Exhibit 1 to addendum 2 Camp Umatilla Barracks - RFI Log With Responses 8-30-21.pdf

RFI Question Drawing / Spec RFI Response

Do you indeed require a Rope Descent System for Windows cleaning for building EB1?

Or would a Fall Arrest/Restraint system for safe roof maintenance (but not suspended access) be more appropriate for building EB1?

Also if fall protection is required for building EB1 should we also provide fall protection for building EB3?

11 24 25 A rope descent system is not required for window cleaning for EB1 or EB3. The reference to the Bosum chair is a reference standard not a requirement to provide the chair. A fall arrest/restraint system for safe roof maintenance is required for EB1 & EB3

Please confirm the Fire Protection Class of the project currently & what the fire protection class will be after the new fire hydrants are installed? N/A Class 3 is the current fire protection class for the Umatilla army depot according to Boardman Rural.

Please confirm the responding fire department for the project will be the Umatilla Fire District #1? N/A No. It is Boardman Rural Fire Protection.

Please confirm Procore will be required to be utilized on the project and supplied by the Contractor? 01 30 00 Procore is not required.

The basis of Design for EB1 is Hardie Board. Hardie Board components are in limited supply currently. In addition to Nichiha USA, Inc. listed in specification 07 46 46, is Azek an acceptable manufacturer? https://azekexteriors.com/products/cladding?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIpqLr3Pa98gIVsMmUCR21rQlTEAAYASAAEgIf__D_BwE

07 46 46 No. Azek is not an equivalent product material wise, does not have the specified warranty available, requires non-campus standard paint, and is not in-line with campus standard finishes found on buildings of like construction on campus.

Drawings G002 for each of the buildings list the required Delegated Design and Deferred Submittals. There are multiple listed (Example for EB1: 05 1200, 05 5213) that do not have specifications for the project. Please advise.

G002 Sections 05 12 00, 05 31 00, and 05 52 13 are removed from the delegated design table with Addendums A & B. All metal stair, railings, and guardrails are covered under spec section 05 51 00.

We were reviewing the specifications for the Umatilla Barracks project, and we’re not finding the design build specs for Fire Suppression. Each barrack code summary shows

Automatic Sprinklers. Can you verify that we need this as design build and provide the specification in your next Addendum?

Div 21 No. This is denoted as delegated design and separate permit on G002. it is design-build to conform to the requirements of

NFPA 13 (commercial, multistory) per the code summary.

I just want to confirm the material. Section 06 41 00 calls for P-Lam only. The keynotes on A601 says N6 is 12 36 00 SOLID SURFACE COUNTERTOP. And the finish schedule only refers to P-Lam. If it is solid surface, would you please select a color/brand?

12 36 00 Spec Section 06 41 00 has been revised in Addendum B to include SS-1, for the restrooms attached to the open bays. SS-

1 is Corian with integrated sinks - color "Modern White" on a wide sheet. PLAM occurs at Sr. Leaders Quarters, with porcelain sinks. Pointe Nevemar studio gray. See Addendum B updates to A601 and A603 Interior Elevation Keynotes.

For spec section 26 0533, is it possible to utilize MC cable in lieu of conduit at unexposed areas 26 05 33 No. The UFC does not permit MC Cable in concealed locations.

Substitution request for Milgard & Cascade windows in lieu of VPI Endurance. 08 53 13 Rejected. Sole source provider needed for warranty and to match campus standards. Windows submitted are not an equivalent product and the contractor did not provide the necessary information to identify a line that complies with the specified testing and performance.

Detail 12 shows 5-6” shoulder in 1 lift with 3” pave in road. Asphalt compacts approx.. ¼” per inch laid. When we pave a 3” compacted mat we lay 3.75” projecting that across the thickened edge to a 5-6” compacted depth would mean laying 7.5”. The main road would compacted 0.75” while the shoulder area would compact 1.5” leaving the shoulder 0.75” lower than the road. The shoulder would require a pre level to match it with the roadway subgrade if a flat top surface is intended. Does this detail apply to all edges not matching existing asphalt or being restrained by concrete. EB1 there is approximately 167 lf, EB2 there is approximately 87 lf. EB3 there is approximately 1985 LF. EB4 there is approximately 93 lf

C4.00 The detail in question is accurate to current assumptions. This detail currently applies to 'all edges not matching existing asphalt or being restrained by concrete'. Please note that if Geotech engineer determines that the pavement section needs to be thicker, this detail will change.

There is a wood framed wall type 051 which has drywall on one side only, some of these walls have insulation in them.

Attached is a sheet with a few typical areas that have this wall type. The wall type, per the assembly page has this furred wall going next to the structure, however, on the drawings it is used in many other places. This would leave exposed wood framing, or exposed insulation inside restrooms, closest, IT room, Mechanical rooms, and more.

1. I want to confirm that the intent is to have drywall on only one side of these walls.

2. On these walls that also have insulation, how is the insulation supported?

A101, A102, A603 Refer to updated Addendum B sheets A101, A102 & A603 with revisions to wall assembly tags, to clarify wall type 052 at the locations in question.

1. Drywall is intended on each side of the assembly.

2. Insulation in wall type 052 is supported by the drywall on both sides.

Substitution Request for Metal-Web Wood joists: Web Joist Northwest Corp. in lieu of Redbuilt (20" Red-W, Red-L) 06 17 36 This is an acceptable substitution.

EXHIBIT 1 TO ADDENDUM 2 TO ITB 219995C001

RESPONSES TO RFIs and SUBSTITUTION REQUESTS RECEIVED THROUGH 8-27-21