Exhibit_A-Netting_Permit_Information_Original_06.2015.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- EASTMONTE OUTFIELD NETTING REPLACEMENT (FIELD 1)
- Solicitation number
- RFQ-26-043-FH
- Issued by
- Seminole County, Florida
About this file
This document is a Subsurface Soil Exploration Report prepared by Ardaman & Associates, Inc. for Bentley Architects + Engineers regarding proposed drainage improvements at the Eastmonte Training Center in Altamonte Springs, Seminole County, Florida. The report documents findings from a shallow subsurface soil exploration conducted on May 7, 2015, including soil stratigraphy analysis, groundwater level measurements, and soil permeability testing at the project site located in Section 18, Township 21 South, Range 30 East. The field exploration program consisted of four auger borings drilled to 20 feet below ground surface and three hand auger borings drilled to 7 feet below ground surface. The site's general soil profile indicates fine sand and fine sand with silt in the upper strata, underlain by fine sand with varying amounts of silt and clay to boring termination depths. Groundwater was encountered at depths ranging from 4.3 to 6.6 feet below the existing ground surface during the April 27, 2015 drilling activities, with the normal seasonal high groundwater level estimated based on site-specific conditions and soil survey data for the Myakka, EauGallie, and Pomello soil series present at the location.
Three falling head field permeability tests were conducted adjacent to auger borings AB-1, AB-2, and AB-3, yielding measured permeability rates of 11.8, 28.9, and 33.9 feet per day, respectively. Grain size analyses and sieve tests were performed on fine sand samples to correlate permeability values, with results ranging from 21 to 32 feet per day. The report recommends a maximum permeability rate of 21 feet per day for ball field drainage system design and advises use of a horizontal to vertical permeability transformation ratio of 1:1. The study explicitly excludes evaluation of sinkhole potential and environmental conditions, and findings are noted as representative only of subsurface conditions at specific boring locations, with local variations characteristic of regional subsurface materials anticipated during construction activities.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFQ-26-043-FH_Addendum_2.pdf | ||
| RFQ-26-043-FH_Addendum_1.pdf | ||
| RFQ26-043-FH-Eastmonte_Outfield_Netting_Replacement-Field_1.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
J t.
MINI MI Ardaman & Associates, Inc.
Geotechnical, Environmental and
Materials Consultants
Bentley Architects + Engineers 665 W. Warren Avenue
Longwood, Florida 32750
Attention: Ms. Molly deVivero, P.E.
Subject: Subsurface Soil Exploration Proposed Drainage Improvements Eastmonte Training Center
Altamonte Springs, Seminole County, Florida
Dear Ms. deVivero:
May 7, 2015
File No. 14-6500
As requested and authorized, we have completed a shallow subsurface soil exploration for the subject project. The purposes of performing this exploration were to explore the general soil stratigraphy and groundwater levels at locations requested by you. In addition, we have preliminarily estimated the normal seasonal high groundwater level at the boring locations and performed three soil permeability tests. This data report documents our findings.
SITE LOCATION AND SITE DESCRIPTION
The subject site is located at the Eastmonte Training Center in Altamonte Springs, Seminole
County, Florida ( Section 18, Township 21 South, Range 30 East). The general site location is shown superimposed on the Casselberry, Florida U.S.G.S. quadrangle map presented on Figure
1.
The site is currently developed with the existing Eastmonte Training Center. The areas for the proposed stormwater storage are grassy and the areas proposed for artificial turf are currently natural grass covered ball fields.
REVIEW OF SOIL SURVEY MAPS
Based on the 1990 Soil Survey for Seminole County, Florida, as prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, the site is located in an area mapped as the " Myakka and EauGallie fine sand" soil series and the "Pomello fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes" soil series.
The " Myakka and EauGallie fine sand" soil series is located throughout the majority of the site and consists of nearly level soils on broad plains on the flatwoods. The soils are typically sandy in the top sixty inches underlain by sandy to sandy clay loam soils to a depth of eighty inches.
The internal drainage of the " Myakka and EauGallie fine sand" is poor and the soil permeability is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers, and moderate to moderately rapid in the sandy part of the subsoil, and moderately slow in the loamy part of the subsoil. According to the Soil Survey, 8008 S. Orange Avenue (32809), Post Office Box 593003, Orlando, Florida 32859-3003 Phone ( 407) 855-3860 FAX ( 407) 859-8121
Florida: Bartow, Cocoa, Fort Myers, Miami, Orlando, Port St. Lucie, Sarasota, Tallahassee, Tampa, West Palm Beach
Louisiana: Alexandria, Baton Rouge, Monroe, New Orleans, Shreveport
EXHIBIT A
Subsurface Soil Exploration Proposed Drainage Improvements
Eastmonte Training Center
Altamonte Springs, Seminole County, Florida
Ardaman & Associates, Inc.
OFFICES
Orlando — 8008 S. Orange Avenue, Orlando Florida 32809 — Phone ( 407) 855-3860
Alexandria — 3609 Mac Lee Drive, Alexandria, Louisiana 71302 — Phone ( 318) 443-2888
Bartow — 1525 Centennial Drive, Bartow, Florida 33830 — Phone (863) 533-0858
Baton Rouge — 316 Highlandia Drive, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70884 — Phone ( 225) 752-4790
Cocoa — 1300 N. Cocoa Blvd., Cocoa, Florida 32922 — Phone ( 321) 632-2503
Fort Myers — 9970 Bavaria Road, Fort Myers, Florida 33913 — Phone ( 239) 768-6600
Miami — 2608 W. 84th Street, Hialeah, Florida 33016 — Phone ( 305) 825-2683
Monroe — 1122 Hayes Street, West Monroe, Louisiana 71292 — Phone ( 318) 387-4103
New Orleans —1305 Distributors Row, Suite I, Jefferson, Louisiana 70123 — Phone ( 504) 835-2593
Port St. Lucie — 460 Concourse Place NW, Unit 1, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 — Phone ( 772) 878-0072
Sarasota — 78 Sarasota Center Blvd., Sarasota, Florida 34240 — Phone ( 941) 922-3526
Shreveport — 7222 Greenwood Road, Shreveport, Louisiana 71119 — Phone ( 318) 636-3673
Tallahassee — 3175 West Tharpe Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32303 — Phone ( 850) 576-6131
Tampa — 3925 Coconut Palm Drive, Suite 115, Tampa, Florida 33619 — Phone ( 813) 620-3389
West Palm Beach — 2200 North Florida Mango Road, Suite 101, West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 — Phone ( 561) 687-8200
MEMBERS:
A.S.F.E.
American Concrete Institute
ASTM International
Florida Institute of Consulting Engineers
T
GRAIN
SIZE
DISTRIBUTION
CURVE
PercentPassing
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50%40%30% 20%10%0% t7
N
N
CZ
co
Z
Z
I.
Z
N Z fh Z
8 -?
Z
Z
Z
Z z
8 O Z
0 N Z
Grain Size ( mm)
0.01
0 .
GRAVEL
SAND
SILT
CLAY
Coarse to
Medium
Fine
Project Name:
Pro ject Location:
Client Name:
Eastmonte Park Drainage Improvements
Eastmonte Park
Bentley Architects + Engineers
Sample No.:
1 (
0 -
3.5 ft)
Sample
Locatio n:
HAB-3
SampleDescription :
SP -
Brown Fine Sand
Percent Passing
No.
Siev e =
3.
1%
AEA
File Number:
14-6500
LL:
Not Tested
PL:
Not Tested
PI:
Not Tested o v AiARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC .
Orland o
Branch
SIZE
DISTRIBUTION
CURVE
100%90%80% 70% 60% a C
50% tv c.)w
40% a
30% 20% 10% 0%
0)
N
4 •
0 Z
Z
Z
N Z
Z
Z
Z
Z o
0 Z
Z
O Z
8N
N
Z z
Grain Size ( mm)
0 .
0.001
GRAVEL
SAND
SILT
CLAY
Coarse to
Medium
Fine
Project Name:
Project Location:
Client Name:
Eastmonte Park Drainage Improvements
Eastmonte Park
Bentley Architects + Engineers
Sample No.:
1 (
0 -
3.5 ft)
Sample Location:
HAB-2
SampleDescriptio n:
SP -
Light Gray Fine Sand
A&A File Number:
14-6500
Percent Passing No.
Sieve =
2. 4%
LL:
No t
Tested
PL:
Not Tested
PI:
Not
Te sted
D dMAI
ARDA
MAN & ASSOCIATES,
INC .
Orland o
Bra nch
SIZE
DISTRIBUTION
CURVE
co .
N
8 <
N .
W d d d
O6
O
O
O
M
N fV t7j .-
CS
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z is
O
V
N
N
O
O
O
O6
O
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
100% r
090%80% C
70%
N CD
60% a C
50%
CD C.)16
40% a
30% 20% 10% 0%
0 .
0.001
Grain Size ( mm)
SAND
SILT
CLAY
GRAVEL
Coarse to
Medium
Fine
Project Name:
Eastmonte Park Drainage
Improv ements
A&A File Number:
QMAI ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES,
INC.
Orlando Branch
Project Location:
Eastmonte Park
14-6500
Client Name:
Bentley Architects + Engineers
Sample No.:
1 (
0 -ft)
Sample
Lo cation:
HAB-1
Sample Description:
SP -
Bro wn
Fine Sand
Percent Passing No.
Sieve =
3.
6%
LL:
Not Tested
PL:
Not Tested
PI:
Not Tested
APPENDIX II
Grain Size Distribution Curves
HAND AUGER BORINGS
Auger borings are used when a relatively large, continuous sampling of soil strata close to ground surface is desired. A 3 -inch diameter, hand-held bucket auger with a cutting head at its end is screwed into the ground in 1 - foot sections. The sample is recovered by withdrawing the auger out of the ground without rotating it. The soil sample so obtained, is classified and representative samples put in bags or jars and brought back to the laboratory for classification testing.
AUGER BORINGS
Auger borings are used when continuous sampling of soil strata close to ground surface is desired. A 4 -inch diameter, continuous flite, helical auger with a cutting head at its end is screwed into the ground in 5 -foot sections. It is powered by the rotating action of the Kelly bar of a rotary drill rig. The sample is recovered by withdrawing the auger out of the ground without rotating it.
The soil sample so obtained, is classified and representative samples put in bags or jars and brought back to the laboratory for classification testing.
APPENDIX I
Auger and Hand Auger Boring Procedures
T:\OAando \14\14-6500\1465000} dg5/07/20154' 2518PM, Chris.Onw
5 10 15
S. E
AB -
27/15I-
WITH TRACE ROOTS
SOIL
DESCRIPTIONS
LEGEND
FINE
SAND (
SP)
FINE
SAND
WITH
SILT (
SPSM)
p
FINE
SAND
WITH
CLAY (
SP -
SC)
CLAYEY
FINE
SAND (
SC)
AB HAB 200
SP,SPSM SM,SC,CH
AB -
04/27/15
Q S
AB -
04/27/15 0 to 0
ORGANIC
2C
STAINED
AB -
04/27/15 0 0
HAB-1 04/27/15
Ox
ORGANIC
4-
STAINED
HAB-2 0427/15
HAB-3 04/27/15
COLORS
OA
UGHT
BROWN
TO
BROWN
OB
DARK
BROWN
OR
DARK
GRAY
O
VERY
DARK
GRORAYWN
OR
VERY
DARK
B
O
UGHT
GRAY
TO
GRAY
AUGER
BORING
HAND
AUGER
BORING
GROUNDWATER
LEVEL
MEASUREDON
DATE
DRILLED ESTIMATEDNORM
AL
SEASO
NAL
HIGH
GROUNDWATER
LEVEL
PERCENT
PASSING
NO.
SIEVE
SIZE (
PERCENT
FINES)(ASTM
D-1140)
UNIFIED
SOIL
CLASSIFICATION
SYSTEM (
ASTM
D-2487)
OORGANIC
2C
SINNED
N
OTE: UPON
CO
MPLETIONOF
EACH
AUGER
BORING,
THE
BOREHOLE
WAS
BACKFILLED
WITH
SOIL
CUTTINGS.
WHILE
THE
BORINGS
ARE
REPRESENTATIVE
OF
SUBSURFACE
CONDITI
ONS
AT
THEIR
RESPECTIVE
LOCATIONS
AND
FOR
THEIR
RESPECTIVE
VERTICAL
REACHES.
L
OCAL
V
ARIATIONS
CHARACTERISTIC
OF
THE
SUBSURFACE
MATERIALS
OF
THE
REGION
ARE
ANTICIPATED
AN
D
MAY
BE
ENCOUNTERED.
THE
BORING
LOGS
AND
RELATED
INFORMATION
ARE
BASED
ON
THE
DRILLER'S
LOGS
AND
VISUAL
EXA
MINATION
OF
SELECTED
SAMPLES
IN
THE
LABORATORY. THE
DELINEATION
BETWEEN
SOIL
TYPES
SHOWN
ON
THE
LOGS
IS
APPROXIMATE
AND
THE
DESCRIPTIO
N
REPRESENTS
OUR
INTERPRETATION
OF
SUBSURFACE
CONDITIONS
AT
THE
DESIGNATED
BO
RING
LOCATIO
NS
ON
THE
PARTICULAR
DATE
DRILLED.
GROUNDWATER
ELEVATIONS
SHOWN
ON
THE
B
ORING
L
OGS
REPRESENT
GROUNDWATER
SURFACES
ENCOUNTERED
ON
THE
DATES
SHOWN.
FLUCTUATIONS
IN
WA
TE R
TABLE
LEVELS
SHOULD
BE
AN
TICIPATED
THROUGHOUT
THE
YEAR .
5 10 15 20
SOIL
BORING
PROFILES
Ardaman &
Associates, Inc.
V Geolech niaal, EnvIr enmenlaland M aterial s
C entultanle
SUSNIAFACE
SOL
EXPLORATION
PROPOSED
ORAS7AIN
ILPROVE
MENT3
EASTWONIE
TANNING
CENTER
ALTAMONTE
SPNMS,
SEMI
OLE
COUNTY, FLORIDA
eer w
CD
Iowa* er:
MI
A.OYaR 44-6-1
Ism
05/01116 neu"` l
I
C
HJ
I
P
I
I
I % i
L .
nvq anwYl
SCALE: -
1'•100'
1 ..
i`. , ..
AB -
4 \ f -- -• •
I(AB-3J;
Ars north Fgpgehon
M and chops n n annn ab nwee. Ball
Ol ena ae
I
LEGEND
AB
AUGER
BORING
LOCATI
ON
Q
HAB
HAND
AUGER
B
ORINGLOCATION
NOTE:
THE
BASE
MAPFOR
THE
B
ORINGLOCATION
PLAN
IS
A
SITE
PLAN
BY
BENTLEY
ARCHITECTS +
ENGINEERS.
BORING
LOCATION
PLAN
INOWIMArdaman & Associates, Inc .
Geal eehnleal, Envlranme nleland
Materi alsLenaaaa nts
115510
IFACE
500 .
EXPLONATION
a0P
OIEDDMHA
OE5P11OVE11EHTI
EAET
UOI(TETNManO
COREA
ALTAMONTE
WNW,
sEA'1OLE
COUNTY.
FLORIDA
MW
1n .
CO
la® radla Amp.
enM:
11-5600
1w1:
08/01/15 nem
L a-a vi N
N
A
5, v c
I -
SECTION 18
TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH
RANGE 30 EAST
OBTAINED FROM U.S.G.S. QUAD MAP: CASSELBERRY, FLORIDA
PHOTOREVISED 1994)
0 1000 2000
APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1"=2000'
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
SITE LOCATION MAP
FIN Ardaman & Associates, Inc.
Geotechnical, Environmental and
Materials Consultants
SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION
PROPOSED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
EASTMONTE TRANNG CENTER
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA
DRAWN Ft CD I04ECKED BY: I DATE: 05/01/15
RE NO. APPROVED BY: MUM
14-6500 1
Bentley Architects + Engineers File No. 14-6500 - 5-
We recommend that a maximum permeability rate of 21 feet/day be used relative to design of the ball field drainage systems.
It is noted that a suitable factor of safety should be used with these values, including a higher factor of safety for the permeability values based on correlation to sieve size only. In addition, for the type of soils tested, a transformation ratio of 1 horizontal to 1 vertical is appropriate ( i.e; the estimated ratio of horizontal to vertical permeability).
CLOSURE
The information submitted herein is based on the data obtained from the soil borings presented on Figure 3. This data report does not reflect any variations which may occur adjacent to or between the borings. The nature and extent of the variations between the borings may not become evident until during further exploration and/or construction. •
This study is based on a relatively shallow exploration and is not intended to be an evaluation for sinkhole potential. This study does not include an evaluation of the environmental ( ecological or hazardous/toxic material related) condition of the site and subsurface.
This data report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Bentley Architects + Engineers in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices for the subject project.
No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
We are pleased to be of assistance to you on this phase of the project. When we may be of further service to you or should you have any questions, please contact us.
Very truly yours, ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Certificate ofAuthorization No. 5950
Virginia A. Goff, E.I.
Assistant Project Engineer
VAG/ZCB/jj/nfm 14-6500 EaslmorM. Drainage ( 2015 Caso)
I7/s _ ate%ir.0 _
Sew+ gineer
File No. 14-6500 - 4-
The seasonal high groundwater level is affected by a number of factors. The drainage characteristics of the soils, the land surface elevation, relief points such as drainage ditches, lakes, rivers, swamp areas, etc., and distance to relief points are some of the more important factors influencing the seasonal high groundwater level.
Based on our interpretation of the site conditions using our boring logs, we estimate the normal seasonal high groundwater level at the boring locations to be approximately at the levels indicated on Figure 3.
Soil Profile and Soil Permeability
The fine sand and fine sand with silt ( Strata 1 and 2 on Figure 3) are generally considered to be relatively permeable. The underlying fine sand with clay and clayey fine sand ( Strata 3 and 4 on
Figure 3) are less permeable than the fine sand and fine sand with silt, and should be considered to be aquitards for retention pond drawdown evaluation.
The results of the falling head field permeability tests are presented in the following table:
Test Location Test Depth feet)
Measured Permeability feet/day)
AB -1 3-4 11.8
AB -2 2 — 3 28.9
AB -3 2-3 33.9
In addition, sieve analysis tests were performed on samples of the fine sand (Stratum 1 on Figure
3) from each of the three hand auger borings conducted relative to the ball field artificial turf in order to help approximate the permeability values of the soils. To estimate the permeability, the
Correlation of Hydraulic Conductivity with Fraction by Weight Passing the US No. 200 Sieve" graph provided in SJRWMD Special Publication SJ93-SP10 was used. Values should be considered rough approximations only. Actual permeability may be much higher or lower.
Our review of the graph indicates roughly correlated permeability rates as presented in the following table:
Test Location Depth ( feet)
Percent
Passing No.
200 Sieve
Correlated
Permeability feet/day)
F Sample
HAB-1 0 — 2 4 21
HAB-2 0 — 3.5 2 32
HAB-3 0 — 3.5 3 28
File No. 14-6500 - 3-
LABORATORY PROGRAM
Representative soil samples obtained during our field sampling operation were packaged and transferred to our laboratory for further visual examination and classification. The soil samples were visually classified in general accordance with the. Unified Soil Classification System ( ASTM
D-2488). The resulting soil descriptions are shown on the soil boring profiles presented on Figure 3.
In addition, we conducted three grain size analyses ( ASTM D421) and one percent fines analyses ASTM D1140) on selected soil samples obtained from the borings. The results of these tests are presented adjacent to the sample depth on the boring profiles on Figure 3. Grain size distribution curves are presented in Appendix II.
GENERAL SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
General Soil Profile
The results of the field exploration and laboratory programs are graphically summarized on the soil boring profiles presented on Figure 3. The stratification of the boring profiles represents our interpretation of the field boring logs and the results of laboratory examinations of the recovered samples. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary between soil types. The actual transitions may be more gradual than implied_
The results of the borings indicate a general soil profile of fine sand ( SP) and fine sand with silt
SP-SM) to a depth of 6 feet, underlain by fine sand with varying amounts of silt and clay ( SP, SP-SM, SP -SC, SC) to the boring termination depths.
The above soil profile is outlined in general terms only. Please refer to Figure 3 for soil profile details.
Groundwater Level
The groundwater level was measured in the boreholes on the day drilled after stabilization of the downhole water level. As shown on Figure 3, groundwater was encountered at depths ranging from 4.3 to 6.6 feet below the existing ground surface on the date indicated. Fluctuation in groundwater levels should be anticipated throughout the year primarily due to seasonal variations in rainfall and other factors that may vary from the time the borings were conducted.
NORMAL SEASONAL HIGH GROUNDWATER LEVEL
The normal seasonal high groundwater level each year is the level in the August -September period at the end of the rainy season during a year of normal ( average) rainfall. The water table elevations associated with a higher than normal rainfall and in the extreme case, flood, would be higher to much higher than the normal seasonal high groundwater level. The normal high water levels would more approximate the normal seasonal high groundwater levels.
File No. 14-6500 - 2-the seasonal high water table for the " Myakka and EauGallie fine sand" soil series is typically within 12 inches of the natural ground surface.
The " Pomello fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes" soil series is located in the southeast portion of the site and consists of nearly level to gently sloping sandy soil on low ridges and knolls on the flatwoods. The internal drainage of the " Pomello fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes" is described as moderate and the soil permeability is very rapid in the surface and subsurface layers, moderately rapid in the subsoil and rapid in the substratum. According to the Soil Survey, the seasonal high water table for the " Pomello fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes" soil series is typically within 36 to 40 inches of the natural ground surface.
FIELD EXPLORATION PROGRAM
Auger Borings
The field exploration program included performing four auger borings and three hand auger borings. The auger borings were drilled using a truck -mounted, 4 -inch diameter, continuous flight auger to a depth of 20 feet below the ground surface. A summary of this field procedure is included in Appendix I. Representative soil samples were recovered from the auger borings and transported to our laboratory for further analysis.
The hand auger borings were conducted using a 3'/2 -inch diameter manual bucket auger to a depth of 7 feet below the existing ground surface. A summary of the hand auger boring procedure is included in Appendix I. Representative soil samples were recovered from the hand auger borings and transported to our laboratory for further analysis.
The groundwater level at each of the boring locations was measured during drilling. The borings were backfilled with soil cuttings upon completion.
Field Permeability Tests
A field permeability test was performed adjacent to three of the auger borings. The field permeability tests were performed by installing a solid -walled PVC casing snugly fit into a 4 -inch diameter auger borehole. The bottom of the pipe was open and raised 1 foot above the bottom of the borehole. The bottom 1 foot of the borehole was gravel -packed. The pipe was then filled to the top with water. The test was performed as a " falling head" test in which the rate of water drop within the pipe was measured.
Test Locations
The approximate locations of the borings are schematically illustrated on a site plan shown on
Figure 2. The permeability tests were conducted adjacent to Borings AB -1, AB -2, and AB -3.
These locations were determined in the field by Ardaman & Associates based on information provided by you and located by estimating distances from existing site features. Boring locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method of measurement used.
0 D '
C c
D D.a D LD- 3
CDv Cn w
I
PRESIDE
NT/ DESIG
NER: MA
RKRAMSEY
i,,,,,, '
GOLF
RANGE
NETTING" 40351U.S.
HIGHWAY
N. SUITE
T
ARPONSPRINGS,
FLORIDA
34689
1,1 i , ;
Pi fgeh i$:r 4?stI+i, %!
1, i"34igk
S t.xR.
S
PA'' .
V!!
N` '
1 '.
email: info©g olfrangenetting.com1lille,E};
V •
C
I site:
www.g olfrangenetting.comt:i;sii6:fa!
Ng
OFFICE. 866.938.4448 727.938.4448
FA
x
727 .
938 .
FOR\P'?: :
w,.. ..., n,K .
c....011.5
Fs s'ONAL v- ,,, `, Joseph R.
Springer '",,+,,,,,,'`, V. ..
T_
4 ~ o
FL
Reg 49806 i
M .
c'
Express Engineering, LLC
CA #
26911
I
Cranes Roost Blvd
Suite
Altamonte Springs, FL
327011
NOTE_
ALL
HARDWARE
TO
BE
GALVANIZED
M
ATERIALS: HPOS
GH61LS
GUY
HOOK
G".`W' ` jC'' w v "" , a t i0 , M ^"" (
Orr,'' "''^_ ,.. ' •
JOSLYN
J1019
G
UY
HOOK
PREF
PG -5518
8"
PVC
GUY
GUARD
r rl
I
X;.
i r-.nv.• fi:
I
SNAP
PLACEMENTDETAIL
t> ,:<,, --.--"
11;11
3EDNETTINGLAYOUT
830MagnoliaDrive meSprings, Florida32701 iII
HPS
3/4"
THIMBLE
EYE
EYENUT
HPS
C
1020025
TRIPLE -
EYE
GUY
ADAPTOR
P1096 3 -
BOLT
CABLE
SUSPENSION
CLAMP
JOSLYN
TUF
TUG
SHEAVE
BLOCK
SB2000E
CURVED
WILLIAMS
FITTINGS
FLAT
G
UY
HOOKS
5/16"
GALVANIZED
GUY
STEEL
TYP .
j
J,;:\ `DETAIL
4 •.,•.
o .
gs
PRECAST
CONCRETE
POLES,
15'
IN -
GROUND
70'
ABOVE
GRADE
i
W
CI CD :+
7/16"
GALVANIZED
G
UY
STEEL
HUBBARDS
SUSPENSION
CLAMPS
3/4"
UNTHREADED
EYES
GALVANIZED
SNAPS
SCNNL:
I/4 •" i• p• 3 -
BOLT
SUSPENSION
CLAMP,
TYPICAL
ALL
POLES
No.
NYLON
NETTING
1.3/4" W/ 3/8"
ROPEBORDER,
S/S
SNAP
EVERY
2'-0" a, t -•
70'
70'
70'
70'/
70'
70'
70'
70'
3/8
70'
70' "
70' a.a.co v
C
S < .
THIMBLE -
EYE
n
5 =.
y t• , t • rye •
N [ jjjjKj 3/8"3/Er.
c; ' ti tyr• ti h • i w rr r d
4' b .
1$x.•1...
ti k3r h" • tj S` •
3/8" •
THIMBLE -
EYE
w, ;V\
Co
Co i /
CA / ,
N` ti, .*:}; ::;
N
5/16" r ;
i•. ,.
r t` yp .}.5.yn •!;
r vrj • p•, : •..
l<
N r4 ' "
Y ti",, j^"?5/16 "• r.':
tn.
r'1 }\•:4,:', t`C:v'A:
v v iC :
ii;
N dd::' t
N x`5/16". ;? ':
s sNot• Grant Permission 1
CO
i /
7116" n'i' 7' n 3 { {' { y .
tiv?
2 '
j. C\1 f d' l k - '' ti'`4 t"ti'N
7/16"1` C"
N :
N ?
I5/16":
a ti . k 1 "
n. +: ,.N.
5/16" ., r •-• vi f;
5/ .
4164:,..,,,, v5116 ":
t:
N
Q j"f ti' .
A. {}
L .
Sy f' •.'::
Si`
V f }..
J ,•
1 :.
n.. ' h v .
iSfi i " S' ri.8 t" .' t .` d.•
M1W• i h.Iy .
s i` • ...,. ':_ i__ ".;_:__
2::. •-:.:,;" /:::4 i
L—
4'„Y}L
3 ` to
DBL
HELIX
30'
APPROX.
GRADE30'DBL
HELIX
Q•
ANCHOR
ANCHOR
7,--
15'
CO -
F'
EMBED,TYP
POLE
SPACING,
TYP.
15'
EMBED,TYP
J
X
48 "
DIA .
HOLE,
BACKFILL
W/
CRUSHED
CD
48" DIA.
HOLE,
BACKFILL
W/
CRUSHED
STONE
HYDRAULICALLY
TAM
PED
STONE
HYDRAULICALLYTAMPED
CD `" ,„' '
NETTING
ELEVATION
1J 1, v
SCALE:
NO
SCALE
11)a)< o'
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .