Attachment_D_-_PPQ.pdf

PDF 173 KB Posted

Attached to
Modify Control Rooms Bldg 380 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA282319RA004
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Test Center

About this file

Attachment D - PPQ

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Modify Control Rooms Bldg 380, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA282319RA004_QandA_30_may.pdf PDF
Conformed_Solicitation_-_FA282319RA0040007.pdf PDF
A60117AA_TFv2.pdf PDF
Amendment_FA282319RA0040007_SF_30.pdf PDF
Conformed_Solicitation__-_FA282319RA0040006.pdf PDF
Amendment_FA282319RA0040006_SF_30.pdf PDF
FA282319RA004_QandA_13_May_19.pdf PDF
Addenda_Existing_Plans_280_Walls_280.290_Access_Plan_Site_Access.pdf PDF
Revised_Sheets_and_Specs.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Amendment_FA282319RA0040005_SF_30.pdf PDF
Amendment_FA282319RA0040004.pdf PDF
Conformed_FA282319RA0040003_5_Apr_19.pdf PDF
Amendment_FA282319RA0040003.pdf PDF
Site_Visit_Sign-in_Sheet.pdf PDF
Slides_Site_Visit.pdf PDF
FA282319RA004_QandA_01_Apr_19.pdf PDF
FA282319RA004_QandA_25_Mar_19.pdf PDF
Amendment_FA282319RA0040002.pdf PDF
FA282319RA004_QandA_21_Mar_19.pdf PDF
Conformed_Solicitation_FA282319RA004.pdf PDF
Attachment_H_-_Asbestos_Report.pdf PDF
FA282319RA004_QandA_20_Mar_19.pdf PDF
Amendment_FA282319RA0040001.pdf PDF
Attachment_G_-_Site_Visit_Map.pdf PDF
FA282319RA004_QandA_15_Mar_19.pdf PDF
FA282319RA004_QandA_14_Mar_19.pdf PDF
Attachment_B_-_Specifications_FTFA_17-1050.pdf PDF
Attachment_A_-_Drawings_FTFA_17-1050.pdf PDF
Attachment_F_-_Base_Access_Memo.docx DOCX document
Solicitation_-_FA282319RA004.pdf PDF
Attachment_E_-_FRQ.pdf PDF
50_Div_Cost.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_C_-_Wage_Determination_FL190217.pdf PDF
Show all 33

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT D

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Request for Proposal: FA2823-19-R-A004 Modify Control Rooms Bldg. 380, FTFA 17-1050, Eglin AFB, FL 32542

1. Name of Contractor:

Contract or Identifying Number:

Title/Description of Contract:

2. Brief description of scope of work:

EVALUATION: Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

A. Did the contractor have any non-conformance issues? If so, what kind?

B. Did the contractor have adequate resources to complete the required performance?

C. Were there issues with the subcontractor’s testing lab and/or material suppliers?

D. Did the contractor submit required documents on time and answer questions in a timely manner?

Assessment Definition Substantial Confidence (SC)

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again.

Satisfactory Confidence

(SAT)

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again.

Limited Confidence

(LC)

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again.

No Confidence

(NC)

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, this customer has no expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort for us again.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral) (UC)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Based upon the assessment definitions above, indicate your assessment of the contractor’s performance on your contract described on Attachment A. Your assessment should consider the contractor’s performance in accordance with the contractual requirements. Circle all that apply.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: __________________________ CONTRACT NO.: _______________________

01 Contractor developed realistic progress schedules & completed the project within the established schedule.

SC SAT LC NC UC

02 Contractor provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.

SC SAT LC NC UC

03 Contractor provided timely and accurate payrolls with no known labor violations (Davis-Bacon Act) or labor claims.

SC SAT LC NC UC

04 Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors, with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

SC SAT LC NC UC

05 Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed them. SC SAT LC NC UC 06 Contractor identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to problems. Displayed initiative and cooperation to solve problems.

Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith.

SC SAT LC NC UC

07 Contractor provided effective quality control, which resulted in a quality-finished product.

SC SAT LC NC UC

08 Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain in comments section, SC SAT LC NC UC

09 Would you hire this contractor again? If no, explain in comments section

SC SAT LC NC UC

OVERALL RATING: ______________________________

BRIEF EXPLANATION OF OVERALL RATING GIVEN:

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Name of Person Completing Evaluation:

Base/Company: Date:

Position Title/Grade: Phone:

Email: Fax:

File details come from the government source that posted it.