its capabilities, facilities, and experience and will base the evaluation on the information presented in the Offeror's proposal.

FA301625R00350001

5.0 Specific Proposal Instructions

The Offeror must follow the instructions contained herein. The proposal must be complete, stand-alone, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation.

The response shall consist of two (2) separate parts/electronic documents:

(a) Volume I - Contracting & Pricing

(b) Volume II - Technical Proposal

5.1 Volume I - Contracting & Pricing Instructions

The Contracting Officer (CO) has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the CO will review this determination and if, in the CO's opinion, adequate price competition exists, no additional cost information will be requested. However, if at any time during competition the CO determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, offerors may be required to submit other than certified cost or pricing data to the extent necessary for the CO to determine the reasonableness of the price.

Section 1 - Solicitation

Offeror must provide a signed copy of the SF 1449 from an individual legally authorized to bind the Offeror, and completed blocks 12, 17, and 30. In doing so, the Offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the solicitation with attachments. In the event any amendments (SF 30) to the solicitation are issued, a signed copy of each amendment shall be placed before the solicitation starting with the most recent amendment issued. Complete all contract clause fill-ins, if applicable.

Section 2 - Schedule of Supplies/Services

The Offeror shall complete the Supplies or Services and Prices/Cost section of the RFP and the Electronic Pricing Schedule spreadsheet (Attachment 3) within Volume I. A unit price shall be proposed and inserted for each Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) Contract Line-Item Number (CLIN) for each performance period and shall be rounded up to two (2) decimal places. For Not to Exceed (NTE) CLINs, the Offeror(s) WILL NOT fill in or change the amount of the NTE CLINS 0X07 of the Supplies or Services and Prices/Cost section of the RFP, but it will be added to the Total Evaluated Price (TEP). The extended amount must equal the unit price multiplied by the number/quantity of units. The proposed prices shall be based on the Offeror's own approach and the Government's PWS requirements as set forth herein. Offerors who change the quantities stated in the solicitation will render the proposal ineligible for award. If there is any mismatch between electronic pricing schedule and the SF 1449, the amount annotated in the SF1449 will be utilized.

The Offeror shall submit only pricing information that will be evaluated for award or become part of the resulting contract. Supply costs and associated General and Administrative (G&A) cost plus profit or fee, should be included in the unit price for each task listed in the Price List. Wages will be subject to Service Contract Labor Standards Wage Determination increases over the contract life.

Section 3 - Representations and Certifications

Complete the necessary fill-ins, certifications, and provisions. The Offeror shall complete only paragraph (b) of the provision at FAR 52.212-3 if the Offeror has completed the annual representations and certification electronically via the SAM.gov website (System for Award Management) located at https://sam.gov. If the Offeror has not completed the annual representations and certification electronically, the Offeror shall complete only paragraphs (c) through (p) of the provision at FAR 52.212-3 and return it along with the proposal.

Section 4 - Status as a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) concern This requirement is an SDVOSB set-aside. Status as an SDVOSB concern under the SDVOSB Program is determined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) in accordance with 13 CFR part 128. For setting aside awards under the SDVOSB Program, the contracting officer shall verify that an offeror is eligible for consideration by confirming that a concern either--

(a) Is designated as certified by SBA in SBA's Veteran Small Business Certification (VetCert) database athttps://veterans.certify.sba.gov; or

(b) Has both represented its status as an SDVOSB concern in the System for Award Management (SAM) and applied for certification to SBA's VetCert database on or before December 31, 2023. Pending applications are available at https://veterans.certify.sba.gov.

If an offeror meets the criteria at (a) or (b) above, the contracting officer may proceed with offeror evaluation. If an offeror is a joint venture, the contracting officer may proceed with offeror evaluation if the managing SDVOSB joint venture partner meets the criteria at (a) or (b) above. If an offeror does not meet either criteria at

(a) or (b), the contracting officer shall remove the concern from consideration.

Section 5 -Teaming Agreement

All Team Members shall have a signed Teaming Arrangement (TA) or Letter of Intent (LOI), and provide a copy in this tab. To be valid under this solicitation, a Teaming Arrangement (TA) or Letter of Intent (LOI) must commit the business entities to performance under this contract, should it be awarded to the Offeror.

(a) Any business entity without a TA or LOI with the Offeror is NOT considered as part of the "team" and will not be evaluated as such.

(b) Mentor-Protege (M-P) is a relationship and not a business entity. M-Ps require formal TAs or LOIs to qualify for consideration as a Team Member.

(c) A Joint Venture (JV) will be considered a sole business entity. Signed JV documentation must be provided in Volume I, Contracting.

(d) The proposal shall present a complete, coherent presentation of the Team's ability as applicable.

Section 6 - Financial Disclosure Release Statement

Provide a release statement authorizing the Government to request information from current financial institutions or lenders which must be submitted on official letterhead. In addition to this authorization, the Offeror should include the financial institution or lender's address and point of contact, including email and phone number, to be contacted with the authorization.

5.2 Volume II -Technical Proposal

Each Offeror shall submit a technical volume with its proposal IAW the format below. Offerors are cautioned that the Government will only use data provided by each Offeror in this volume in the technical evaluation. By your proposal submission, you are representing that you will perform all the requirements specified in the solicitation and attachments herein and is not necessary or desirable for you to tell us so in your proposal. Do not merely reiterate the objectives or reformulate the requirements specified in the solicitation.

Section 1 - Technical Factors and Subfactors

All the requirements specified in the solicitation are mandatory. The contractor shall address the proposed approach to meeting the minimum performance or capability requirements of each technical Sub factor. The responses will be evaluated against FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation Factors. Marketing presentations are not wanted and will not be evaluated. Hard and compelling evidence of capabilities is required to receive credit for evaluation factors. Legibility, clarity, and coherence are very important. Offerors are strongly encouraged to provide as specifically as possible, the actual methodology to be used for accomplishing and satisfying the requirements.

1) Technical Factor # 1 - Management Plan

The offeror shall submit a management plan that illustrates the corporate philosophy and management approach to demonstrate evidence of sound organization, appropriate manning mix and qualifications proposed, and performance management processes to successfully accomplish tasks delineated in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). The plan should provide evidence of knowledge and capability delivering custodial services as defined in the solicitation. At a minimum, the plan shall:

(a) Demonstrate a business approach for structuring, staffing (to include proposed manning), retaining personnel, and utilization of key personnel to plan, control, and direct the labor force to meet the requirements of the PWS. The approach shall include an organizational chart with definition of roles and responsibilities of key operating personnel and staffing levels depicting various job classifications (including supervision).

(b) Provide mitigating strategies and processes designed to prevent and proactively identify and forecast potential risks that could have an adverse impact to schedule or performance.

(c) Identify phase-in activities (to include a timeline with rationale addressing the start and completion of staffing, training, and equipment/supplies acquisition) designed to provide seamless continuity of services without interruption or degradation of services by contract start date.

2) Technical Factor # 2 - Quality Control Plan

The offeror shall provide a "quality control plan" (QCP) with a complete written system for identifying and correcting deficiencies and degradation in the quality of services before the level of performance becomes unacceptable. At a minimum, the plan should specifically address contract requirements and location(s) listed and provide the following:

(a) The plan shall address responsibilities for oversight of the QCP, functions associated with such oversight, and specify authority to coordinate with the Contracting Officer Representative (COR) and Contracting Officer (CO).

(b) The plan shall describe the methodology to monitor deficiencies/complaints in relation to the performance standards. Describe the approach to inform employees of validated deficiencies/complaints, and a process to ensure that the deficiencies/complaints are corrected.

(c) The plan shall include samples of inspection forms, records, reports, and any other internal quality control methods.

3) Technical Factor #3 - Top Secret Facility Clearance

The offeror shall provide proof of current Top Secret Facility Clearance issued by the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) and be Director of Central Intelligence ICD 704 eligible with a current T5/T5R investigation. All applicants must be U.S. citizens. A valid Top Secret Facility Clearance is required to be in the National Industrial Security Program (NISP) Database IAW the attached DD Form 254 (Attachment 4).

Addendum to 52.212-1(c), Period for Acceptance of Offers. The paragraph is tailored as follows: "The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 180 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers."

Addendum to 52.212-1(d), Product Samples, is deleted in its entirety.

Addendum to 52.212-1(e), Multiple Offers, is deleted in its entirety.

Addendum to 52.212-1(g), Contract Award, is deleted in its entirety.

Addendum to 52.212-1(h), Multiple Awards, is deleted in its entirety.

(End of Addendum)

Evaluation Factors for Award

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation--Commercial Products and Commercial Services

Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation--Commercial Products and Commercial Services

Addendum to 52.212-2(a), Paragraph (a) is tailored as follows:

(a) The Government intends to award one contract for this competitive, Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Set-Aside acquisition. Award will be made to the technically acceptable offer with the lowest evaluated price who is deemed responsible IAW FAR 9.104 and whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements. The solicitation requirements include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by this solicitation. Unless specifically identified in your proposal, by submission of its offer the Offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in a proposal being determined ineligible for award.

This contract will be awarded as Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ). It is the Government's intent to evaluate proposals and award a contract in accordance with (IAW) FAR 13.106. FAR Part 15 based evaluations will NOT be used for this acquisition. The initial proposal should contain your best terms; however, the Government reserves the right to conduct interchanges if determined necessary by the Contracting Officer to resolve issues such as technical or price, or deal with contract documentation including any other matter in the evaluation process. The contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity to revise proposals.

1.0 Evaluation Process

The Government may consider, throughout the evaluation, the "correction potential "of any proposal. The judgment of such "correctional potential" is within the sole discretion of the Government. If any aspect of an offeror's proposal does not meet the Government's requirements and is not considered correctable, the offer may be ineligible for award. Offers will be ranked based on initial assessment of total overall evaluated prices, followed by a full evaluation of Technical Acceptability, then Price Reasonableness of the technically acceptable offer with the lowest evaluated price. Only proposals rated technically acceptable are eligible to receive an award.

1.1 Price Evaluation

The Government will rank proposals based on an initial assessment of offeror's total evaluated prices, followed by a full evaluation of Technical Acceptability and Price Reasonableness as follows:

(a) Rank by Total Evaluated Price, as submitted. The Government will rank all proposals by the initially proposed total evaluated price, from lowest to highest, including all ordering periods. An offeror's proposed estimated price will be determined by multiplying the estimated quantities by the proposed unit price for each CLIN. The total evaluated price also includes the amounts associated with all Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Not to Exceed CLIN's 0X07. The extended amount for each CLIN will be totaled to obtain the estimated total for each performance period. The estimated total for the basic performance period will then be added to the estimated total for each ordering period to obtain the Total Evaluated Price. The Total Evaluated Price consists of the base and all ordering periods.

(b) The contract will include FAR Clause 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, with the potential to extend the contract an additional six (6) months beyond the awarded contract performance period. The price for that period will be determined based on the unit prices proposed for the current period of performance and will be evaluated at time of award. In the event the Government requires continued performance, the Government's evaluation of prices proposed will be considered fair and reasonable as applied to an extension of services IAW FAR 52.217-8. Should an extension of services be required, rates will only be adjusted due to revisions on applicable prevailing Department of Labor wage rates.

1.2 Technical Evaluation

If the Government receives three (3) or fewer initial proposals, all proposals will be evaluated for Technical Acceptability. If the Government receives more than three (3) proposals, the Government will only select the three (3) lowest priced proposals and then evaluate them for Technical Acceptability. The Government reserves the right to evaluate additional proposals for Technical Acceptability if in the Government's best interest. If additional proposals are evaluated for Technical Acceptability, they will be selected in the order of total evaluated price.

1.3 Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method

The technical rating reflects the evaluation of the acceptability of the offeror's technical approach for meeting the Government's requirement. The offeror's proposal shall be evaluated to determine whether the proposal is acceptable or unacceptable. The evaluation factors listed below will be evaluated and receive one (1) of the following ratings:

(a) Acceptable - The proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

(b) Unacceptable - The proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

1.4 Evaluation of Factors

Offerors are advised that their initial submission should be their best effort. Only Technically Acceptable proposals, either initially or as a result of interchanges, are eligible for award. If award is made without interchanges, proposal revisions will not be permitted. The Government will evaluate the proposals selected above for Technical Acceptability on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis.

For the technical proposal to be rated as "Acceptable", all technical factors and subfactors must be rated "Acceptable". If any technical factor or subfactor is rated "Unacceptable", the overall proposal will be rated as "Unacceptable". The technical proposal will be evaluated for the following technical factors and subfactors:

1) Technical Factor # 1 - Management Plan

Standard: The offeror shall submit a management plan that illustrates the corporate philosophy and management approach to demonstrate evidence of sound organization, appropriate manning and qualifications proposed, and performance management processes to successfully accomplish tasks delineated in the PWS.

The plan should provide evidence of knowledge and capability delivering janitorial services as defined in the solicitation. At a minimum, the plan:

(a) Demonstrates a business approach for structuring, staffing (to include proposed manning), retaining personnel, and utilization of key personnel to plan, control, and direct the labor force to meet the requirements of the PWS. The approach includes an organizational chart with definition of roles and responsibilities of key operating personnel and staffing levels depicting various job classifications (including supervision).

(b) Provides mitigating strategies and processes designed to prevent and proactively identify and forecasts potential risks that could have an adverse impact to schedule, or performance.

(c) Identifies phase-in activities (to include a timeline with rationale addressing the start and completion of staffing, training, and equipment/supplies acquisition) designed to provide seamless continuity of services without interruption or degradation of services by contract start date.

The standard has been met when: The offeror adequately demonstrates a sound, comprehensive, realistic, effective, and efficient management approach to provide and manage the appropriate workforce to achieve consistent, efficient, and uninterrupted operations in accordance with the requirements of the PWS and subfactors above.

2) Technical Factor # 2 - Quality Control Plan

Standard: The offeror shall provide a "quality control plan" (QCP) with a complete written system for identifying and correcting deficiencies and degradation in the quality of services before the level of performance becomes unacceptable. At a minimum, the plan specifically addresses contract requirements and location(s) listed and provides the following:

(a) The plan addresses responsibilities for oversight of the QCP, functions associated with such oversight, and specifies authority to coordinate with the COR and CO.

(b) The plan describes the methodology to monitor deficiencies/complaints in relation to the performance standards. Describes the approach to inform employees of validated deficiencies/complaints, and a process to ensure that the deficiencies/complaints are corrected.

(c) The plan includes samples of inspection forms, records, reports, and any other internal quality control methods.

The standard has been met when: The offeror adequately demonstrates a sound, comprehensive, realistic, effective, and efficient quality control approach to correct deficiencies and degradation of services to achieve consistent, efficient, and acceptable performance service levels in accordance with the requirements of the PWS and subfactors above. The strategies outlined in the plan are realistic to minimize the effects of deficiencies/complaints and designed to efficiently and effectively correct and prevent reoccurrence.

3) Technical Factor #3 - Top Secret Facility Clearance

Standard: The offeror shall provide proof of current Top Secret Facility Clearance issued by the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) and be Director of Central Intelligence ICD 704 eligible with a current T5/T5R investigation. All applicants must be U.S. citizens. A valid Top Secret Facility Clearance is required to be in the National Industrial Security Program (NISP) Database IAW the attached DD Form 254 (Attachment 4).

The standard has been met when: The offeror has provided proof of current Top Secret (TS) Facility Clearance issued by the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) and be Director of Central Intelligence ICD 704 eligible with a current T5/T5R investigation. Applicant(s) is a U.S. Citizen and has valid Top Secret Facility Clearance in the NISP Database.

2.0 Price Reasonableness

The Government will conduct a complete Price Analysis using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR 13.106, to determine if the lowest price technically acceptable offer is fair and reasonable.

(End of Addendum)

1655 SELFRIDGE AVE BLDG 5450, CP 210-671-3617

JBSA LACKLAND, TX 78236-5286

UNITED STATES

Miranda Garza, Email: miranda.garza.2@us.af.mil Telephone: 2106712842 AdminBy:

SCD: PAS: