PISP_C5_RipReport.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- AZ NPS PP 2016(7), Pavement Preservation Arizona
- Solicitation number
- DTFH7017R00003
About this file
PISP_C5_RipReport
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q&A_(3-3-2017).pdf | ||
| Q&A.pdf | ||
| A002.pdf | ||
| A001.pdf | ||
| GLCA_C5_RipReport.pdf | ||
| TUMA_C5_RipReport.pdf | ||
| IFB_PP_Arizona.pdf | ||
| SUCR_C5_RipReport.pdf | ||
| HUTR_C5_RipReport.pdf | ||
| WACA_C5_RipReport.pdf | ||
| CACH_C5_RipReport.pdf | ||
| TUZI_C5_RipReport.pdf | ||
| NAVA_C5_RipReport.pdf | ||
| WUPA_C5_RipReport.pdf | ||
| MOCA_C5_RipReport.pdf | ||
| PROJECT_DESCRIPTION_AZ_PP.pdf |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Pipe Spring National Monument
PISP
Cycle 5 Report
Prepared By: Federal Highway Administration Road Inventory Program (RIP) Data Collected: 06/2012 Report Date: 02/2013
Pipe Spring National Monument in
Arizona
Pipe Spring National Monument
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1. INTRODUCTION 1 - 1
2. PARK ROUTE INVENTORY
2 – 1
3. PARK SUMMARY INFORMATION
3 – 1 3 – 3 3 – 4
4. PARK ROUTE LOCATION MAPS
4 – 1 4 – 2 4 – 3 4 – 4
5. PAVED ROUTE CONDITION RATING SHEETS
5 – 1
6. MANUALLY RATED PAVED ROUTE CONDITION RATING SHEETS
6 – 1
7. PARKING AREA CONDITION RATING SHEETS
7 – 1
8. PARKWIDE / ROUTE MAINTENANCE FEATURES SUMMARIES
8 – 1 8 – 2 8 – 3
9. ROUTE MAINTENANCE FEATURES ROAD LOGS
9 – 1
10. APPENDIX
10 – 1 10 – 2 10 – 3 10 – 5 10 – 12 10 – 16 10 – 19 10 – 20
Section 1 Introduction
1-2 be achieved by modifying the relative impact certain distresses would have on the overall rating.
The changes that were implemented were endorsed by management at both the FHWA and NPS in October 2010. These changes will allow greater use of RIP and HPMA data for not simply condition data reporting, but also as a reliable tool for project identification and selection.
Because of these changes, the PCR Condition ratings reported in Cycle 5 do not directly relate to the condition ratings reported in previous cycle RIP Reports. For more detailed information about the changes, see Section 3 and Section 10 in this RIP Report.
Cycle 5 has launched in the summer of 2010 and will again comprise all parks, large and small, that are served by paved roads and/or parking areas. For Cycle 5, the decision was made to collect condition data in large parks on Functional Class 1, 2, and 7 paved routes only, as well as any new routes that were previously not collected. In small parks, all paved routes and parking areas will be collected. As a result, this will include 81 large parks with 4,459 paved route miles and 231 small parks with 529 paved route miles and associated paved parking areas.
Since 1984, the Road Inventory Program has been funded through the Federal Lands Highway Park Roads and Parkways (PRP) Program. Currently, coordination of the RIP with FLH is under the NPS Washington Headquarters Park Facility Management Division. The FLH Washington office coordinates policy and prepares national reports and needs assessment studies for Congress.
In 1998, the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) amended Title 23 U.S.C., and inserted Section 204(a)(6) requiring the FHWA and NPS, to develop by rule, a Pavement Management System (PMS) applied to park roads and parkways serving the National Park System.
FLH is responsible for the accuracy of all data presented in this report. Any questions or comments concerning the contents of this report should be directed to the national RIP Coordinator located in Sterling, Virginia.
Respectfully, FHWA RIP Team
FHWA/Eastern Federal Lands FHWA/Central Federal Lands 21400 Ridgetop Circle 12300 West Dakota Ave Sterling, VA 20166 Lakewood, CO 80228
(703) 404-6371 (720) 963-3556
Section 2 Park Route Inventory
PIPE SPRING NATIONAL MONUMENT
FROM NORTH PIPE
SPRINGS ROAD
60401 NORTH BOUNDARY
ROAD
0.00 0.13 NVTO END107974 N/A 0.13NC
FROM NORTH PIPE
SPRINGS ROAD
60402 WELL ROAD 0.00 0.60 NVTO END107976 N/A 0.60NC
FROM NORTH PIPE
SPRINGS ROAD
60403 WATER STORAGE TANK
ROAD
0.00 0.70 NVTO WATER TANK107977 N/A 0.70NC
FROM MAINTENANCE
YARD
60404 MAINTENANCE TO
FORT ROAD
0.00 0.16 NVTO END107979 N/A 0.16NC
FROM ROUTE 0404
(MAINTENANCE TO FORT
ROAD)
60405 HONEYMOON TRAIL
ROAD
0.00 0.09 NVTO END107980 N/A 0.09NC
FROM END OF ROUTE 0404
(MAINTENANCE TO FORT
ROAD)
60406 SOUTH CORRAL
MIDDLE GATE TO
BONEYARD ROAD
0.00 0.10 NVTO END107981 N/A 0.10NC
FROM ROUTE 0401
(NORTH BOUNDARY
ROAD)
60407 HISTORIC DISTRICT
NORTH ACCESS ROAD
0.00 0.10 NVTO CORRALS107982 N/A 0.10NC
FROM ROUTE 0407
(HISTORIC DISTRICT
NORTH ACCESS ROAD)
60408 CHICKEN COOP SPUR 0.00 0.04 NVTO CHICKEN COOP107984 N/A 0.04NC
FROM ROUTE 0400ZZ
(RESIDENCE ROADS)
60409 MAINTENANCE SHOP
LOOP
0.00 0.05 GRTO ROUTE 0400ZZ
(RESIDENCE ROADS)
107985 N/A 0.05NC
all
Principal Park Road/Rural Parkway (Public Roads) Roads which constitute the main access route, circulatory tour, or thoroughfare for park visitors.
Route Numbers 1 - 99. Note: Rural parkways (e.g. Natchez Trace) are numbered 1 - 9. State Routes Inventoried for Park. Route Numbers 5000-5999
Connector Park Road (Public Roads) - Roads which provide access within a park to areas of scenic, scientific, recreational or cultural interest, such as overlooks, campgrounds, etc. Route Numbers 100-199.
Special Purpose Park Road (Public Roads) - Roads which provide circulation within public areas, such as campgrounds, picnic areas, visitor center complexes, concessionaire facilities, etc. These roads generally serve low-speed traffic and are often designed for one-way circulation. Route Numbers 200-299.
Primitive Park Roads (Public Roads) - Roads which provide circulation through remote areas and/or access to primitive campgrounds and undeveloped areas. These roads frequently have no minimum design standards and their use may be limited to specially equipped vehicles. Route Numbers 200-299.
Note: Functional Classes 3 and 4 have the same route numbers because, historically, they were numbered similarly.
Administrative Access Road (Administrative Roads) - All public roads intended for access to administrative developments or structures such as park offices, employee quarters, or utility areas. Route Numbers 400-499.
Restricted Road (Administrative Roads) - All roads normally closed to the public, including patrol roads, truck trails, and other similar roads. Route Numbers 400-499.
Note: Functional Classes 5 and 6 have the same route numbers because historically they were numbered similarly and often there is little distinction between these routes. For example, because utility areas and employee housing are often closed to the public, this restriction would result in classification of FC 6 rather than FC 5.
Urban Parkway (Urban Parkways and City Streets) - These facilities serve high volumes of park and non-park related traffic and are restricted, limited-access facilities in an urban area. This category of roads primarily encompasses the major parkways which serve as gateways to our nation's capital. Other major park roads or portions thereof, however, may be included in this category. Route Numbers 1-9.
City Streets (Urban Parkways and City Streets) - City streets are usually extensions of the adjoining street system that are owned and maintained by the National Park Service. The construction and/or reconstruction should conform with accepted local engineering practice and local conditions. Route Numbers 600-699.
A park road system contains those roads within or giving access to a park or other unit of the NPS which are administered by the NPS, or by the Service in cooperation with other agencies. The assignment of a functional classification (FC) to a park road is not based on traffic volumes or design speed, but on the intended use or function of that road or route.
The historic route numbering system also included a 300 number series for interpretive roads, and a 500 series for one-way roads. There are approximately 250 roads nationwide which are designated by the 300 and 500 series. The numbers for these roads will be maintained for reporting consistency. However, since these interpretive and one-way routes are not as clearly tied to a specific functional class, the 300 and 500 series will be discontinued for future use.
5000 route numbers are assigned to Non-NPS Routes that are State, County or City owned which border, traverse, or provide access to Park Facilities or Locations. 5000 Routes are driven for GPS and Video Log only.
ROUTE IDENTIFICATION CHANGES TO PAVED ROUTES FROM PREVIOUS CYCLE - PISP
ROUTES ADDED FROM PREVIOUS INVENTORY:
Route # Reason for AdditionRoute Name Comments
ROUTES MODIFIED FROM PREVIOUS INVENTORY:
Route # Type of ModificationRoute Name Comments
Section 3 Park Summary Information
PISP: PAVED ROUTE MILES AND PERCENTAGES
BY FUNCTIONAL CLASS AND PCR
Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Poor (0-60) Fair (61-84) Good (85-94) Excellent (95-100) TOTAL
F.C. MILES % MILES % MILES % MILES % MILES
0.24
Totals 0.19 79.17% 0.03 12.50% 0.02 8.33% 0.00 0.00% 0.24
Note:
Explanation of the Excellent, Good, Fair and Poor Condition Descriptions
The information in this table is derived from the PMS_20 table in the Park database, which only contains processed data from routes collected with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV). Information for Manually Rated Routes (MRR) and Parking Areas is not reported in this table. Only Functional Class 1, 2, & 7 routes, and any new routes not previously collected by RIP, are collected in Large Parks.
Note: Condition data was collected for Route 5000 by special request, but that condition data is not included on this page because Route 5000 is not a Park owned route.
PISP: DCV ROAD CONDITION SUMMARY
Data Collected 06/2012
DCV ROAD CONDITION SUMMARY
ROUTE NUMBER
SC
R
/P C
R
PISP: PARKWIDE DCV CONDITION SUMMARY
AVERAGE
PAVEMENT
CONDITION
RATING (PCR)
AVERAGE
ROUGHNESS
CONDITION
INDEX (RCI)
AVERAGE
SURFACE
CONDITION
RATING (SCR)
AVERAGE
RUT INDEX
AVERAGE
ALLIGATOR
CRACKING
INDEX
AVERAGE
LONGITUDINAL
CRACKING
INDEX
AVERAGE
TRANSVERSE
CRACKING
INDEX
AVERAGE
PATCHING
INDEX
22 NA 22 92 24 97 96 100
All Index values are based on Data Collection Vehicle (DCV) driven roads that were collected in Cycle-5.
Roughness data is only collected on routes with lengths greater than 0.5 miles and a posted speed limit of 25 MPH or greater.
Data Collected 06/2012
CYCLE 5 PARKWIDE CONDITION SUMMARY
R A
TI
N
G
3-4
Section 4 Park Route Location Maps
º
Route Location Map
Key Map
Rte 0900
Rte 5000
Rte 0400ZZ
º
Pipe Spring National Monument Route Location Map
Area 1
Route Condition Map
PCR - Mile by Mile Key Map
Rte 5000
Rte 0400ZZ
º
Pipe Spring National Monument Route Condition Map
PCR - Mile by Mile Area 1
Section 5 Paved Route
Condition Rating Sheets
Rte 0400ZZ
ROUTE: 0400ZZ RESIDENCE ROADS
PISP : PIPE SPRING NATIONAL MONUMENT
COLLECTED: 6/12/2012
INTERMOUNTAIN REGION TOTAL LENGTH: 0.25 Miles Section Number Section Length (mi) Cross Section Information
Roadway Condition Information
Distress Index Values
Summary Record
R O
U T
E : 0
0Z
Z R
E
SI
D E
N C
E R
O A
D S
º
Rte
AZ
ROUTE: 0400AZ RESIDENCE ROAD
PISP : PIPE SPRING NATIONAL MONUMENT
COLLECTED: 6/12/2012
INTERMOUNTAIN REGION TOTAL LENGTH: 0.19 Miles Section Number Section Length (mi) Cross Section Information
Roadway Condition Information
Distress Index Values
Subcomponent Record
R O
U T
E : 0
0A
Z R
E
SI
D E
N C
E R
O A
º
Rte 0400BZ
ROUTE: 0400BZ RESIDENCE LOOP
PISP : PIPE SPRING NATIONAL MONUMENT
COLLECTED: 6/12/2012
INTERMOUNTAIN REGION TOTAL LENGTH: 0.05 Miles Section Number Section Length (mi) Cross Section Information
Roadway Condition Information
Distress Index Values
Subcomponent Record
R O
U T
E : 0
0B
Z R
E
SI
D E
N C
E L
O O
P
! 0
Rte 5000
ROUTE: 5000 RV PARK ROAD
PISP : PIPE SPRING NATIONAL MONUMENT
COLLECTED: 6/12/2012
INTERMOUNTAIN REGION TOTAL LENGTH: 0.14 Miles Section Number Section Length (mi) Cross Section Information
Roadway Condition Information
Distress Index Values R
O U
T E
: 5
R
V P
A R
K R
O A
Section 6 Manually Rated Paved Route
MANUALLY RATED ROUTE CONDITION RATING SHEETS
Section 7 Parking Area
Route 0900
Route Number
Public / NonPublic Lane Miles *
Culverts Drop Inlets Curb
Surface Type
PCRCurb & Gutter
Date Visited Area (sq ft)
Gates
º
Rte 0400AZ
Rte 0900
Section 8 Parkwide/Route
Maintenance Features Summaries
PISP: PARKWIDE MAINTENANCE FEATURES SUMMARY
Includes DCV, MRL, MRP & PKG routes collected in Cycle-5
FEATURE LINEAR FEET COUNT
Data Collected 06/2012
Note: Maintenance feature data was collected for Route 5000 by special request, but that maintenance feature data is not included on this page because Route 5000 is not a Park owned route.
PISP: DCV ROUTE MAINTENANCE FEATURES SUMMARY
FEATURE R
O
U T
E
0Z
Z R
E
SI
D E
N C
E R
O A
D S
R O
U T
E
R V
P A
R K
R O
A D
UNIT
STRUCTURE LIST
Section 9 Route Maintenance Features
Road Logs
FROM
MILEPOST
TO
MILEPOST FEATURE SIDE COMMENT
ROUTE 0400AZ: RESIDENCE ROAD
PISP: ROUTE MAINTENANCE FEATURES ROAD LOG
Notice:
TO
MILEPOST FEATURE SIDE COMMENT
ROUTE 0400BZ: RESIDENCE LOOP
PISP: ROUTE MAINTENANCE FEATURES ROAD LOG
TO
MILEPOST FEATURE SIDE COMMENT
ROUTE 5000: RV PARK ROAD
PISP: ROUTE MAINTENANCE FEATURES ROAD LOG
Section 10 Appendix
Explanation of Changes to the RIP Index Equations and Determination of PCR
Explanation of the Excellent, Good, Fair and Poor Condition Descriptions
Excellent/New: PCR of 95-100. Pavements in this range will require only spot repairs
Good: PCR of 85-94. Pavements in this range will likely be candidates for Preventive Maintenance. Examples include Chip and Slurry Seals, Micro Surfacing and Thin Overlays.
Fair: PCR of 61-84. Pavements in this range will likely be candidates of Light Rehabilitation (L3R).
Examples include single-lift overlays up to 2.5 inches in total thickness, milling and overlays.
Poor: PCR of 60 or below. Pavements in this range will likely be candidates of Heavy Rehabilitation or Reconstruction (H3R or 4R). Examples include Pulverization, Multiple Lift Overlays, and Reconstruction.
Pa ve m en t C on di ti on R at in g
Pavement Age
Condition Categories and Treatments
Reconstruction
POOR/Heavy Rehabilitation
GOOD/Preventive Maintenance EXCELLENT/Localized Repairs Only
FAIR/Light Rehabilitation
DESCRIPTION OF RATING SYSTEM
Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program”, Publication No. FHWA-RD 03-031, June 2003, Distress Identification Manual for the NPS Road Inventory Program, Cycle 5, 2010-2013”
Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program”
“Distress Identification Manual for the NPS Road Inventory Program, Cycle 5, 2010- 2013”
SURFACE DISTRESSES
Surface Condition Rating - SCR
Surface distresses determined from digital images
Surface distress measured by DCV (Data Collection Vehicle) LRMS (Laser Rut Measuring System)
Each of the five surface distresses is assigned a computed surface distress index
Structural Crack Index
Roughness Condition Index - RCI
Additional condition data measured by DCV (lasers and accelerometers)
Pavement Condition Rating - PCR
Asphalt PCR Concrete PCR everity xtent severity Maximum Allowable Extent terminable serviceability
Note:
TABLE 1: Distress Summary
*Note: Roughness is measured on concrete roadways, but surface distresses and rutting are not measured. For concrete, PCR = RCI
ASPHALT-SURFACED PAVEMENT DISTRESS TYPES with RUTTING and ROUGHNESS
DISTRESS TYPE UNIT OF
MEASURE…
…CONVERTED TO DEFINED
SEVERITY
LEVELS?
MEASURED BY
Alligator Cracking Square Feet Percent of Lane Per 0.02 Mile Yes
Digital Image Crack Detection Software
Transverse Cracking Linear Feet Number of Cracks Per
0.02 Mile Yes
Digital Image Crack Detection Software
Longitudinal Cracking Linear feet Percent of Lane Length
Per 0.02 Mile Yes Digital Image Crack Detection Software
Patching/Potholes Square Feet Percent of Lane Per 0.02 Mile No
Digital Image Crack Detection Software
Rutting Inches Rut Depth Per 0.02 Mile Yes DCV – Laser Rut Measuring System (LRMS)
Roughness IRI *RCI Per 0.02 Mile No DCV – Lasers /Accelerometers
ALLIGATOR CRACKING
Description
Severity Levels
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
TABLE 2: Alligator Crack Severity Levels
ALLIGATOR CRACKING SEVERITY
LEVELS
Crack Pattern
LOW MED HIGH
Cr ac k
W id th
LOW
MED
HI
LONGITUDINAL CRACKING
Severity Levels
LOW
MED
HIGH
TRANSVERSE CRACKING
Description
Severity Levels
LOW
HIGH
PATCHING AND POTHOLES
Severity Levels
RUTTING
Description
Severity Levels
LOW
HIGH
ROUGHNESS
Severity Levels
TABLE 3: IRI
IRI Descriptions
Type of Road Typical IRI ( in/mile )
INDEX FORMULAS
Alligator Crack Index
AC_INDEX
%LOW %MED %HI
Longitudinal Crack Index
LC_INDEX
%LOW %MED %HI
Structural Crack Index
SC_INDEX
Structural Crack Index
Transverse Crack Index
TC_INDEX
LOW MED HI
Patching Index
PATCH_INDEX
%PATCHING
Rutting Index
RUT_INDEX
Each wheelpath is analyzed independently for rut severities. %LOW %MED %HI total percentage total number of ruts within each severity in both wheelpaths 20 * 100
Roughness Condition Index (Asphalt)
RCI
AVG IRI
Roughness Condition Index (Concrete)
RCI
Surface Condition Rating Index
SCR Lowest
Note: The modified SCR equation above combines AC_INDEX and LC_INDEX, and considers that a single AC/LC index value of the Structural Crack Index (SC_INDEX).
The lowest of the four computed index values (SC_INDEX, TC_INDEX, PATCH_INDEX, or RUT_INDEX) becomes the SCR.
Data Collection Vehicle Subsystems
CAMERAS
CAMERA SPECIFICATIONS
Two Forward/ One Rear Facing
CAMERA SPECIFICATIONS
Pavement Line Scan
DMI (Distance Measuring Instrument)
ROUGHNESS (IRI)
RUTTING
IRI SPECIFICATIONS
RUTTING SPECIFICATIONS
GPS & INERTIAL SYSTEMS
GPS SPECIFICATIONS
Geodatabase – Background and Metadata geodatabase metadata
GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
TERM OR
ABBREVIATION DESCRIPTION OR DEFINITION
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .