Bridge Inspection Rpt_STR 5460-005P.pdf

PDF 4 MB Posted

Attached to
Great Smoky Mountains National Park
Solicitation number
693C73-21-B-000003
Issued by

About this file

This is a solicitation for a construction project to rehabilitate and resurface roads within Great Smoky Mountains National Park. The project consists of rehabilitating approximately 2.44 miles of Newfound Gap Road and resurfacing approximately 6.18 miles, including parking areas and pull-offs. Work includes asphalt patching, milling and overlay, placing an ultra-thin bonded wearing course, crack sealing, permanent markings, and miscellaneous work. The project will be split into multiple schedules with a total cost expected between $5 million to $10 million. Certified small businesses may submit sealed bids by the due date specified in the solicitation. Questions regarding construction projects should be sent to the email address provided. Bidders must register in SAM for payment purposes. Security screening is required for facility access and visitors should plan to arrive at least one hour before scheduled bid openings.

View the file

Other files

Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-005P

COLE CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 5/16/18

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... ARCH - DECK NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... NOT APPLICABLE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 41.0 FT (12.5 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 37.0 FT (11.3 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 1A2 / 1067B SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2013 - ROADWAY REPAVED

LOCATION

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 9.26 (KM PT 14.90)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 7.4 MILES SOUTH OF SUGARLANDS VISITOR CENTER OR 5.5 MILES NORTHWEST FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NEWFOUND GAP ROAD

FROM NEWFOUND GAP.

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. COLE CREEK

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete arch bridge is in good to fair condition overall with some problems that require attention. Problems include undermining of the north and south retaining walls on the downstream side of the bridge; scour hole with footing exposure at upstream side of north abutment and downstream side of south abutment; deteriorated masonry mortar joints; voids in the concrete between both abutment footings and the arch; debris in the channel; and missing object markers at all bridge corners.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: R. SILVESTRY, E. JOHNSON

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

REINALDO SILVESTRY, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6251

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 11/8/18

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-005P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS. 4 EA

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

223.4 REPAIR UNDERMINING OF RETAINING WALLS WITH CONCRETE. 1 LS

58, 59, 60, CLEAN AND REPOINT MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AS NECESSARY. 1 LS

60.5,9 FILL VOIDS BETWEEN ABUTMENT FOOTINGS AND ARCH WITH

CONCRETE. PLACE RIPRAP OVER EXPOSED FOOTING.

1 LS

61.4 REMOVE DEBRIS FROM CHANNEL. 1 LS

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,

DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-005P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N

N N F N N N N F G

N G

G G N F G N

N

N

N

N

58.3, 222.4 NEW ASPHALT OVERLAY AND ROADWAY STRIPPING SINCE

PREVIOUS INSPECTION CYCLE.

58.6 MINOR TO MODERATE DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS; MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH IN JOINTS.

59.3,8 MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ARCH UNDERSIDE WITH

EFFLORESCENCE AND WATER LEAKAGE, MODERATE

EFFLORESCENCE ON AND NEAR RING STONES.

MINOR HONEYCOMBING AT TOP AND ENDS OF ARCH. MODERATE

DETERIORATION OF SPANDREL WALL MORTAR JOINTS; MINOR

VEGETATION GROWTH IN JOINTS, ON WEST SIDE.

60.5,9, 61.2 MODERATE SCOUR HAS EXPOSED FOOTING AT NORTH ABUTMENT

AT BOTH UPSTREAM (12") AND DOWNSTREAM (16") CORNERS;

STREAM BED APPEARS STABLE, HOWEVER. SMALL VOID IN

CONCRETE AT FOOTING/ARCH JUNCTION AT BOTH ABUTMENTS.

SCOUR UP TO 12" WITH 12" UNDERMINING AT WEST SOUTHWEST

END OF FLOOR SLAB.

60.6 MINOR TO MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALLS.

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS N

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS F

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N

5. FOUNDATIONS G

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11. SLOPE PROTECTION N

12. OTHER N

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

14. PILE BENTS N

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N

16. FOUNDATIONS N

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION N

19. OTHER N

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-005P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61. CHANNEL 6

1. ALIGNMENT F

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION N

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS F

5. OTHER N

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING SUFF

7. NORMAL VELOCITY MED

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 10 FT.

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :

222. APPROACHES 7

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER (APPROACH SHOULDER)

N N G G G G N F G

223. RETAINING WALL 6

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

F N N F G N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS

B. TRANSITIONS

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS

N N N

61.1 CHANNEL FLOWS AGAINST RETAINING WALLS. SEE 223.4.

CHANNEL FLOWS AGAINST UPSTREAM END OF NORTH ABUTMENT

AND DOWNSTREAM END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT. 2' DEEP SCOUR

HOLE AT UPSTREAM END OF NORTH ABUTMENT AND 1.5 SCOUR

HOLE AT DOWNSTREAM END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT.

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4 MODERATE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND SEVERAL TREES IN

CHANNEL ON UPSTREAM SIDE; INTERFERENCE WITH NORMAL

FLOW IS MINIMAL.

222.3 TIMBER GUARDRAIL AT WEST SIDE OF SOUTH APPROACH ONLY.

222.7 TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS MISSING AT BRIDGE

CORNERS.

223.1 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS; MINOR

VEGETATION GROWTH IN JOINTS, MODERATE ALONG TOP OF

WALLS. SEVERAL TREES GROWING FROM NORTH RETAINING

WALL.

223.4 SOUTH RETAINING WALL IS UNDERMINED IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS.

LARGE UNDERMINED AREA ALONG BOTTOM OF NORTH RETAINING

WALL EXTENDS APPROXIMATELY 50' ALONG WALL.

36.A,C HEIGHT OF EAST SIDE STONE MASONRY PARAPET IS 2'-0" AND

WEST SIDE IS 1'-9"; AASHTO SPECIFIES A 2'-3" MINIMUM HEIGHT FOR

TRAFFIC BARRIERS.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-005P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 23 21 39 35

TYPE 3 20 18 33 30

TYPE 3S2 29 26 49 44

TYPE 3-3 40 36 66 60

DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: LOAD RATING IS BASED ON ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO MANUAL FOR

BRIDGE EVALUATION (MBE). SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR MORE INFORMATION.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-005P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... COLE CREEK BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 155 - SEVIER

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-005P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 10 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... COLE CREEK

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........005P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. NEWFOUND GAP ROAD

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460005P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 7.4 MILES SOUTH OF SUGAR

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................1A2 (11) MILE POINT: .............................9.26 (KM PT 14.90)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 1067B (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 3 - POSSIBLY ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

11 - ARCH - DECK

30.0 FT (9.1 M)

30.0 FT (9.1 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

N - NOT APPLICABLE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 23.0 TONS (21.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 39.0 TONS (35.4 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 5/18 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-005P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°38'13.90"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°27'54.30"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 90 MI (145 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 99.9 FT (99.9 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

37.0 FT (11.3 M)

41.0 FT (12.5 M)

38.0 FT (11.6 M)

24.0 FT (7.3 M)

7.0 FT (2.1 M)

7.0 FT (2.1 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

37.0 FT (11.3 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

3 - PARAPET ONLY

9 - OTHER

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

1.80 FT (0.55 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK: ................................. N

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ...........................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL:

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

4 - Stable; action required to pro

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2013 - ROADWAY REPAVED

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

https://83�27'54.30 https://35�38'13.90

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-005P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-005P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD NEWFOUND GAP

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #4 - MOSS GROWTH ALONG MORTAR JOINTS ON WEST

MASONRY PARAPET

PHOTO #5 - SOUTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO #6 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE CRACKING

WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT WEST SIDE OF ABUTMENT

PHOTO #7 - CLOSE UP VIEW OF CRACKING

WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST SIDE OF

SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE ALSO

EFFLORESCENCE FROM SOUTHWEST

RINGSTONES

PHOTO #8 - CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE AT EAST END OF SOUTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #9 - VERTICAL CRACK WITH

EFFLORESCENCE, EXTENDING UP TO 10'

FROM BASE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT, NEAR

WEST END

PHOTO #10 - HONEYCOMBING AND SCALING

ALONG BASE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #11 - SCOUR HOLE IN MASONRY RETAINING WALL AT

SOUTHWEST CORNER OF STRUCTURE

PHOTO #12 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #13 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #14 - SCOUR HOLE WITH EXPOSED FOOTING, UP TO 1.5', AT

NORTHEAST CORNER OF STRUCTURE

PHOTO #15 - UNDERMINED AREA AT NORTHWEST RETAINING WALL

ABOUT 50' DOWNSTREAM OF BRIDGE

PHOTO #16 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL; NOTE DEBRIS AND FALLEN TREES

IN CHANNEL

PHOTO #17 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .