Attch_12_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(PPQ).docx
DOCX document 109 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MODELING, SIMULATION, AND ANALYSIS (MS&A) FOR SPACE AND CYBERSPACE CAPABILITIES Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA2517-17-R-7003
About this file
PPQ.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
MODELING, SIMULATION, AND ANALYSIS (MS&A) FOR SPACE AND CYBERSPACE CAPABILITIES has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE SPACE COMMAND
Date
MEMORANDUM FOR: (Reference POC)
FROM: (Offeror’s Address & POC (Name, title, Contact Info of Individual Legally Able to Bind Contractor))
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Contract Requirement FA2517-17-R-7003
1. We are currently responding to the request for proposal, FA2517-17-R-7003, issued by 21ST Contracting Squadron in Colorado Springs for the Modeling, Simulation, and Analysis (MS&A) for Space and Cyberspace Capabilities (MSCC) Support contract.
2. A major consideration in proposal evaluation is verification of past performance on contracts which reflect our ability to perform on the proposed effort. This acquisition requires we provide a past performance questionnaire to you since I believe you have first-hand experience with our performance on the contract, identified in the subject line.
3. It is extremely important to us that you please take a few moments to complete sections 3 and 4 of the attached questionnaire. Once completed, the detailed information contained in the questionnaire is considered Source Selection Sensitive and will NOT be released to us, the Offeror. Return responses directly to the contracting office as soon as possible, but not later than TBD by encrypted e-mail or by mail as follows:
· Steve A. Wells, Contracting Officer 21st Contracting Squadron, LGCCB 135 Dover Street, Building 350 Ste. 2225 Peterson AFB, CO 80914-4914 steven.wells.7@us.af.mil Phone: (719) 556-6561
· Gina Garcia, Contract Specialist 21st Contracting Squadron, LGCCB 135 Dover Street, Building 350 Ste. 2225 Peterson AFB, CO 80914-4914 virginia.garcia.9@us.af.mil Phone: (719) 556-8087
· Chris Tucker, Contract Specialist 21st Contracting Squadron, LGCCB 135 Dover Street, Building 350 Ste. 2225 Peterson AFB, CO 80914-4914 chris.tucker@us.af.mil Phone: (719) 556-7858
4. If you have any questions about completing the questionnaire contact either the Contracting Officer or Contract Specialist identified above for assistance.
5. Do NOT send a copy of the completed questionnaire to us. This information is intended for Government use only.
6. I appreciate your assistance and prompt response.
(Offeror’s POC) Encl. Past Performance Questionnaire
Solicitation # FA2517-17-R-7003
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR
Contractor Company Name: ______________________________________________________________________
Contract Number and/or Program Title: _____________________________________________________________
Period of Performance of Your Contract: ________________________________________________
Contract Value of Your Contract at Award: _______________________________________________
Final/Current Contract Value: __________________________________________________________
SECTION 2: RESPONDENT INFORMATION TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONDENT
Government Contractor |_| Commercial Contractor |_| Evaluator’s Name: __________________________________________________________________________ Evaluator’s Title: __________________________________________________________________________ Organization/Company Name: ________________________________________________________________ Phone Number/Fax Number: ___________________________________________________________________ E-mail Address: ___________________________________________________________________________ Dates of Involvement in Program/Contract: _______________________________________________________ Evaluator’s Role on Subject Contract: ___________________________________________________________ Did/Does this contract involve any classified work? |_|No |_|Secret |_|Top Secret |_|SCI |_|Other
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? |_| Yes |_|No If yes, please explain outcome. _________________________________________________________________________________________
SECTION 3: DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT EFFORTS TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONDENT
The contractor cited in Section 1 is submitting this citation due to one or more relevant similarities with the non-personal services to assist HQ AFSPC/A9XY and HQ AFSPC/A3Z in the development/modification of MS&A and decision support tools as well as the analysis of space and cyberspace capabilities that provide tactical, operational, and strategic level support to meet military and national objectives on an IDIQ, cost-plus fixed-fee contract.
Please mark the efforts below that were performed on your contract. Efforts need not be for exactly the same services as long as expertise/efforts were similar. (Double click on the box to select an answer. Under “Default value” select “checked” and hit “OK”)
| Contract Reference Mission and Functional Area |
| Performed by Contractor |
| Modeling, Simulation, and Analysis (MS&A) |
| |_| |
| Analysis Resource Portal |
| |_| |
| Consolidated Computer Facility |
| |_| |
| Continuous Service Improvement |
| |_| |
SECTION 4: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONDENT
For each question below, please rate the contractor’s quality of performance from unsatisfactory to exceptional (as defined below) and please provide comments supporting your rating. A rating of N/A should be used if either the question is not applicable or the answer is unknown.
(Respondents who have already entered performance information via the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and know information is currently reflected in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) need not complete Section 4, unless they wish to add information not yet contained in PPIRS).
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Exceptional (E) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance exceeds most contractual requirements and the goals and objectives of the PWS. The area of evaluation experienced a few minor problems for which timely corrective action was taken and was effective. |
| Very Good (VG) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance meets all contractual requirements and exceeded some. The contractor is fulfilling the goals and objectives of the PWS. The area of evaluation experienced a few minor problems for which timely corrective action was taken and was effective. |
| Satisfactory (S) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and the goals and objectives of the PWS. The area of evaluation experienced some minor problems for which: either, 1) corrective action was taken and appears to be satisfactory, or 2) corrective action was identified that will probably correct the problems. |
| Marginal (M) |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects serious problems that were difficult to correct. Corrective action was either not identified, appeared only marginally effective, or was not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory (U) |
| Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractor's corrective actions to date are ineffective. |
| Not Applicable (NA) |
| Not applicable or unknown. Did not observe performance in this area. |
PART A: PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONDENT
(Double click on the box to select an answer. Under “Default value” select “checked” and hit “OK”)
QUESTIONS
ASSESSMENT
E VG S M U N/A
a. QUALITY OF SERVICES
| 1. | How would you rate the contractor on providing managers and supervisors that were experienced with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements? |
| |_||_||_||_||_||_| |
2. How would you rate the contractor on providing effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements?
| 3. | How would you rate the contractor on providing timely resolution of contract discrepancies? |
| |_||_||_||_||_||_| |
| 4. | How would you rate the contractor on being pro-active in identifying problems? |
| |_||_||_||_||_||_| |
| 5. | How would you rate the contractor on suggesting alternative approaches to problems? |
| |_||_||_||_||_||_| |
| 6. | How would you rate the contractor on providing skilled and knowledgeable technical personnel who were able to perform all aspects of the contract? |
| |_||_||_||_||_||_| |
| 7. | How would you rate the contractor on following government/customer, regulations/ procedures with very little oversight? |
| |_||_||_||_||_||_| |
| 8. | How would you rate the contractor’s ability to understand contract requirements without the need for government/customer involvement? |
| |_||_||_||_||_||_| |
| 9. | If this is a task order type contract to what extent did the contractor meet all individual task order requirements? |
| |_||_||_||_||_||_| |
| 10. | How would you rate the contractor’s ability to develop technically sound innovative solutions? |
| |_||_||_||_||_||_| |
| 11. | How would you rate the accuracy of the deliverables provided by the contractor? |
| |_||_||_||_||_||_| |
| 12. | How would you rate the contractor’s ability to comply with DD254, Contract Security Classification Specification, to include proper handling, storage, transmission, and destruction of classified materials? |
| |_||_||_||_||_||_| |
| 13. | How would you rate the contractor’s ability to provide critical site security operations and planning support (Force Protection, Physical Security, and Anti-Terrorism)? |
| |_||_||_||_||_||_| |
| 14. | Overall how would you rate the contractor’s quality of service provided on your contract? |
| |_||_||_||_||_||_| |
COMMENTS:
| b. SCHEDULE |
| E VG S M U N/A |
| 1. | How would you rate the contractors’ ability to develop realistic project schedules? |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
| 2. | How would you rate the contractor’s ability to meet established project schedules? |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
| 3. | How would you rate the contractor’s ability to incorporate changes to project schedules in timely manner while adhering to schedule? |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U N/A
| 4. | How would you rate the contractor’s ability to provide deliverables in a timely manner? |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
| 5. | How would you rate the contractor’s ability to provide timely response to time-sensitive requirements, including short notice requirements and a large number of requirements in a short period (surge capability)? |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
| 6. | To what extent was documentation (to include change order proposals) submitted on time? |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
| 7. | Overall how would you rate the contractor’s ability to meet critical milestones for the project? |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
COMMENTS:
| c. COST CONTROL |
| E VG S M U N/A |
| 1. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to provide accurate and complete line item cost proposals? |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
| 2. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to manage costs to eliminate or reduce cost overruns on a cost type contract? |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
3. Overall how would you rate the contractor’s final contract cost compared to their original estimated cost? Did contractor adequately explain differences from target cost?
COMMENTS:
| d. BUSINESS RELATIONS |
| E VG S M U N/A |
| 1. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to provide clear, accurate, and timely written and verbal communication? |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
| 2. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to provide adequate corporate capabilities for solving technical and administrative problems, when necessary? |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
| 3. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to work collaboratively with other contractor and government personnel? |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
| 4. Overall how would you rate the contractor’s cooperation and ability to work as a team with the Government? |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
COMMENTS:
| e. MANAGEMENT OF PERSONNEL |
| E VG S M U N/A |
| 1. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to delegate authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements? |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
| 2. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to manage subcontractors? |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
| 3. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period in a timely manner?? |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
4. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to commit adequate resources to meet the requirements of the contract?
E VG S M U N/A
5. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to select quality subcontractors with the proper skills and knowledge to perform their assigned work?
| 6. Overall how would you rate the contractor’s ability to manage their personnel to provide the quality and quantity of personnel it proposed? |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
COMMENTS:
| f. TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE |
| E VG S M U N/A |
| 1. MS&A: Managed and performed software development |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
| 2. MS&A: Enhanced M&S tools to support studies and conduct M&S investments. |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
3. MS&A: Performed scenario development and execute analysis processes and methodologies 3.
| 4. MS&A: Planned and conducted warfighting analysis across at least two of the following operational warfighting domains (air, land, sea, or littoral) |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
| 5. Analysis Resource Portal: Performed Change Management processes for controlling the lifecycle of all changes to an Analysis Resource Portal |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
| 6. Analysis Resource Portal: Performed service configuration management for all delivered Analysis Resource Portal Services (Hardware and Software assets management) |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
| 7. Analysis Resource Portal: Performed Analysis Resource Portal architecture development and maintenance of Analysis Resource Portal baseline and vision |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
| 8. Analysis Resource Portal: Performed tasks for gathering, storing, analyzing, and sharing information in accordance with best industry practices. |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
| 9. Consolidated Computer Facility: Performed Consolidated Computer Facility Project Management from concept to completion of a project (including charter, project management plan, status reporting, service design, release and deployment, validation and testing, and project closure) |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
| 10. Consolidated Computer Facility: Performed Consolidated Computer Facility Portfolio Management from concept throughout lifecycle for IT services |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
| 11. Consolidated Computer Facility: Performed Transition Planning and Support to close Consolidated Computer Facility help desk tickets. |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
COMMENTS:
PART B: OVERALL ASSESSMENT TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONDENT
| a. How well did the contractor meet your overall expectations with regard to their performance in meeting the objectives and requirements of the contract? | E | VG | S | M | U | N/A |
| |_| | |_| | |_| | |_| | |_| | |_| |
| b. How well was the contractor able to manage multiple high interest tasks? | E | VG | S | M | U | N/A |
| |_| | |_| | |_| | |_| | |_| | |_| |
Please identify the types, number and complexity of tasks the contractor was required to perform under the contract. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
c. In your opinion, what was the contractor’s strongest attribute and why? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
d. In your opinion, what was the contractor’s weakest attribute and why? Did the contractor correct or attempt to correct the weakness? __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
e. Given the opportunity, would you hire this contractor again?
|_| Definitely Would |_| Probably Would |_| Probably Would Not |_| Definitely Would Not Please explain:
f. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Thank you for supporting this source selection!
image1.png image2.wmf
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .