Attachment L-02 MAHG23-1052 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Reconfigure Keesler AFB Perimeter Security Fence Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA301025R0008
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for the Keesler Air Force Base Perimeter Security Fence Reconfiguration project. The solicitation (FA301025R0008) is a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business set-aside construction project with an estimated value between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000, located at Keesler AFB. The questionnaire is designed to collect performance feedback from previous contractors, with responses due by 2:00 PM CST on April 14, 2024, to be submitted directly from a corporate or government email account.
The evaluation form requires detailed ratings across multiple performance categories including quality, schedule, management, and regulatory compliance, using a scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory. A site visit for potential contractors is scheduled for Tuesday, March 25, 2025 at 9:30 AM CDT, with specific base access requirements including valid identification, vehicle registration, and proof of insurance. The project is being managed by the 81st Contracting Squadron under the Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation No. FA301025R0008
Please complete this questionnaire and email to: kristy.hill.1@us.af.mil
We are currently preparing our proposal for the 81st Contracting Squadron, Keesler AFB, MS, Solicitation Number: FA301025R0008 for Reconfigure Keesler AFB Perimeter Security Fence, F8544. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency or company under the previous or ongoing contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
This Questionnaire is due to Kristy Hill no later than 2:00 PM CST on April 14, 2024. The Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate or government email account.
If you will be unavailable on April 14, 2024, for verification (if necessary) of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another point of contact (POC) for the Contracting Officer to contact.
Thank you.
POC/Alternate POC Name:
POC/Alternate POC Phone Number:
POC/Alternate POC Email Address:
Name of Offeror:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
CONTRACT REFERENCED
Contract Number (including Task Order number if applicable):
Contract Value (including all modifications):
Period of Performance:
Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:
Agency/Company:
Title:
Phone:
Email:
Attachhment L-02
FA301025F0008
MAGH 23-1052
Brief Description of Work Required in the Referenced Contract:
EVALUATION
Please rate the contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives giving specific details would be appreciated. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. Evaluation Definitions:
The following definitions should be used in assessing Contractor performance.
Exceptional: Performance EXCEEDS MANY contractual requirements. Performance being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good: Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. Performance being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory: Performance MEETS contractual requirements. Performance being evaluated contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. Performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginal effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory: Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirements. Performance contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Not Applicable (N/A): Performance information is not recent or relevant as defined in the solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
QUALITY
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet work requirements and the overall quality of the work?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A Quality of Work
Comments:
Attachhment L-02
SCHEDULE
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide end-products timely?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A Timeliness Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems
Comments:
MANAGEMENT
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to manage all aspects of the work?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A Managing Work Aspects
Comments:
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet all regulatory requirements? Examples would include safety regulations, Davis-Bacon Act and other labor standards.
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A Complying with Regulations
Comments:
OVERALL RATING OF CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
What is your overall rating of the Contractor’s performance on the contract being assessed.
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
Attachhment L-02
General Comments:
Attachhment L-02
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .