PostingResponsetoQuestionsdated14Mar08.pdf

PDF 30 KB Posted

Attached to
Maxwell-Gunter AFB BOS FA3002-06-R-0004 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA3002-06-R-0004
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Installation and Mission Support Center Installation Contracting Agency

About this file

Response to Questions dated 14 Mar 08

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Maxwell-Gunter AFB BOS FA3002-06-R-0004, newest first.
File Type Posted
10-2 Housing Occupancy Rate amendment 0013.doc DOC document
CE-SAG SDS Metric amendment 0013.doc DOC document
19 01 Max Custodial Description of Services amend 0013.doc DOC document
19 02 Max Custodial Service Summary amend 0013.doc DOC document
05 05 MAX Resource Management Workload Appendix 5B amendment 0013.doc DOC document
Service Delivery Summary w val method for Bidders V2 amendment 0013.xls XLS spreadsheet
10 05 MAX Housing Workload Appendix 10 B amendment 0013.doc DOC document
ATTACH7MaxwellCostModel-21Aug08Amend0017.xls XLS spreadsheet
ATTACH6ManpowerMatrix-6AUG08Amend0016.xls XLS spreadsheet
ATTACH7MaxwellCostModel-6Aug08Amend0016.xls XLS spreadsheet
AF 7115 Dec 2007.pdf PDF
ATTACH7MaxwellCostModel-5May08Amend0014.xls XLS spreadsheet
02 05 MAX All-Services Workload Appendix 2B(Amendment 14).doc DOC document
PostingENQuestionResponseAmend12_26Mar08.pdf PDF
PostingQuestions04Sep.pdf PDF
PostingQuestions30Aug.pdf PDF
Amend0011.zip ZIP file
Amend0010.zip ZIP file
Amend0008.zip ZIP file
FA3002-06-R-0004-0005Replacement95page.pdf PDF
Amend0004.zip ZIP file
GunterSiteVisit.doc DOC document
MaxwellPPMaster11May07.ppt PPT presentation
FA3002-06-R-0004Amendment0003SF30.doc DOC document
HotelsMotelsMontgomeryPrattvilleAL.doc DOC document
ATTACH5CBAs.zip ZIP file
ATTACH16PART1DRAFTPP.zip ZIP file
Section7A.doc DOC document
1_QUESTIONFORM5.doc DOC document
Section7-Consolidated.doc DOC document
RFIDraftPWSSection7.doc DOC document
QuestionFormDraftPWSSection7.doc DOC document
RFIDraftSectionHClause.doc DOC document
QuestionFormDraftSectionHClause.doc DOC document
ReadyCombinedSA14.doc DOC document
ReadyCombinedSA28.doc DOC document
RFIDraftPWS10 15 and28.doc DOC document
6_QuestionFormDraftPWS.doc DOC document
RFIDraftPWS5.doc DOC document
ReadyCombinedSA24.doc DOC document
ReadyCombinedSA21.doc DOC document
4_QuestionFormDraftPWS.doc DOC document
ReadyCombinedSA30.doc DOC document
RFIDraftPWS1.doc DOC document
ReadyCombinedSA16.doc DOC document
1_QuestionFormDraftPWS.doc DOC document
ReadyCombinedSA22.doc DOC document
ReadyCombinedSA3.doc DOC document
ReadyCombinedSA9.doc DOC document
NOTICETOOFFERORS.doc DOC document
Show all 50

Maxwell-Gunter AFB BOS FA3002-06-R-0004 has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Response to Questions dated 14 Mar 08 FA3002-06-R-0004 there wi e signi icant changes within the cost mode .

r

GOVT RESPONSE TO OFFEROR QUESTIONS

Tracking # RFP Reference Comment/Question Response

MAX-DIS-001 Section B, Page 10,19,28,36,44,53,of 126, Attch 7, Basic through Option 5 Schedule

DISCUSSION: RFP Section B lists CLINs X001 through X046 above the Target Cost Line. Attachment 7 Schedules list CLINs X001 through X040 above Target Cost, with a formula that sums said CLINs. The “definition” of Target Cost seems to conflict between the two schedules.

QUESTION: Will the Government provide a clear definition of the CLINs to be included in the Target Cost and/or revise the format of Section B to reflect the format coded in the Attachment 7 Cost Model?

The definition of Target Costs is the sum of all Fixed Price Incentive (Firm Target) CLINs, which include CLINs X0001 – X040. The Schedules worksheets on the revised Cost Model at Attachemnt 7 (to be incorporated with Amendment 0012) will include the definition of Target Costs which is to be applied to Section B and the Cost Model.

MAX-DIS-002 Sections B & L , Attch 6 Manpower Matrix & Atch 7 Cost Model

DISCUSSION: In the Summary, Example 1, there is a reference to Cost Reimbursable CLIN X044, Services for NAF "which should not be included" but does not specify from which model, Manpower Matrix or Electronic Cost Model, it is to be removed.

QUESTION: Does this exclusion refer to ATTACH 6 Manpower Matrix or to ATTACH 7 Electronic Cost Model?

Since the Cost Reimbursable CLIN X044, Services for NAF, is not included in the Total Evaluated Price, the total man-years (and corresponding total price) should be excluded from the totals on both the Manpower Matrix (Attachment 6) and the Cost Model (Attachment 7).

MAX-DIS-003 Section L, Atch 7 Cost Model

DISCUSSION: The instructions for change pages in the EN responses include change bars on the right side of the page. In XXXX's cost model, changes ripple through the model affecting other worksheets. With the changes impending due to Amendment 0012, ll b f XXXX l QUESTION: Is it necessary to place changes bars on all changes o is it sufficient to address the scope of the changes within XXXX's cost model in the EN responses?

It is sufficient to address the scope of the changes within your firm’s cost model in the EN responses provided that the scope of changes to the cost model and any other supporting worksheets is detailed enough to sufficiently track the changes in all the affected documents to include which specific files and worksheets are affected.

MAX-DIS-004 Section L, Atch 7 Cost Model

DISCUSSION: En references the use of a corrected cost model titled, ATTACH7MaxwellCost Model-1 Oct07 Amend 0012, dated 1 Oct 07, attached to amendment 0012.

QUESTION: The last amendment posted to FED BIZ OPS is Amendment 0011 dated 30 Aug 07. There is no Posting for Amendment 0012, not did we receive it via any other means.

Additionally, the date referenced in the EN is 1 Oct 07, which was approximately 2 weeks after submittal date of our proposal. Please Clarify.

Amendment 0012 was issued on 12 Mar 08. The revised Cost Model incorporated with Amendment 0012 is now dated 8 Feb 08.

MAX-DIS-005 Section L, Atch 7 Cost Model

DISCUSSION: The formulas in column D that sum the Prime and Subcontract cost are adding the Subcontract cost twice. For example, entering $100 in the ODC line for the Subcontractors results in a total of $100 in the Prime’s cost column, and would appear to be correct. However, all costs from columns B and C are then added across into column D. The $100 entered in the Subcontract column becomes $200 in the Prime and Sub column (column D) so that the Subcontract cost is added twice. We acknowledge that Section B appears to pull the information properly from the Schedule B worksheets and the effect of this double counting of the Subcontract cost does not carry forward. However, this double counting creates an inherent discrepancy between the Section B worksheets and the Schedule B worksheets supporting them.

QUESTION: Will the formula error in column D be corrected to eliminate the double counting of the Subcontract costs?

Please disregard Column D data. All necessary cost data to be evaluated is contained in Columns B & C. As you acknowledged, Section B pulls the correct information properly from the Schedule B worksheets so there is no double counting of costs to Section B.

MAX-DIS-006 RFP Section L.2.1 DISCUSSION: PWS explanations could be very lengthy.

QUESTION: Do the page limitations in RFP L.2.1 still apply for EN change page responses? Please Clarify.

Yes. There will be no change in page limitations.

necessar production ti e etc

A support or G is no longer per or ed

MAX-DIS-007 RFP Section L DISCUSSION: The current due date of March 28, 2008 was based upon receipt of Amendment 0012 by March 10, 2008. In light of the fact that Amendment 0012 has not been posted yet, we request an extension of the current due date of March 28, 2008. Offerors must go out to subcontractors for revised proposals, conduct analysis and discussions of those proposals, make revisions to our proposal, conduct internal proposal audits and corporate reviews and allow for y m .

QUESTION: Will the Government consider an extension of the current due date of March 28, 2008 to allow for the noted delay in the receipt of Amendment 0012?

The EN response date is extended to 4 April 08, however, cut-off date for questions remains 19 Mar 08.

MAX-DIS-008 PWS DISCUSSION: AETC Enterprise Transformation will in essence remove the PWS requirements for the Maxwell IT Help Desk in April 08 and the Telephone Switchboard in July 08. Additionally, base housing was privatized at Maxwell-Gunter in October 07 and AVAY f ELS f m .

QUESTION: Is it your intent to amend the solicitation to remove or revise the PWS to reflect changes in these areas? If the scope does change, is it your intent to require our responses to ENs written in these areas? Please Clarify.

Refer to Amendment 0012

MAX-DIS-009 PWS para 4.2.a.1.c DISCUSSION: Majority of technical ENs received discuss meeting PWS requirements. Contractor’s intent was to meet RFP requirement 4.2.a.1.a in general terms for all PWS sections and to address PWS requirement 4.2.a.1.c in greater detail within our organization. QUESTION:

Answering in the detail requested by each EN could easily exceed 300 pages. Is it your intent for the contractor to provide this level of detail for all PWS requirements? Please Clarify.

Contractor will not exceed page limitations stated in the RFP and respond accordingly to ENs.

many y week 7days a week and are any o the de ined recurrin routs

NOTE: This solicitation is for a Fixed Price contract to accomplish the complete Base Operating Support (BOS) requirement identified in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). The workload data for the past 3 years has been included for reference to use in creating your bid. However, the workload data provided is only an estimate of the contractor support required for the future contract. Changing Maxwell- Gunter missions may cause the actual required future workload to fluctuate. Specific average workload events per month and associated average duration of effort required for each event is not guaranteed and may go up or down from the workload estimate data provided or from the answers we are providing to the following questions:

MAX-DIS-0010 PWS 25B.1 Workload Data

Please define how many of the 32 events are exercises and how are deplo ments.

Makes no difference as the process is the same

MAX-DIS-0011 PWS 25B.1 Workload Data

Please confirm whether or not the 109 Air Freight Line Items processed are included in the 1571 Volume of cargo processed annually?

No

MAX-DIS-0012 PWS 25B.1 Workload Data

Please confirm whether or not the 96 annual 463L pallet loads are included in the 786 annual tons handled for surface movement during mobility?

No

MAX-DIS-0013 PWS 25B.1 Workload Data

Please list what WRM equipment is referred to in PWS 25.1.2.4.21.

There is no WRM equipment listed in the workload.

25K load joint use between transportation and PAX terminal

MAX-DIS-0014 PWS 25B.1 Workload Data

a) Please define the mileage associated with the 10,735 bus dispatches. And do the dispatches occur 5 days a week or 7 days a

( ) , f m f g ?

b) And do the dispatches occur 5 days a week or 7 days a week;

c) and are any of them defined recurring routs?

a) Range 10 to 100 Miles one-way b) 7days a week c) Yes

MAX-DIS-0015 PWS 25B.1 Workload Data

a) Of the 324 dispatches outside the POD, please define the average distance traveled.

b) Also please define dispatches as bus, taxi, truck or U-drive it.

a) Range 100 to 200 miles one way; b) Varies; as required

MAX-DIS-0016 PWS 25B.1.2.1.1 a) Please define “small quantities of haz material.”

b How many trips to Anniston a year?

a) Range .25 to 5 tons b) Varies; as directed by DRMO

MAX-DIS-0017 PWS 25B.1 Workload Data

Please specify how many of the 296 annual DRMO dispatches are to Anniston AL, Ft Benning GA, and Eglin FL?

DRMO directs which location

MAX-DIS-0018 PWS 25B.1 Workload Data

Please confirm if the 2405 dispatches to Gunter from Maxwell are taxi dispatches and whether they are included in the 7854 annual taxi dispatches?

Refer to note in section 25B.1.15 through 25B.1.18 y g gl

MAX-DIS-0019 PWS 25B.1 Workload Data

Please confirm if the 2277 dispatches to Maxwell from Gunter are taxi dispatches and whether they are included in the 7854 annual taxi dispatches?

Refer to note in section 25B.1.15 through 25B.1.18

MAX-DIS-0020 PWS 25B.1 Workload Data

Please confirm if the 2718 dispatches on weekends are taxi dispatches and whether they are included in the 7854 annual taxi dispatches?

Refer to note in section 25B.1.15 through 25B.1.18

MAX-DIS-0021 PWS 25B.1 Workload Data

Please define how many special needs buses are needed or define their routs, frequencies, miles driven, da s required etc.

At this time 1 bus, daily, from Maxwell to Gunter and return

MAX-DIS-0022 PWS 25B.1 Workload Data

Of the 10,735 annual bus dispatches, how many require bus safety attendants? Which days are they required. How many miles per dispatch?

At this time 1 bus, daily, from Maxwell to Gunter and return

MAX-DIS-0023 PWS 25B.1 Workload Data

Are all of the 207 annual mobility dispatches 40ft trailers and tractors, or do they also consist of box trucks, forklifts, K loaders? If so how many of each and what is the average mileage of the dispatches?

Operate a contingency dispatch operation to dispatch vehicles and equipment as required IAW the PWS

MAX-DIS-0024 PWS 25B.1 Workload Data

The workload specifies 2065 annual dispatches to Dannelly Field from Maxwell and 222 annual dispatches to Dannelly Field from Gunter. What kind of dispatches are these, bus, truck, taxi, u-drive it? Are they 5 or 7 days a week?

Varies; as required, workload is an average and changes continually

MAX-DIS-0025 RFP Section L Given the restriction on page count and the need for us to address additional topics, and the fact that the 160 page Technical Proposal has already been reviewed, will the Government allow us additional page count to avoid us having to remove material in order to insert the new information? XXX considers the responses to the ENs binding contract documents, based on that fact, are changed pages to the proposal required?

The Page Count will not be increased from 160 pages. If the EN requires a change to the Proposal then a change page as directed will be required.

MAX-DIS-0026 RFP Section J Attachments 2 & 5

Will the Government provide the most current Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBAs) and Wage Determinations (WDs) to allow us to revise our pricin accordin y?

See Amendment 0012.

s eci ies re lace e t o su lies, aterials, a d vehicles. e have

MAX-DIS-0027 Sect H, Clause H-029 CLIN No. X042 includes a “plugged number” cost amount ($1,000,000.00) to cover costs associated with Clause H-029, which p f p m n f pp m n W included the amount specified in our pricing to cover the replacement of these items. However, we are being requested to identify and fund these items. Please clarify whether or not the plugged number provided is intended to cover the costs of these items.

CLIN X042 is an estimated CLIN and funds may or may not be available. In accordance with H-029(b), “The contractor will be provided any supplies/materials at contract start that is left over from previous contract. Any additional supplies/materials for BOS or authorized customers shall be provided by the contractor. The contractor shall bid those costs into the target cost”. The CLIN X042 funds will not be used for this. In accordance with H-029(c), “The contractor shall provide replacement of government furnished commercial design general-purpose, special-purpose, base maintenance, and material handling vehicles necessary for contract performance by either purchase or lease. The contractor shall bid those costs in their target cost”. The CLIN X042 funds will not be used for this.

MAX-DIS-0028 PWS Appendix 25FF.1.7 and

25FF.1.8

Reference Appendix 25FF.1.7 and 25FF.1.8 Contractor Furnished GSA leases and other Government motor vehicle conveyances, is the cost of these leases included in the Government provided “plugged number” for CLIN X042?

Appendix 25FF.1.7. identifies vehicles that the incumbent is leasing and those costs are not funded out of the CLIN X042 (see answer above). The purchase or leasing costs should be bid in your target cost. Appendix 25FF.1.8. are vehicles for tracking purposes only and not funded by the contractor.

Command and Control Vehicles for AU and ABW, costs should be included in CLIN X039 AA and AB.

MAX-DIS-0029 PWS Appendix 25F Appendix 25F indicates no Government supplies, materials, or lease equipment provided, however, Appendix 25FF provides a list of Government provided supplies and vehicles. Please clarify.

All the titles of Appendixes dealing with Property start out …… “Government Furnished Property and Services” and then they get specific. i.e. Appendix XXF is for supplies, materials, and leased equipment, Appendix XXFA is for Facilities, Appendix XXFB is for EAID, Appendix XXFC is for Non-EAID, Appendix XXFF is for Vehicles.

RFP (00)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .