Amendment_000001.pdf

(x)

DTRT5716R20005

x x copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT

THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

x

V221

Cambridge MA 02142-1001 55 Broadway, V221 Off Site Eng & R&D Contracts USDOT/Volpe Center

V221

Cambridge MA 02142-1001 55 Broadway V221 Off Site Engin & R&D Contracts USDOT/Volpe Center

03/29/2016000001

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE CODE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY

PAGE OF PAGES

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

03/10/2016

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

See attached pages for solicitation changes.

Continued ...

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

Robert P. Robinson

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

Solicitation No. DTRT5716R20005 Amendment 000001

The purpose of this amendment is to make the following changes to Solicitation

DTRT5716R20005:

1. The slides from the March 24, 2016 Pre-Proposal Webinar are attached to this amendment.

2. The list of attendees from the March 24, 2016 Pre-Proposal Webinar are attached to this amendment.

3. Remove the following by reference clause from I.2 and move to section L, Subsection L.2 FAR - Solicitation Provisions:

4. In paragraph L.4.IV replace:

“Any questions, clarification requests, or other inquiries pertaining to the solicitation must be submitted no later than TBD.”

With:

“Any questions, clarification requests, or other inquiries pertaining to the solicitation must be submitted no later than 11:59 PM, March 31, 2016.”

5. Replace Attachment J.7 ATEPS SBSA Master Contract Cost and Business Proposal Checklist with the following revised Attachment J.7:

ATTACHMENT J. 7 - ATEPS SBSA MASTER CONTRACT COST AND BUSINESS

PROPOSAL CHECKLIST

FOR CLIN ____*

Prime Offeror /Subcontractor Name:_______________________________________________

Item Solicitation

Reference

Prime

Offeror Subcontractor(s) Proposal

Page Reference

Signed SF 33 SF 33 pg. 1, L.5.II.1, L.6.II.1

X

Acknowledgement of Amendments to the solicitation, if applicable

SF 30 pg. 1, L.5.II.1, L.6.II.1 X

Offeror Representations and Certifications

Section K (entire), L.5.II.1, L 6 II 1

X

Signed Proposal Cover Sheet L.5.II.1, L.6.II.2 X X

Approved Accounting System Documentation

L.6.II.2(m)

X X

(cost-type only)

Solicitation No. DTRT5716R20005 Amendment 000001

Item Solicitation

Reference

Prime

Offeror Subcontractor(s) Proposal

Page Reference

Subcontract Consent Packages L.4.VIII, L.5.II.1, L.6.II.3.b

X

Self -Performance by the Offeror J.15, L.IX X

Cost Control Plan L.5.II.1, L.6.II.3.a X

Master Contract Cost and Business Proposal Checklist (this document) L.5.II.1, L.6.II.2 X X

Conflict of Interest Disclosure Statement (with Mitigation Plan, if applicable)

H.2, L.5.II.1,

L.6.II.3.c

X X

Master Contract Cost and Business Proposal Schedules:

Schedule 1: Summary of Estimated/Proposed Costs and Fixed Fee/Profit

J.8, L.5.II.1,

L.6.II.2 X X

Schedule 2: Summary of Estimated Costs and Fixed Fee by Cost Element

J.8, L.5.II.1,

L.6.II.2 X

X

(cost-type only)

Schedule 3: Summary of Proposed Costs and Profit by Cost Element

J.8, L.5.II.1,

L.6.II.2

X

(fixed price type only)

Schedule 4: Calculation of Direct Labor Cost

J.8, L.5.II.1,

L.6.II.2

X X

Schedule 5: Proposed Indirect Rates and Allocation Bases

J.8, L.5.II.1,

L.6.II.2

X X

Schedule 6: Proposed Fixed Fee and Profit Calculation and Master Contract Maximum Fee/Profit Rates

J.8, L.5.II.1,

L.6.II.2 X

Schedule 7: Table of Subcontractors J.8, L.5.II.1, L.6.II.2 X

Schedule 8: Breakdown of Labor Hours Between Offeror and Subcontractors

J.8, L.5.II.1,

L.6.II.2 X

Schedule 9: Schedule of Offeror Proposed Other Direct Costs (ODCs)

J.8, L.5.II.1,

L.6.II.2 X X

Schedule 10: Resume Checklist and Labor Cost Realism

J.8, L.5.II.1,

L.6.II.2 X

Client Authorization Letter J.8, L.7.II.A.1, L.7.III.A.1, J.9

Pre-Proposal Conference Air Traffic Engineering and Program Support (ATEPS)

Solicitation DTRT5716R20005 (Small Business Set Aside)

The National Transportation Systems Center

Advancing transportation innovation for the public good

U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Research and Technology John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center

March 24, 2016

Today’s Agenda

Introduction

Ground Rules and Logistics

Volpe Center Overview

ATEPS Overview & Procurement Objectives

RFP Highlights

Technical Proposal

Cost/Business Proposal

Proposal Submission Reminders

Ground Rules and Logistics

Any statements, remarks or explanations made during this pre-proposal conference shall not qualify the terms of the RFP, unless an amendment is issued.

A copy of today’s presentation and list of attendees will be provided as an amendment to the solicitation.

No questions will be entertained during this webinar.

Ground Rules and Logistics – cont’d

Any questions, clarification requests, or other inquires pertaining to the solicitation must be submitted, via e-mail, no later than 11:59 p.m. ET on Thursday, March 31, 2016

Written questions received after March 31, 2016 will be answered by amendment only if determined by the CO to be in the best interest of the Government.

An amendment will be issued answering written questions received by the CO

Today’s Presenters

Camille Hogan, Office of Acquisitions, Contract Specialist, V-221

Dr. Michael Geyer, Office of Air Traffic Systems and Operations, V-

Brandon Lint, Management and Program Analyst, V-341

Volpe Center Overview

Background Volpe established in 1970 Part of U.S. Department of

Transportation (DOT) Office of Research and Technology

Named after former DOT Secretary and MA Governor John A. Volpe

Volpe supports DOT goals Safety State of good repair Economic competitiveness Livable communities Environmental sustainability

About Volpe

Operations Offices

Volpe Center organization

Technical Centers

Safety Management and Human Factors Stephen Popkin

Policy, Planning, and Environment

Gregg Fleming

Air Traffic Systems and Operations

Anne Aylward, acting

Infrastructure Systems and Technology

Luisa Paiewonsky

Chief Financial Officer William Henrikson

Chief Counsel Monica Conyngham

EEO Officer Karen Kowalewski

Acting Director David Ishihara

Human Resources

Susan Connors

Acquisitions Mary Doherty

Information Technology

Eric Frykenberg

Facilities Management David Duncan

Communication and Knowledge Management

Cassandra Allwell

Director Emeritus Richard John

Strategic Management Rachel Winkeller

Deputy Director for Research and Technology

Anne Aylward

Deputy Director for Operations David Ishihara

Organizational Culture and Work Life Helen Blackman

Strategic Initiatives Ellen Bell

Multimodal Programs and Partnerships

Mike Dinning Research Infrastructure and Operations Bob Dorer

Technical organizations

Safety Management and Human

Factors

Policy, Planning, and Environment

Safety Information

Systems

Safety Measurement and Analysis

Aviation Safety

Management Systems

Surface Transportation Human Factors

Aviation Human Factors

Economic Analysis

Transportation Planning

Organizational Performance

Environmental Measurement and Modeling

Environmental Science and Engineering

Energy Analysis

CAFE

Program

Office

Infrastructure Systems and

Technology

Air Traffic Systems and Operations

Aviation Systems

Engineering

Situational Awareness and

Logistics

Systems Safety and

Engineering

Structures and Dynamics

Advanced Vehicle

Technology

Infrastructure Engineering and Deployment

Technology Innovation and Policy

Air Navigation and

Surveillance

Air Wakes and

Weather

Air Traffic Management

Systems

Aviation Facilities and Business Services

NextGen Program

Office

Air Traffic Systems and Operations Focus Development of aviation systems that alleviate air traffic congestion, improve safety, and mitigate environmental impacts

Planning, testing, research, and evaluation in support of the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen)

Real-time operational communication, navigation, surveillance, and decision support systems

Example projects Aircraft wake turbulence and aircraft separation – FAA Remotely piloted aircraft technology assessments – FAA NextGen surveillance systems(ADS-B) – FAA NextGen modeling and simulation – FAA Air traffic facilities support – FAA

ATEPS Small Business Set-Aside Overview & Procurement

Objectives

ATEPS SBSA- Procurement Objective

Acquire the services of two contractors with expertise and capabilities in Strategic Planning/Management Development & Integration and Risk, Issue, and Opportunity Management activities in support of the Volpe Center’s efforts to support the FAA’s Air Traffic Organization (ATO), Program Management Organization’s (PMO) deployment of the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen)

Recap - FBO Special Notice

TMIS Follow-On Acquisition Strategy Announced on 9/17/2015 https://www.fbo.gov/notices/9a2666bdd7d88cc9714e03c739aef75b

Work has “evolved” to require separate procurements Three Solicitations to be issued

Two for ATEPS (one Full and Open and one SBSA) One for TMSEDS (Full & Open) https://www.fbo.gov/notices/9a2666bdd7d88cc9714e03c739aef75b

ATEPS – Background – Current Contract

Traffic Management Infrastructure Systems (TMIS) multiple award ID/IQ contracts Six master contracts (Boeing Company, Computer Sciences Corporation, Engility

Corporation, Lockheed Martin IS&GS, Raytheon Company, and Science Application International Corporation) awarded December 8, 2011

Ordering Period Expires December 7, 2016. Performance period expires December 7, 2017

Maximum Value: $450 million over 5 Years

To date, 21 task orders have been issued under the TMIS multiple award contracts – 11 of those to support the FAA’s ATO PMO deployment of NextGen

ATEPS – Acquisition Strategy (cont’d)

SBSA – Single Award ID/IQ for each CLIN - CLIN 0100 Strategic Planning/ Management Development and Integration CLIN 0200 Risk, Issue, and Opportunity Management

F&O – Single Award ID/IQ

First Task Order (Transition) awarded concurrently with Master Contract

Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee(CPFF) and Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) Task Orders

ATEPS - Procurement Overview

Statement of Work based on ongoing TMIS task orders issued in support of the FAA ATO PMO’s deployment of NextGen.

Funded by Intra-Agency Agreements

Advisory and Assistance Services

Federal Acquisition Certification-certified personnel will ensure appropriate management controls and perform contracting functions under the contracts and all task orders

ATEPS - SBSA SOW – CLIN 0100 –

Task Areas

The Contractor will support the following task areas:

1. Strategic Planning

2. Management Development and Integration

Task Area 1- Strategic Planning

The Contractor shall assist in:

Program charters for governing bodies Business process re-engineering Refinement of processes within PMO programs

Task Area 1- Strategic Planning

Examples of activities in Task Area 1 include:

Facilitation and integration of key program governance teams Facilitation of working sessions such as strategic, tactical, and other management meetings Development of strategies options for ensuring synchronized joint delivery of program commitments by the Government and industry, within and across PMO lines of business

Analysis of technical and integration issues for proposed architectures and concept of operations

Development or refinement of enterprise architectures describing national-level systems and support in the decomposition of architectures into functional components and program products.

Task Area 2- Management Development and Integration The Contractor shall provide consultation and support to

ATO PMO to assist in:

Enhancement of Senior Leadership’s ability to identify critical issues impacting operations Achievement of strategic goals Development of collaborative behaviors and a culture based on the collective integration of cross-organizational efforts Support to the Leadership Council for governance processes Development of collective skills for effective strategic and operational management

Task Area 2- Management Development and Integration Examples of activities in Task Area 2 include:

Management consulting for executives and managers Support redesign and change management activities related to realignment of organizational structures Identification of issues and recommended strategies for management team development Assistance to Leadership in designing and implementing products and processes to clarify expectations and improve accountability throughout the ATO management chain

ATEPS - SBSA SOW – CLIN 0200 –

Task Areas

The Contractor will support the following task area:

1. Risk, Issue, and Opportunity (RIO) Management

ATEPS - SBSA SOW – CLIN 0200 -

Task Area 1- RIO Management

Provide support to the various PMO programs to identify technical, cost and schedule risks and identify necessary actions to mitigate impacts on the program. The Contractor’s support includes:

Development of Risk Management Plans Creation and maintenance of a risk database Analysis, assessment, monitoring, and tracking of identified risks Facilitation of risk management board meetings Coordination with responsible parties and subject matter experts to develop and update risk mitigation plans Generation of white papers and briefings

Task Order 0001 – SOW – CLIN 0100 and CLIN 0200

Transition Period of Performance 90 Days

The Contractor will finalize the Draft Transition Plan submitted with initial offer and begin transitioning the work being performed under existing TMIS task orders to personnel that will perform the same work on under this effort with minimal disruption For work being performed under existing TMIS task orders see attachment J.13

Technical Reference Library

Task Order 0002 RFP to be issued during the transition period

Transition Plan Deliverables (see Section F – Part II)

RFP Highlights

Sections B through I Contains Parts I and II Part I – Refers to the Master RFP Part II – Refers to Task Order 0001 The items listed as Part II will be included in the OF 347 for Task Order 0001

Master Contract and Task Order 0001 will be awarded concurrently

Note the Cybersecurity Compliance Requirements (TAR 1252.239-70) in I.5

Note the Security and Position Sensitivity (DOT Order 1630.2B) Compliance Requirements in H.5

RFP – Section L

L.3 – Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data

L.4.I – Exclusion from Making an Offer

L.4.III – Award Without Discussions

RFP Questions – NLT 11:59PM on March 31, 2016 (e-mail only)

Proposal Validity – Minimum of 180 Calendar Days

RFP – Section L – cont’d

Offerors must clearly identify if its proposal is a proposal for CLIN 0100 or a proposal for CLIN 0200 ON EVERY VOLUME.

Offerors desiring to pursue awards for both CLINs must submit separate proposals for each CLIN. Separate proposals may not be contained within the same binders/volumes nor may one proposal refer to the other proposal.

This requirement also applies to Subcontractor proposals

RFP – Section L – cont’d

L.5.II – Proposal Organization Volume I – Cost/Business Proposal (three labeled sections) o Three (3) copies of Cost/Business (original and two copies) and one (1) copy on virus-free CD (including subcontractors) o CD Must include the completed cost proposal schedules in Microsoft Excel 2013. Excel file must include shall be used to verify calculations (no encrypted or protected cells) o Narrative (such as the subcontracting plan and other business proposal documents) must be provided in Microsoft Word 2010 or compatible format.

o NOTE CDs MUST CLEARY BE LABELED WITH COMPANY NAME, IDENTIFICATION

AS AN OFFEROR OR SUBCONTRATCOR, AND RFP NUMBER.

Volume II – Technical Proposal (three labeled sections) o Six (6) copies of Technical Proposal (original and five copies) and one (1) copy on virus-free CD o The Technical Proposal CD must be in Adobe Acrobat or compatible format.

RFP – Section L –Technical Proposal Written Technical Proposal Submission Consisting of Three (3)

Sections Staffing Transition Contract Past Performance

Oral Presentations Consisting of Two (2) Sections:

Technical Understanding Management Approach

L.5.V – Proposal Format

NO COST INFORMATION SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE TECHNICAL

PROPOSAL

RFP – Section L –Technical Proposal – Oral Presentations

ORAL PRESENTATION SCHEDULE

Evaluation Factor Topic Time Limit Presenters N/A Introduction 5 minutes Program Manager and/or any of the Task Area Managers Only

Technical Understanding Presentation of Technical Understanding

20 minutes Program Manager and/or any of the Task Area Managers only

Technical Understanding Structured Questions and Answers on Technical Understanding

10 minutes Program Manager and/or any of the Task Area Managers Only

Break Management Approach Presentation of Management

Approach 10 minutes Program Manager and/or any of the Task Area Managers Only

Management Approach Structured Questions and Answers on Management Approach

10 minutes Program Manager and/or any of the Task Area Managers Only

N/A Conclusion 5 minutes Program Manager and/or any of the Task Area Managers Only

ATEPS – SBSA – Section L – Cost/Business Proposal

Follow the guidance as provided in Section L.6 Identification of uncompensated overtime (FAR Provision 52.237-10) Include information required under FAR Provision 52.222-46

(Evaluation of Compensation of Professional Employees) Proposals must contain sufficient information for the Government to complete its evaluation (completely filled out Cost Proposal Schedules )

Supporting documentation must be clear, complete, and convincing Proposals need to be stand-alone proposals and not reference previously submitted proposals or other provided documentation

Cost/Business Proposal cont’d

Prime Offerors must complete all ten (10) Attachment J.8 Cost Proposal Schedules

Cost Type Subcontractors must Complete Attachment J.8 Schedules 1 through 5, Schedule 9, and other items as identified on the Attachment J.7 Checklist NOTE: Cost type subcontractors must provide evidence that their accounting system has been approved by a Federal Government Audit Agency or describe how their accounting system could be reviewed and approved.

NOTE: There was an error in the Attachment J.7 Checklist. Subcontractors should not complete Schedules 6 and 7. This will be issued via Amendment 0001.

Cost Type Subcontractors – when completing Schedules 2 and 3, enter $0 for subcontracts and $0 for RFP-stipulated ODC.

Those are reserved for the prime offeror.

Note that second-tier subcontracting is not permissible unless the Offeror can provide a strong technical rationale for inclusion of a second-tier subcontract and demonstrate what steps have been taken to prevent layering of costs and profit.

Cost Type Subcontractors shall also enter 90% of their direct labor to Schedule 2 and the remaining 10% to Schedule 3.

Time and Material (T&M) Subcontractors must provide items as identified on the Attachment J.7 Checklist Consent for T&M type subcontractors will be based on cost build up or commerciality of billing rates (fully loaded).

If consent is based on commerciality, the offeror must provide information and statistical information demonstrating the use of billing rates in substantial quantities to the non-Government public

Burden of proof rests with the offeror and subcontractor If based on commerciality, Include a signed statement that the offered rate is

“most favored customer rate”.

Schedule 1 CPFF Columns: Enter Estimated Cost and Fixed Fee for each Contract Period

(from the totals in Schedule 2) o Note to include the RFP stipulated ODC as shown on Schedule 2 o Offeror estimated ODC may be proposed provided that a detailed breakdown is provided. The Master Contract will include a list of offeror proposed ODCs

FFP Columns: Enter Estimated Cost and Profit for each Contract Period (from the totals in Schedule 3) o Note that there is no RFP stipulated ODCs for FFP.

o Offeror estimated ODC may be proposed provided that a detailed breakdown is provided. The Master Contract will include a list of offeror proposed ODCs

The Master Contract Value will be based on the Total provided in this Schedule

Schedule 2 Complete the elements of cost for each cost element by Contract Period.

Totals will be entered in the CPFF Table on Schedule 1 Direct Labor comes from the CPFF labor calculations of Schedule 4 (90% of

Direct Labor Costs) Fixed fee comes the calculations provided in Schedule 6

Schedule 3 Complete the elements of cost for each cost element by Contract Period.

Totals will be entered in the FFP Table on Schedule 1 Direct Labor comes from the Schedule 4 Profit comes the calculations provided in Schedule 6

Schedule 4 Prime Offeror Labor is entered on this schedule o Prime labor hours (excluding subcontractor assigned LOE) is provided in Section A of this schedule o For Administrative Labor, the offeror shall specify the labor category, the number of hours proposed (Section A) and the unburdened hourly rate in Section B o Unburdened labor rates for each category must be entered in Section B (Labor Rate Calculations - see page 94 – Direct Labor) o Extended Labor costs (hours time hourly rates) must be shown in Section C o 90% of the annual direct labor total costs is entered in Schedule 2 (by contract period) o 10% of the annual direct labor total costs is entered in Schedule 3 (by contract period)

Schedule 5 Prime Offerors shall indicate their indirect rates by their Fiscal Year and calculate a weighted average based on the anticipated performance period (beginning November 1st in each year of contract performance)

Indicate and provide evidence whether the offeror has an approved Forward Price Rate Agreement with the Government. Include a copy of the FPRA.

Offerors shall provide a copy from their cognizant audit agency, such as DCAA, that their Accounting System has received Government approval.

Offerors shall provide the allocation base for each indirect rate

Schedule 6 Prime Offerors shall complete the schedule for the purpose of indicating the maximum factors for fixed fee and profit The total for estimated cost for fixed fee and profit shall be based on the entire five year performance period The fixed fee amounts shall come from Schedule 2 and the profit estimate costs shall come from Schedule 3 The total fixed fee and profit percentages shall be entered in Clause H.14 of the contract Note that the Government reserves the right to negotiate lower percentages (if the Government decides to negotiate instead of awarding without discussions).

The Government shall analyze proposed fixed fee and profit based on DOT

Weighted Guidelines. NOTE: A proposal that proposes fixed fee in excess of statutory limitations shall be eliminated from consideration.

Schedule 7 Complete the amount proposed for each subcontract (for the entire 5 year effort). In addition to the amount indicate the type of subcontract and the total number of technical hours proposed.

90% of the total for subcontractors is entered in Schedule 2 while the remaining 10% is entered in Schedule 3. The 90/10 ratio applies to each year of performance

Schedule 8 Offerors shall provide the allocation of direct labor hours for the prime and each proposed subcontractor for the entire 5 year effort.

Additionally, provide the value and type of subcontract for each year of performance.

Schedule 9 Offerors shall provide an estimate for each of its Offeror-estimated ODCs that it anticipates invoicing directly during performance of the initial Task Orders.

The Offeror must clearly identify the different types of costs that may be direct costs in accordance with its established accounting practice, the amount for each cost, and the basis of the cost estimate.

Schedule 10 Offerors shall provide the allocation of direct labor hours for the prime and each proposed subcontractor for the entire 5 year effort.

Additionally, provide the value and type of subcontract for each year of performance.

Complete the Labor Cost Realism Schedule by providing the Labor Category for the

Resumed Person, the Resumed Person’s Name, their Company Affiliation, their current unburdened labor rate and the Contract Period 1 unburdened labor rate for that labor category (from Schedule 4). If the resume person rate is greater or lower than 5% of the Schedule 4 rate, the offeror must provide an explanation on why the rate is higher or lower.

Task Order 0001 Cost Proposal Complete Attachment J.15 Firm-Fixed Price Consisting of Three (3) Schedules No stipulated ODCs for this Task Order Any proposed Subcontractors must provide the same level of detail as Schedules 1 through 3.

Business Proposal

Cost Control Plan Subcontract Consent

Offeror compliance with FAR Part 44

Subcontracting Plan No subcontracting plan is required, however, Prime must perform 51% of the services

Conflict of Interest Disclosure Required for offeror and each proposed subcontractor

Limitations on Pass-Through Charges Compliance with FAR 52.215-22 Provide the required information Description of value added may be required

ATEPS – SBSA – Section M – Evaluation Factors for Award

Basis for Award Award to be made to the responsive and responsible offeror whose proposal provides the best value to the Government Award may be made based on initial offers However, the Government may determine during proposal evaluation that discussions may be necessary The Government intends to award Task Order 0001 concurrently with the award of the Master Contract, provided the proposed price for the Task Order is fair and reasonable.

The Government may determine that it is necessary to negotiate Task Order 0001.

If Task Order 0001 is negotiated, then the Task Order may be awarded after the award of the Master Contract.

ATEPS – SBSA – Section M – Evaluation Factors for Award – cont’d

Order of Importance Technical Proposal significantly more important than the Cost Business Proposal Offerors are cautioned not to minimize the importance of the Cost Business proposal.

Technical Proposal Factors for Evaluation Technical Understanding Staffing Management Approach Transition Contract Past Performance

ATEPS – SBSA – Section M – Evaluation Factors for Award – cont’d

Cost Proposal Evaluation Criteria Cost Proposal for Master Contract to be evaluated for Realism, Reasonableness and Completeness Analysis will include a probable cost determination Best Value Determination will be based on Cost Realism Cost Analysis to be performed on Task Order 0001 Price Proposal to establish fairness and reasonableness of the FFP proposal Cost/Business Proposal Evaluation by the Government will also include:

Evaluation for Consistency Evaluation of Proposed Fee Assignment of Risk Evaluation of Uncompensated Overtime, Compensation for Professional

Employees Evaluate the Acceptability of the Cost Control Plan

Amendment 0001

To Be Issued NLT March 29th Provide Webinar PowerPoint Slides Correct Attachment J.7 Checklist Add FAR 52.204-16 to Section L Correct L.4.IV inquiries submitted no later than March 31, 2016

Important Dates and Reminders

Offerors are encouraged to ask questions.

RFP Questions due NLT 11:59 PM, March 31, 2016 via e-mail to

Camille.hogan@dot.gov

Terms and Conditions of the Solicitation remain unchanged unless the CO issues an Amendment

Proposals must remain valid for a minimum of 180 calendar days effective from the proposal due date (May 10, 2016)

Proposals Due at 2:00 PM ET, on May 10, 2016.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENDANCE

mailto:Camille.hogan@dot.gov

FirstName LastName Email Title Company John Fries john.fries@noblis.org Capture Manager Noblis, Inc.

Bob Etris betris@evansincorporated.com Partner and Director Evans Incorporated Randall Hoover rhoover@linkvisum.com Capture Manager LinkVisum Consulting Group, Inc.

Arianne Tidwell arianne.tidwell@ruota.consulting Consultant Ruota Consulting Arianne Tidwell arianne.tidwell@ruota.consulting Consultant Ruota Consulting John Andreadakis johnandreadakis@orbisinc.net ORBIS Betsy Robbins betsy.robbins@ruota.consulting Principal Ruota Consulting Douglas Robert drobert@evansincorporated.com Contracts Managwr Evans Incorporated Valerie Nottage valerie.nottage@6ksystems.com Director 6K Systems Mike Wodell mike.wodell@hitecsystems.com Sr. Director Hi Tec Systems David Scali dscali85@comcast.net Director DS Consulting Richard Abbott richard.abbott@hitecsystems.com Program Director, Transportation Systems Hi-Tec Systems, Inc.

Josue Sanchez josue.g.sanchez@us.pwc.com Business Architect PwC shueyb ali sali@world-servicesllc.com President World Services LLC Jared Hegberg jared.hegberg@dot.gov Contract Specialist Volpe Center Sasha Kruse sasha.kruse@ruota.consulting Ruota Consulting Aaron Mallin aaron.mallin@6ksystems.com 6K Systems, Inc.

Ashley Tolub atolub@evansincorporated.com Evans Incorporated Lance Johnson lance.johnson@6ksystems.com 6K Systems, Inc.

brandon lint brandon.lint@dot.gov DOT Volpe Roberta Massiah rmassiah@aurorasciences.com Aurora Sciences Steve Scheimreif edinunzio@crownci.com Crown Consulting, Inc.

Eric Anderson eric@rigil.com Rigil Ross Pringle ross.pringle@ruota.consulting Ruota Consulting Jim Wright jwright@evansincorporated.com Director Evans Incorporated Michael Kalnasy mkalnasy@wsl-llc.com WSL Consulting