Amendment - FA282320R00010003.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The Purpose of This Amendment Is:

1. To reopen the solicitation. Offers are due on 12 December 2019 by 1300 CST.

2. To clarify the FF&E requirements, as identified on page I-101.2 of the Drawings and within the SID, Appendix D to the Specifications, adding and updating information. Changes attached herein are incorporated and supersede all previous editions of the Drawings and Specifications.

3. To change Section L para. 2.5.6 (Note) and Section M para. 3.1.2.1, making clear that prices should be separately identified in Section B, SubCLINs 0002AA & AB, breaking out cost for identified furniture and construction under project FTFA 17-1045. Note: Said FF&E does not need a separate 50 Division Sheet, and should be included in the one for CLIN 0002.

4. Incorporating all Questions and Answers, as an attachment, This current and final version supersedes all previous versions.

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Contract Description \nTHE GOVERNMENT

REQUIRES PERFORMANCE

OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN

THE DOCUMENTS ATTACHED

TO THIS SOLICITATION.\n\n- This solicitation is unrestricted \n\n-CLIN 0001: Project FTFA 16-1189 is the main Fire Suppression System Renovation.

CLIN 0002 (Project FTFA

17-1045), CLIN 0003 (FTFA

17-1120) and CLIN 0004 (FTFA 17-1126) are bid options for additional renovations. A complete proposal includes pricing for all CLINs. \n\n-SOW, Specs & Drawings are dated 16 April 2019 and attached in Section J\n\n-NAICS Code for this requirement: 236220 Commercial and Institutional Building Construction\n\n-A Site Visit will occur on 29 October 2019 at 0800 at Hangar 68 on Eglin AFB. See Section L and FAR Clause 52.236-27, Alternate I, for additional details \n\n-The Magnitude of this effort is between $5,000,000 and $10,000,000\n\n-Enter Prices

\nTHE GOVERNMENT

REQUIRES PERFORMANCE

OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN

THE DOCUMENTS ATTACHED

TO THIS SOLICITATION.\n\n- This solicitation is unrestricted \n\n-CLIN 0001: Project FTFA 16-1189 is the main Fire Suppression System Renovation.

CLIN 0002 (Project FTFA

17-1045), CLIN 0003 (FTFA

17-1120) and CLIN 0004 (FTFA 17-1126) are bid options for additional renovations. A complete proposal includes pricing for all CLINs and SubCLINs. \n\n-SOW, Specs & Drawings are dated 16 April 2019 and attached in Section J\n\n-NAICS Code for this requirement: 236220 Commercial and Institutional Building Construction\n\n-A Site Visit will occur on 29 October 2019 at 0800 at Hangar 68 on Eglin AFB. See Section L and FAR Clause 52.236-27, Alternate I, for additional details \n\n-The Magnitude of this effort is between $5,000,000 and

FA282320R00010003

in Section B using, TYPED or BLACK INK ONLY\n\n-All offerors shall be registered in the System for Award management (SAM) to be eligible for award of contract. See Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Clause 52.204-8 for additional information\n\n*****ALL

WORKERS ARE REQUIRED TO

BE U.S. CITIZENS*****\n

$10,000,000\n\n-Enter Prices in Section B using, TYPED or BLACK INK ONLY\n\n-All offerors shall be registered in the System for Award management (SAM) to be eligible for award of contract. See Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Clause 52.204-8 for additional information\n\n*****ALL

WORKERS ARE REQUIRED TO

BE U.S. CITIZENS*****\n

Section J - List of Attachments

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

TITLE DATE PAGES

Attachment A - Drawings........................................................16 April 2019

Change to page I-101.2..............................06 December 2019

Attachment B - Specifications.................................................16 April 2019

Changes to Appendix D: SID......................06 December 2019

Attachment C - Wage Determination FL190217.....................04 January 2019

Attachment D - Past Performance Questionnaire...................N/A

Attachment E - Financial Responsibility Questionnaire..........N/A

Attachment F - Base Access Memo........................................N/A

Attachment G - 50 Division Cost Estimate Worksheet............N/A

Attachment H - Small Business Participation Plan..................N/A

Questions and Answers...........................................................06 December 2019

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

1.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS.

1.1 General Information

1.1.1 The offeror's proposal must include all data and information requested by these Instructions to Offerors and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the Specifications and Solicitation. Non-conformance with the instructions provided in these Instructions to Offerors may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation or rejection of an offer.

1.1.2 The proposal acceptance period is specified in Block 13, SF 1442, of this solicitation. By signing block 20B of the SF 1442, the offeror certifies that the proposal is valid from the due date and time listed in block 13A through the entire period specified in block 13D.

1.1.3 All referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the Federal Business Opportunities website at http://www.fedbizopps.gov. Potential offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time e-mail notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation.

1.1.4 The Government reserves the right to revise or amend the specifications, drawings, or the solicitation prior to the proposal closing time. Such revisions or amendments will be communicated by amendments to the Request for Proposal (RFP) and posted in Federal Business Opportunities website (www.FBO.gov). If such amendments require material changes in quantities or prices, the proposal closing date may be postponed by enough days to enable offerors to revise their proposals.

In such cases, the amendment will include an announcement of the new closing date and time.

Offerors MUST acknowledge all amendments in their proposal, either by completing SF 1442 Block 18, providing signed copies of the amendments with their proposal (Section III), or by separate letter which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers.

1.1.5 Questions. The Contracting Officer listed below is the Government's primary point of contact for this acquisition. All questions regarding this solicitation must be submitted in writing. Any questions and subsequent answers will be posted to the Federal Business Opportunities website (www.fbo.gov). It is the offeror's responsibility to continuously monitor the site for updates. The site visits will be held on 29 October 2019 and 12 November 2019, and due to ongoing mission requirements will be the only available site visits. See relevant clauses in solicitation for additional details. To mitigate the risks associated with the cancellation of this solicitation due to untimely submission of questions, all questions must be submitted to the individual(s) listed below in writing no later than close of business 19 November 2019. Offerors must thoroughly review the specifications and drawings before submitting questions. Any questions not submitted in writing, to include any at the site visit, will not be considered an official response and will not form a basis for an extension of the proposal due date.

Contracting Officer: Ronald J. Wilson, ronald.wilson.22@us.af.mil

Contracting Specialist: 1st Lt Michael Cenedella, michael.cenedella.1@us.af.mil

1.1.6 In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8 (Government Contract Files), the Government will retain a copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of such unsuccessful proposals.

1.1.7 Debriefings. The Contracting Officer will promptly notify offerors of any decision to exclude them from the competitive range (if established); whereupon, they may request and receive a debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.505. Offerors excluded from the competitive range may request a pre-award debriefing or they may choose to wait until after the source selection decision to request a post award debriefing. However, offerors excluded from the competitive range are entitled to no more than one debriefing for each proposal. The Contracting Officer will notify unsuccessful offerors of the source selection decision in accordance with FAR 15.503(b). Upon such notification, unsuccessful offerors may request and receive a debriefing. Offerors desiring a debriefing must make their request in accordance with the requirements of FAR 15.505 or 15.506, as applicable.

1.1.8 Discrepancies. If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer in writing with supporting rationale as well as the remedies the offeror is asking the Contracting Officer to consider as related to the omission or error. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

This reservation includes matters of additional or substitute pages of the initial proposal.

1.1.9. The Contracting Officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the Contracting Officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional cost information will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness and affordability of the price.

1.1.10 Who Can Participate. Proposals may be submitted by ALL interested parties pursuant to the following: At the time of initial contract offer and at time of award, each business must be registered at SAM.gov.

2.0 SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS

2.1 The following instructions are to aid in the evaluation process.

2.1.1 Offerors are responsible for submitting proposals and any revisions or modifications, so as to reach the Government office designated in this solicitation by the time specified in this solicitation.

Contractors shall submit documentation, unless otherwise specified, electronically to the Government, as described in the following paragraphs:

2.1.1.1 Proposal Format: Offerors shall submit their proposals in electronic format via email or via the DoD SAFE site to the points of contact (POC) listed below. The electronic copies of the proposal shall be submitted in a format readable and usable by Microsoft (MS) Office 2013 Suite (to include:

Word, Excel, and PowerPoint) or in PDF format viewable with standard Adobe Acrobat Reader X.

Hidden fields, comments, macros, etc. shall be omitted, and read passwords on files shall not be used. No picture shots of MS Excel spreadsheets shall be included. All spreadsheets and formulas shall be accessible for review if submitted. The files shall be consistent and uniformly named to allow for easy distinction between required proposal submissions. Inclusion of abbreviated company name in file naming convention is acceptable otherwise use company's CAGE code.

2.1.1.2 Email submission: For points of contact see para. 2.1.1.4, below. Contractors should allow time for the email to be uploaded to the server. Email is received based on the time indicating it was received by the Air Force server.

a) The subject line of all emails that comprise the proposal shall be formatted as follows:

Subject: FA282320R0001/Company Name/Email X of X (insert number of the email and total number of emails)

b) File Size. Individual emails shall not exceed 4MB in size. Offeror shall submit multiple emails as necessary to stay under the 4MB limit. Failure to stay under this limit may cause a rejection of the email.

2.1.1.3 Submission via DoD SAFE. In addition to email, contractors may submit proposals electronically to the Government via the DoD SAFE site (https://safe.apps.mil/). All documents other than MS Excel Worksheets must be submitted and saved in .pdf format, and shall follow the instructions in 2.1.4 below. Title of the documents should include the offerors CAGE code (i.e., "Vol 1 Tech Proposal CAGE#").

2.1.1.4 Points of Contact for Proposal Submissions. Submit proposals to:

ronald.wilson.22@us.af.mil michael.cenedella.1@us.af.mil

2.1.1.5 Submission of Bid Guarantee. An electronic copy of the bid guarantee shall be submitted with the electronic proposal. Offerors shall submit a hard copy of the bid guarantee via mail or hand delivery. Offerors shall deliver or mail the bid guarantee no later than 3-business days after the date established for receipt of proposals. Mail or deliver to the address listed in Block 7 of the SF1442 to the Attention of the points of contact listed in paragraph 1.15 above. Failure to submit a hard copy original of the bid guarantee may render the offer ineligible for award.

2.1.2 Any proposal, modification, or revision, that is received at the designated Government office after the exact time specified for receipt of proposals is "late" and will not be considered unless the Contracting Officer determines the criteria set forth in FAR 15.208 exists.

2.1.3 Proposals shall be complete, clearly presented, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation as detailed in section M of this solicitation and for substantiating validity of stated claims.

The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements but rather provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of the offeror's facilities and/or experience and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror's proposal. Proposals shall be neat, indexed (cross-indexed as appropriate) and assembled in an orderly manner. Elaborate artwork and expensive visual and other presentation aids are neither necessary nor desired. Include only information that is relevant to this source selection.

2.1.4 Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits.

2.1.4.1 Proposal Volumes:

Volume I: Technical Proposal;

Volume II (a), Past Performance;

Volume II (b), Signed Teaming Agreement (if applicable);

Volume III, Price Proposal (Executed RFP Documents/Contractor Responsibility);

Volume IV, Small Business Participation Plan;

Volume V, Subcontracting Plan (Applicable to Large Businesses Only)

2.1.4.2 Page Size, Format and Limit. Specific guidance regarding the content of each volume will be discussed further below. Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. If exceeded, the excess pages will not be read or considered in the evaluation of the proposal. When Evaluation Notices (ENs) are necessary, the Government will issue them by electronic means to prospective offerors.

Page limitations may be placed on responses to these ENs and such limitations will be provided at the time the EN is issued.

2.1.4.2.1 A page is defined as each face of an 8 1/2" X 11" sheet of paper containing information.

Pages in excess of the maximum page limits defined below will be removed from the proposal and will not be evaluated. For the purposes of formatting, typing shall not be less than 10 pitch. Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume.

Volume I - Technical Proposal: See paragraphs 2.2.3 and 2.2.4 for Page Limit/Format Criteria

Volume II (a) - Past Performance: See paragraph 2.3 for Page Limit/Format Criteria

Volume II (b) - Signed Teaming Agreement: No Page limit

Volume III - Price Proposal and Contractor Responsibility: No Page Limit

Volume IV - Small Business Participation Plan: No Page Limit

Volume V - Subcontracting Plan: Set page limit, no additional pages

2.1.4.2.2 All pages of each part shall be appropriately numbered and identified with the Request for Proposal (RFP) number. Pages in excess of the maximum will be removed from the proposal and will not be evaluated.

2.1.4.3 Cost of Pricing Related Data. All cost or pricing data shall be addressed ONLY in the Cost/ Price Proposal Volume.

2.1.4.4 Indexing. Each volume shall contain a more detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections. Indexing is not included in the page limitations.

2.1.4.5 Proposal Acceptance Period. The proposal acceptance period is specified in Block 13d of the Standard Form 1442 of the Solicitation.

2.2 Volume I - Technical Proposal.

2.2.1 Subfactor 1: Construction Progress Schedule. Prepare and submit a practicable construction progress schedule showing all necessary work elements to complete the project identified under this solicitation. The Contract Progress schedule must include all Bid Options. At a minimum, the Contract Progress Schedule must include mobilization, submittals, demolition, major work elements by specification division (A major work element is defined as those elements identified in the specifications as a Division, e.g. Division 26 - Electrical.), final inspection, demobilization, and close-out documents. The schedule must be in the form of a progress chart of suitable scale to indicate appropriately the percentage of work scheduled for completion by any given date during the performance period. The submitted schedule must be developed using project scheduling software such as MS Project, Primavera, or any other comparable form. Offerors should only include the work elements necessary to complete the required work. This list is provided as a guide and is not all inclusive or exclusive. It is the offeror's responsibility to identify all necessary work elements.

2.2.1.1 Each offeror's progress schedule must address the following:

a) Identification of separate work elements.

b) Order of work elements to include project phasing.

c) Identification of start and end dates for each Phase of the project as indicated in the Specifications and Drawings (Phases A-D). For the purposes of the proposal assume a start work date of 1 January 2020. The phases as indicated are not required to be completed in sequential order. Work on the separate phases may run concurrently.

d) Number of days for each work element.

e) Identification of Long Lead Time Materials. Long lead items, such as, major HVAC equipment, electrical equipment, pre-engineered buildings, etc., must be specifically identified in the technical proposal. If there are no Long Lead Time Materials, the proposal must state that there are no Long Lead Time Materials.

f) Identification of work elements in the critical path.

2.2.1.2 The proposed schedule must include the activities which are consistent with those described within the project specifications and drawings and must not exceed the Government's maximum allowable performance period including Options (if any), as noted in FAR Clause 52.211-10. Typing shall not be less than 10 pitch. No Page Limit.

2.2.1.3 Offerors are encouraged to provide, as necessary, additional information to clarify their technical proposal. Additional information is limited to five (5) page, as defined at paragraph 2.1.4.2.1, and will be considered as part of their technical proposal. If exceeded, the excess pages will not be read or considered in the evaluation of the proposal.

2.2.1.4 Failure to submit a Construction Progress Schedule will result in immediate elimination from the competition.

2.2.2 Subfactor 2: 50 Division Cost Estimate Worksheet - Offerors shall submit four (4) separate 50 Division Cost Estimate Worksheets, one for each individual Project/CLIN in accordance with the instructions listed below in paragraph 2.5.6 of Technical Volume III, Price Proposal. Offer will be complete, accurate, and sufficiently detailed to demonstrate a clear technical understanding of the requirement. Evaluation of this area will be addressed under the Price Factor and the Technical Factor. Failure to provide separate proposals for each Project/CLIN will result in immediate removal from the competition for non-compliance with the solicitation instructions.

2.3 Volume II (a) --Past Performance Information. Offerors shall provide a maximum of five (5) total references on completed or current contracts (including Federal, State, local government and private) to demonstrate their ability to perform the proposed work as identified within the Specifications.

The Government's evaluation of past performance information will take into account only past performance information regarding the prime contractor's relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects (25% or more of the total project price). See Teaming Agreements, para 2.4, when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition.

2.3.1 Provide a summary of the previous contracts described above, not to exceed 1 (one) page of past performance information per reference. The summary should explain what aspects of each contract are deemed recent and relevant as related to the requirements of this solicitation and in accordance with Section M. Failure to provide required relevancy description may impact the confidence rating, (i.e. aspects of previous projects should match work elements identified in the solicitation/specification). The summary should not exceed 1 (one) page per reference (maximum total of five (5) pages) and include:

a) Name of project (Contract number, if applicable)

b) Name and address of customer or Government agency

c) Name, telephone, fax number and/or email of customer contact or contracting officer

d) Dollar value

e) Period of performance/Completion date

f) Brief description of work performed, and why the effort is relevant

g) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions

2.3.2 RECENCY is defined as projects performed within the last six (6) years of the issue month of the solicitation. All references for work not performed within six (6) years of the issue month of the solicitation will not be evaluated.

2.3.3 RELEVANCY is defined as projects involving the type of construction and work elements described in the attached Specifications and Drawings.

2.3.4 Past/Present Performance Questionnaires.

2.3.4.1 Offerors shall complete Attachment D, Past/Present Performance Questionnaire and mail, fax, or email the attached Past/Present Performance Questionnaire to all past performance references and instruct them to return the completed questionnaire directly to the individual indicated in paragraph 2.3.4.1.1 below by email. Evaluators are only allowed to use the Attachment D, Past/ Present Performance Questionnaire. Past/Present Performance Questionnaire submissions do not count against the page limits specified at para 2.1.4.2.1, Volume II (a). Altered or substituted questionnaires will not be evaluated. Also, Past Performance Questionnaires will only be accepted from Project Owners or their authorized representatives. Past Performance Questionnaires will not be accepted from Prime Contractors, Subcontractors, or Manufacturers. Offerors are responsible to ensure questionnaires are transmitted to their references and to indicate which references the questionnaire was sent to (see paragraph 2.3.4.1.1 below).

2.3.4.1.1 Inform your references that they shall forward questionnaires directly to the address(es) below. Questionnaires shall be addressed to the Contracting Officer. Questionnaires must be received not later than the closing date of the solicitation. Offerors are responsible for ensuring their references transmit the questionnaire to the Contracting Office at the below emails addresses:

michael.cenedella.1@us.af.mil ronald.wilson.22@us.af.mil

2.3.4.2 In lieu of a Past/Present Performance Questionnaire, if a project is currently available in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) (now, Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), the contractor shall attach the evaluation to the questionnaire with the relevant contract/solicitation number and submit, along with the rest of the proposal package, to the Contracting Office no later than the official closing date and time of the solicitation.

2.3.5 Lack of any past performance will not automatically disqualify an offeror. See Section M for how lack of past performance will be evaluated.

2.3.6 If the offeror claims there is no past performance, then that status must be identified to the Contracting Officer not later than the date and time proposals are due from all offerors.

2.3.7 The Government shall consider past performance information on contracts obtained from other sources when evaluating the offeror's past performance.

2.3.8 If Teaming Agreements are contemplated, the teaming members must provide complete information as to relevant and recent past performance information on previous teaming agreements.

If this is a first time teaming effort, each party to the teaming agreement must provide information on all relevant contracts as specified in paragraph 2.3.1. The maximum number of past performance references for the entire team shall not exceed a total of ten (10). See additional documentation requirements for Teaming Agreements in Volume II (b) paragraph 2.4 below.

2.4 Volume II (b) - Teaming Agreements (include only if applicable). Submit original and one (1) copy of signed Teaming Agreement.

2.4.1 If Teaming Agreements are contemplated they must comply with the appropriate Federal Regulations (13 C.F.R. Part 121 (Size Regulations), Part 124 (8(a) & SDB), Part 125 (Government Contracting Programs), and/or Part 126 (HUBZone). The Government will recognize the integrity and validity of contractor teaming agreements; provided, the agreements are identified and company relationships are fully disclosed in an offer. Teaming agreements will be incorporated into the contract. Failure to clearly define roles and/or provide a teaming agreement with a proposal shall make teaming agreements and related subcontractor past performance ineligible for evaluation and consideration of award. Teaming Agreements must provide the following information as part of their proposal, Volume II (b), not later than the date/time proposals are due:

2.4.1.1 Clearly establish roles of each party (who is prime and who is subcontractor, who is responsible for what tasks, contract administration, proposals, work management, etc.)

2.4.1.2 Provide for protection of competition-sensitive proprietary information (subcontractor past performance cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor's consent). Provide a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor, only if it is being used as part of the past performance evaluation.

2.4.1.3 Identify each member's share of the prospective contract, e.g. 50/50, 51/49, etc.

2.4.1.4 Exclusivity. Assurance that the team member will not be replaced for the duration of the contract, any exceptions should be identified. Assurance that the team members are not teaming with another firm for the same procurement.

2.4.1.5 Statement of acknowledgement that the Prime Contractor is responsible for adhering to contract terms and conditions and daily management. The Prime Contractor is obligated to negotiate in good faith and responsible for conveying mandatory government terms and conditions to subcontractors.

2.4.1.6 The prime contractor shall remain fully responsible for contract performance, regardless of any teaming agreement between the prime contractor and its subcontractors.

2.5 Volume III - Price Proposal and Proposal Documents:

2.5.1 Submit the Standard Form 1442 as specified below.

2.5.2 Complete blocks 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, and 20a-c of the SF 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award.

An authorized official of the firm submitting the offer must sign and date the SF 1442 in block 20a-c.

(In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP, Sections A through K).

2.5.3 Insert proposed prices in Section B for each Contract Line Item.

2.5.4 Complete remaining sections through Section K. Representations and certifications shall be included in Section K or the System for Award Management (SAM). Ensure that both the FAR and DFARS representations and certifications are completed.

2.5.5 Submit the Financial Responsibility Questionnaire (Attachment E) with the top portion only completed.

2.5.6 Price Proposal - Offerors shall provide a price breakdown for each Project/CLIN utilizing Attachment G, the 50 Division Cost Estimate Worksheet. Use the 50 Divisions Cost Estimate CSI* Format tool to build your proposal. Offerors shall input the major work elements by specification division and provide pricing for those major work elements within each division sheet. The information from the division sheets may not be all inclusive. Offerors are allowed to include any missing items from each division and are allowed to fill in other divisions that are not listed in the prefilled division sheets. Offer will be complete, accurate, and sufficiently detailed to demonstrate a clear understanding of the requirement. Offeror's are cautioned not to utilize Lump Sum or Total Pricing when pricing each individual specification division. Failure to breakout major work elements within a specification division may result in an unfavorable evaluation. The burden of proof for credibility of proposed pricing rests with the offeror. Evaluation of this area will be addressed under the Price Factor and the Technical Factor.

*NOTE: Each CLIN must have one 50 Division Cost Estimate Worksheet, a total of four, one per project number, including bid options. Separate prices of modular furniture (FF&E) and construction work in Section B for CLIN 0002, as SubCLINs AA & AB, but use only one (1) 50 Division Cost Estimate Worksheet for CLIN 0002.

2.6 Volume IV- Small Business Participation Plan

2.6.1. The Offeror must complete and submit the Small Business Participation Plan Form (Attachment H).

2.6.2. All offerors (both large and small businesses) will be evaluated on the level of proposed participation of U.S. Small businesses in the performance of the contract relative to the objectives and goals established herein. The Offeror's proposal must meet the minimum mandatory Total Small Business Participation Goal of 37% of total contract value (through collective small business participation from any type of small business or sub-category small business). The subcategory small business goals are as follows:

Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business.............2%;

HUBZone Small Business.........................................2%;

Small Disadvantaged Business....................................3%;

Women-Owned Small Business..................................5%.

2.7. Volume V - Subcontracting Plan (Applicable to Large Businesses Only)

2.7.1 Separate from the Small Business Participation Plan. Large Business concerns must also submit a Subcontracting Plan as required by FAR 52.219-9 Small Business Subcontracting Plan

- Alternate II (DEVIATIONS 2018-O0018 and 2019-O0005). The Subcontracting Plan will not be rated by the Source Selection Team (SSET), but rather reviewed by the Small Business Advisor and the Contracting Officer for acceptability. Proposals submitted in response to this solicitation shall include a subcontracting plan that separately addresses subcontracting with small business, veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone small business, small disadvantaged business, and women-owned small business concerns. If the offeror is submitting an individual contract plan, the plan must separately address subcontracting with small business, veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone small business, small disadvantaged business, and women-owned small business concerns, with a separate part for the basic contract and separate parts for each option (if any). The plan shall be included in and made a part of the resultant contract. The subcontracting plan shall be negotiated within the time specified by the Contracting Officer. Failure to submit and negotiate a subcontracting plan shall make the offeror ineligible for award of a contract.

2.7.2 In accordance with Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations, DFARS 215.304(c)(i), when an evaluation assesses the extent that small businesses are specifically identified in proposals, the small businesses considered in the evaluation shall be listed in any subcontracting plan submitted pursuant to FAR 52.219-9, Alternate II (DEVIATIONS 2018-O0018 and 2019-O0005) and DFARS 252.219-7003 Small Business Subcontracting Plan (DoD Contracts)-Basic (Dec 2018). The assessment will consider if the plan adequately responds to each of the required elements of the FAR 52.219-9, Alternate II (DEVIATIONS 2018- O0018 and 2019-O0005) and if the commitments listed in the Offeror's Subcontracting Plan are comparable to the commitments addressed in the Offeror's Small Business Participation Plan submitted in Volume IV, Factor 4.

2.8. Relationship between Instructions and Evaluation. Your attention is directed to the functional relationship between Sections L and M of this solicitation. Section L provides information for the purpose of organizing the proposal and is not intended to be all inclusive. Section M describes evaluation factors for award. The Government evaluation of proposals will cover areas identified in Section M, proposals should address all such areas of evaluation.

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

1.0 BASIS FOR AWARD

1.1 General Information.

1.1.0 This is a competitive best value source selection conducted in accordance with (IAW) Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.3, Source Selection, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Supplement (DFARS), and the Air Force Federal Acquisition Supplement (AFFARS).

These regulations are available electronically at the FAR website, https://acquisition.gov/. By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or sub-factors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an unfavorable evaluation or elimination from the competition. The Government reserves the right to award all, none or some of the Bid Options (CLINS 0002-0004).

1.1.1 This acquisition will utilize a Best Value approach. The Best Value technique chosen for this particular acquisition will be a tradeoff between Past Performance and Price IAW FAR 15.101-1. This technique permits tradeoffs between price and past performance in order to achieve the best value.

1.1.1.1 The Government will select the best overall offer, based upon an assessment of Past Performance and Price. A contract may be awarded to the offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation's requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Section L of this solicitation) and is judged, based on the evaluation factors and sub-factors to represent the best value to the Government. The Government seeks to award to the offeror who gives the Air Force the greatest confidence that it will best meet, or exceed, the requirements. This may result in an award to a higher rated, higher priced offeror, where the decision is consistent with the evaluation factors, and the Source Selection Authority (SSA) reasonably determines that the past performance of the higher price offeror outweighs the cost difference.

The SSA will base the source selection decision on an assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in the solicitation (described below). While the Government source selection evaluation team and the SSA will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective; and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

1.1.1.2 Offerors are cautioned to follow the detailed instructions fully and carefully, as the Government reserves the right to make an award based on initial offers received, without discussion of such offers.

1.1.1.3 If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to establish a competitive range the Contracting Officer may determine that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted. The Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals. Therefore, the offeror's initial proposal should contain the offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint.

1.1.1.3.1 Discussions or negotiations with all offerors in the competitive range, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs), and the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) may be considered in making the source selection decision. If the offeror's proposal has been evaluated as acceptable at the time discussions are closed, any changes or exceptions in the Final Proposal Revision are subject to evaluation and may introduce risk that the offeror's proposal be determined unacceptable and ineligible for award. Offerors may be required to participate in telephone discussions or face-to-face oral discussions at the Contracting Office (AFTC/PZIOC) at 308 W. D Avenue, Ste. 130 (Bldg. 260), Eglin AFB, FL, 32542.

1.1.1.4 Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal (for example, the relevance of past performance information) or respond to adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system.

2.0. Evaluation process.

2.1 All proposals received in response to this Request for Proposals (RFP) will be evaluated. The Government will evaluate Offferor's proposals based on the criteria described herein and will award the contract to the Offeror providing the Best Value to the Government. The Government intends to award without discussions.

The source selection procedures will begin with the initial review of proposals and continue with technical, and price evaluations conducted by the Source Selection Evaluation Team (SSET). The SSET shall evaluate proposals based solely on the evaluation criteria identified in the following paragraphs. The results of the SSET evaluations will be presented to the SSA for review. The SSA will make the final source selection decision. The Contracting Officer will determine whether it is appropriate to engage in clarifications or communications with the offerors prior to establishment of a competitive range, or to establish a competitive range and conduct discussions with those offerors that are included in the competitive range. All communications leading to the establishment of the competitive range will be conducted in accordance with FAR subpart 15.306(b). However, if a competitive range is established, discussions will be conducted with offerors who are included in the competitive range. After conclusion of discussions and receipt of final proposal revisions (if applicable), the SSET will complete the evaluation and establish the final ratings and present them to the SSA. The SSA will then review the proposals and make the final source selection decision.

2.2 Contractor Responsibility. Once the apparent successful offeror is selected the Government will evaluate the offeror's financial capabilities and the specified criteria at FAR 9.104. In the case of a Teaming Agreement, the financial capabilities of both teaming partners will be evaluated, with the Prime Contractor's financial capability carrying significantly more weight than the subcontractor's.

Attachment E, Financial Responsibility Questionnaire will be forwarded to the financial institution(s) and a determination will be made regarding the apparent successful offeror's financial capabilities and overall contractor responsibility using the specified criteria at FAR 9.104.

3.0. Proposal Evaluation

Evaluation Factors. The below evaluation factors will be used to evaluate proposals:

Factor 1: Technical Evaluation. Construction Progress Schedule--Volume I

Factor 2: Past Performance Evaluation--Volume II

Factor 3: Price Evaluation, Proposal Documents and Contractor Responsibility--Volume III

Factor 4: Small Business Participation Plan - Volume IV

Factor 5: Subcontracting Plan (Large Businesses Only) - Volume V

3.1 FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL EVALUATION. Offeror's technical proposals will be evaluated as specified below:

3.1.1. Subfactor 1: Proposed Construction Progress Schedule - The offeror's proposed contract progress schedules will be evaluated relative to overall coordination of the construction phase, to include ability to identify all necessary work elements of the specific project, the offerors ability to schedule the activities in a logical sequence, is within the time required in this solicitation, and covers the minimum requirements listed in below. The proposed schedule must include the activities which are consistent with those described within project specifications and drawings, and must not exceed the Government's maximum allowable performance period, as noted in SF 1442 (RFP), Block 11 and Section F, FAR Clause 52.211-10.

3.1.1.1 In accordance with Section L, Subfactor 1 will be evaluated against the following minimum requirements:

a) The Construction Progress Schedule includes the following work elements: mobilization, submittals, demolition, major work elements identified in each specification division, final inspection, demobilization and close-out documents.

b) The order of the work elements in the Construction Progress Schedule, to include project phasing, is logically sequenced.

c) The start and end dates for each Phase of the project as indicated in the Specifications and Drawings (Phases A-D) is identified and Phase starts on the specified date.

d) The total number of days for each phase when aggregated together does not exceed 365 calendar days.

e) Long Lead Time Materials (e.g. major HVAC equipment, electrical equipment, pre-engineered buildings, etc.) are identified in the proposal, or the proposal states that there are no Long Lead Time Materials.

f) Proposal identifies those work elements within the critical path.

Failure to submit a Construction Progress Schedule will result in immediate elimination from competition.

3.1.2. Sub Factor 2: 50 Division Cost Estimate Worksheet: The Government will evaluate the offeror's understanding of the contracts technical requirement through an analysis of the major work elements proposed by each offeror in each specification Division. In accordance with Section L, this Sub Factor will be evaluated against the following minimum requirements:

a) The offeror submitted the four 50 Division Cost Estimate Worksheets;

b) The offeror has proposed the appropriate Divisions in relation to the specifications;

c) Major work elements are identified within each Division and are sufficiently detailed to demonstrate a clear understanding of the requirement; and

d) Quantities for materials, labor and other services are not significantly understated or overstated.

3.1.2.1. Failure to submit a price for all CLINs and SubCLINS in the price schedule at Section B or failure to submit and complete the four 50 Division Cost Estimate Worksheets will render the offer ineligible for award.

3.l.2.2. Offeror's who fail to provide a breakdown of the major work elements within each Division and only provide a lump sum or other aggregate type of unit pricing consisting of a quantity of 1 for an entire Division will be evaluated as Unacceptable.

3.1.2.3. Technical Evaluators shall assign a rating of "ACCEPTABLE" or "UNACCEPTABLE" for each subfactor based on the minimum requirements established above. For Sub Factor 2 evaluators will assign a rating for each of the four (4) required 50 Division Cost Estimate Worksheets. Ratings are defined as follows:

Adjectival Rating Description

ACCEPTABLE Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

UNACCEPTABLE Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

*If any subfactor is evaluated as unacceptable then the whole factor is considered unacceptable. For Subfactor 2 if any of the four (4) 50 Division Cost Estimate Worksheets are rated unacceptable the whole factor is considered unacceptable.

**If all offerors are deemed technically unacceptable, the Government may establish a competitive range and enter into discussions.

3.2. FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. Only Offeror's proposal that have been determined technically acceptable will have their past performance information evaluated. The

Government will perform a Past Performance evaluation and determine a Performance Confidence Assessment rating. The Past Performance evaluation assesses the degree of confidence the Government has in the Offeror's ability to successfully perform the requirements of this effort. The evaluation considers recency, relevancy and quality.

3.2.1. Performance confidence is assessed at the overall Past Performance factor level. The Government may consider aggregate Past Performance in addition to Past Performance on an individual contract basis. In conducting the Past Performance evaluation, the Government reserves the right to use both the information provided in the Offeror's Past Performance proposal volume and in the information obtained from other sources, such as the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or similar systems, the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) and commercial sources.

3.2.1.1. Recency Assessment - An assessment of the Past Performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must have been performed during the past six

(6) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Efforts that have not yet been completed must have at least one (1) year of performance from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Past Performance information that fails to meet these conditions may not be evaluated.