Attch 5 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 50 KB Posted
- Attached to
- HQ AETC IT Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA301625F0005
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template (Attachment 5) for solicitation FA301625R0005 for AETC IT Support Services. The questionnaire is designed to evaluate contractors' past performance across 15 specific performance areas using a 1-5 rating scale, where 1 is Unsatisfactory and 5 is Very Good.
The evaluation criteria focus on the contractor's management capabilities, quality control procedures, problem-solving abilities, schedule adherence, and overall performance. Key areas include: providing experienced managers/supervisors, maintaining qualified personnel, following quality control plans, timely resolution of issues, meeting schedules, responsiveness to contract changes, and cooperation with Government personnel. The questionnaire must be completed by previous clients and submitted to specified Air Force personnel via email. The document includes sections for contractor information, respondent details, and additional remarks, including whether the contractor received any cure notices or would be recommended for future contracts.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment FA301625R00050004.pdf | ||
| Attch 6 Past Performance References.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation Amendment FA301625R00050002 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA301625R00050003 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment 0001 SF30.pdf | ||
| Attch 2 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP).pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA301625R0005.pdf | ||
| Attch 3 WD 2015-5253 Rev 25 dated 23 Dec 2024.pdf | ||
| Attch 4 DD Form 254.pdf | ||
| Attch 6 Past Performance References.pdf | ||
| Attch 1 Performance Work Statement (PWS).pdf | ||
| Attch 5 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA301625R0005
AETC IT Support Services
Attachment 5 PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled in This Document is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
Contractor’s Name: Address: Telephone Number: Fax Number: Point of Contact:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Contractor:
*NOTE: If the contractor holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years from the date of issuance of this solicitation, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Contractor performed as the □ Prime Contractor □ Sub-Contractor □ Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
| Name of Respondent: | Title: | Address: | Telephone Number: | |
| Fax Number: | E-mail Address: |
C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: michelle.watkins4@us.af.mil and ricky.harris@us.af.mil
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance quality. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY QUALITY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| Unknown (Neutral) |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
No relevant past performance information is available or it is so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be assigned.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problems(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
FA301625R0005
AETC IT Support Services Services
THE CONTRACTOR:
| 1 |
| Provide experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 2 |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 3 |
| Followed approved quality control plan |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 4 |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspections procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 5 |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 7 |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 8 |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 9 |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 10 |
| Met established project schedules |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 11 |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 12 |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 13 |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 14 |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 15 |
| How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 16 |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES / NO |
| 17 |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks." |
| YES / NO |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
Remarks:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .