SATOCPPQuestionnaire.doc

Please complete the attached questionnaire and email or fax response to wanda.mcdonald@randolph.af.mil or fax 210-652-3445 or DSN 487-3445 as soon as possible, preferably by 31 March.

Please review the Past Performance Information Form Part I for accuracy and provide comments/corrections in question #34 of the questionnaire if necessary.

Part II - To Be Completed by Reference

Please provide your opinion on the contractor’s performance for the following statements by putting a check mark in the appropriate box using the following definitions:

EXCEPTIONAL - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contract's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to the effort assessed.

Date:

Company Name (being evaluated):

Project Name & Number:

Reference Name/Company:

Reference Telephone number:

1. How well did the contractor manage, design, and construct multiple types of projects with varying complexity?

( Exceptional ( Very Good ( Satisfactory ( Marginal ( Unsatisfactory ( N/A

Why?

2. How well did the contractor perform in remote/austere location?

( Exceptional ( Very Good ( Satisfactory ( Marginal ( Unsatisfactory ( N/A

Why?

3. How well did the contractor perform in a hostile location?

( Exceptional ( Very Good ( Satisfactory ( Marginal ( Unsatisfactory ( N/A

4. How effectively did the contractor execute mobilization?

( Exceptional ( Very Good ( Satisfactory ( Marginal ( Unsatisfactory ( N/A

Why?

5. How well did the contractor meet start-up timelines?

( Exceptional ( Very Good ( Satisfactory ( Marginal ( Unsatisfactory ( N/A

Why?

6. How well did the contractor protect existing site utilities, structures, surface features, service operations, monitoring wells and other types of wells, and the general site environment, including flora, fauna, water and air quality, both in preparation for and during construction?

7. Did the contractor have problems obtaining necessary bonding?

( Yes ( No (If “Yes”, please provide details)

What were the circumstances?

8. How well did the contractor demonstrate the ability to effectively perform multiple task orders concurrently?

( Exceptional ( Very Good ( Satisfactory ( Marginal ( Unsatisfactory ( N/A

Why?

9. How would you rate the quality and timeliness of submittals?

10. How well did the contractor respond to project request for proposals in terms of timeliness and substantiated subcontracting costs?

11. How well did the contractor maintain effective management and oversight of their subcontractor(s) to ensure task for multiple skills were provided?

( Exceptional ( Very Good ( Satisfactory ( Marginal ( Unsatisfactory ( N/A

Why?

12. How well did the contractor meet cost requirements?

( Exceptional ( Very Good ( Satisfactory ( Marginal ( Unsatisfactory ( N/A

Why?

13. How well did the contractor meet schedule requirements?

( Exceptional ( Very Good ( Satisfactory ( Marginal ( Unsatisfactory ( N/A

Why?

14. How well did the contractor meet quality requirements?

15. How effective was the management team?

( Exceptional ( Very Good ( Satisfactory ( Marginal ( Unsatisfactory ( N/A

Why?

16. How well did the contractor respond to issues raised by government oversight?

( Exceptional ( Very Good ( Satisfactory ( Marginal ( Unsatisfactory ( N/A

Why?

17. How effective was the contractor’s Quality Assurance/Quality Control management?

( Exceptional ( Very Good ( Satisfactory ( Marginal ( Unsatisfactory ( N/A

Why?

18. How well did the contractor identify and mitigate issues timely and accurately to make informed, proactive and corrective decisions?

( Exceptional ( Very Good ( Satisfactory ( Marginal ( Unsatisfactory ( N/A

Why?

19. How well did the contractor have clear and concise lines of communication with all parties?

20. How well did the contractor coordinate worksite activities with applicable personnel to ensure the safety and protection of human health, and the environment; the prevention of damage to property, utilities, materials, supplies, and equipment; and the avoidance of work interruptions?

21. How effectively did the contractor manage Government Furnished Equipment (GFE)?

( Exceptional ( Very Good ( Satisfactory ( Marginal ( Unsatisfactory ( N/A

Why?

22. Contractor’s cost control. How well did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to or estimated price/cost? Describe the reasons for changes to contract/Task Order value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/under run, Government-imposed changes, etc.)?

23. How well did the contractor manage obtaining host nation, federal, state, local, and other applicable permits, access, agreements, licenses, and certificates required to perform and complete the contracted effort?

24. How well did the contractor comply with all applicable permit conditions?

25. How well did the contractor correct warranty and latent defects?

26. How well did the contractor demonstrate cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction?

27. Was the contractor issued a cure notice or a show cause notice?

( Yes ( No

(If “Yes”, please provide the details of circumstances.)

What were the circumstances?

28. Has the contractor ever not met contract standards/objectives/thresholds or been issued a notice for poor performance?

What were to circumstances?

29. Did the contractor achieve small business subcontracting goals during contract performance?

( Yes ( No (If “No”, provide details of shortfalls in meeting small business goals.)

What were the circumstances?

30. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default?

What were the circumstances?

31. What is your overall rating of the contractor’s performance?

32. Would you recommend this contractor?

( Yes ( No

What were the circumstances?

33. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? If “Yes”, please identify contract/program and point of contact by name, organization, telephone number, and email address.

( Yes ( No

Name:

Organization:

Telephone:

Email:

34. Additional Questions or Comments: