DLA CSDR plan for Active Protection System Adaptor Kit (A-Kit) (002).xls
XLS spreadsheet 94 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SPRRA2-24-R-0015
- Issued by
-
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation
About this file
This document is a Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) Plan for the Active Protection System Adaptor Kit (A-Kit) contract under a Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) acquisition. The plan outlines the CSDR reporting requirements, including submission events, cost reporting, technical data, and other instructions for the contractor. Key details include that this is a firm-fixed price, indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract for a 3-year period. The acquisition is set aside for economically disadvantaged women-owned small businesses (EDWOSB) or women-owned small businesses (WOSB) under the WOSB program. The CSDR plan provides the work breakdown structure, required data reporting, and other compliance instructions the contractor must follow when submitting cost and technical data. This document does not contain a specific Statement of Work or Objectives, but rather provides the CSDR plan details for the stated federal contract opportunity.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SPRRA224R0015-0005.pdf | ||
| Updated Section M (SPPRA224R0015).pdf | ||
| A-Kit GFM.pdf | ||
| SPRRA224R0015-0004.pdf | ||
| QUESTIONS FROM VENDORS FOR SPRRA224R0015_16AUG2024.pdf | ||
| MK57K7977_BOM_X5_2024-07-24.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Questions from Vendors for SPRRA224R0015_9AUG24.pdf | ||
| SPRRA224R0015-0003 2024AUG12.pdf | ||
| Definitions.pdf | ||
| PPQ.pdf | ||
| PPS.pdf | ||
| SPRRA224R0015-0002.pdf | ||
| Section M (SPPRA224R0015).pdf | ||
| SPRRA224R0015-0001.pdf | ||
| Section L (SPRRA224R0015).pdf | ||
| IFLD A-Kit RFP CDRL List.docx | DOCX document | |
| Iron Fist A-Kit DLA Production SOW.docx | DOCX document | |
| Enclosure 1_Pricing Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| SPRRA224R0015.pdf |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DD Form 2794, Pg 1 (METADATA)
| COST AND SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING PLAN | OMB No. 0704-0671 |
| The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 57 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Executive Services Directorate (0704-0671). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. |
PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE ABOVE ORGANIZATION.
| 1a. PROGRAM NAME | ||
| DLA - Defense Logistics Agency | ||
| 1b. PHASE/MILESTONE (check all that apply) | ||
| Pre-A | ||
| A | ||
| B | ||
| C-LRIP | ||
| X | C-FRP | |
| O&S | ||
| 1c. PRIME MISSION PRODUCT | ||
| Active Protection System Adaptor Kit (A-Kit) | ||
| 1d. ACQUISITION CATEGORY (ACAT) | ||
| Pre-ACAT | ||
| ACAT I (MDAP) | ||
| ACAT IA (MAIS) | ||
| ACAT II | ||
| ACAT III | ||
| X | Other | |
| 2. COMMODITY TYPE | ||
| Ground Vehicle System | ||
| 3. PLAN ITERATION TYPE | ||
| X | INITIAL | |
| REVISION | ||
| 4. CURRENT SUBMISSION DATE (YYYYMMDD) | ||
| 20240626 | ||
| 5. LAST APPROVED PLAN DATE (YYYYMMDD) | ||
| 6a. GOVERNMENT PLAN POINT OF CONTACT (POC) NAME (Last, First, M.) | ||
| Medley, Mallory, R | ||
| 6b. ADDRESS (Include ZIP Code) | ||
| DLA AVN Huntsville | ||
| 6c. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code) | ||
| 256-616-6502 | ||
| 6d. E-MAIL ADDRESS | ||
| mallory.medley@dla.mil | ||
| 7. PLAN TYPE | ||
| GOVERNMENT | ||
| X | CONTRACT (PRIME) | |
| CONTRACT (SUB) | ||
| 8. PLAN GOVERNMENT PREPARING ORGANIZATION | ||
| Defense Logistics Agency - Aviation - Huntsville | ||
| 9a. CONTRACTOR NAME/ADDRESS | ||
| i. REPORTING ORGANIZATION NAME | ||
| TBD | ||
| ii. DIVISION NAME | ||
| TBD | ||
| iii. LOCATION | ||
| TBD | ||
| iv. CONTRACTOR BUSINESS DATA REPORT (CBDR 1921-3) REQUIREMENT: | ||
| CBDR REQUIRED FOR THIS ORGANIZATION | ||
| 9b. CONTRACT NUMBER (List all that apply, separated by commas) | ||
| TBD - (D-24-A-C4) | ||
| 9c. APPROPRIATION (check all that apply) | ||
| RDT&E | ||
| X | PROCUREMENT | |
| O&M | ||
| FMS | ||
| WCF | ||
| OTHER | ||
| 10a. APPROVED PLAN NUMBER | ||
| D-24-B-C4 | ||
| 10b. APPROVED PLAN REVISION NUMBER | ||
| 0 | ||
| 10c. APPROVED PLAN REQUIREMENTS | ||
| X | AT COMPLETION COSTS FOR STANDARD FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES (FlexFile or Legacy) | |
| X | AT COMPLETION COSTS FOR RECURRING/NONRECURRING (FlexFile only) | |
| TECHNICAL DATA REQUIRED | ||
| 10d. COST REPORT TYPE | ||
| X | FLEXFILE | |
| LEGACY DD 1921 SERIES | ||
| DD FORM 2794 (PAGE 1), METADATA, MAY 2024 | PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE |
DD Form 2794, Pg 2 (REPORTING)
| COST AND SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING PLAN | COST, SOFTWARE, & TECHNICAL DATA REPORTING/EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT CO-PLAN | |||||
| 11. WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE (WBS) | 12. COST | 13. TECHNICAL DATA | ||||
| a. WBS | ||||||
| CODE | b. WBS | |||||
| LEVEL | c. WBS ELEMENT NAME | a. ACTUALS TO | ||||
| DATE (ATD) | b. LEGACY | |||||
| 1921-1 | c. LEGACY | |||||
| 1921-2 | d. LEGACY | |||||
| 1921-5 | e. EAC/FAC | |||||
| (See item 10d) | a. QUANTITY | b. SRDR | ||||
| FORMATS | c. |
MAINT. &
REPAIR
PARTS
| i. QUANTITY | ||
| DATA | ii. GFE |
QUANTITY
| 1.0 | 1 | EXNDI Bradley Active Protection System (APS) | X | X | |
| 1.1 | 2 | Iron Fist, Bradley, APS Kit | X | X | |
| 1.1.1 | 3 | Integration, Assembly, Test, and Checkout | X | X | X |
| 1.1.2 | 3 | Main Control Unit (MCU-U-B) | X | X | X |
| 1.1.3 | 3 | Control Panel, Iron Fist (LFCP-B) | X | X | X |
| 1.1.4 | 3 | Launcher (LHR M2.3) - DFARS Magnets | X | X | X |
| 1.1.5 | 3 | Launcher Control Unit (LCU) | X | X | X |
| 1.1.6 | 3 | Radar (aCHR V11) | X | X | X |
| 1.1.7 | 3 | Smart Optics Sensor (SOPS) | X | X | X |
| 1.1.8 | 3 | Sensor Adapter Kit | X | X | X |
| 1.1.9 | 3 | Key, Encryption | X | X | X |
| 1.1.10 | 3 | Installation Kit | X | X | X |
| 1.1.11 | 3 | Other Components Hardware 1...n (Specify) | X | X | X |
| 1.1.12 | 3 | Active Protection System (APS) Software | X | X | |
| 1.2 | 2 | System Engineering | X | X | |
| 1.3 | 2 | Program Management | X | X | |
| 1.4 | 2 | System Test and Evaluation | X | ||
| 1.4.1 | 3 | Developmental Test and Evaluation | X | X | |
| 1.4.2 | 3 | Operational Test and Evaluation | X | X | |
| 1.4.3 | 3 | Live Fire Test and Evaluation | X | X | |
| 1.4.4 | 3 | Mock-ups/System Integration Labs (SILs) | X | X | |
| 1.4.5 | 3 | Test and Evaluation Support | X | X | |
| 1.4.6 | 3 | Test Facilities | X | X | |
| 1.5 | 2 | Training | X | X | |
| 1.6 | 2 | Data | X | X | |
| 1.7 | 2 | Peculiar Support Equipment | X | X | |
| 1.8 | 2 | Common Support Equipment | X | X | |
| 1.9 | 2 | Operational/Site Activation | X | X | |
| 1.10 | 2 | Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) | X | X | |
| 1.11 | 2 | Industrial Facilities | X | X | |
| 1.12 | 2 | Initial Spares and Repair Parts | X | ||
| 1.12.1 | 3 | Initial Spares and Repair Components Hardware 1...n (Specify) | X | X | X |
| Subtotal Cost | X | X | |||
| Reporting Contractor G&A | X | X | |||
| Reporting Contractor Undistributed Budget | X | X | |||
| Reporting Contractor Management Reserve | X | X | |||
| Reporting Contractor FCCM | X | X | |||
| Total Cost | X | X | |||
| Reporting Contractor Profit/Loss or Fee | X | X | |||
| Total Price | X | X | |||
| DD FORM 2794 (PAGE 2), REPORTING, MAY 2024 |
WBS will update/change prior to RFP closing. WBS change should not affect pricing.
DD Form 2794, Pg 3 (EVENTS)
| COST AND SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING PLAN | |||||||
| 14. CSDR SUBMISSION EVENTS | |||||||
| a. | |||||||
| EVENT ID | b. | ||||||
| DATA REPORT(S) | c. | ||||||
| SUBMISSION EVENT NAME | d. | ||||||
| REPORT CYCLE | e. AS OF DATE | f. DUE DATE | |||||
| (YYYYMMDD) | (YYYYMMDD) | ||||||
| 1 | Cost and Hour Report (FlexFile), Quantity Data Report | Contract Award + 90 Days | Interim | 20241130 | 20250129 | ||
| 2 | Cost and Hour Report (FlexFile), Quantity Data Report | Biennial Submission 1 | Interim | 20250731 | 20250929 | ||
| 9 | Cost and Hour Report (FlexFile), Quantity Data Report | Contract Complete | Final | 20270731 | 20270929 | ||
| DD FORM 2794 (PAGE 3), SUBMISSION EVENTS, MAY 2024 | PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE |
DD Form 2794, Pg 4 (REMARKS)
| COST AND SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING PLAN |
| 15. REMARKS |
| a. CSDR Planning Approach & Preparation Instructions |
| 1. In addition to the direction provided in the associated CSDR Data Item Descriptions (DIDs) and the CSDR Manual (DoDM 5000.04), the following instructions, requirements, and considerations found on this page/worksheet shall be utilized when collecting data and preparing CSDR submissions. |
2. This CSDR Contract plan is intended to capture costs associated with the contract number(s) listed in block 9.b. The contractor shall capture and report any and all costs incurred in order to perform the scopes of work on the Contract irrespective of contract type (e.g., firm-fixed price, cost-plus fixed fee) or funding source (i.e., via contract, via contractor internal research & development funds). The reporting entity is not expected or required to significantly modify its accounting system or technical approach to execution solely to comply with this CSDR Plan’s reporting requirements. The reporting entity is not required to track costs from specific employees, purchase orders, agreements, or subcontracts if it utilizes a standard cost accounting system and may utilize internal standard costs when prepared CSDR deliverables if those standard costs represent the most accurate “actual” cost data available to the reporting entity.
3. Costs reported against this CSDR plan shall be cumulative in nature (i.e., each submission shall report any and all costs incurred on and prior to the submission’s “AS OF DATE” (block 14.e)).
4. Other than the Resource Distribution Table, submission events associated with this CSDR plan are classified as either "Initial", "Interim", or "Final" submissions as identified in block 14.d of this CSDR plan.
i. Submission events marked "Initial" shall report the Contractor's total anticipated contract cost and resulting price using the maximum allowable contractor quantities, hours, or options (as applicable). For sealed bid contracts (i.e., contracts awarded under FAR Part 14) the reported FAC/EAC shall equal the value of the Contractor's sealed bid (using the maximum allowable contractor quantities, hours, or options (as applicable)). For negotiated contracts (i.e., contracts award under FAR Part 15) the reported FAC/EAC shall be equal in overall value to the Contractor's best and final offer (and consistent in distribution with any supporting cost and pricing data (e.g., basis of estimates, engineering build-ups) (using the maximum allowable contractor quantities, hours, or options (as applicable)). For all other contracts, the reported FAC/EAC shall be equal in overall value to the Contractor's final proposal and consistent in distribution with any supporting data provided to substantiate the contract's value, reasonableness, and/or realism (e.g., basis of estimates, engineering build-ups) (using the maximum allowable contractor quantities, hours, or options (as applicable)). No ATD costs are anticipated to reported on an "Initial" submission except for any certified precontract costs incurred prior to or on the date of contract award.
ii. "Interim" report submissions are any report that is not either an "Initial" or "Final" report. Reported ATD, EAC/FAC, and quantities on "Interim" submissions shall be prepared reflecting only the value of work, quantities, hours, or options (as applicable) awarded on the report's "As Of Date" (do not include costs for anticipated but not awarded scopes of work, quantities, hours, or options).
iii. Reported ATD, EAC/FAC, and quantities on "Final" submissions shall be prepared reflecting the value of work, quantities, hours, and options (as applicable) anticipated to be awarded on a contract and meet the conditions listed in block 15.c.i.4.
5. Regarding the WBS Structure (block 11): This CSDR Plan utilizes the Office of the Secretary of Defense Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation Operating and Support Cost-Estimating Guide's Cost Estimating Structure (available here: https://www.cape.osd.mil/files/OS_Guide_Sept_2020.pdf) as the baseline for its WBS which has been extended to provide additional insight into system(s) or subsystem(s) which the Government believes to be high-risk or high-technical-interest in accordance with DoD Manual 5000.04. The contractor shall utilize the definitions found in the Operating and Support Cost-Estimating Guide when mapping its costs into this CSDR plan’s WBS.
i. The contractor may extend any WBS element to allow the contractor to provide additional insight into its technical solution. Any and all extensions or tailoring of the WBS shall be in accordance with the Office of the Secretary of Defense Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation Operating and Support Cost-Estimating Guide's Cost Estimating Structure, the WBS guidelines included in MIL-STD-881E, and DoD Manual 5000.04.
ii. If changes to the contract scope, hours, or options (as applicable) necessitate the need to revise or add additional WBS elements to remain in compliance with the Operating and Support Cost-Estimating Guide's Cost Estimating Structure, MIL-STD-881E, or DoD Manual 5000.04, any associated contract cost/price changes related to the updated CSDR Plan or submission of revised CSDR deliverables, shall be included within the contract modification that awards the changed scope of work, hours, or options (as applicable).
| b. Resource Distribution Table |
| 1. Submissions of the Resource Distribution Table (RDT) are required under the following conditions: |
i. An RDT shall be delivered seven calendar days before the “Post-Award Cost and Software Data Reporting Conference”. Prepare this submission of the RDT at FAC/EAC value and utilizing the instructions at Block15.a.4.i.This copy of the RDT will be used during the “Post-Award Cost and Software Data Reporting Conference” in order to finalize which subcontractors will be required to provide CSDR reporting via electronic submission of deliverables directly to the Defense Cost and Resource Center (DCARC) and which subcontractors may qualify for a CSDR direct reporting subcontractor waiver.
ii. An RDT shall be delivered within thirty calendar days of the contractor identifying that a subcontractor who, at the time of initial subcontractor award, was not anticipated to qualify for direct subcontractor CSDR reporting via electronic submission of deliverables directly to the DCARC but is subsequently anticipated to meet the CSDR direct reporting subcontractor threshold value due to changes to scopes of work, end-item design, subcontractor/supplier, or subcontract price changes since initial contract award (unless the newly identified subcontractor has already been issued a subcontractor reporting waiver associated with this contract).
| c. Submission Dates |
| 1. All CSDR deliverable “AS OF DATES” and “DUE DATES” listed in blocks 14.e and 14.f are identified for planning purposes only. Submission dates are subject to change and are determined in accordance with the event drivers as identified below: |
i. Initial Submission: Submission events marked as an "Initial" submission in block 14.d. shall have an “AS OF DATE” as of the date of contract award.
ii. Interim Submission(s): Submission events marked as an "Interim" submission in block 14.d shall have an "AS OF DATE" based on the submission event name in block 14.c. For example, if the submission event name was "Contract Award Plus 24 Months" then the submission's "AS OF DATE" is the contract award date plus 24 calendar months. If the submission event name was "Complete Delivery of First Article Test Assets" then the submission's "AS OF DATE" would be the date the final First Article Test Asset was delivered.
iii. Final Submission(s): Submission events marked as "Final" submission in block 14.d shall have an "AS OF DATE" when the following conditions have been met:
1. Condition 1: All end items anticipated to be procured on the contract have been delivered and accepted by the government (e.g., as evidenced by a completed DD Form 250) or higher tier contractor in the case of a subcontractor.
2. Condition 2: 95% or more of all ATD total costs have been incurred relative to all costs the reporting entity expects to incur for each and every Order/Lot (defined in Data Group B, Item 4 of the approved FlexFile DID)."
| d. Cost and Hour Report (FlexFile) & Quantity Data Report |
| 1. Nonrecurring/Recurring Segregation: The contractor shall utilize the specific definitions and requirements in the CSDR Manual (DoDM 5000.04) and the definitions in the DID for the Cost and Hour Report (FlexFile) report (DI-FNCL-82162) to segregate Recurring and Nonrecurring costs discretely and not as an aggregate. |
2. Order Lot Scope: Block 16 of this CSDR Plan is meant to capture the discrete Delivery Orders/Task Orders (as applicable) exercised on the contract. If a Delivery Order/Task Order (as applicable) is exercised on the contract but is not listed in block 16, the contractor shall submit the dollars and hours in the Cost and Hour Report (FlexFile) and the quantity information in the Quantity Report tagged using the name of the Delivery Order/Task Order (as applicable) utilized on the contract. The CSDR Plan will be updated to include the appropriate Delivery Order/Task Order (as applicable) name in block 16, after report submission, if required.
3. End Item Scope: Block 17 of this CSDR Plan is meant to capture the discrete hardware end items that are DD-250'ed, ordered, procured, or exercised (as applicable) on the contract to the greatest degree possible given the reporting entity’s accounting system capabilities and technical approach to contract execution. If an End Item is DD-250'ed, ordered, procured, or exercised (as applicable) on the contract but is not listed in block 17, the contractor shall submit the dollars and hours in the Cost and Hour Report (FlexFile) and the quantity information in the Quantity Report tagged using the name of the End Item utilized on the contract. The CSDR Plan will be updated to include the appropriate End Item name in block 17, after report submission, if required. If the reporting entity’s accounting system and technical approach to contract execution does not allow for the segregation and reporting of data at the level indicated in block 17, it shall seek Government approval on an alternate set of end item IDs or revisions to the WBS that provide insight into actual contractual costs at a time no later than the completion of the CSDR Readiness Review. The reporting entity may utilize internal standard costs when reporting hardware or material costs when its accounting system cannot associate specific purchase orders or subcontractor agreements to the contract number(s) listed in block 9.b.
4. End Item ID Common: The "Common" end item tag shall be used to report costs and hours which are not incurred or directly attributable to an individual end item. For example, overarching program management costs and hours that are required, independent of the type or quantity of end items on contract would be tagged against the “Common” end item. Common hardware (i.e., identical/homogeneous part numbers) procured and integrated into multiple end items shall utilize the end item tag for the prime product they were integrated onto and shall not be tagged with the “Common” end item.
| e. Period Of Performance & Additional Scope Of Work |
| 1. If the Contract period of performance is extended by more than six months, or if the scope of work is modified to include work not otherwise covered by the CSDR Plan, the government may modify the CSDR Plan to require additional submission events and add additional WBS elements in order to ensure the accurate and complete collection of cost data associated with the modified contract. Depending on the scope and complexity of the contract modification, the contractor may be required to host or attend an additional Post-Award Cost and Software Data Reporting Conference to review the CSDR Plan changes and the contractor’s plan to collect and report costs associated with the additional scope of work. |
| f. FAC vs EAC |
| 1. The checkmarks for EAC/FAC in column 12e at the WBS level shall be reported as "Forecast at Completion" (FAC). The Forecast At Completion (FAC) required here is not subject to the standards established in ANSI/EIA-748 guideline #27 (Estimate at Complete); therefore, the FAC does not need to be, but may be, derived from Industry Earned Value Management (EVM) processes. |
| g. COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS (CAS) DISCLOSURE STATEMENT DIFFERENCES |
| 1. The contractor shall follow the accounting procedures specified in its CAS Disclosure Statement and with any clauses or requirements included in the contract. As part of the CSDR Readiness Review, the contractor shall identify any aspect(s) of its CAS Disclosure Statement which preclude or inhibit compliance with this CSDR Plan and DoDM 5000.04 (CSDR Manual). During the CSDR Readiness Review, the contractor shall identify any deviations from its CAS disclosure statement it intends to utilize to prepare CSDR submissions. |
| h. CSDR READINESS REVIEW (CSDR-RR) also known as Post Award Conference (PAC) |
| 1. The Reporting Entity shall attend and participate in a CSDR Readiness Review meeting (also known as the Post award CSDR conference) which will be held with the Cost Working Group Integrated Product Team (CWIPT) IAW DFARS 242.503-2(b) and DoDM 5000.04 (CSDR Manual). During this meeting, the CWIPT and contractor will review the Reporting Entity's process for data collection and reporting to ensure it satisfies the guidelines outlined in the DoDM 5000.04, CSDR Manual, the approved CSDR plan reporting requirement, and the Resource Distribution Table. The Reporting Entity shall demonstrate how costs will be based, to the maximum extent possible, upon actual cost transactions and not cost allocations; describe how recurring vs. nonrecurring costs will be segregated; demonstrate how the data from its accounting system will be mapped into the reporting categories in the approved CSDR plan. The Reporting Entity shall present the methodologies used for mapping internal cost accounts to the agreed upon WBS, specifically illustrating how individual WBS elements and standard functional categories in the FlexFile (functional data elements in the 1921 series) codes will be populated. The review shall include any reporting issue corrections and allow the contractor to propose any changes to this CSDR Plan in order to tailor the plan to the contractor's accounting system to include any contractor recommended changes or additions to the WBS elements or end item IDs. |
| DD FORM 2794 (PAGE 4), REMARKS, MAY 2024 PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE |
DD Form 2794, Pg 5 (SCOPE DEF)
| COST AND SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING PLAN | |||||
| INTRA-CONTRACT SCOPE REPORTING DEFINITION | |||||
| 16. ORDERS/LOTS | |||||
| a. ID | b. NAME | c. PHASE/MILESTONE | |||
| 1 | Delivery Order 1 | C-FRP | |||
| 2...n | Delivery Order 2...n | C-FRP | |||
| 17. END ITEMS | |||||
| a. ID | b. NAME | ||||
| 18. UNIT/SUBLOT REPORTING AND UNIT SEQUENCING REQUIREMENTS | |||||
| a. ORDER/LOT ID | b. END ITEM ID | c. UNIT/SUBLOT REPORTING | |||
| (X if applicable) | d. UNIT SEQUENCING |
(X if applicable)
DD FORM 2794 (PAGE 5), INTRA-CONTRACT SCOPE, MAY 2024
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .