DRFP_Attachment 2_PPQ.pdf

PDF 216 KB Posted

Attached to
Dugway Proving Ground (DPG) West Desert Test Center (WDTC) Mission Support Services (MSS)
Solicitation number
W51EW725RA001
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template for RFP W51EW7-25-R-A001, issued by the U.S. Army Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC) Theater Support Center for the Dugway Proving Ground West Desert Test Center Mission Support Services contract. The PPQ must be completed and returned to the contracting officer and contract specialist by TBD 2025, within 5 days of receipt.

The questionnaire consists of three parts: Part I requires offerors to provide contract identification details; Part II requires respondents to evaluate past performance across five areas (compliance, project management, timeliness, cost control, and customer satisfaction) using a four-tier rating system from "Substantial Confidence" to "No Confidence." Part II also includes a checklist to compare previous work to WDTC scope, covering areas such as field testing, chamber testing, laboratory services, chemical/biological agent testing, engineering support, and various weapons systems testing. The form requires detailed rationale for all ratings and must be submitted to ingrid.v.smith.civ@army.mil and cyntia.l.grant18.civ@army.mil.

View the file

Other files

Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. ARMY MISSION AND INSTALLATION CONTRACTING COMMAND

THEATER SUPPORT CENTER

HQ MISSION & INSTALLATION CONTRACTING COMMAND (MICC)

TBD, 2025

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal

(RFP) W51EW7-25-R-A001

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC), Theater Support Center (TSC), is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government contracts as compared to solicitation W51EW7-25-R- A001. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

The prospective Offeror will complete Part I. I respectfully request you complete Part II with BOTH a rating and rationale for the rating.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.

Please complete the enclosure and return to the MICC-TSC Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist herein, no later than five (5) days after receipt of request or by 5:00 PM EST on TBD, 2025, whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to the undersigned, ingrid.v.smith.civ@army.mil and Contract Specialist, cyntia.l.grant18.civ@army.mil.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Any questions may be directed to the undersigned.

Sincerely, Ingrid V. Smith Contracting Officer

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and notify the Government Contract Specialist, Cindy Grant via cyntia.l.grant18.civ@army.mil. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions, or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror competing for the requirement)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Respondent Point of Contact) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs

Satisfactory Confidence

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

F. Comparison to WDTC MSS scope. Please check if your contract included any (or all) of the following services and/or support:

Field testing support services aligned with WDTC mission

Chamber testing support services aligned with WDTC mission

Laboratory testing support services aligned with WDTC mission

Test support or testing of/with lethal or incapacitating chemical and biological agents, chemical and biological simulants, or testing of items previously exposed to these agents

Engineering and test support in the design and development of test fixtures and facilities, air supply and vacuum systems, vapor and aerosol dissemination and sampling systems, virtual reality methodology and implementation, and manned and unmanned defeat targets

Support the operations and sustainment of laboratories, chambers, ranges, test areas and manned/unmanned system operations in support of various testing mission

Chamber controlled surety materiel testing

Chemical energetic and homemade explosive testing

Smoke and obscurant testing

Energetic and non-energetic direct/indirect fire

Artillery and weapons system testing large-area simulant disbursement

Chemical/biological monitoring and sampling

Range debris remediation Environmental and climatic condition test chambers

Unmanned Aerial Systems, Unmanned Ground Systems (UAS/UGS) testing and training to include targets and transportation of UAS/UGS system and equipment items

Sensor testing Decontamination testing

Meteorological monitoring and chemical/biological material testing

Comments: _________________________________________________________

G. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

H. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

I. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Points of Contact identified in the cover letter, emails copied below for ease of reference.

ingrid.v.smith.civ@army.mil cyntia.l.grant18.civ@army.mil

Thank you for your assistance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .