PISP_C5_RipReport.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
AZ NPS PP 2016(7), Pavement Preservation Arizona
Solicitation number
DTFH7017R00003
Issued by

About this file

PISP_C5_RipReport

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Q&A_(3-3-2017).pdf PDF
Q&A.pdf PDF
A002.pdf PDF
A001.pdf PDF
GLCA_C5_RipReport.pdf PDF
TUMA_C5_RipReport.pdf PDF
IFB_PP_Arizona.pdf PDF
SUCR_C5_RipReport.pdf PDF
HUTR_C5_RipReport.pdf PDF
WACA_C5_RipReport.pdf PDF
CACH_C5_RipReport.pdf PDF
TUZI_C5_RipReport.pdf PDF
NAVA_C5_RipReport.pdf PDF
WUPA_C5_RipReport.pdf PDF
MOCA_C5_RipReport.pdf PDF
PROJECT_DESCRIPTION_AZ_PP.pdf PDF
Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Pipe Spring National Monument

PISP

Cycle 5 Report

Prepared By: Federal Highway Administration Road Inventory Program (RIP) Data Collected: 06/2012 Report Date: 02/2013

Pipe Spring National Monument in

Arizona

Pipe Spring National Monument

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

1. INTRODUCTION 1 - 1

2. PARK ROUTE INVENTORY

2 – 1

3. PARK SUMMARY INFORMATION

3 – 1 3 – 3 3 – 4

4. PARK ROUTE LOCATION MAPS

4 – 1 4 – 2 4 – 3 4 – 4

5. PAVED ROUTE CONDITION RATING SHEETS

5 – 1

6. MANUALLY RATED PAVED ROUTE CONDITION RATING SHEETS

6 – 1

7. PARKING AREA CONDITION RATING SHEETS

7 – 1

8. PARKWIDE / ROUTE MAINTENANCE FEATURES SUMMARIES

8 – 1 8 – 2 8 – 3

9. ROUTE MAINTENANCE FEATURES ROAD LOGS

9 – 1

10. APPENDIX

10 – 1 10 – 2 10 – 3 10 – 5 10 – 12 10 – 16 10 – 19 10 – 20

Section 1 Introduction

1-2 be achieved by modifying the relative impact certain distresses would have on the overall rating.

The changes that were implemented were endorsed by management at both the FHWA and NPS in October 2010. These changes will allow greater use of RIP and HPMA data for not simply condition data reporting, but also as a reliable tool for project identification and selection.

Because of these changes, the PCR Condition ratings reported in Cycle 5 do not directly relate to the condition ratings reported in previous cycle RIP Reports. For more detailed information about the changes, see Section 3 and Section 10 in this RIP Report.

Cycle 5 has launched in the summer of 2010 and will again comprise all parks, large and small, that are served by paved roads and/or parking areas. For Cycle 5, the decision was made to collect condition data in large parks on Functional Class 1, 2, and 7 paved routes only, as well as any new routes that were previously not collected. In small parks, all paved routes and parking areas will be collected. As a result, this will include 81 large parks with 4,459 paved route miles and 231 small parks with 529 paved route miles and associated paved parking areas.

Since 1984, the Road Inventory Program has been funded through the Federal Lands Highway Park Roads and Parkways (PRP) Program. Currently, coordination of the RIP with FLH is under the NPS Washington Headquarters Park Facility Management Division. The FLH Washington office coordinates policy and prepares national reports and needs assessment studies for Congress.

In 1998, the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) amended Title 23 U.S.C., and inserted Section 204(a)(6) requiring the FHWA and NPS, to develop by rule, a Pavement Management System (PMS) applied to park roads and parkways serving the National Park System.

FLH is responsible for the accuracy of all data presented in this report. Any questions or comments concerning the contents of this report should be directed to the national RIP Coordinator located in Sterling, Virginia.

Respectfully, FHWA RIP Team

FHWA/Eastern Federal Lands FHWA/Central Federal Lands 21400 Ridgetop Circle 12300 West Dakota Ave Sterling, VA 20166 Lakewood, CO 80228

(703) 404-6371 (720) 963-3556

Section 2 Park Route Inventory

PIPE SPRING NATIONAL MONUMENT

FROM NORTH PIPE

SPRINGS ROAD

60401 NORTH BOUNDARY

ROAD

0.00 0.13 NVTO END107974 N/A 0.13NC

FROM NORTH PIPE

SPRINGS ROAD

60402 WELL ROAD 0.00 0.60 NVTO END107976 N/A 0.60NC

FROM NORTH PIPE

SPRINGS ROAD

60403 WATER STORAGE TANK

ROAD

0.00 0.70 NVTO WATER TANK107977 N/A 0.70NC

FROM MAINTENANCE

YARD

60404 MAINTENANCE TO

FORT ROAD

0.00 0.16 NVTO END107979 N/A 0.16NC

FROM ROUTE 0404

(MAINTENANCE TO FORT

ROAD)

60405 HONEYMOON TRAIL

ROAD

0.00 0.09 NVTO END107980 N/A 0.09NC

FROM END OF ROUTE 0404

(MAINTENANCE TO FORT

ROAD)

60406 SOUTH CORRAL

MIDDLE GATE TO

BONEYARD ROAD

0.00 0.10 NVTO END107981 N/A 0.10NC

FROM ROUTE 0401

(NORTH BOUNDARY

ROAD)

60407 HISTORIC DISTRICT

NORTH ACCESS ROAD

0.00 0.10 NVTO CORRALS107982 N/A 0.10NC

FROM ROUTE 0407

(HISTORIC DISTRICT

NORTH ACCESS ROAD)

60408 CHICKEN COOP SPUR 0.00 0.04 NVTO CHICKEN COOP107984 N/A 0.04NC

FROM ROUTE 0400ZZ

(RESIDENCE ROADS)

60409 MAINTENANCE SHOP

LOOP

0.00 0.05 GRTO ROUTE 0400ZZ

(RESIDENCE ROADS)

107985 N/A 0.05NC

all

Principal Park Road/Rural Parkway (Public Roads) Roads which constitute the main access route, circulatory tour, or thoroughfare for park visitors.

Route Numbers 1 - 99. Note: Rural parkways (e.g. Natchez Trace) are numbered 1 - 9. State Routes Inventoried for Park. Route Numbers 5000-5999

Connector Park Road (Public Roads) - Roads which provide access within a park to areas of scenic, scientific, recreational or cultural interest, such as overlooks, campgrounds, etc. Route Numbers 100-199.

Special Purpose Park Road (Public Roads) - Roads which provide circulation within public areas, such as campgrounds, picnic areas, visitor center complexes, concessionaire facilities, etc. These roads generally serve low-speed traffic and are often designed for one-way circulation. Route Numbers 200-299.

Primitive Park Roads (Public Roads) - Roads which provide circulation through remote areas and/or access to primitive campgrounds and undeveloped areas. These roads frequently have no minimum design standards and their use may be limited to specially equipped vehicles. Route Numbers 200-299.

Note: Functional Classes 3 and 4 have the same route numbers because, historically, they were numbered similarly.

Administrative Access Road (Administrative Roads) - All public roads intended for access to administrative developments or structures such as park offices, employee quarters, or utility areas. Route Numbers 400-499.

Restricted Road (Administrative Roads) - All roads normally closed to the public, including patrol roads, truck trails, and other similar roads. Route Numbers 400-499.

Note: Functional Classes 5 and 6 have the same route numbers because historically they were numbered similarly and often there is little distinction between these routes. For example, because utility areas and employee housing are often closed to the public, this restriction would result in classification of FC 6 rather than FC 5.

Urban Parkway (Urban Parkways and City Streets) - These facilities serve high volumes of park and non-park related traffic and are restricted, limited-access facilities in an urban area. This category of roads primarily encompasses the major parkways which serve as gateways to our nation's capital. Other major park roads or portions thereof, however, may be included in this category. Route Numbers 1-9.

City Streets (Urban Parkways and City Streets) - City streets are usually extensions of the adjoining street system that are owned and maintained by the National Park Service. The construction and/or reconstruction should conform with accepted local engineering practice and local conditions. Route Numbers 600-699.

A park road system contains those roads within or giving access to a park or other unit of the NPS which are administered by the NPS, or by the Service in cooperation with other agencies. The assignment of a functional classification (FC) to a park road is not based on traffic volumes or design speed, but on the intended use or function of that road or route.

The historic route numbering system also included a 300 number series for interpretive roads, and a 500 series for one-way roads. There are approximately 250 roads nationwide which are designated by the 300 and 500 series. The numbers for these roads will be maintained for reporting consistency. However, since these interpretive and one-way routes are not as clearly tied to a specific functional class, the 300 and 500 series will be discontinued for future use.

5000 route numbers are assigned to Non-NPS Routes that are State, County or City owned which border, traverse, or provide access to Park Facilities or Locations. 5000 Routes are driven for GPS and Video Log only.

ROUTE IDENTIFICATION CHANGES TO PAVED ROUTES FROM PREVIOUS CYCLE - PISP

ROUTES ADDED FROM PREVIOUS INVENTORY:

Route # Reason for AdditionRoute Name Comments

ROUTES MODIFIED FROM PREVIOUS INVENTORY:

Route # Type of ModificationRoute Name Comments

Section 3 Park Summary Information

PISP: PAVED ROUTE MILES AND PERCENTAGES

BY FUNCTIONAL CLASS AND PCR

Pavement Condition Rating (PCR) Poor (0-60) Fair (61-84) Good (85-94) Excellent (95-100) TOTAL

F.C. MILES % MILES % MILES % MILES % MILES

0.24

Totals 0.19 79.17% 0.03 12.50% 0.02 8.33% 0.00 0.00% 0.24

Note:

Explanation of the Excellent, Good, Fair and Poor Condition Descriptions

The information in this table is derived from the PMS_20 table in the Park database, which only contains processed data from routes collected with the Data Collection Vehicle (DCV). Information for Manually Rated Routes (MRR) and Parking Areas is not reported in this table. Only Functional Class 1, 2, & 7 routes, and any new routes not previously collected by RIP, are collected in Large Parks.

Note: Condition data was collected for Route 5000 by special request, but that condition data is not included on this page because Route 5000 is not a Park owned route.

PISP: DCV ROAD CONDITION SUMMARY

Data Collected 06/2012

DCV ROAD CONDITION SUMMARY

ROUTE NUMBER

SC

R

/P C

R

PISP: PARKWIDE DCV CONDITION SUMMARY

AVERAGE

PAVEMENT

CONDITION

RATING (PCR)

AVERAGE

ROUGHNESS

CONDITION

INDEX (RCI)

AVERAGE

SURFACE

CONDITION

RATING (SCR)

AVERAGE

RUT INDEX

AVERAGE

ALLIGATOR

CRACKING

INDEX

AVERAGE

LONGITUDINAL

CRACKING

INDEX

AVERAGE

TRANSVERSE

CRACKING

INDEX

AVERAGE

PATCHING

INDEX

22 NA 22 92 24 97 96 100

All Index values are based on Data Collection Vehicle (DCV) driven roads that were collected in Cycle-5.

Roughness data is only collected on routes with lengths greater than 0.5 miles and a posted speed limit of 25 MPH or greater.

Data Collected 06/2012

CYCLE 5 PARKWIDE CONDITION SUMMARY

R A

TI

N

G

3-4

Section 4 Park Route Location Maps

º

Route Location Map

Key Map

Rte 0900

Rte 5000

Rte 0400ZZ

º

Pipe Spring National Monument Route Location Map

Area 1

Route Condition Map

PCR - Mile by Mile Key Map

Rte 5000

Rte 0400ZZ

º

Pipe Spring National Monument Route Condition Map

PCR - Mile by Mile Area 1

Section 5 Paved Route

Condition Rating Sheets

Rte 0400ZZ

ROUTE: 0400ZZ RESIDENCE ROADS

PISP : PIPE SPRING NATIONAL MONUMENT

COLLECTED: 6/12/2012

INTERMOUNTAIN REGION TOTAL LENGTH: 0.25 Miles Section Number Section Length (mi) Cross Section Information

Roadway Condition Information

Distress Index Values

Summary Record

R O

U T

E : 0

0Z

Z R

E

SI

D E

N C

E R

O A

D S

º

Rte

AZ

ROUTE: 0400AZ RESIDENCE ROAD

PISP : PIPE SPRING NATIONAL MONUMENT

COLLECTED: 6/12/2012

INTERMOUNTAIN REGION TOTAL LENGTH: 0.19 Miles Section Number Section Length (mi) Cross Section Information

Roadway Condition Information

Distress Index Values

Subcomponent Record

R O

U T

E : 0

0A

Z R

E

SI

D E

N C

E R

O A

º

Rte 0400BZ

ROUTE: 0400BZ RESIDENCE LOOP

PISP : PIPE SPRING NATIONAL MONUMENT

COLLECTED: 6/12/2012

INTERMOUNTAIN REGION TOTAL LENGTH: 0.05 Miles Section Number Section Length (mi) Cross Section Information

Roadway Condition Information

Distress Index Values

Subcomponent Record

R O

U T

E : 0

0B

Z R

E

SI

D E

N C

E L

O O

P

! 0

Rte 5000

ROUTE: 5000 RV PARK ROAD

PISP : PIPE SPRING NATIONAL MONUMENT

COLLECTED: 6/12/2012

INTERMOUNTAIN REGION TOTAL LENGTH: 0.14 Miles Section Number Section Length (mi) Cross Section Information

Roadway Condition Information

Distress Index Values R

O U

T E

: 5

R

V P

A R

K R

O A

Section 6 Manually Rated Paved Route

MANUALLY RATED ROUTE CONDITION RATING SHEETS

Section 7 Parking Area

Route 0900

Route Number

Public / NonPublic Lane Miles *

Culverts Drop Inlets Curb

Surface Type

PCRCurb & Gutter

Date Visited Area (sq ft)

Gates

º

Rte 0400AZ

Rte 0900

Section 8 Parkwide/Route

Maintenance Features Summaries

PISP: PARKWIDE MAINTENANCE FEATURES SUMMARY

Includes DCV, MRL, MRP & PKG routes collected in Cycle-5

FEATURE LINEAR FEET COUNT

Data Collected 06/2012

Note: Maintenance feature data was collected for Route 5000 by special request, but that maintenance feature data is not included on this page because Route 5000 is not a Park owned route.

PISP: DCV ROUTE MAINTENANCE FEATURES SUMMARY

FEATURE R

O

U T

E

0Z

Z R

E

SI

D E

N C

E R

O A

D S

R O

U T

E

R V

P A

R K

R O

A D

UNIT

STRUCTURE LIST

Section 9 Route Maintenance Features

Road Logs

FROM

MILEPOST

TO

MILEPOST FEATURE SIDE COMMENT

ROUTE 0400AZ: RESIDENCE ROAD

PISP: ROUTE MAINTENANCE FEATURES ROAD LOG

Notice:

TO

MILEPOST FEATURE SIDE COMMENT

ROUTE 0400BZ: RESIDENCE LOOP

PISP: ROUTE MAINTENANCE FEATURES ROAD LOG

TO

MILEPOST FEATURE SIDE COMMENT

ROUTE 5000: RV PARK ROAD

PISP: ROUTE MAINTENANCE FEATURES ROAD LOG

Section 10 Appendix

Explanation of Changes to the RIP Index Equations and Determination of PCR

Explanation of the Excellent, Good, Fair and Poor Condition Descriptions

Excellent/New: PCR of 95-100. Pavements in this range will require only spot repairs

Good: PCR of 85-94. Pavements in this range will likely be candidates for Preventive Maintenance. Examples include Chip and Slurry Seals, Micro Surfacing and Thin Overlays.

Fair: PCR of 61-84. Pavements in this range will likely be candidates of Light Rehabilitation (L3R).

Examples include single-lift overlays up to 2.5 inches in total thickness, milling and overlays.

Poor: PCR of 60 or below. Pavements in this range will likely be candidates of Heavy Rehabilitation or Reconstruction (H3R or 4R). Examples include Pulverization, Multiple Lift Overlays, and Reconstruction.

Pa ve m en t C on di ti on R at in g

Pavement Age

Condition Categories and Treatments

Reconstruction

POOR/Heavy Rehabilitation

GOOD/Preventive Maintenance EXCELLENT/Localized Repairs Only

FAIR/Light Rehabilitation

DESCRIPTION OF RATING SYSTEM

Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program”, Publication No. FHWA-RD 03-031, June 2003, Distress Identification Manual for the NPS Road Inventory Program, Cycle 5, 2010-2013”

Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program”

“Distress Identification Manual for the NPS Road Inventory Program, Cycle 5, 2010- 2013”

SURFACE DISTRESSES

Surface Condition Rating - SCR

Surface distresses determined from digital images

Surface distress measured by DCV (Data Collection Vehicle) LRMS (Laser Rut Measuring System)

Each of the five surface distresses is assigned a computed surface distress index

Structural Crack Index

Roughness Condition Index - RCI

Additional condition data measured by DCV (lasers and accelerometers)

Pavement Condition Rating - PCR

Asphalt PCR Concrete PCR everity xtent severity Maximum Allowable Extent terminable serviceability

Note:

TABLE 1: Distress Summary

*Note: Roughness is measured on concrete roadways, but surface distresses and rutting are not measured. For concrete, PCR = RCI

ASPHALT-SURFACED PAVEMENT DISTRESS TYPES with RUTTING and ROUGHNESS

DISTRESS TYPE UNIT OF

MEASURE…

…CONVERTED TO DEFINED

SEVERITY

LEVELS?

MEASURED BY

Alligator Cracking Square Feet Percent of Lane Per 0.02 Mile Yes

Digital Image Crack Detection Software

Transverse Cracking Linear Feet Number of Cracks Per

0.02 Mile Yes

Digital Image Crack Detection Software

Longitudinal Cracking Linear feet Percent of Lane Length

Per 0.02 Mile Yes Digital Image Crack Detection Software

Patching/Potholes Square Feet Percent of Lane Per 0.02 Mile No

Digital Image Crack Detection Software

Rutting Inches Rut Depth Per 0.02 Mile Yes DCV – Laser Rut Measuring System (LRMS)

Roughness IRI *RCI Per 0.02 Mile No DCV – Lasers /Accelerometers

ALLIGATOR CRACKING

Description

Severity Levels

LOW

MEDIUM

HIGH

TABLE 2: Alligator Crack Severity Levels

ALLIGATOR CRACKING SEVERITY

LEVELS

Crack Pattern

LOW MED HIGH

Cr ac k

W id th

LOW

MED

HI

LONGITUDINAL CRACKING

Severity Levels

LOW

MED

HIGH

TRANSVERSE CRACKING

Description

Severity Levels

LOW

HIGH

PATCHING AND POTHOLES

Severity Levels

RUTTING

Description

Severity Levels

LOW

HIGH

ROUGHNESS

Severity Levels

TABLE 3: IRI

IRI Descriptions

Type of Road Typical IRI ( in/mile )

INDEX FORMULAS

Alligator Crack Index

AC_INDEX

%LOW %MED %HI

Longitudinal Crack Index

LC_INDEX

%LOW %MED %HI

Structural Crack Index

SC_INDEX

Structural Crack Index

Transverse Crack Index

TC_INDEX

LOW MED HI

Patching Index

PATCH_INDEX

%PATCHING

Rutting Index

RUT_INDEX

Each wheelpath is analyzed independently for rut severities. %LOW %MED %HI total percentage total number of ruts within each severity in both wheelpaths 20 * 100

Roughness Condition Index (Asphalt)

RCI

AVG IRI

Roughness Condition Index (Concrete)

RCI

Surface Condition Rating Index

SCR Lowest

Note: The modified SCR equation above combines AC_INDEX and LC_INDEX, and considers that a single AC/LC index value of the Structural Crack Index (SC_INDEX).

The lowest of the four computed index values (SC_INDEX, TC_INDEX, PATCH_INDEX, or RUT_INDEX) becomes the SCR.

Data Collection Vehicle Subsystems

CAMERAS

CAMERA SPECIFICATIONS

Two Forward/ One Rear Facing

CAMERA SPECIFICATIONS

Pavement Line Scan

DMI (Distance Measuring Instrument)

ROUGHNESS (IRI)

RUTTING

IRI SPECIFICATIONS

RUTTING SPECIFICATIONS

GPS & INERTIAL SYSTEMS

GPS SPECIFICATIONS

Geodatabase – Background and Metadata geodatabase metadata

GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

TERM OR

ABBREVIATION DESCRIPTION OR DEFINITION

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .