ESBD_503606_1775169508841_Attachment D IC-RFP-2026-005.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 10 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- IC-RFP-2026-005
- Issued by
- Travis County, Austin City, Texas
About this file
This is a rate sheet attachment for a Request for Proposal (RFP IC-RFP-2026-005) issued by an unspecified Texas state or local agency for property management services. The RFP encompasses two distinct scopes of work: Traditional Property Management (Scope 1) and PSH Specialty Property Management (Scope 2). Proposers are required to submit pricing for one or both scopes, with detailed cost breakdowns organized into fixed fees, percentage-based management fees, and alternative pricing models as applicable. The rate sheet template requires bidders to complete designated yellow-shaded cells while maintaining the integrity of locked formula cells, ensuring consistent calculation and comparison across all proposals.
The pricing structure accommodates multiple fee approaches: fixed fees calculated on a per-unit-per-month (PUPM) basis, percentage-based management fees with specified calculation bases, and optional alternative pricing models. Proposers bidding both scopes must complete a cost roll-up section that consolidates Scope 1 and Scope 2 totals into combined monthly figures. The rate sheet also includes a section for additional costs such as turnover, maintenance, after-hours services, and PSH support costs, allowing bidders to identify whether these are monthly or per-event charges. All cost categories and calculations must be clearly documented to enable evaluation and comparison of competing proposals.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Rate Sheet
| IC-RFP-2026-005 – Attachment D: Rate Sheet | |||
| INSTRUCTIONS: | |||
| 1. Complete all yellow-shaded cells only. | |||
| 2. All other cells are locked to preserve the integrity of the worksheet. | |||
| 3. Provide all costs associated with Traditional Property Management (Scope 1) and PSH Property Management (Scope 2). | |||
| 4. Proposers bidding both scopes must complete the roll-up section. | |||
| 5. Alternative pricing models may be included in Section 4. | |||
| SECTION 1 – FIXED FEE (Per Unit Per Month – PUPM) | |||
| Service Category | Number of Units | Fixed Fee (PUPM) | Total Monthly Cost |
| Traditional Property Management (Scope 1) | 0 | ||
| PSH Specialty Property Management (Scope 2) | 0 | ||
| SECTION 2 – PERCENTAGE-BASED MANAGEMENT FEE | |||
| Service Category | Management Fee (%) | Basis of Calculation | |
| Traditional Property Management (Scope 1) | 0 | ||
| PSH Specialty Property Management (Scope 2) | 0 | ||
| SECTION 3 – COST ROLL-UP (For Proposers Bidding Both Scopes) | |||
| Cost Category | Scope 1 Total | Scope 2 Total | Combined Total |
| Fixed Fee PUPM Total | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Percentage Fee Total | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| All-In Combined Monthly Total | 0 | ||
| SECTION 4 – ALTERNATIVE PRICING MODELS (Optional) | |||
| Description of Alternative Model | Cost Structure | Notes |
| SECTION 5 – ADDITIONAL COSTS (e.g., Turnover, Maintenance, After-Hours, PSH Support Costs) | ||
| Cost Category | Description | Monthly or Per-Event Cost |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .