Amendment 0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ.NO.

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

Items 8 and 15, and returning is extended, is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required.)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

(x) A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

1 4

000001 07/31/2017

AAQ-811 FAC. & AVIATION SAFETY ACQ

FAA AERONAUTICAL CENTER

PO BOX 25082

MPB ROOM 380

AAQ0811-AFN

OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73125

AAQ-811 FAC. & AVIATION SAFETY ACQ

FAA AERONAUTICAL CENTER

PO BOX 25082

MPB ROOM 380

AAQ811-AFN

OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73125

x

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment number. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT

THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By ___________ 1 x x

DTFAAC-17-R-00023

1 copies to the issuing office.

07/25/2017

(x)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. CONTRACT AUTHORITY 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

Cynthia L. Cooper

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

LIST OF CHANGES:

The purpose of this amendment is to revise Section F.1 Working Hours, Section L.1 Submission of Questions Prior to Proposal, and Section M.2

FIRST: Section F.1 Working Hours is hereby revised as follows:

FROM: Work at the site shall be accomplished between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding federally established holidays, except when prior approval has been obtained from the Contracting Officer. Approval for overtime work shall not be construed as an agreement for payment of overtime work.

TO: Work at the site shall be accomplished between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding federally established holidays, except when prior approval has been obtained from the Contracting Officer. Approval for overtime work shall not be construed as an agreement for payment of overtime work.

SECOND: Section L.1 Submission of Questions Prior to Proposal is hereby revised as follows:

FROM: All questions regarding the project/specifications/plans must be received in writing (stephanie.riddle@faa.gov) no later than 2:00 p.m. CT, August 3, 2017, to allow for responses to be provided prior to the due date for receipt of proposals.

TO: All questions regarding the project/specifications/plans must be received in writing (stephanie.riddle@faa.gov) no later than 2:00 p.m. CT, August 15, 2017, to allow for responses to be provided prior to the due date for receipt of proposals.

THIRD: Section M.2 Technical Evaluation Rating Scale is hereby revised as follows:

FROM: All vendors will be ranked according to the quality of their submission. All offerors will be rated according to the rating scheme outlined in this section.

Each evaluator will use the following criteria to measure and score each proposal. Scoring will reflect the extent to which the vendor has met the overall factor requirements. Upon completion of the evaluation of each factor by a member of the evaluation team, the lead technical evaluator will summarize the proposals in a manner that determines which proposals are acceptable and which are unacceptable to support. Evaluation factors will be scored as outlined below to which the Offeror has met the overall factor requirements. The Technical Evaluation will consist of two past performance ratings: Experience Relevancy and Performance Confidence. Using questionnaires, the Government shall seek performance information for the offerors.

EXPERIENCE - RELEVANCY (Factor 1) Rating Score Very Relevant 7 – 6 Relevant 5 – 4 Somewhat Relevant 3 – 2 Not Relevant 1 – 0 Unknown Relevancy 0

PAST PERFORMANCE- CONFIDENCE (Factor 1) Rating Score Substantial Confidence 7 – 6 Satisfactory Confidence 5 – 4 Limited Confidence 3 – 2 No Confidence 1 – 0

Unknown Confidence 0

Weighting Factors. Technical is significantly more important than price/cost.

TO: All vendors will be ranked according to the quality of their submission. All offerors will be rated according to the rating scheme outlined in this section.

Each evaluator will use the following criteria to measure and score each proposal. Scoring will reflect the extent to which the vendor has met the overall factor requirements. Upon completion of the evaluation of each factor by a member of the evaluation team, the lead technical evaluator will summarize the proposals in a manner that determines which proposals are acceptable and which are unacceptable to support. Evaluation factors will be scored as outlined below to which the Offeror has met the overall factor requirements. The Technical Evaluation will consist of two past performance ratings: Experience Relevancy and Performance Confidence. Using questionnaires, the Government shall seek performance information for the offerors.

EXPERIENCE - RELEVANCY (Factor 1) Rating

Very Relevant Past/present performance effort involved essentially the same magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Past/present performance effort involved much of the magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Past/performance contractual effort involved some of the magnitude of effort and complexities that this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Past/present performance effort did not involve any of the magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Unknown Relevancy No past/present performance record is identifiable or the offeror's past/present performance record is so sparse that no relevancy assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

PAST PERFORMANCE- CONFIDENCE (Factor 1) Rating

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror's performance record, the FAA has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror's performance record, the FAA has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror's performance record, the FAA has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror's performance record, the FAA has no expectation the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence No performance record is identifiable or the offeror's performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Weighting Factors. Technical is significantly more important than price/cost.

FOURTH: The Proposal Due Date remains as Tuesday, August 22, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. CT.

FIFTH: All other terms and conditions remain unchanged and in full force and effect.