TEAMS-NEXT_Industry_Day__2_Briefing.pdf

Missile Defense Agency TEAMS-Next Industry Day #2

Approved for Public Release 19-MDA-10036 (7 May 19)

Ms. Aundreia Blackwell TEAMS-Next, Lead

June 18, 2019

Industry Day Purpose

To communicate TEAMS-Next requirements and other considerations to industry, with the goal to enhance industry understanding and work toward mutually beneficial outcomes for the Missile Defense Agency and our industry partners.

Approved for Public Release 19-MDA-10036 (7 May 19)

Introductions/Administrative Items

• Introductions

• Westin Information

• Rules of Engagement

Westin Information

• Mediterranean Ball Room

• Restrooms

• 1-on-1s:

19-20 June Westin

21&24 June Telecoms

• Phones

• Refreshments

Approved for Public Release 19-MDA-10036 (7 May 19)

Valencia IV:

19-20 June In-person 1-on-1s

Mediterranean:

General Session

0800-0815 Welcome / Introductions / ROEs Ms. Aundreia Blackwell 0815-0830 MDA and BMDS Mission Overview Ms. Karla Jackson 0830-0845 MDA A&AS Operating Environment Mr. Timothy Yopek 0845-0855 Consolidation Considerations Mr. John Penley 0855-0900 Functional Area Introduction Mr. Tyler Green 0900-0915 Public Affairs Requirements Mr. Mark Wright 0915-0930 Human Resources Requirements Ms. LaTongia Griffin 0930-0945 International Affairs Requirements Ms. Jacqueline Walker-Brown 0945-1000 Quality, Safety, Mission Assurance Requirements Mr. Larry Easterwood 1000-1015 Logistics Requirements Mr. Dewayne Price 1015-1030 Strategic Warfighter Integration Requirements Mr. Christopher Robinson 1030-1100 Environ Mgmt, FLCM, and FLSM Requirements Mr. David Nieman 1100-1130 Office Admin, Exec Admin, Strat Planning, Protocol Requirements Mr. Joseph Gaines 1130-1230 1230-1245 Acquisition Requirements Mr. Marcus Odum 1245-1300 Business Operations Requirements Ms. Gina Bryant 1300-1315 ITMA, CCRM, and CSM/CND Requirements Mr. LeRoy K. Smith 1315-1330 TEW and Test Provisioning Requirements Mr. Alex Richards 1330-1400 Engineering, Security, and Intelligence Requirements Ms. Sylvia Ferry 1400-1415 Contracts Requirements Mr. Jesse Kirstein 1415-1430 Organizational Conflicts of Interest Mr. Jesse Kirstein 1430-1445 1445-1545 Questions and Answers 1545-1600 Final Thoughts

Lunch Break

Afternoon Break

Industry Day Agenda

Rules of Engagement

• General Session

- Please use provided comment cards for questions

- We will collect questions by noon, and provide answers by the end of the day. Other questions will be answered after the General Session.

- All questions and answers will be posted to FedBizOpps

- Please do not put proprietary restrictions on written questions

• Briefers are NOT authorized to discuss requirements during breaks

• One-on-Ones

- Limited to 20 minutes (In-person and telecoms)

- Focused on company feedback from RFI and any unique company concerns

- The Government will respect proprietary information, but any non-proprietary information deemed worthy of distribution will be made public

Reminder

• Please continue to monitor FedBizOpps notice #CS-2019-0002 for further updates

8Approved for Public Release

Technical, Engineering, Advisory & Management Support TEAMS-Next Industry Day #2:

MDA Mission & BMDS Overview

Approved for Public Release 19-MDA-10036 (7 May 19)

John Cannaday Deputy for Operations and Services

Missile Defense Agency Mission To develop and deploy a layered Ballistic Missile Defense System to defend the United States, its deployed forces, allies, and friends from ballistic missile attacks of all ranges and in all phases of flight

Missile Defense Capability Globally Deployed

Missile Defense Capability Globally Deployed

Missile Defense Agency Priorities

- In Support Of The National Defense Strategy -

• Continue focus on increasing system reliability to build warfighter confidence

• Rapidly address the Advanced Threat

• Increase engagement capability and capacity

BMDS Meets Today’s Threat but Requires Additional Capacity and Advanced Capability to Stay Ahead of the

Evolving Threat

BMDS Meets Today’s Threat but Requires Additional Capacity and Advanced Capability to Stay Ahead of the

Evolving Threat

Notional

Multi-Object Kill Vehicle

Today’s Ballistic Missile Defense System

GBI

Ground-Based

Interceptor

Aegis Sea-Based Terminal

PAC-3

Patriot Advanced

Capability-3

THAAD

Terminal High

Altitude Area Defense

TERMINAL

Defense Segment

Aegis Ashore

SM-3

Standard Missile-3

Sea-Based X-Band Radar

AEGIS BMD

SPY Radar

Upgraded Early Warning Radar

Satellite Surveillance Forward-Based Radar

Sensors

The System Of Elements

Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense

MIDCOURSE

Defense SegmentBOOST / ASCENT

Defense Segment

NMCC USSTRATCOM USNORTHCOM USINDOPACOM USEUCOM USCENTCOM

C2BMC Command and Control, Battle Management and Communications

HQ-G-0371-18

TEAMS-Next (December 2018)

• Mission, Mission, Mission

• Competitive

• Maximize Small Business Opportunity

• Cybersecurity

• Streamlined Acquisition Approach

Since Industry Day #1 (December 2018)

• Market Research

• Preliminary Consolidation Strategy

• Level of Effort

• Organizational Conflict of Interest

Requirements-Based Contracts

Engineering Portfolio IT / Cyber Portfolio

#1 Full & Open - Engineering ~1,020 FTE

• Systems Engineering/Analysis (all levels)

• Modeling and Simulation (all levels)

• Element/Component Design, Dev, Integration

• Architecture

• Requirements Generation

• C3BM

• Directed Energy

• Risk Management

Full & Open – Advisory, #2 Agency, Analytical Support (A3) ~70 FTE

• On-demand executive-level advisory support

#3 Set-Aside – Engineering ~145 FTE

• Threat

• Lethality

• Flight & Ground Test Analysis/Integration

• Risk/Knowledge Points

• International Program Engineering

• Cyber Engineering

Market Research Ongoing – #4 Counterintelligence ~45 FTE

• Counterintelligence

Market Research Ongoing – #5 Security Operations ~145 FTE

• Security Program Execution

• Information Security

• Special & Personnel Security

• Intelligence Operations

• Declassification

Set-Aside – Cyber Compliance #6 and Risk Management ~70 FTE

• Cyber Controls Validation Testing

• Software IV&V

• Cyber Range OT&E

• Cyber Risk Assessment

• Cyber Training

Set-Aside – IT and Cybersecurity #7 Management ~145 FTE

• IT Architecture

• IT Planning

• IT Networks/Systems Services

• Information Management

• Enterprise Operations

• Integrated Communications

• Information Assurance Workforce Mgt

• Cyber Planning/Integration

• Network Defense

Test & Warfighter Portfolio

#9 Set-Aside – Test Support ~295 FTE

• Flight Test

• Ground Test

• Wargames & Exercises

• Test Provisioning

• Test Infrastructure Support

Market Research Ongoing – #8 Warfighter ~95 FTE

• Warfighter Integration

• Watch Officer Support

Professional Services Portfolio

Administrative Portfolio

Set-Aside – BMDS Program Planning & Procurement Operations

#11 ~345 FTE

• Acquisition Planning/Policy/Analysis

• Baseline Support

• Program Support

• Small Business Office Support

• Scheduling

• Strategic Planning / War Room /

Executive Advisory Support

• MDA Boards

• International Affairs/Policy/Strategy

Set-Aside - #15 Operations ~320 FTE

• Financial Management

• Cost Estimating

• EVM

• Accounting

• Financial Systems Support

• Human Resources Operations

• Training/Curriculum

Development

Set-Aside – Facilities, Logistics, #12 Environmental ~195 FTE

• Facilities Planning/Policy/Operations

• BMDS Logistics/Analysis

• Environmental Management

Set-Aside – Quality and #13 Mission Assurance ~145 FTE

• QA Policy/Planning/Execution

• QA Risk Management

• QA Test Support

• Corrective Action Support

#14 Set-Aside – Safety ~70 FTE

• Safety Support (at all levels)

• Safety Policy/Planning

Market Research Ongoing – #10 Facilities Life-cycle Mgt ~95 FTE

• Infrastructure Planning/Policy

• Asset Management

• Facilities Design/Acquisition/

Construction Support

• Site Activation/Deployment

Set-Aside – #16 Administration ~270 FTE

• Administrative Support

• Executive Support

• Staff Action Support

• Protocol

8(a) Set-Aside – #17 Public Affairs <10 FTE

• Open Source Media

Compilation/Analysis

• Communication Products

• Security and Policy Review

Mkt Research Ongoing

F&O

SB Set-Aside

8(a) Program

16Approved for Public Release

TEAMS-Next Industry Day:

MDA Advisory and Assistance Operating Environment

Approved for Public Release 19-MDA-10036 (7 May 19)

Timothy Yopek Program Manager

Consolidated Support Program Office

Outline

• TEAMS-Next Goal

• MDA Primary Operating Locations

• Consolidated Services Environment

• Services Acquisition Overview

• Evolution from MiDAESS to TEAMS – Way Ahead TEAMS-Next

TEAMS-Next Goal

To continue to provide BMDS stakeholders with comprehensive and integrated professional knowledge-based support in order to meet MDA’s demanding and dynamic mission.

Missile Defense Capability Globally Deployed

Missile Defense Capability Globally Deployed

Primary Operating Locations

Sea-Based X-band Radar (SBX)

Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF)

•Directed Energy Research Program Office

• Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD)

• Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)

• Targets & Countermeasures (TC)

• Advanced Technology Director (DV)

• Command, Control, Battle Management and

Communications(C2BMC)

• Sensors (SN)

• Missile Defense Integration & Operations Center (MDIOC)

• Space Sensor Layer (SSL)

Dahlgren, VA

Aegis BMD

Fort Belvoir, VA

HQ MDA

Albuquerque, NM

• Vandenberg AFB, Beale AFB,

• Point Mugu NAS, NSWC Corona

• Port Hueneme, SPAWAR and other locations

Colorado Springs, CO

Fort Greely

Hawaii

California

Huntsville, AL

PACOM AOR

Alaska

MDA Consolidated Services Environment

INTEGRATED

RESEARCH &

ENTERPRISE

SOLUTIONS (IRES)

Research & Development Enterprise Collaboration Services

(RECS)

SPECIALIZED

WARFIGHTER

DEVELOPMENT

CONTRACT (SWDC)

Modeling and Simulation Contract -

Truth (MSC-T)

ADVANCED

RESEARCH

CENTER (ARC)

TEAMS

Functional “Owners”

TEAMS

Functional “Owners”

TEAMS

Program

“Stakeholders”

TEAMS

Program

“Stakeholders”

COMMERCIAL

SERVICES &

EQUIPMENT

TEAMS‐NEXT

(PROFESSIONAL SERVICES)

MDA SERVICES

Current TEAMS - Functionally Aligned

SBSAF&O

Quality, Safety, & Mission Assurance

Quality & Mission Assurance

Safety

Test

Test, Exercises, and Wargames

Test Provisioning

Engineering

Systems Engineering

Weapons & Missiles Systems Engineering

C3BM Engineering

Specialty Engineering

Predictive Engineering

International Engineering

CIO

IT Mgmt. & Analysis

Cybersecurity Mgmt. & Computer Network Defense

Cybersecurity Compliance and Risk Management

Acquisition

Acquisition Support

Operations

Business Operations

Intelligence

Cybersecurity Eng.

Security Programs

Counter-Intelligence

Human Resources

HR & Training

Chief of Staff

Protocol

Office Administration

Strategic Planning

Facilities and Deployments

Environmental

Facilities Space Mgmt

Facilities Lifecycle Management

Warfighter Strategic integration

Warfighter Integration

Logistics

Logistics

International Affairs

International Affairs

A3 Support

Public Affairs

Public Affairs

Tech Intelligence / Special Programs

31 Contract Vehicles

Approved for Public Release

8(a)

3rd Generation TEAMS-Next 2020 - 2028

• Early planning focused on Evolving and Maturing Agency Mission

- Primary Drivers:

– Mission Flexibility

– Cost Savings

– Increased Efficiency

• Engagements with other DoD Agencies and Organizations

• Internal MDA Dialogue – Engage the Mission Partners

• Extensive Dialogue with Industry – Lessons Learned

Emerging requirements are driving innovative solutions

• 1st Gen: Consolidated and gained program control with MiDAESS

• 2nd Gen: Stabilized and allowed specialization with TEAMS

Technical Engineering Analytical and Management Support – Next

(TEAMS-Next)

TEAMS-Next: Following the Process

• Leverage Small Business

• Maximize Competition

• Improve Productivity and Performance

• Use Existing Best in Class Vehicles when practical

• Manage and Control Costs

• Provide Flexible and Innovative Solutions

• Leverage Small Business

• Maximize Competition

• Improve Productivity and Performance

• Use Existing Best in Class Vehicles when practical

• Manage and Control Costs

• Provide Flexible and Innovative Solutions

Codified in recent update to DoD Instruction 5000.74

Form the Team

Review Current Strategy

Perform Market Research

Define the Requirements

Develop Acquisition Strategy

Execute the Strategy

Manage Performance

Seven Steps to the Services Acquisition Process

OSD Emphasis on Services Acquisition

• Services Contracts Require at Least the Same Discipline and Rigor as Weapons System Acquisitions due to the Amount of DoD Annual Spend

Areas of OSD Emphasis MDA Implementation

• Requirements Definition Requirements Defined “Basic Contract & Tasks”

• Market Research Large Business Interest & Small Business Set-Aside

• Price Reasonableness Determinations Price Evaluation for Contract

• Project Management Program Structure (Centralized Support Services)

• Oversight Functional Matrix Implementation & Reporting

• Appropriate Skill Sets Contract Awards by Functional “Skill Sets”

• Best Practices & Sharing Lessons Learned Enterprise-Wide Efforts Promote Sharing/Innovation

• Structured Acquisition Reviews OSD Peer Reviews by OSD, Defense Pricing and

Contracting (DPC) Acquisition Strategy & Plan Approved by OSD DPC Consolidation Cost Benefit Analysis to SBA Multiple Engagements w/ Industry for Feedback

Approved for Public Release 19-MDA-10036 (7 May 19)

20112011 20122012 20132013 20142014 20152015

0.

0.

5.

5.

8.

8.

4.

4.

Defense Agency Obligations on ContractsDefense Agency Obligations on Contracts

8.

8.

6ProductsProducts

ServicesServices 18 4.

4.

2.

2.

9.

9.

9.

9.

4.

4.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

0.

5.

8.

4.

Defense Agency Obligations on Contracts

8.

6Products

Services 18 4.

2.

9.

9.

4.

Knowledge Based Services – Core Priorities

Army Contracting Command Expeditionary – Responsive - Innovative

Satisfy Agency Mission While Controlling Lifecycle Costs

Expect Qualified and Motivated Industry Partners

Promote Effective Competition

Approved for Public Release 19-MDA-10036 (7 May 19)

Eliminate Unproductive Processes and Unnecessary Bureaucracy

Facilitate Open and Continuous Communication during Contract Execution

Encourage and Leverage an Environment of Innovation and Collaboration

“We need to remember that our goal is always, ultimately, mission impact. That demands balancing speed with diligence and quality. It’s not actually speed that matters; it’s velocity… We also need to expedite the requirements generation process and maintain excellence in contract execution to remain ahead of our adversaries.”

Michael Griffin, USD R&E, at DoD’s 2019 Lab Day at the Pentagon

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Slide 27 Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 & 3.104

TEAMS-Next Milestones To First Award

Time Now

Approved for Public Release 19-MDA-10036 (7 May 19)

TEAMS-Next First Award December 2020

2019 2020 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMilestone

Industry Day #2

Acquisition Strategy Development

First Draft RFP/ First Final RFP

First TEAMS-Next Award

6/18 6/24

12/12

28Approved for Public Release

19-MDA-10036 (7 May 19)

TEAMS-Next Consolidation Considerations

John Penley Contracts Director

Consolidation

• Consolidation

• One solicitation that combines two requirements previously obtained through two or more separate, smaller contracts

• MDA Consolidation History

• Pre-MiDAESS

• 181 service contracts (50% had 6 FTE or less)

• Numerous non-MDA vehicles (via MIPR)

• MiDAESS

• Consolidated down to 57 task orders across 36 IDIQ contracts

• TEAMS

• Consolidated down to 31 C-type contracts

• TEAMS Next

• MDA is assessing further consolidation, while still retaining or improving small business posture

• 3 to 5 source selections per year on a rolling 5-year cycle

Business Operations

NAICS: 541611

Size Standard:

$15M Earned Value Management

NAICS: 541330 ($15M)

Cost Estimating & Analysis

NAICS: 541330 ($15M)

Strategic Planning & Financial Management Support

NAICS: 541611 ($15M)

Budget Execution & Funds Control

NAICS: 541611 ($15M)

Accounting

NAICS: 541219 ($20.5M)

Financial System Support & Integration

NAICS: 541611 ($15M)

Consolidation Under TEAMS Construct Biz Ops example

Approved for Public Release 19-MDA-10036 (7 May 19)

MiDAESS

TEAMS

Small Business Set-aside

Full and Open

Decreased administrative and resource burden From 6 source selections to 1 Fewer contracts to manage

Captured significant savings

Increased small business footprint No bundling

Benefits of Consolidation

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

PRE-DECISIONAL - WORKING PAPERS

PRE-DECISIONAL - WORKING PAPERS

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE

Distribution Statements B, E, and F:

Controlling office is the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Consolidated Support Program Office.TEAMS-Next

Requirements-Based Contracts Engineering Portfolio IT / Cyber Portfolio

#1 Full & Open - Engineering ~1,020 FTE

• Systems Engineering/Analysis (all levels)

• Modeling and Simulation (all levels)

• Element/Component Design, Dev, Integration

• Architecture

• Requirements Generation

• C3BM

• Directed Energy

• Risk Management

Full & Open – Advisory, #2 Agency, Analytical Support (A3) ~70 FTE

• On-demand executive-level advisory support

#3 Set-Aside – Engineering ~145 FTE

• Threat

• Lethality

• Flight & Ground Test Analysis/Integration

• Risk/Knowledge Points

• International Program Engineering

• Cyber Engineering

Market Research Ongoing – #4 Counterintelligence ~45 FTE

• Counterintelligence

Market Research Ongoing – #5 Security Operations ~145 FTE

• Security Program Execution

• Information Security

• Special & Personnel Security

• Intelligence Operations

• Declassification

Set-Aside – Cyber Compliance #6 and Risk Management ~70 FTE

• Cyber Controls Validation Testing

• Software IV&V

• Cyber Range OT&E

• Cyber Risk Assessment

• Cyber Training

Set-Aside – IT and Cybersecurity #7 Management ~145 FTE

• IT Architecture

• IT Planning

• IT Networks/Systems Services

• Information Management

• Enterprise Operations

• Integrated Communications

• Information Assurance Workforce Mgt

• Cyber Planning/Integration

• Network Defense

Test & Warfighter Portfolio

#9 Set-Aside – Test Support ~295 FTE

• Flight Test

• Ground Test

• Wargames & Exercises

• Test Provisioning

• Test Infrastructure Support

Market Research Ongoing – #8 Warfighter ~95 FTE

• Warfighter Integration

• Watch Officer Support

Professional Services Portfolio

Administrative Portfolio

Set-Aside – BMDS Program Planning & Procurement Operations

#11 ~345 FTE

• Acquisition Planning/Policy/Analysis

• Baseline Support

• Program Support

• Small Business Office Support

• Scheduling

• Strategic Planning / War Room /

Executive Advisory Support

• MDA Boards

• International Affairs/Policy/Strategy

Set-Aside - #15 Operations ~320 FTE

• Financial Management

• Cost Estimating

• EVM

• Accounting

• Financial Systems Support

• Human Resources Operations

• Training/Curriculum

Development

Set-Aside – Facilities, Logistics, #12 Environmental ~195 FTE

• Facilities Planning/Policy/Operations

• BMDS Logistics/Analysis

• Environmental Management

Set-Aside – Quality and #13 Mission Assurance ~145 FTE

• QA Policy/Planning/Execution

• QA Risk Management

• QA Test Support

• Corrective Action Support

#14 Set-Aside – Safety ~70 FTE

• Safety Support (at all levels)

• Safety Policy/Planning

Market Research Ongoing – #10 Facilities Life-cycle Mgt ~95 FTE

• Infrastructure Planning/Policy

• Asset Management

• Facilities Design/Acquisition/

Construction Support

• Site Activation/Deployment

Set-Aside – #16 Administration ~270 FTE

• Administrative Support

• Executive Support

• Staff Action Support

• Protocol

8(a) Set-Aside – #17 Public Affairs <10 FTE

• Open Source Media

Compilation/Analysis

• Communication Products

• Security and Policy Review

Approved for Public Release 19-MDA-10036 (7 May 19)

Mkt Research Ongoing

F&O

SB Set-Aside

8(a) Program

33Approved for Public Release

Functional Area Introduction

Approved for Public Release 19-MDA-10036 (7 May 19)

Tyler Green Director, Acquisition

Slide 35

Functional Area Overview (1 of 2)

• Overview of the Functional Organization/Mission

• High Level Overview of Requirements in Each Functional Area

• Challenges/Unique Aspects of the Functional Domain

• Presentations are Based on Current TEAMS Structure, Expect Changes

• Live Questions will not be Taken During the Briefings

Functional Area Overview (2 of 2)

Quality, Safety and Mission Assurance

(QS)

Quality & Mission

Assurance

Safety

Director for Test

(DT)

Test, Exercises, and Wargames

Test Provisioning

Engineering Directorate (DE)

Systems Engineering

Weapons & Missiles Systems Engineering

C3BM Engineering

Specialty Engineering

Predictive Engineering

International Engineering

Chief Information Office (IC)

IT Mgmt. & Analysis

Cybersecurity Mgmt. & Computer Network

Defense

Cybersecurity Compliance and Risk Management

Director for Acquisition (DA)

Acquisition Support

Director for Operations (DO) Business OperationsTechnical

Intelligence (DEI)

Intelligence

Cybersecurity Eng.

Security Programs

Counterintelligence

Human Resources (HR)

HR & Training

Chief of Staff

(DS)

Protocol

Office Administration

Strategic Planning

Facilities and Deployments (FD)

Environmental

Facilities Space Mgmt.

Facilities Lifecycle Management

Warfighter Strategic

Integration

(DDW)

Warfighter Integration

Logistics (DPL)

Logistics

International Affairs

(DI)

International Affairs

A3 Support

Public Affairs

Public Affairs

(PA)

8(a) contractF&O Set-Aside

37Approved for Public Release

MDA/PA

Mark Wright

Approved for Public Release

Public Affairs

Functional Organizational Chart

Functional Mission

• Provide direct support to the MDA Director and agency programs in four key areas:

Public Information/Media

Relations Mission Support

Internal Communications

Community Relations

Public Affairs

Stakeholder Summary

• MDA Director for Public Affairs

- Daily news article compilation for distribution to MDA leadership

- Internal/external publications

- Fact sheets

- Talking points

- Leadership biographies

- Security and Policy Review

- Draft media query responses

• MDA Director for Test (DT)

- Flight test mission planning

- Mission Readiness Reviews

- Data coordination

• MDA Office of the Chief Information Officer (IC)

- MDA public website

- MDA intranet

- Records management/archival

- Social media outlets

Summary of Scope

• Scope of work is performed in the following locations:

- Colorado Springs, Colorado (COS)

- Fort Belvoir, Virginia (NCR)

- Huntsville, Alabama (HSV)

Summary of Scope (cont.)

• Scope of Work:

Daily News Compilation

• Search and compile missile defense related news items

• Event-specific news items as required

Communication Products

• Internal/external articles

• Press releases

• Talking points

• Fact sheets

• Leadership biographies

• Daily images for the MDA intranet

Meeting Support – Flight Test

• Flight test mission planning

• Mission

Readiness Reviews

• Data coordination

Summary of Scope (cont.)

• Scope of Work:

Security and Policy Review

• Receive, review, distribute for program coordination

• Track all cases through coordination and final decision

Internet and Intranet Support

• Maintain and update approved releasable communication products on the MDA public website

• Maintain and update approved communication products for the MDA intranet

Delivery of Support Services for the BMDS

• Teamwork/cooperation

• Management of personnel

• Data coordination

Complexities / Challenges

• Meeting Support for Flight Test Support: Huntsville, Alabama

- Location: HSV

- Preferred location due to the majority of flight test planning and data coordination is produced in HSV

- DT front office is located in HSV

• Internet and Internet Support:

- Location: COS

- Historically, IC stakeholder support has been located in COS

47Approved for Public Release

MDA/HR

LaTongia Griffin

Approved for Public Release

Human Resources

49Approved for Public Release

Organizational Chart

To link our human capital planning efforts to the strategic intent of the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) to employ the right workforce in the right place at the right time, through implementation of best practices that will ensure human, financial, and other resources are aligned with MDA goals.

• The Human Resources Function covers HR operations, personnel staffing, recruitment and requirements for the following Stakeholders

- Human Resources Operations (HR) Liaisons,

– Acquisition (DA)

– Engineering (DE)

– Chief Information Officer/Information Management & Technology

Operations (IC/ICT)

– Warfighter Strategic Integration (DDW)

– Test and Evaluation (DT)

– Facilities and Deployments (FD)

- Human Capital,

- Manpower & Information Systems,

- Employee Development and Acquisition Career Management

- Equal Opportunity & Diversity Management (EO)

- Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) Outreach

- Missile Defense Career Development Program (MDCDP) planning and execution

• Primary work locations are Huntsville, AL, Colorado Springs, CO, Headquarters Fort Belvoir, VA, Dahlgren, VA, and the National Capitol Region.

• Primary areas of importance are:

- Execution of Human Resources Operations (HSV, COS, HQ)

- Civilian Recruitment, Staffing and Placement Support ) (HSV)

- Collection, Interpretation, and Presentations of Human Capital Data

(HSV)

- Employee Development and Acquisition Career Management (HSV)

- Total Force Manpower Management and Planning (HSV)

- Equal Opportunity and Diversity (HSV)

- MDA Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)

Program (HSV)

- Military Personnel (HQ)

- Missile Defense Career Development Program (MDCDP) (HSV)

• Multiple technical functional areas

• High op tempo environment, high volume, parallel tasking

• Execute Human Resources Operations in four locations/three primary geographic areas

• Cybersecurity Risk Management embedded in HR processes

• Support Security Requirements pertaining to Classified and

Unclassified Information

• Effective transition plan

• Liaison support must pay close attention to task requirements

54Approved for Public Release

MDA/DI

Jacqueline Walker-Brown

Approved for Public Release

International Affairs

Director for International Affairs

Chief of Staff for International Affairs and

Strategy & Operations (DIB)

AB International

NATO

International Security (DIS)

& FMS (DIF)

Deputy Director for International Affairs

Asia-Pacific (DIA)

Europe / Americas

(DIE)

Middle East

(DIM)

Executive Officer

Interagency/Policy

FUNCTIONAL

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

• DI provides executive leadership and strategic direction for all international activities and engagements proposed or conducted by the MDA to ensure the BMDS and associated acquisition program plans and accomplishments are aligned with established policies, strategies, guidance, and objectives and serves as the Functional Manager for International Affairs.

• The DI Directorate develops and implements the Agency international strategy to facilitate BMDS development and deployment. The Director for International Affairs applies unique expertise to a broad range of international policy and foreign affairs issues for the MDA Director, MDA headquarters staff, and programs across the Agency.

International Cooperation

Engagement / Outreach

Missile Defense Analysis

Cooperative Projects

Co-development DeploymentCo-productionTest / Wargame Participation

“This cooperation will leverage our joint contributions and focus on expanding opportunities for collaboration on missile defense programs; deepening interoperability in missile defense systems and operations;

expanding burden sharing among the United States and its allies and partners; and limiting the proliferation of advanced offensive missile technologies and components.”

- 2019 Missile Defense Review Report

Foreign Military Sales Technical Assistance

FMS Case Weapon System

FMS Case Requirements Analysis/

Architecture Studies

Engagement

• Conferences

• Flight Tests

• Capability Briefings

• Senior Leader Visits

Cooperative Projects & Programs

Basic Research / Cooperative R&D

Co- Development

Co- Production

Joint Analysis

Participation in Tests/Exercises/Wargames

Hosting U.S. Assets Analysis/Siting Studies Agreement

Capability Delivery

Interoperability

Bilateral

Multilateral

• The following MDA organizations are stakeholders that receives support from this requirement:

• International Affairs Directorate (DI)

• International Affairs Directorate – Foreign Military Sales (DI/F)

• Program Executive for AEGIS Ballistic Missile Defense (AB)

• Program Executive for AEGIS Ballistic Missile Defense –Foreign Military Sales (AB-FMS)

• Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Program Office (TH)

• Support is required for the International Affairs Directorate (DI) and the Functional Matrixed Support Program Offices of the Aegis Ballistic (AB) Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) Program, the Sensors (SN) BMD Program, and the Terminal High Altitude Area BMD Program (THAAD) and covers geographically dispersed locations such as the National Capital Region, VA (NCR) Dahlgren, VA (DHL); and Huntsville, AL (HSV).

• Provide International Affairs and Foreign Military Sales (FMS) support for the Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) development and execution.

• Dispersed Workforce issues (different locality rates coupled with hiring difficulty in some areas).

• Foreign Military Sales Background limited in some areas

62Approved for Public Release

19-MDA-10036 (7 May 19)

MDA/QS

Larry Easterwood

Quality, Safety and Mission Assurance Directorate Overview

Approved for Public Release 19-MDA-10036 (7 May 19)

The Quality, Safety and Mission Assurance Directorate of the Missile Defense Agency performs a continuous assessment of the engineering, technology, processes, production and programmatic practices used to develop and operate the BMDS such that high risk attributes can be identified and addressed to increase confidence in achieving mission success while ensuring personnel safety.

BMDS Assurance Integration (COS)

QSI

BMDS Safety Officers

(COS)

QSC

Parts, Materials & Processes

QSP

Mission Assurance

QSA

BMDS Safety

QSS

BMDS Quality

QSQ

Safety & Occupational

Health

QSH

BMDS Sensors

SNQ

Terminal High Altitude Area Defense

THQ

Israeli Cooperative Program

IPQ

Ground-based Midcourse Program

GMQ

C2BMC

BCQ

Aegis BMD

(DAHL)

ABQ

Targets & Countermeasures

TCQ

Advanced Technologies

DVQ

Advanced Technology, Directed Energy & Sensor

Technology (KAFB)

DVL

Q

CCO Financial MgmtQS

Chief Engineer QS

QS Director (RSA)

QS

Deputy DirectorQS

Deputy Chief Engineer

Q S

Business Operations

QS

Tech Assessments & Verification (TUS)

QS

V

Functional MDA/QS Organizational Chart

Stakeholder QMA Safety AEGIS Ballistic Missile Defense (AB) X X Test Directorate (DT) X X Advanced Technology Directorate (DV) X X Ground‐based Midcourse Defense Program Office (GM) X X Terminal High Altitude Area Defense Program Office (TH) X X Targets and Countermeasures Program Office (TC) X X Sensors Program Office (SN) X X Command & Control, Battle Management & Communications (BC) X X U.S.‐Israeli Cooperative Program Office (IP) X Programs & Integration (DP) X

MDA organizations/stakeholders that receive support:

Stakeholder Summary and Geographic Locations

Geographic work locations:

Approved for Public Release 19-MDA-10036 (7 May 19)

Safety

Albuquerque, NM (ABQ)

Cape Canaveral, FL

Dahlgren, VA (DHL)

Fort Greeley, AK (FGA)

Huntsville, AL (HSV)

Kirkland Air Force Base, CA AFB)

QMA

Albuquerque, NM (ABQ)

Camden AR

Dahlgren, VA (DHL)

Fort Greeley, AK (FGA)

Huntsville, AL (HSV)

Joplin, MO

Kirkland Air Force Base, NM (KAFB)

Moorestown, NJ

Salt Lake City, UT (SLC)

Tucson, AZ

Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA (VAFB)

Topics Covered in Summary of Scope

• QSMA Components (Quality, Mission Assurance, and Safety)

• Geographic Locations

• QMA Subarea Functions:

- MDA Assurance Provisions (MAP) Rev B

- MAP Revision C (in work)

- Parts, Materials, and Processes (PMAP) Rev B

- PMAP Rev C (in work)

- MDA Assurance Representatives (MARs)

- MDA Assurance Audits

- Test Event Certification (TEC)

• Safety Subarea Functions:

- MDA Director’s Safety Policy

- Program/Range Safety

- Safety and Occupational Health

Summary of Scope: QSMA Scope

Proposed scope of QSMA Components

• Quality - Includes supporting the development, implementation, sustainment, and execution of both BMDS and Program level quality assurance policies, requirements, and programs; supporting BMDS and Program level system quality assurance risk management process; and supporting quality assurance conduct of system demonstration activities, to include flight and ground tests, at both the BMDS and Program levels.

• Mission Assurance – Includes supporting the development, implementation, and execution of both BMDS and program level mission assurance policies, requirements, and functional areas such as Parts, Materials and Processes; Configuration Management; and Manufacturing supporting the BMDS and program level technical risk identification and management process; and supporting successful conduct of system demonstration activities, to include flight and ground tests at BMDS and program levels.

• Safety – Includes supporting the development, implementation, sustainment, and execution of both BMDS and Program level safety policies, requirements, and programs; supporting BMDS and Program level system safety risk identification and management processes; and supporting safe conduct of system demonstration and simulation activities, to include flight and ground tests, at both the BMDS and Program levels. These requirements also include supporting the development, implementation, and execution of safety and occupational health (SOH) agency wide policies, requirements, and programs; and providing management support for developing, implementing, and executing Program level SOH program(s).

Summary of Scope:

MDA Assurance Provisions and Parts, Materials, and

Processes Mission Assurance Plan

MDA Assurance Provisions (MAP) Rev B

• Establishes the MDA minimum standards assuring reliable, effective, safe and successful BMDS

• Implementing on all new contracts; existing contracts under assessment

• A standardized set of 14 Quality, Safety, and Mission Assurance provisions, requirements, and processes for mission and safety critical items

Parts, Materials, and Processes Mission Assurance Plan (PMAP) Rev B

• Establishes uniform minimum Standard Part quality levels for each hardware category that meets or exceeds current OSD Parts and Materials Policies

• PMAP is put on all contracts and is tailored as required

• PMAP was the first DoD PMP Plan which addresses all 7 major PMP topics within one document

MDA Assurance Representatives (MARs)

• Located in critical manufacturing plants and integration facilities but also assess lower-tier suppliers ensuring MDA requirements are met

• Provide independent, unfiltered technical and quality assessments ensuring MDA requirements are met

MDA Assurance Audits

• Validate that end items at a selected level conform to engineering design requirements and end item is qualified

• Compare fabrication methods and acceptance test levels against MDA & industry standards

• Validate production readiness

Test Event Certification (TEC)

• Develop TEC checklist of Mandatory and Required Items

• Verify Certification Data Packages against deployed and configured test hardware and software

• Monitor tests for discrepancies and ensure they are addressed

Summary of Scope:

MDA Assurance Representatives, MDA Assurance Audits, and Test Event Certification

Summary of Scope: QS Safety Functions and Safety and Occupational Health

QS Safety Functions

• Independent verification that MDA products and operations are safe, and assist Programs in accomplishing this goal.

• Accomplished through assessment of requirements, engineering change requests, participation in working groups, meetings, and milestone reviews; detailed review of pertinent documentation to verify compliance with applicable standards; oversight of selected operations; and periodic audits.

Safety and Occupational Health

• Missile Defense Agency Safety and Occupational Health (SOH) establishes program plans, policy, responsibilities, and guidelines for compliance with statutory, regulatory, and DoD policy/program directions

• MDA SOH programs designed for the protection of human resources through accident prevention, protection of MDA systems, property, and equipment and compliance with appropriate statutes, regulations, Executive Orders, and DoD policies.

Summary of Scope: Potential New Scope and resulting Complexities/Challenges

New scope is expected to be based on R&E technology requirements.

- Examples: hypersonics, directed energy/non-kinetic systems and potentially including space elements

- FMS: product increase is expected to be needed for new international partners

Complexities/Challenges:

- Expanding focus for MDA/QSMA to more developmental efforts and providing more flexibility/tailored continuous assessment of the engineering, technology, and processes for prototype production such that high risk attributes can be identified and addressed to increase confidence in achieving mission success while ensuring personnel safety.

- Obtaining and retaining experienced/qualified individuals in emerging areas of emphasis within MDA for R&E and Acquisition and Sustainment.

73Approved for Public Release

Logistics

MDA/DPL

Dewayne Price

Organizational Chart

Slide 1

FM: Functional Manager FL: Functional Lead PH&S: Packaging, Handling & Storage GSE: Ground Support Equipment

DE DIF DT DV TF GM IC SN SS TC

DPLR

Logistics Policy &

Assessment

DPLO

PH&S Operations

DPLP

Property Management

DPLT

Transportation & Fleet

Management

FD

Deputy Director

AB BC

Logistics Functional Integrator/

Log Synchronization

DPLDPL

Logistics

FM

Functional Execution

- Ordnance Storage Igloos

- Non-ordnance Storage

Warehouses

- Outdoor Storage Area

- GSE management

- Air transportation

- Surface transportation

- HAZMAT certification

- Operational support airlift

- Principal liaison with

USTRANSCOM

• NTV management

- Property management oversight & support (A2R)

- APSR management (DPAS)

- Property policy development and implementation

Logistics workforce adopting PSM, PSP, and PSI construct to align with DoD and regulatory requirements.

Product Support Provider (PSP)

Product Support Integrator (PSI)/FL

Logistics Support Directorate Product Support Manager (PSM)

A2R: Acquired to Retire DPAS: Defense Property Accountability System NTV: Non-Tactical Vehicle

Mission Statement: The Logistics Support Directorate (DPL) provides Ballistic Missile Defense System life cycle product support management, logistics functional management, and integrated functional services for the Missile Defense Agency.

• Functional Manager of the MDA logistics workforce: MDA Core, MDA Contractors, and Other Government Agencies and their Contractors.

• Key responsibilities:

‒ Assess and adjust logistics personnel allocations and performance requirements for integrated product support, to meet Warfighter needs and optimize implementation of the Integrated Product Support Strategy

‒ Analyze and conduct appropriate cost analyses, including cost-benefit analyses, to determine the preferred product support strategy

‒ Establish/enforce policies for BMDS logistics support ‒ Increase performance/reliability, right size logistics footprint, and reduce system life-cycle cost

Provides best value integrated product support across all MDA programs

• Logistics Policy Analysis & Assessment:

- Provide BMDS program managers with independent review of program’s life cycle logistics planning to ensure the MDA provides quality products and services to the lead Service and Warfighter

- Prescribe policies and procedures for the conduct of life cycle logistics support in MDA and implement policies to improve support and life cycle logistics cost

• Centralized Property Office:

- Ensure property book management of Ballistic Missile Defense

System (BMDS) assets valued at $14.3 Billion

- Ensure audit readiness

• Operational and Strategic Transportation: Validate transportation for world-wide movement (air, ground, surface) of BMDS assets to operational sites and test locations

• Package, Handling & Storage (PH&S): Provide PH&S support, including aircraft up/download for world-wide movement of BMDS assets

• Maintenance:

- Perform maintenance checks and services on ground support equipment

- Repair Standard Missile – 3 Vertical Launch System canisters

- Perform service life extension on Missile Transport Trailers

• Fleet Management: Provide employee ground transportation support and manage non-tactical vehicle fleet

MDA Logistics Roles and Functions

• Program Executive for AEGIS Ballistic Missile Defense (AB)

• Engineering Directorate (DE)

• Logistics Support Directorate (DPL)

• Test Directorate (DT)

• Advanced Technology (DV)

• Facilities and Deployment Program Office (FD)

• Foreign Military Sales (FMS)

• Ground-based Midcourse Defense Program Office (GM)

• Internal Controls (IC)

• Israeli Cooperative Program Office (IP)

• Sensors Program Office (SN)

• Space Systems (SS)

• THAAD Project Office (TH)

• Targets and Countermeasures Program Office (TC)

• Locations: Huntsville, AL; Colorado Springs, CO; Dahlgren, VA;

National Capital Region (NCR), VA; Hanscom AFB, MA; Fort Bliss, TX; Clear Air Forces Station, AK

• Scope: The contractor shall assist with developing, preparing, evaluating, validating and documenting BMDS logistics policy; this includes guidelines and procedures that streamline logistics operations, tracking and reporting. The contractor shall assist with planning, development, implementation, execution and management of integrated product support (IPS) elements across the BMDS portfolio. The contractor shall assist with analysis and assessments of life-cycle logistics support for the BMDS; this includes the development, acquisition, testing, deployment and sustainment of BMDS equipment, including hardware and software.

Logistics Summary

DPL is a Force Multiplier:

- Program life-cycle logistics planning, analysis and assessment

- Property Management

- BMDS worldwide Transportation Planning and Execution

- PH&S, including 30 storage facilities for explosives and general supplies

- Support Equipment and Maintenance

- Ground transportation services (Dahlgren, Huntsville, NCR, and

Colorado Springs) and Mass Transit Benefit Program

- Matrixed logisticians across 14 program offices; right size logistics footprint, increase performance/reliability, and reduce system life-cycle cost

81Approved for Public Release

MDA/DDW

Christopher Robinson

Approved for Public Release

Strategic Warfighter Integration

DDW Functional Organizational and Stakeholder Chart

Deputy Director

Director, Warfighter Strategic Integration

(DDW)

Aegis BMD (AB) C2BMC (BC) GMD (GM) THAAD (TH) Sensors (SN)

Dahlgren, VA

Colorado Springs, CO

San Diego, CA

Huntsville, AL

Colorado Springs, CO

Fort Greely, AK

Vandenberg AFB, CA

Huntsville, AL

Colorado Springs, CO

Ft Belvoir, VA

Huntsville, AL

Colorado Springs, CO

• Warfighter Strategic Integration Directorate (DDW) is the Functional Manager for the Operations Support Functional Area (OSFA).

• OSFA is responsible for:

• Requirements development, planning, deployment, situational awareness and potential transition of MDA developed capabilities to military Service Departments to achieve effective BMD of the homeland, deployed regional forces and allies.

• Serves as principal MDA interface with the warfighter, Joint Staff, CCMDs and Service Departments on BMD capabilities development and operational issues.

• Seamless integration between the development community, prototype and fielded BMDS elements, Service Departments and CCMDs.

• Interfaces with the CCMDs and Service Components to effectively employ, maintain, and sustain the BMDS and provides the means for CCMD participation in the MDA program to define, develop, and field future missile defense capabilities.

• MDA Elements supporting in this effort on TEAMS Next:

• Ground-based Midcourse Defense

• Aegis BMD

• Sensors

• Challenges

• Deliver analysis on emerging threats in support of Warfighter operational planning

• Transitioning Warfighter feedback into capability insertion/delivery in a timely manner to pace threat

• Complexity

• Capability delivery alignment with Navy installation schedules

• Mission Planning Prototype development and distribution

• Threat model development to support operational analysis

• Flexibility to adapt to COCOM evolving Operations Support environment as future radars are deployed

• High Risk

• Turnover

• Key personnel impact overall knowledge level, continuity and team cohesiveness

• Quality labor mix for mission accomplishment

• Relevant warfighter operational analysis to support planning requirements

Complexity - Mission Essential Functions (MEF) and Lines of Effort (LOE)

MEF 1: Warfighter (DDW-C) MEF 2: BMDS Program Management (DDW)

•BMDS Asset Management Scheduling and primary coordination with JFCC IMD J31

•BORRS/IST, COLT Online Tool development & sustainment for WF asset management interface

•BMDS Availability and Resource Optimization

LOE 1.1: BMDS

Asset Management

•MDA 24/7 Operations for BMDS Asset management and Configuration Control

•CCMD and Service Staff Warfighter Interface •Commander Critical Information

Requirements and Incident Reporting •Operations Planning Support

LOE 1.2:

Operations Support

•RFA/RFI Process •WIP/PCL/ACL/MFRL Process •Configuration Management/OCB process/Corporate Boards Principal/ Technical Capability Declaration (TCD) for Warfighter

•BMDS Handbook

LOE 1.3: Strategic Planning

•MDST Support to Service Components and BMDS elements

•JBTEC Liaison for BMDS Training •DDW IQT and Cadre Sustainment Training •Wargame and exercise support (US , Joint, Allied)

LOE 1.4 BMDS

Training Support

•BMD Governance and Oversight Process

•Service BOD, OFSC, MDEB •Transition and Transfer of capabilities •JROC and AMD Forums (AMDWG, FCB, JCB, Tank)

LOE 2.1:

BMDS

Lifecycle Management

•WIP/PCL/ACL/MFRL Process

•HDAWG/SMAC

•JEON/JUON Coordination •BMD Corporate Boards (PCB) •RFI/RFA Coordination •DTW/DEW Interface •Service PEM and CCMD ATD/LNO

LOE 2.2:

Warfighter

Strategic Integration

•JSAP and CATIMS •RFI/RFA Coordination •MDR and RTC Coordination •JEON/JUON Coordination •POM Position Coordination

LOE 2.3:

CCMD and Joint Staff

Integration

• Support required for the Operations Support Functional Area (OSFA) which includes:

• Warfighter Strategic Integration Directorate (DDW)

• Aegis BMD (ABW)

• Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD)

• Sensors (SNW and SNR)

• Primary Requirements for this effort include:

• Strategic level integration with Service Departments, Joint Staff and CCMDs

• Strategic Policy Development

• Current Operations Support

• Coordination, development, and execution of operational events supporting the BMDS

• Asset Management

• 24/7 Watch Standing

• Program Support for Ground-based Mid-course Defense, Sensors, Aegis BMD

• TTP, CONOP and SOP Development and Coordination

• BMDS fielding and life-cycle operations including:

• Technical, programmatic, deployment, and site activation

• Supporting all phases of CCMD level exercises, tests, event execution and post-execution

• Support covers world-wide, geographically dispersed locations including

• NCR, Colorado Springs CO, Huntsville AL, Dahlgren VA, Vandenberg AFB CA, & Fort Greely

AK

88Approved for Public Release

MDA/FDO

David Nieman

Approved for Public Release

Environmental Management

Organizational Chart

Provide sound, timely, and cost-effective environmental compliance and stewardship support to MDA using processes that are integrated into MDA’s planning and decision-making activities.

• FDO

Director of Operations, Plans, and Environment; Facilities and Deployments

• FDOE (Lead Stakeholder) Environmental Management Division Chief

• To provide comprehensive and sustainable environmental management, planning, compliance, sustainability and related technical support to the MDA including such support to the acquisition, development, testing, deployment and fielding of an integrated Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) and other new or emerging missions assigned to the agency.

• The requirement supports the MDA, the Global BMDS and other assigned missions including weapons systems acquisition, development, testing, deployment, and fielding at geographically dispersed locations worldwide. Environmental support extends to facilities and infrastructure acquisition, management and sustainment at any and all MDA locations including deployment and test facilities. The requirements in this contract include, but are not limited to, support in the following areas:

- Environmental analysis, planning, strategies, estimates, regulatory requirements, and recommendations to assist in managing facilities, military construction, and environmental initiatives.

- Development of Energy Conservation and sustainability program and reporting.

- Development, implementation, sustainment (includes energy, water, and waste reduction) and execution of BMDS and MDA environmental management activities.

- Environmental compliance, planning, and regulatory requirements for siting and geotechnical efforts.

- Environmental policy, test support, planning, analysis, and compliance both in the Continental United States (CONUS) and overseas.

• Work locations:

- Huntsville, AL

- Washington, D.C. (1 billet)

• Preview of potential new scope for TEAMS-Next that was not included in TEAMS

- Provide more surge/reach-back to support EISs/EAs

• The ability to supplement the base team – with additional contractors on short notice – familiar with MDA processes, procedures – having CAC and security clearances – to provide surge capability to support new or unplanned EISs or EAs.

- CIS EIS – complexities in preparing a NEPA document on compressed schedule – 24 mths in normal 3.5 yr process. Coordinating with multiple state/federal and DoD entities, i.e., Four states, four different installations (4 cooperating agencies), two EPA regions, three US. Fish & Wildlife Services, two USACE Districts. Politically sensitive project.

Continually changing scope and requirements. Significant impacts to water resources and wetlands. Extensive cultural resources consultations (NHPA) depending on site selected.

- FGA EA – compressed schedule – completion in 8 mths in normal 18 mths process.

- HDR-H EIS – many of the same complexities as CIS – High priority, agency focus.

Compressed schedule – 2 yr in 3.5 yr process. 4 cooperating agencies; 3 islands; added regulatory requirements - unusual requirements – Hawaii Environmental Policy Act compliance. Extensive NHPA consultations required. Extensive community engagements requirements. ESA Section 7 Formal Consultation

• Other challenges – extensive distance from home base; building technical credibility with cooperating agencies (land owners) and regulatory agencies – usually requires much more work to prove our word; changing requirements/scope without adjusting schedules; fluctuating work loads – requires ability to focus on different projects depending on the current pressing need.

95Approved for Public Release

MDA/FDE, FDD and FDO David Nieman

Approved for Public Release 19-MDA-10036 (7 May 19)

Facilities Life-Cycle Management

(FLCM)

Organizational Chart

Plan, program, acquire, and oversee design and…