Attch 5 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

FA301625R0005

AETC IT Support Services

Services

Attachment 5 PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled in This Document is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

Contractor’s Name: Address:

Telephone Number:

Fax Number:

Point of Contact:

Project Title or Brief Description of Work:

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Contractor:

*NOTE: If the contractor holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years from the date of issuance of this solicitation, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

Contractor performed as the □ Prime Contractor □ Sub-Contractor □ Key Personnel.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: Title:

Address: Telephone Number:

Fax Number:

E-mail Address:

C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: michelle.watkins4@us.af.mil and ricky.harris@us.af.mil

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance quality. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR

ANY QUALITY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.

1 2 3 4 5

Unknown (Neutral)

Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good

No relevant past performance information is available or it is so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be assigned.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problems(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

FA301625R0005

AETC IT Support Services

THE CONTRACTOR:

1 Provide experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

1 2 3 4 5

2 Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

1 2 3 4 5

3 Followed approved quality control plan 1 2 3 4 5

4 Provided effective quality control and/or inspections procedures to meet contract requirements.

1 2 3 4 5

5 Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

1 2 3 4 5

6 Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies 1 2 3 4 5

7 Identified problems as they occurred. 1 2 3 4 5

8 Suggested alternative approaches to problems 1 2 3 4 5

9 Displayed initiative to solve problems 1 2 3 4 5

10 Met established project schedules 1 2 3 4 5

11 Was responsive to contract changes. 1 2 3 4 5

12 Provided adequate project supervision. 1 2 3 4 5

13 Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. 1 2 3 4 5

14 Cooperated with Government personnel after award 1 2 3 4 5

15 How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance? 1 2 3 4 5

16 Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES / NO

17 Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks." YES / NO

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

Remarks: