Bridge Inspection Rpt_STR 5460-199P.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Great Smoky Mountains National Park
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-21-B-000003
About this file
This federal solicitation seeks sealed bids from small businesses for a construction project within Great Smoky Mountains National Park. The project involves rehabilitating approximately 2.44 miles and resurfacing approximately 6.18 miles of Newfound Gap Road, including asphalt patching, milling, overlay, wearing course placement, crack sealing, markings, and other miscellaneous work. The total cost is expected to fall between $5 million and $10 million. Bid documents were to be issued on or about October 15, 2020, with bid due date and location specified on the SF 1442 solicitation form. The solicitation is available on SAM.gov using keyword "693C73." Registration on SAM.gov is required for payment. The Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration is the issuing agency.
View the file
Other files
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-199P
TROUT BRANCH BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 3/26/19
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... SLAB NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 18.0 FT (5.5 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 18.0 FT (5.5 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 33.5 FT (10.2 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... MASONRY YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 000000000000 / NONE SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2013, 2019 - ROADWAY REPAVED.
LOCATION
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 9.50 (KM PT 15.29)
STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 7.8 MILES SOUTH OF SUGARLANDS VISITOR CENTER OR 5.3 MILES NORTHWEST FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NEWFOUND GAP ROAD
FROM NEWFOUND GAP.
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. TROUT BRANCH
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete slab bridge is in good condition overall and has only minor problems at this time. Problems include a displaced capstone at the northeast parapet/wingwall end, deteriorated masonry mortar, gravel and debris accumulation along the curblines, moderate erosion at the southwest parapet/wingwall end, and a lack of reflective object markers at the bridge corners. It should be noted that flow may be seeping behind the south abutment breastwall, as evidenced by the saturated stones on the south abutment breastwall in the past. This condition may eventually cause settlement of the south approach and will continue to be monitored.
Since the last inspection, the asphalt roadway over the structure and on the approaches has been repaved and the south capstone on the west parapet has been reset.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: L. SHEPTUCK, N. KHANHANSUK (CLARK NEXSEN)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
LUKE E SHEPTUCK, FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 7/9/19
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-199P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.6, 60.6 RESET CAPSTONE AT NORTHEAST PARAPET/WINGWALL END. 1 CY
60.9, 222.5 FILL AND STABILIZE EROSION AT SOUTHWEST PARAPET/WINGWALL END. 2 CY
222.7 INSTALL REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS. 4 EA
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
58.6, 60.6 CLEAN AND REPOINT MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AS NECESSARY. 1 LS
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,
DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.
1 LS
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-199P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
N N G N N N N G G
N G
G G N G F N
N
N
G
G
58.1, 59.3 MINOR CRACKING OF DECK SLAB UNDERSIDE WITH HEAVY
EFFLORESCENCE ALONG RING STONES. MINOR PATCHING ON
DECK SLAB UNDERSIDE AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS.
58.3,7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF GRAVEL AND DEBRIS ALONG
CURBLINES.
58.3, 222.4 ROADWAY OVER STRUCTURE AND ON APPROACHES REPAVED
SINCE LAST INSPECTION.
58.6, 60.6 MINOR DETERIORATION OF PARAPET AND WINGWALL MASONRY
MORTAR JOINTS WITH MINOR VEGETATION AND MOSS GROWTH IN
SEVERAL LOCATIONS. NORTHEAST CAPSTONE DISPLACED (UP TO
1"). SOUTHWEST CAPSTONE RESET SINCE LAST INSPECTION.
59.8 MINOR DETERIORATION OF FASCIA MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS
WITH MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ON WEST SIDE.
60.1 MINOR TO MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE ON ABUTMENT
BREASTWALLS. MINOR DETERIORATION OF ABUTMENT
BREASTWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS, PRIMARILY ALONG
BOTTOM.
60.6 MINOR TO MODERATE MOSS GROWTH ON WINGWALLS. MINOR TO
MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST
WINGWALLS.
60.7 STEADY FLOW FROM DOWNSTREAM WEEP HOLE IN SOUTH
ABUTMENT BREASTWALL; CREEK WATER MAY BE SEEPING BEHIND
BREASTWALL. NO FLOW WAS NOTED AT TIME OF INSPECTION.
60.9, 222.5 MINOR EROSION ALONG WINGWALLS; MODERATE AT SOUTHEAST
PARAPET/WINGWALL END.
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N
5. FOUNDATIONS N
6. WINGWALLS G
7. WEEP HOLES G
8. EXPANSION JOINTS N
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F
10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11. SLOPE PROTECTION N
12. OTHER N
PIER(S)
N13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
N14. PILE BENTS
N15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
N16. FOUNDATIONS
N17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
N18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
N19. OTHER
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-199P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL 7
G G N G N
MED
SUFF
16 FT.
61.2 MINOR SLOUGHING OF CHANNEL BANKS.
222.7 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS NOT PRESENT AT BRIDGE
CORNERS.
ROCK
222. APPROACHES 7
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
N N N G G G N G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
N N N N N N
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
N N N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-199P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 27 24 45 40
TYPE 3 22 20 37 33
TYPE 3S2 35 32 58 53
TYPE 3-3 43 39 72 65
DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE, AND
CONDITION.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-199P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... TROUT BRANCH BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 155 - SEVIER
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-199P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 10 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... TROUT BRANCH
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........199P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. NEWFOUND GAP ROAD
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460199P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 7.8 MILES SOUTH OF SUGAR
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................000000000000 (11) MILE POINT: .............................9.50 (KM PT 15.29)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 3 - POSSIBLY ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
1 - CONCRETE
01 - SLAB
18.0 FT (5.5 M)
18.0 FT (5.5 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 27.0 TONS (24.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 45.0 TONS (40.0 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 3/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-199P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°38'03.74"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°27'41.53"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 90 MI (145 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
30.0 FT (9.1 M)
33.5 FT (10.2 M)
30.0 FT (9.1 M)
24.0 FT (7.3 M)
3.0 FT (0.9 M)
3.0 FT (0.9 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
0 °
NO
30.0 FT (9.1 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
3 - PARAPET ONLY
9 - OTHER
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
2.25 FT (0.69 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ...........................N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
8 - Stable; scour above top of fo
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2013, 2019 - ROADWAY REPAVED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
https://83�27'41.53 https://35�38'03.74
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-199P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-199P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH TOWARD GATLINBURG
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ALONG CURBLINES;
WEST SIDE NEAR NORTH END SHOWN; ALSO NOTE TYPICAL
VEGETATION AND MOSS GROWTH ON PARAPETS
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR
JOINTS; WEST SIDE AT NORTH END SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - DISPLACED NORTHEAST CAPSTONE
PHOTO #7 - EROSION AT SOUTHEAST
PARAPET/WINGWALL END
PHOTO #8 - EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTHEAST
WINGWALL; ALSO NOTE TYPICAL MOSS
GROWTH
PHOTO #9 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW
LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE
ALONG RING STONES; WEST SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO #11 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE ON
ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS; WEST SIDE AT
SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALL
MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS; SOUTH ABUTMENT NEAR CENTERLINE
SHOWN
PHOTO #14 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL
PHOTO #15 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .