CLDP Requirements and Standards Workshop.pdf

Operations Requirements and

Standards

CLDP-STD-1101

Common Docking System Standard

CLDP-REQ-3102

Hazard Analysis and

Safety Process

CLDP-STD-1102

Heritage Payload

Interfaces Standard

CLDP-REQ-1130 Updates since RFI #3

• Cargo and Utilization requirements added

• Total Requirements: 289 ~ 523

• Verification statements for al l

• Annex 1 Best Practices is now Appendix K

• RFI #3 Forward Work items addressed in Safety TIM part 2

627 comments from 13 companies drove 121 updates to the requirements

660 comments from internal NASA organizations and stakeholders

COMMERCIAL

~~vgg~~~T Crew Health Requirement Updates

• Updated standard that is referenced for cleanliness requirement ·

• Added requirement for limiting the electrical leakage currents of bioinstrumentation and medical equipment specifically designed for ·contact with the h~man body

• Added requirement for baro.traunia -_prevention · ·•

• Acoustic/Noise Exposure (R.CLDS~·297 /.-298_ merged") promoted from Best Pra.cti·c~s•a_n·d .-Verification added

• Added analysis verificatiOn.- rnet~o<ifor both potable water physiochemical limits ·a·nd potable water microbial limits

'I(

DEVELOPMENT

P ROGRAM

Cargo Capability Through the Phases of Flight

Capability Pre-Launch

Time Critical R.CLDS.014: Pre launch handling <24 hrs prior to a scheduled launch R.CLDS.536: Access due to launch delay

Non Time Critical

Launch

R.CLDS.565: Cargo Dynamic Environment for Pressurized Payloads

Post-Dock

R.CLDS.563: On-orbit removal within 96 hrs from ground handover

R.CLDS.537: Maintain a ttached cargo services until cargo is removed

Hard Mounted

R.CLDS.721 Common Payload System Interfaces Standard

Return

R.CLDS.565: Cargo Dynamic Environment for Pressurized Payloads

Pre-Undock

R.CLDS.564: Crew access to load cargo <24 hrs prior to vehicle departure

R.CLDS.537: Maintain a ttached cargo services until cargo is loaded

Environment: R.CLDS.561: 65 to 85deg for time-critical and powered cargo; 50 to 11 5 deg for non-sensitive soft stow Temp

Environment: R.CLDS.562: Mainta in 25-75% humidity Humidity

Environment: R.CLDS.734: Mainta in 13.9 to 15.2 psia Pressure

Environment: R.CLDS.731: lOOK Cleanliness c lean room

R.CLDS.732: exterior surfaces to general c lean

Post-Land

R.CLDS.015: Handover to USG rep within 4hrs after landing R.CLDS.566: Ground handover <72hrs from crew loading

R.CLDS.751 Return non-time critical cargo within R+ 14 days

R.CLDS.733: exterior surfaces to general c lean

No e: A requ1remen s opp 1ca e o o Crew an Cargo ve 1c es 25

Conditioned Stowage

Gloveboxes

Microscopes

Plant Research Facilities

Pressurized and Unpressurized Payload Resources

Ultrasounds

Environmental Monitoring

Human Sample Collection

Basic Labora tory Consumables, Equipment, and Supplies

Data and Comm Management

COMM ERCIAL

LE w

DEVELOPMENT

PRO GR AM

Updated Section:

• Since RFl#3, entire verification section has been added.

• Every requirement has a corresponding verification.

• Verifications are listed in same order as requirements in section 3.0.

• Verifications are expected to use flight or flight-equivalent · hardware and software except where expressly denoted otherwise.

Verifications

4.3.2. l Crew Safety 4 V ERIFICATION

4.1 Genera l

4.3.2.2 Safety a nd Hazard Control

4.3.2.3 Fa ilure Tolerance

4.2 Commerc ial LEO Destination System

4.2. l Safety and Mission Assurance

4.2. l . l Failure Tolerance

4.2. 1.2 Emergency Response

4.2. l .3 Crew Safety

4.3.2.4 Emergency Equ ipment

4.3.3 Pre-Launch/Ascent

4.3.3. l Pad and Ascent Aborts

4.3.3.2 Pad Contingencies

4.3.4 On Orbit

4.3.4. l Nominal

4.3.4.2 Contingency

4.2.2 Crew and Mission Support

4.2.2. l Ground Support

4.2.2.2 Cargo and Logistics

4.2.3 Avionics and Communication

4.2.4 Power and Electrical

4.3.5 Entry/Landing Requ irements

4.3.5. l Nominal

4.2.4. l Power and Electrical Standards

4.2.5 Structural and Mechanical

4.3.5.2 Contingency

4.3.5.3 Post-Landing Recovery

4.3.8 Crew Visiting Vehicle

4.3.8. l Communications

4.2.6 Hatch Design 4.3.8.2 Control and Handling

4.2.7 Environmenta l Control and Life Support 4.3.9 Spacecraft and Launc h Vehic le Design

4.2.7. l Fire Detection and Notification Manufacturing Standards

4.2.7 .2 Fire Isolation 4.3.10 Human Health, Medica l a nd Performance

· 1 4.3.1 0.l Operational Limitations 4.2.7 .3 Fire Suppressan

4.3.10.2 Crew Support Equipment

4.2.7.4 Fixed Fire Suppression 4.4 commercial LEO Destination

4.2.7 .5 Portable Fire Suppression 4.4. l Safety and Mission Assurance

4.2.8 G uidance, Navigation and Control 4.4. l. l Operations Nomenc lature Process

4.2.9 Space Environment Assessment

4.2. l O Software 4.4.2 Crew and Mission Support

4.2. l O. l Software Safety 4.4.3 Human Hea lth, Med ical, a nd Performance

4.2. 11 Human Health, Medical and Performance 4.5 Commercial Cargo Transportation System

4.2.1 1. l Crew Health and Medica l 4.6 Commercial LEO Utilizatio n

4.2.1 1.2 Crew Characteristics 4.6. l Conditioned Stowage

4.6.2 Gloveboxes

4.2.1 1.3 Human Performance 4_6_3 Microscopy

4.2.1 1.4 Acoustics 4.6.4 Plant Research

4.2.12 Other Design and Construction Standards 4.6.5 Pressurized Payload Resources

4.2.13 Design Testing 4.6.6 Unpressurized Payload Resources

4.3 Commercial Transportation and Service 4.6.7 Data Management a nd Communication Requirements 4.6.8 Lab Equipment and Supplies

4.3. l Genera l 4.6.9 Environmental Monitoring

4.3.2 Safety and Mission Assurance 4.6.10 Centrifuge

4.6.11 Ultrasou nd

~~vgg~~E~T Methods used within 1130 and their Meanings Method

Inspection

Demonstration

Analysis

Test

Meaning A method of verification that uses visual observations, physical measurement techniques, review of design, review of records, or review of other verification activities.

A method of verification that consists of a qualitative determination of the properties of a test article. This qualitative determination is made through observation, without special test equipment or instrumentation, which verifies characteristics such as human engineering features, services, access features, and transportability.

A verification method using techniques and tools such as math models, prior test data, simulations, analytical assessments, etc. Analysis may be used for the assessment of lower level requirements when technical evaluation is sufficient. Analysis of documentation to assess combinations of verifications to conclude an acceptable overall result.

A method of verification wherein requirements are proven by measurement during or after the controlled application of functional and environmental stimuli. A method of verification in which technical means, such as the use of special equipment, instrumentation, simulation techniques, and the application of established principles and procedures are used for the evaluation of components, subsystems, and systems to determine compliance with requirements. The analysis of data derived from tests is an integral part of the test program. Test will be used to determine quantitative compliance to requirements and produce quantitative results.

CLDS ;,

CLD

I

Destination

• ■ CLO IS

Launch Vehicle

Destination r-

Cargo Visiting Vehicle (CaW}

Lounch

,-cw\ (\ crs,s

Vehiclz u

CLD MS ■■■■■ CTSMS ■■■■■

CLO GS s1j Me

:r CTSGS s. ~11 ~' m. /

I caw

CaTSIS

'···"'U

Vehicle

CaTSGS Ill., ..

CaTS

Doc

Name Sectio Doc section

Name n requirement is ■I II expected to apply to. : · "·

FAILURE

B...CLQS.006

TOLERANCE TO

3-2.1.1 Failure Tolerance X X X X X

CATASTROPHIC

EVENTS

Failure Tolerance 1111111111111

•1 -B...CLQS.007

TRANSPORT

CREW

3.3.1 General X X X X ---■■l■■■■■■I

11111 RETURN CREW 3.3.1 General X X X

LE w

DEVELOPMENT

P ROGRAM

Best Practices summary

• Best Practices reflect highly useful or recommended approaches based on past spaceflight experience.

• ALL best practices are should statements and are NOT part of the certification plan for CLDP.

• Within RFI #3, Best Practices were captured as a separate document. These have now been incorporated into CLDP- REQ-1130 as part of Appendix K. · ·

• New Best Practices "should" statements: .

• R.CLDS.(\27 Lln1>ressurized Payload Field of Viev,,:: Should provide mir, imized _ obstructions 1n FOY for external payload mounting locations_, '." -::-: ,: _

• R.CLDS.752 Thin-Walled Flexible Pressure Boundaries: Should meet the intent of

JSC 67035 ·.~ _ • · ·

• R.CLDS.753 Radiation Hardness Assurance: Should meet the in.te.nt of NASA/TM

20210018053, NESC RP-19-01489 , .

• R.CLDS.758 Lowest Replaceable Unit Labeling: Should label down to the Lowest

Replaceable Unit

• R.CLDS.759 Spacecraft Window Location: Should be located away from

FOO/ debris/ contamination sources

• A·dded Sections to

Appendix K for Organization:

- Mission· Design

- Cargo

· - Crew _Vehicle

- - Standards

. - Reliability and Maintenance

...,. Window Design

- Crew Health and Accessibility

- Safety

- Operation Design

- System Design

All items are anticipated to be closed prior to draft RFP release

All items are anticipated to be closed prior to draft RFP release

COMMERCI AL ..

DEVELOPMENT

PR OG~AM

Docking Standard Summary

• The CLOP Docking Standard establishes a common, commercial LEO docking interface for commercial Crew Visiting Vehicles (CVVs), Cargo Transportation Systems (CaTSs), Commercial LEO Destinations (CLDs), and COS operations.

• This standard defines the minimum interface characteristics and performance capability Passive CDS (P-CDS) capability (assumed to be on the CLO-side) that will be compatible with CVV and CaTS Active CDS (A-CDS) capability.

• Docking standard envelopes compatibility with active docking systems from CCP and ISS Programs, so does not prohibit compatibility with ISS.

• The COSS envelopes common IDSS standard

• Focuses on physical/structural interfaces focused on.the passive side of interface (and interfaces to the passive side) while allowing .for active side innovations

• The Provider may explore different docking system options that complements their business objectives (e.g., transportation of larger scale payloads) as long as those docking system options do not prohibit the usage of the available CVVs and CaTSs addressed by this standard.

,; I

M•I !:,Ill -_., ' l'I

I

Iii;'! ..

,'°\ [ IOXUMBUCAL .. > KEEP OUT ZONE

./ TO\IEHICLE

MATltiGPLAIIE

I --•-i+- - LIIIEOf L SYMMETRY

10:X: 177.8

AUUMBU CAL

LOCATlc»iS ~ l"'!:i

Only minor updates in current baseline version since RFI

#3.

!TABLE OF CONTENTS!

1.0 Bac.kground and Introduction

I .I Purpou and Scope l .Z Ruponsibiliiy and Cltangt Authority

1.3 Convutioa and ~otatioa

1.4 Require.mtnta Identification

1.5 Rationale Staltmtnts

1.61\ftaauremtnl Unita

1:7 Ordor 0£:Pre.-odtnco ..................................................................... ___ ~·············

'.0 Documents ..... -........ .., ......... ··- ········· .. ·············· ........ _

1.1 Applicable Document

' ." Ref eruct Documtnts

3.0 Commercial LEO Docking System (CDS) ............................ ·- ············· .. ········ .... lO

3.1 c .. a,ral

3.1.1 CDS Co.actpl ofOperaliom ....................... ....... ... ----··· .. ••·•

3.1.2 Enginomni: Unim o£M,u ure

3.Z l\Iatiai; lnterfate Definition ............................ ....... .. ·----···· .. •·•

3.Z.l Tran:ntr Pusai:un y

3.Z.Z Sort Caplart Syirtem ................................... ....... .. ·----···· .. •·•

3.Z.3 Hard Capture Syst<>m

3.l.4 El•clrical Boadiag

3.Z.S A-CDS lnt,rt'1ee Compati1>ility

3.l.61\hterial,, and Sarface Fiaiahu

3.Z.7 Docking laterf'act Lukagt Rat,

3.3 Docking Perlorman••····················· .. ··· .. ·················· .. ··· .. ··

3.3.1 SCS Pert'ormance

3.3.2 HCS Perlormaace

3.4 Resource Transfer Umbilicals

3.4.l Power :tad D:tta Transfer Umbilical

3.4.1 Powu Transfu

3.4.3 Data Transfer

3.4.4 Additional Umbilical Connectors

3.4.S Fluid Tr .... ru Couplu (FTC)

3.5 Rend=·ou and Ali~ent Aida .... .............. ........ ............... ·---- ··"·

3.5.1 Perimeter Rt>ll,,etor T1rgtts

3.5.2 N'umber of PRT Retro Refl•cton

4.0 Verification····--············· .. ····· ......... _ ........ ._ .. ., .......................... _

4.1 ,·,rificalion l\Iethods ........................................... ................................. ,, •....•........ ,, LE -2

DEVELOPMENT Heritage Payload Interfaces Standard

PR OGRAM . •

• Defines minimum interface characteristics and performance requirements for a specific set of heritage middeck locker (MDL) pressurized payloads .

• Developed to promote compatibility between commercial LEO capabilities and heritage MDL pressurized payload design

• This document does NOT prohibit other unique, business driven pressurized payload interface options, and providers are • encouraged to explore additional pressurized payload interfaces that complements their business obje_ctives

• Includes on-orbit payload _iriterfaces419·r· Single, Double, and Quad payload conf1gurat1ons . : · . ·. ··· · · . .

• Includes transportation payload interfaces for Single and Double payload configurations

COMMERCI AL ..

DEVELOPMENT

PR OG~AM

Content/Structure

CLDP-STD-1102 Sections

On-Orbit (3.2)

• Structural (3.2.1)

• Electrical (3.2.2)

• Telemetry (3.2.3)

• Vacuum (3.2.4)

• Gases (3.2.5)

• Thermal (3.2.6)

• Environment (3.2. 7)

Transportation (3.3)

• Structural (3.3.1)

• Electrical (3.3.2)

• Telemetry (3.3.3)

• Thermal (3.3.4)

• Environment (3.3.5)

CUI//SP-EXPT

CLOP-STD 1102

Baseline (Draft- November 2024)

PARAGRAPH

1.0

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

2.0

2.1

2.2 3.0

3.1 u

3.2. 1

3.2.2

U 2.1 3.2.2.2

3.2.2.3

U3 3.2.4

3.2.5

U6 3.2.6.1

3.2.6.2

U .7 3.3

3.3.1

U 2 3.3.2.1

3.3.2.2

U 2.3 3.3.3

3.3.4 u s 3.3.5.1

3.3.5.2

U S.3 3.3.5.4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION.

PURPOSE

SCOPE

PRECEDENCE

VERB APPLICATION.

REQUIREMENTS VERIFICATION

RATIONALE STATEMENT-··

ORDER OF PRECEDENCE ..

OOCUMEJJTS

APPLICABLE OOOJIAENTS .

REFEREJ,/CE DOCUMENTS.

HERITAGE IAIDOECK LOCKER PRESSURIZED PAYLOAD IHTERFACES •. _

DESCRIPTION

O~RBIT HERITAGEIAJL PRESSURIZED PAYLOAD INTERFACES .. ··-·

STRIX-TURAL - ON-ORBIT .

ELECTRICAL - ON-ORBIT ...

ELECTRICAL POV/ER - ON-ORBIT.

23 Voe VOLTAGE RANGE ANO CHARACTERISTICS - ON-ORBIT

ELECTROAIIACNEflC ENVIAO~MENTAL COMPATIBILITY - ON-ORBIT ·-·

TELEMETRY - ON-ORBIT-··

VACUUM ................ ·-········-··

GASES ................... ·-········-··

THERMAL - ON-ORBIT . ··-··

FORCED AIR-COOLING - OIJ-ORfllT.

FLUID COOLANT SUPPLY - ON-ORBIT

EIJVIRONIAENT-OIJ-ORBIT ..... _

TRANSPORTATION PAVLOAO INTERFACES

STRUCTUAAL - TRANSPORTATION

ELECTRICAL . TRANSPORTATION.

28 Vdc VOLTAGE A.ANGE ANO CHARACTERISTICS - TRANSPORTATION

ELECTROMAGNETIC ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY - TRANSPORTATION ..

TELEMETRY - TRANSPORTATION

THEAMAL - TR..ANSPORTATION_

EIJVIRONIAENT - TRANSPORTATION

SOFT-STOW PAYLOAD EtM RONMENTS

METABOLIC LOADS FOR ANIMAL HABITAT PAYLOADS - TRANSPORTATION ...

MIDDECKLOCKER \MDL) MATERIALS FOR TOUCH TEMPERATURE ANALYSIS

TRANSPORTATION .

iii

EXPORT CONTROLLEO- s... Title Page for more infonnation.

PAGE

1-1 1-1 1- 1

·1-1

1-1 1-2

1-2 1 -2

Z-1

2-1 2-1 3-1

3-1 3-1 3-1

3-5

3-5 3-ll

3-14

3-18 3-2 1

3 -21

3-23 3-23

3 -2 4

3-24 3-26

3-26

3-29 3-29

3-30

3-33 3-35 3-36

3-37 3-37

3-38

3-38

3-39

CUI//SP-EXPT

CLOP STD-1102

Baseline (Draft - November 2024)

4.0

4.1

APPENDIX

A B

C D

TABLE

3.2.1 -1

3 .2 .2 .1-1

3.2.2.1-2

3.2.2. 1-3

3 .2 .2 .2 -1

3.2.2.3-1

3.2.2.3-2

3 .2 .2 .3-3

3.2.2.3-4

3 .2 .2.3-5

3 .2 .2 .3-6

3.2.2.3-7 3.2.3-1

3 .2 .3-2

3.2.5-2 3 .2 .5-2

3 .2 .5-3

3.2.7-1

3.2.7-2

3.2.7-3

3.3.1 -2 3 .3 .1 -3

3 .3 .2.1-1

3.3.5.1-1 C- 1

C-2 C-3

D-I

FIGURE

3.2.1 -1

3.2.1 -2

VERIFICAllON

VERIFICATION W.TRIX . ................................................. ··-··

ACRONYMSAtlO A66REVIATIONS .............................. , .. - ..

GLOSSARY .. ······································································-··

OPEIJ 'NORK ...

VERIFICAllot4Mo.TRIX . ................................................. , .. - ..

PAvtOAO VOLUME DIMENSIONS ................................ , .. - ..

PAvtOAO TOTAL POWER LOADS ..

POWER COl'l'IECTOR AND PIN ASSIGl'<MEITTS

POWER CABLES- REFERENCE OHLY ........................ , .. - ..

PO\NER PERFOAMAUCE LlrvtT VALUC.S .

C1:Cl1 LIMlSFOR EQUIPMENT 1A OR LESS

CEO·J LIMITS FOR EQUIPMENT1A OR LESS

RE02 LIMITS ..

28V CS01 ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY INJECTIOIL .-..

28V CS02 ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY INJECTtol~., .. - ..

RS0·3 LIMIT LEVELS ..

AC fv'AGtlETIC FIELDS FOR PAYLOADS ...................... ··-·· CONNECTOR At-o PIN ASSION'.vlEIITS (2 PAGES)

DA TA CABLES- REFERENCE ONLY ...

GAS SUPPLY TEMPERATURE RANGES ...................... ··-··

GAS SUPPLY TEMPERATURE RANGES ...................... , .. - ..

GAS SUPPLY QUALITY .. .

NOISE LIMITS ................................................................. ··-·· ANIMAL METABOl..k) REQUIREMENTS ........................ , .. - ..

SEG'8117022 (Ss'JGLE STOWAGE LOCKER ASSEMBLY) MATERIALS ..

SINGLE PAYLOAD LOCATION I\IASS PROPERTIES LIMITS

DOUBLE PAYLOAD LOCATION MASS PROPERTIES LIMITS

WORST-CASE POWERSHAAING CONFIGURATIONS ···-··

RETURN RAJJOOM VIBRATION EIIVIRONMEl'IT 10 6E OETERt;UHEO ITEMS .......................................... , .. - ..

10 BE RESOLVED ISSUES . ........................................... , .. - ..

TO BE CONFIRMED ISSUES .......................................... ··-··

VERIFICAllot4~TRIX ................................................. , .. - ..

SINGLE PAYLOAD CONFIGURATION (LEtlGTH X WIDTH X HBGHT) -

REffREf'CE OOLY ........................................................ , .. - ..

EX.AMPLE OF SINGLE, DOUBLE, QUAD PAYLOAD CONFICLRA.TIONS -

REffREf'CE OOLY ........................................................ , .. - ..

iv

EXPORT CONTROUED - See Tit!• Pago for more information.

4.1

4.1

A-1

B-1

C-1 D-1

3-2

3-5

3-6

3-1<

3-15

3-15

3-16 3-16

3-17

3-17

3-16

3-20

3-22 3-22

3-23

3-25 3-25

3-2S

3-28 3-28

3-30

3-37 C- 1

C.1 C-2 D- 1

3-2

3-J

CUl,t..tT'DIIU T«h.o.kal Staudanh Or.slgu Evaluation ror tbr

Couuuercial Low Earth Orbit Developmt nt P1-oaram s:..:\ .. w i'fbV,l•~•.eotm«dllO.ll' l'fetllm

~~vgg~~E~T Updates to Appendices since RFI #3

RFl3 Baseline

A PPENDIX A Acronyms APPENDIX A ACRONYMS A ND ABBREVIA TIO NS

A PPENDIX B Glossary APPENDIX B G LOSSARY

A PPENDIX C OPEN WORK APPENDIX C O PEN WORK

A PPENDIX D Human Health and Performance Supplementa l APPENDIX D HUMAN HEALTH A ND PERFORMANCE SUPPLEMENTAL

A PPENDIX E Habitable A tmosphere APPENDIX E HABITABLE ATMOSPHERE

A PPENDIX F VERIFICATION MATRIX APPENDIX F VERIFICATION MATRIX

A PPENDIX G A llocation Matrix APPENDIX G A LLOCATIO N MA TRIX

A PPENDIX H

Computer-Based Contro l System Safety

APPENDIX H ACCELERATION

Requirements

A PPENDIX I Acceleration Limits Accelera tion Coord inate System APPENDIX I CARGO ENVIRONMENT

A PPENDIX J Fire Systems Suppression Requirements APPENDIX J EXTR EM E TEMPERATURE HAZARDS

APPENDIX K BEST PRACTICES GUIDANCE

53 ~

Frozen

Refrigerated

Incubation

Rapid Freeze

Single Failure Tolerance

Configurable Setpoints

Crew-tended

Remotely-tended

Real-time Imagery

H&S Monitoring

2 Levels of Containment

ISO 8 Cleanliness

Air Filtration

Payload Accommodations (power, heat, vacuum, etc.)

Crew Accommodations (glove sizing, illumination, multi-crew access, etc.)

Sample Accommodations (slides, petri d ishes, cell culture plates, microtiter plates, module adjustability, etc.)

Crew-tended

Remotely-tended

Data Management

Temperature Control

Variety of Magnifications and Lenses ( dry lenses, long working distance objectives, water immersion, oil immersion, etc.)

Confocal Microscopy

Live and Fixed Cell Imaging

Illumination (intensity, spectrum, DIC prisms, etc.)

Environmentally Controlled Habitat

Open-Air Habitat

Specified Volumes

Illumination

Nutrient Delivery

Data Management

Environmental Measurements

COMMERCI AL

DEVELOPMENT

PR OGRAM

Basic Laboratory Capabilities (2/3)

I I I I I I

Mechanical Attachments

Configurable Power

28VDC

Heat Rejection

Vacuum Resource a nd Exhaust

N2 and CO2 Gasses

Power Inverter and Converter

Data Management

II

II

II

II

I

Mechanical Attachment

Mass~ 500kg

120 voe Heat Rejection

Volume~ 1.5m x 1.5m x 3m

1 kW Operational and 300W survival

300W during translation

Installation and Removal

Dual-Power Channel

I

II

II

II

II

■ 1 •• I

Data Mgt. and Comm.

Downlink~ 1 Gbps

Uplink~ 100 Mbps

Transfer~ 1 Gbps

Storage ~ 100 TB

Latency < 1 second

Command and Data Processing

Time-Synced Payload Telemetry, Health, and Status

Data Recording during LOS

Payload-Specific Software Hosting

Privatized Data (secure and encrypted storage, transmission, and distribution)

I I I I I I I I I

All requirements are considered d raft and subject to change prior to fina l RFP release.

General Use Lab Optics Bench

Sample Collection Equipment (Blood, Urine, DNA, Saliva, Fecal, etc.)

General Use Lab Supplies (PPE, consumables, homogenization equipment, sample handling equipment, mass measurement, etc.)

Laboratory Analysis Equipment (Fixation, Spectrophotometry, PCR, Chromatography, Spectroscopy, Tensile and Compression Testing, etc.)

I I

Microgravity

Radiation

Atmosphere

Contamination

Disturbance

Electromagnetic Interference

Spacecraft Pointing and Attitude

Small-Arm Centrifuge Performance Parameters (timing, protocols, speed, volume sizing, etc.)

Small-Arm Centrifuge Safety Parameters (installation alerts, emergency stop and release, contamination prevention, etc.)

Medium-Arm Centrifuge Performance Parameters (gravity control, sample accommodation, volume, environmental controls, lighting, imagery, etc.)

Heart Scanning

Vascular Scanning

Abdominal Scanning

Bladder Scanning

Eye Scanning

Cerebral Scanning

Bone Scanning

Muscle Scanning

Performance Parameters (scanning modalities, imagery, data collection, etc.)