Attachment_6_-_PPQ.docx
DOCX document 39 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SERE Training Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA3002-20-R-0002
About this file
This request for proposal solicits non-personal services to conduct and support SERE and ECAC training. Required services include personnel, supervision, instruction, and other identified items. Training will be conducted at Fairchild Air Force Base and Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland. The NAICS code is 611519 and the small business size standard is $16.5 million. This will be a competitive set-aside for SDVOSBs. Proposals are due by November 15, 2019. The 338th Specialized Contracting Squadron is conducting this follow-on acquisition.
Section J - Attachment 6 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA3002-20-R-0002, SERE Training Support Services Section J - Attachment 6
For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
Past Performance Questionnaire
The 338th Specialized Contracting Squadron of the Air Force is in the process of competitively selecting a source for Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape (SERE) Training Support Services. Service Provider selected will be required to provide SERE instructors to augment military instructors for the 336th Training Group at Fairchild AFB, WA and Lackland AFB, TX. Service Provider will conduct, support and supplement training at Fairchild, Lackland, and remote training sites in accordance with (IAW) approved Air Force syllabus.
One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the Offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the Offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the Offeror, for the evaluation of the Offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.
Our areas of interest regarding the Offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 10 calendar days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data.
To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to kenneth.campbell.22@us.af.mil and joseph.sitterly.2@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.
Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.
KENNETH CAMPBELL
Contracting Officer
1 Atch Past Performance Questionnaire
PLEASE DO NOT SEND THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE CONTRACTOR.
1. The contractor listed below is being considered in a Source Selection by the 338th Specialized Contracting Squadron, Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph, TX. You have received this questionnaire because you have been identified as a source of Past Performance Information for that offeror.
2. Indicate a rating, based on the description below, for the contractor’s performance on the identified program. Circle, or otherwise clearly mark the selected rating. Assessments should reflect only contractor liable performance. The following is a definition of the rating levels:
Performance Ratings
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Exceptional (E)
During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.
Very Good (VG)
During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action.
Satisfactory (S)
During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.
Marginal (M)
During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) all contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.
Unsatisfactory (U)
During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or failed) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered. Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required.
| Not Applicable (N/A) |
| Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know. |
3. Please provide narrative explanations to support your ratings particularly for high or low ratings. If narrative explanations are not provided, you may be contacted to provide the explanations. Space for your remarks is provided after each area.
4. Please fill in all sections. Indicate “Not Applicable - N/A” if a question does not apply.
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
1. Program Title ______________________________________________________________
1. Contractor (Company/Division): _______________________________________________
1. Contractor Cage Code _______________________________________________________
1. Contract number ____________________________________________________________
1. Contract type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPFF ____________________________________________
1. Was this a competitively awarded contract? Yes __________ No _________
1. Was this contract set aside for small business? Yes __________ No _________ If Yes, how was it set aside ___________________________________________
1. Period of Perfomance ______________________________________________________
1. Initial contract cost: __________________________________________________________
1. Current/final contract cost: ____________________________________________________
1. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
L. Brief Description of Effort as ________Prime or ________Subcontractor:
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
1. Customer or agency name: _____________________________________________________
1. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
1. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, national, worldwide, other Commands: ________________________________________________________________
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
1. Evaluator's Name: ___________________________________________________________
1. Evaluator's Position or Title ( e.g., Program Manager, QAE, PCO/ACO): __________________________________________________________________________
1. Evaluator's PhoneNnumbe/E-mail:_______________________________________________
| D. | Number of years Evaluator worked on subject contract:______________________________ |
| E. | Other suggested points of contact: ______________________________________________ |
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
A. Mobilization
A.1. Contractor’s ability to recruit, train, qualify and certify a sufficient number of fully qualified instructors and staff to assume full responsibility on performance start date.
(Please explain, in the Comments block, any disruptions of service during the mobilization period.)
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| A.2. Contractors ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel to meet mobilization plan as stated in their proposal? |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
A.3. Timely contract start-up (acquired required licenses, administrative clearances, equipment, etc.) by performance start date.
(Please explain, in the Comments block, if there were significant changes to their proposed approach.)
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
A.4. How well did the contractor ensure all employees performing services on this contract possessed the required clearance level prior to performing services and that the contractor possessed a current industrial facility clearance?
(Please explain, in the Comments block, if there were significant changes to their proposed approach.)
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| A.5. Rate the contractor’s ability to ensure all employees passed a government approved Human Factors Evaluation. |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| A.6. Please provide YOUR OVERALL RATING for this factor. |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
Comments:
B. Staffing Strategy
| B.1. How well did the Contractor retain trained and qualified personnel, including training management and instructor staffing to meet the requirement throughout the life of the contract? |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| B.2. How well did the Contractor provide certified backup personnel for “one deep” positions to ensure continuous contract performance? |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| B.3. Rate the Contractor’s ability to determine workforce composition, e.g., productive/non-productive hours, overtime, weekend shift, proper skills mix for proper work areas, etc. |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| B.4. How well has the contractor worked with active-duty military personnel in a training environment? |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| B.5. Please provide YOUR OVERALL RATING for this factor. |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
Comments:
D. Technical Performance
| D.1 Rate the contractor’s experience in conducting laboratory role play instruction in captive prisoner scenarios. |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| D.2. How well did the contractor conduct survival training to include tasks such as navigation and use of maps? |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| D.3. Perform to standard as it applies to communication skills in the application and limitations in the use of physical and psychological pressures in conduct of safe role-play and resistance training laboratories |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| D.4. Perform to standard of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements. |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| D.5. Ability to transition to new guidance |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| D.6.Contractor submitted all deliverables in accordance with the established delivery schedules. |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| D.7.Contractor’s timely performance of administrative actions (e.g. submission of required reports, records and other data submissions). |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| D.8. Please provide YOUR OVERALL RATING for this factor. |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
Comments:
E. Quality Control Plan
| E.1. How well did the Contractor implement corrective action to ensure timely and acceptable performance in accordance with the PWS and contractor’s QCP? |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| E.2. How well did the contractor link their internal quality control strategy to achieving corrective actions when needed? |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| E.3. Please provide YOUR OVERALL RATING for this factor. |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
Comments:
F. Employee Retention/Attraction
F.1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| F.2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort. |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
Comments:
G. Program Management
| G.1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| G.2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes) |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| G.3. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes) |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| G.4. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
| G.5.Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations |
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
Comments:
H. Please discuss each response for which you indicated EX (Exceptional), MAR (Marginal) or UNS (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
I. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience? Or indicate if there is a pending termination?
No ____ Yes ____ For Default ____ For Convenience ____ Pending Terminations ____ If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.). __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
J. Please provide YOUR OVERALL RATING for this contract by circling your rating:
| UNS |
| MAR |
| SAT |
| VG |
| EX |
| NA |
K. GENERAL COMMENT (Choose one of the following and explain your choice in the remarks)
Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute as promised in their proposal, I, (mark your response below), award to them today given that I had a choice.
Definitely would _____________ Probably would ______________ Might or might not ____________ Probably would not ___________ Definitely would not ___________
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
EVALUATOR’S SIGNATURE DATE
PLEASE DO NOT SEND this completed questionnaire to the Contractor.
WE APPRECIATE YOUR PROMPT RESPONSE AND ASSISTANCE!
Please complete the questionnaire for the contractor and program described in Section 1. Send the completed questionnaire via email to the following addresses:
(Simply copy and paste the addresses below in to the “To…” box) kenneth.campbell.22@us.af.mil; joseph.sitterly.2@us.af.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .