MSCC_QAs_dtd_27_Apr17.pdf
PDF 97 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MODELING, SIMULATION, AND ANALYSIS (MS&A) FOR SPACE AND CYBERSPACE CAPABILITIES Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA2517-17-R-7003
About this file
QAs in response to MSCC draft RFP.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
MODELING, SIMULATION, AND ANALYSIS (MS&A) FOR SPACE AND CYBERSPACE CAPABILITIES has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
MSCC - Q&As in response to DRAFT RFP Posted 25APR17
Item Question Government Response
Page 85, L6.6: Should this be a subsection to L6.3? Or are you saying you want L6.6-L6.9 in the Total Compensation Plan tab?
No, this should not be a subsection of L.6.3. The Total Compensation Plan is applicable to the entire contract. As instructed in the RFP, review FAR 22.1103 and Provision 52.222-46 for guidance.
2 Page 86, L7: Should this be L6.7? Yes, a correction will be made prior to release of the final RFP.
3 Page 87, L6.10: Should this be Tab 6? Is it appropriate to this level or just the TO level?
Yes, a correction will be made prior to release of the final RFP.
Page 87, L7 and L7.3: It says the Task Orders are a subsection to Volume
1. Are the 15 pages per TO from L7.3 included in 50 pages for Volume 1 as called out in L.6 on page 85?
No, the 15 pages per TO are not included in the 50 pages for Volume 1 as called out in L.6 on page 85.
PP 87-90: The required tab #s for TOPs do not appear to correspond to the template in Attachment 11. Recommend that required content be aligned to the Attachment 11 sections.
Attachment 11 is the preferred format for Task Order Proposals (TOPs) in order to streamline Government evaluations. Please use this format as much as possible when submitting TO proposals.
6 Page 89, L7.3.3: Is the text under Tab 3 correct? Yes, as part of sample TO 0003.
27-Apr-17
Clarification Question to Q. 1 above On Question 1, L6.6 is not Total Compensation Plan. L6.6 is SF - 1 Software Development. My underlying question was if L6.6 through L6.9 should have their content in Tab 3 or if they are in the correct location and have their own tabs.
Correction to response given in #1 above: Yes, the subfactors (SFs) should immediately follow Technical Capability under Tab 3. The final RFP will reflect the necessary changes. The new order format is as follows:
L.6.1 Tab 1: Executive Summary L.6.2 Tab 2: Table of Contents, Glossary, and Definitions L.6.3 Tab 3: Special Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) L.6.4 Tab 4: Total Compensation Plan L.6.5 Tab 5: Technical Capability L.6.6 SF 1 - Software Development
Clarification Question to Q. 6 above On Question 6, the answer is exactly why I asked. TO3 is the analysis TO and the text does not appear to correspond to either analysis TO or the intent of "Task Order Lead Roles and Responsibilities".
New language:
Tab 3: Task Order Lead Roles and Responsibilities: Describe an approach for overall management, conflict resolution and risk management for the sample
TO.
INDUSTRY DAY Q&As
The following questions and answers are documented notes received in response to the DRAFT RFP posted 25 APR 17.
Sheet1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .